No description available.

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are the most dynamic growth sector of the aerospace industry today. The need to provide persistent intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance for military operations is driving the planned acquisition of over 5,000 UAVs over the next five years. The most pressing need is for quiet, small UAVs with endurance beyond what is capable with advanced batteries or small internal combustion propulsion systems. Fuel cell systems demonstrate high efficiency, high specific energy, low noise, low temperature operation, modularity, and rapid refuelability making them a promising enabler of the small, quiet, and persistent UAVs that military planners are seeking. Despite the perceived benefits, the actual near-term performance of fuel cell powered UAVs is unknown. Until the auto industry began spending billions of dollars in research, fuel cell systems were too heavy for useful flight applications. However, the last decade has seen rapid development with fuel cell gravimetric and volumetric power density nearly doubling every 2-3 years. As a result, a few design studies and demonstrator aircraft have appeared, but overall the design methodology and vehicles are still in their infancy. The design of fuel cell aircraft poses many challenges. Fuel cells differ fundamentally from combustion based propulsion in how they generate power and interact with other aircraft subsystems. As a result, traditional multidisciplinary analysis (MDA) codes are inappropriate. Building new MDAs is difficult since fuel cells are rapidly changing in design, and various competitive architectures exist for balance of plant, hydrogen storage, and all electric aircraft subsystems. In addition, fuel cell design and performance data is closely protected which makes validation difficult and uncertainty significant. Finally, low specific power and high volumes compared to traditional combustion based propulsion result in more highly constrained design spaces that are problematic for design space exploration. To begin addressing the current gaps in fuel cell aircraft development, a methodology has been developed to explore and characterize the near-term performance of fuel cell powered UAVs. The first step of the methodology is the development of a valid MDA. This is accomplished by using propagated uncertainty estimates to guide the decomposition of a MDA into key contributing analyses (CAs) that can be individually refined and validated to increase the overall accuracy of the MDA. To assist in MDA development, a flexible framework for simultaneously solving the CAs is specified. This enables the MDA to be easily adapted to changes in technology and the changes in data that occur throughout a design process. Various CAs that model a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) UAV are developed, validated, and shown to be in agreement with hardware-in-the-loop simulations of a fully developed fuel cell propulsion system. After creating a valid MDA, the final step of the methodology is the synthesis of the MDA with an uncertainty propagation analysis, an optimization routine, and a chance constrained problem formulation. This synthesis allows an efficient calculation of the probabilistic constraint boundaries and Pareto frontiers that will govern the design space and influence design decisions relating to optimization and uncertainty mitigation. A key element of the methodology is uncertainty propagation. The methodology uses Systems Sensitivity Analysis (SSA) to estimate the uncertainty of key performance metrics due to uncertainties in design variables and uncertainties in the accuracy of the CAs. A summary of SSA is provided and key rules for properly decomposing a MDA for use with SSA are provided. Verification of SSA uncertainty estimates via Monte Carlo simulations is provided for both an example problem as well as a detailed MDA of a fuel cell UAV. Implementation of the methodology was performed on a small fuel cell UAV designed to carry a 2.2 kg payload with 24 hours of endurance. Uncertainty distributions for both design variables and the CAs were estimated based on experimental results and were found to dominate the design space. To reduce uncertainty and test the flexibility of the MDA framework, CAs were replaced with either empirical, or semi-empirical relationships during the optimization process. The final design was validated via a hardware-in-the loop simulation. Finally, the fuel cell UAV probabilistic design space was studied. A graphical representation of the design space was generated and the optima due to deterministic and probabilistic constraints were identified. The methodology was used to identify Pareto frontiers of the design space which were shown on contour plots of the design space. Unanticipated discontinuities of the Pareto fronts were observed as different constraints became active providing useful information on which to base design and development decisions.

Aluminum Cross-Car Beam is significantly lighter than the conventional steel counterpart and presents superior energy absorption characteristics. The challenge is however, its considerably higher cost, rendering it difficult for the aluminum one to compete in the automotive market. In this work, using material distribution techniques and stochastic optimization, a Multidisciplinary Design Optimization procedure is developed to optimize an existing Cross-Car Beam model with respect to the cost. Topology, Topography, and gauge optimizations are employed in the development of the optimization disciplines. Based on a qualitative cost assessment, penalty functions are designed to penalize costly designs. Noise-Vibration-Harshness (NVH) performance is the key constraint of the optimization. To fulfill this requirement, natural frequencies are obtained using modal analysis. Undesirable designs with respect to the NVH criteria are gradually eliminated from the optimization cycles. The new design is verified by static loading scenario and evaluated in terms of the cost saving it offers.

Aluminum Cross-Car Beam is significantly lighter than the conventional steel counterpart and presents superior energy absorption characteristics. The challenge is however, its considerably higher cost, rendering it difficult for the aluminum one to compete in the automotive market. In this work, using material distribution techniques and stochastic optimization, a Multidisciplinary Design Optimization procedure is developed to optimize an existing Cross-Car Beam model with respect to the cost. Topology, Topography, and gauge optimizations are employed in the development of the optimization disciplines. Based on a qualitative cost assessment, penalty functions are designed to penalize costly designs. Noise-Vibration-Harshness (NVH) performance is the key constraint of the optimization. To fulfill this requirement, natural frequencies are obtained using modal analysis. Undesirable designs with respect to the NVH criteria are gradually eliminated from the optimization cycles. The new design is verified by static loading scenario and evaluated in terms of the cost saving it offers.

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) is an area in engineering design which has been growing rapidly in terms of applications in the last few decades, aircraft design being no exception to that. The application of MDO to aircraft and more specifically, wing design, presents many challenges, since disciplines like aerodynamics and structures have to be combined and interact. The level to which this interaction is implemented depends only on how much one is willing to pay in terms of computational cost. The objective of the current work is therefore to develop a simplified MDO tool, suitable for the preliminary design of aircraft wings. At the same time, versatility in the definition of optimization problems (in terms of design variables, constraints and objective function) is given great attention. At the same time, modularity will ensure that this framework is upgradeable with higher-fidelity and/or more capable modules. The disciplines that were chosen for interaction were aerodynamics and structures/ aeroelasticity, though more data can be extracted from their results in order to perform other types of analyses. The aerodynamics module employs a Vortex Lattice code developed specifically for the current implementation of the tool. The structural module is based on Equivalent Plate model theory. The fluid structure interaction is simply one-way, wherein the aerodynamics loads are passed on to the structural analyzer for computation of the static deformation. Semi-empirical relations are then used to estimate the flutter speed. The optimizer, which controls the activity of the other modules, makes use of a gradient based algorithm (Sequential Quadratic Programming) to search for a local minimum of a user defined objective function. Among the myriad of MDO strategies available, two are chosen to exemplify the modularity of the tool developed: Multidiscipline Feasible (MDF) and Sequential Optimization (SO), and their results are compared. Several case studies are analyzed to cover a broad spectrum of the capabilities of the framework. Because user interaction is of prime concern in design optimization, a graphical interface (GUI) of the tool is presented. Its advantages in terms of the set up of optimization problems and post-processing of results are made clear. In conclusion, some topics for future work regarding the expansion and improvement of the features of the application are noted.

ABSTRACT Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of an Extreme Aspect Ratio HALE UAV Bryan J. Morrisey Development of High Altitude Long Endurance (HALE) aircraft systems is part of a vision for a low cost communications/surveillance capability. Applications of a multi payload aircraft operating for extended periods at stratospheric altitudes span military and civil genres and support battlefield operations, communications, atmospheric or agricultural monitoring, surveillance, and other disciplines that may currently require satellite-based infrastructure. Presently, several development efforts are underway in this field, including a project sponsored by DARPA that aims at producing an aircraft that can sustain flight for multiple years and act as a pseudo-satellite. Design of this type of air vehicle represents a substantial challenge because of the vast number of engineering disciplines required for analysis, and its residence at the frontier of energy technology. The central goal of this research was the development of a multidisciplinary tool for analysis, design, and optimization of HALE UAVs, facilitating the study of a novel configuration concept. Applying design ideas stemming from a unique WWII-era project, a “pinned wing” HALE aircraft would employ self-supporting wing segments assembled into one overall flying wing. The research effort began with the creation of a multidisciplinary analysis environment comprised of analysis modules, each providing information about a specific discipline. As the modules were created, attempts were made to validate and calibrate the processes against known data, culminating in a validation study of the fully integrated MDA environment. Using the NASA / AeroVironment Helios aircraft as a basis for comparison, the included MDA environment sized a vehicle to within 5% of the actual maximum gross weight for generalized Helios payload and mission data. When wrapped in an optimization routine, the same integrated design environment shows potential for a 17.3% reduction in weight when wing thickness to chord ratio, aspect ratio, wing loading, and power to weight ratio are included as optimizer-controlled design variables. Investigation of applying the sustained day/night mission requirement and improved technology factors to the design shows that there are potential benefits associated with a segmented or pinned wing. As expected, wing structural weight is reduced, but benefits diminish as higher numbers of wing segments are considered. For an aircraft consisting of six wing segments, a maximum of 14.2% reduction in gross weight over an advanced technology optimal baseline is predicted.

In this thesis, the authors investigate how machine learning can be utilized for speeding up the design optimization process of gas turbines. The Finite Element Analysis (FEA) steps of the design process are examined if they can be replaced with machine learning algorithms. The study is done using a component with given constraints that are provided by Siemens Energy AB. With this component, two approaches to using machine learning are tested. One utilizes design parameters, i.e. raw floating-point numbers, such as the height and width. The other technique uses a high dimensional mesh as input. It is concluded that using design parameters with surrogate models is a viable way of performing design optimization while mesh input is currently not. Results from using different amount of data samples are presented and evaluated.

Multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) can be used as an effective tool to improve the design of automotive structures. Large-scale MDO problems typically involve several groups who must work concurrently and autonomously for reasons of efficiency. When performing MDO, a large number of designs need to be rated. Detailed simulation models used to assess automotive design proposals are often computationally expensive to evaluate. A useful MDO process must distribute work to the groups involved and be computationally efficient. In this thesis, MDO methods are assessed in relation to the characteristics of automotive structural applications. Single-level optimization methods have a single optimizer, while multi-level optimization methods have a distributed optimization process. Collaborative optimization and analytical target cascading are possible choices of multi-level optimization methods for automotive structures. They distribute the design process, but are complex. One approach to handle the computationally demanding simulation models involves metamodel-based design optimization (MBDO), where metamodels are used as approximations of the detailed models during optimization studies. Metamodels can be created by individual groups prior to the optimization process, and therefore also offer a way of distributing work. A single-level optimization method in combination with metamodels is concluded to be the most straightforward way of implementing MDO into the development of automotive structures.

Les produits mécatroniques sont complexes et multidisciplinaires par nature. Les exigences pour les concevoir sont souvent contradictoires et doivent être validées par les différentes équipes d'ingénierie disciplinaire (ID). Pour répondre à cette complexité et réduire le temps de conception, les ingénieurs disciplinaires ont besoin de collaborer dynamiquement, de résoudre les conflits interdisciplinaires et de réutiliser les connaissances de projets antérieurs. De plus, ils ont besoin de collaborer en permanence avec l’équipe d’ingénierie systèmes (IS) pour avoir un accès direct aux exigences et l’équipe d’optimisation multidisciplinaire (OMD) pour valider le système dans sa globalité.Nous proposons d'utiliser des techniques de gestion des connaissances pour structurer les connaissances générées lors des activités de collaboration afin d'harmoniser le cycle de conception. Notre principale contribution est une approche d'unification qui explique comment IS, ID et OMD se complètent et peuvent être utilisés en synergie pour un cycle de conception intégré et continu. Notre méthodologie permet de centraliser les connaissances nécessaires à la collaboration et au suivi des exigences. Elle assure également la traçabilité des échanges entre les ingénieurs grâce à la théorie des graphes. Cette connaissance formalisée du processus de collaboration permet de définir automatiquement un problème OMD. / Mechatronic products are complex and multidisciplinary in nature. The requirements to design them are often contradictory and must be validated by the various disciplinary engineering (DE) teams. To address this complexity and reduce design time, disciplinary engineers need to collaborate dynamically, resolve interdisciplinary conflicts, and reuse knowledge from previous projects. In addition, they need to work seamlessly with the Systems Engineering (SE) team to have direct access to requirements and the Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) team for global validation. We propose to use Knowledge Management techniques to structure the knowledge generated during collaboration activities and harmonize the overall design cycle. Our primary contribution is a unification approach, elaborating how SE, DE, and MDO complement each-other and can be used in synergy for an integrated and continuous design cycle. Our methodology centralizes the product knowledge necessary for collaboration. It ensures traceability of the exchange between disciplinary engineers using graph theory. This formalized process knowledge facilitates MDO problem definition.

No description available.