• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 7
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 23
  • 23
  • 10
  • 10
  • 7
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 4
  • 3
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
21

Effect of reproductive site limitation on the intensity of sexual selection and the quality of paternal care: a meta-analysis / Efeito da limitação de sí­tios reprodutivos sobre a intensidade da seleção sexual e a qualidade do cuidado paternal: uma meta-análise

Louise M. Alissa 21 August 2018 (has links)
The availability of reproductive sites is a major factor shaping the behavior of males and females in species with resource-based mating systems. Using a meta-analytic approach, we tested five predictions directly or indirectly derived from the mating system theory. We expected that reproductive site limitation would lead to: (1) intense male-male competition for resource possession; (2) high variance in male reproductive success, generating high values of opportunity for sexual selection; (3) high intensity of selection on male traits related to resource possession; (4) high sperm competition risk; and (5) low quality of paternal care. We compiled information from observational and experimental studies that compared the reproductive behavior of individuals of the same species under low and high reproductive site limitation. We found that, when reproductive sites are limited, there is a slight increase in male-male competition, with higher rates of nest takeover and agonistic interactions, and a slight increase in the selection gradient on male traits, with successful males tending to be larger than unsuccessful males. Reproductive site limitation has no consistent effect on the opportunity for sexual selection and on the sperm competition risk. However, territorial males invest more in gonads and lose less paternity when reproductive sites are limited. There is also no clear effect of reproductive site limitation on the quality of paternal care, but few studies have addressed this subject. Taken together, our findings indicate that predictions on how reproductive site limitation affects several aspects of resource-based mating systems have weak empirical support. These predictions do not consider the plasticity in the mating tactics of males and females, which make them too simplistic. Moreover, since the original proposition of the mating system theory, our understanding of sperm competition increased a lot. We now know that accurate predictions on the intensity and direction of sexual selection should take into account both pre- and post-copulatory processes. Finally, the interplay between sexual selection and parental care is complex, and the original framework of mating system theory does not provide sufficient elements to derive clear and taxonomically broad predictions / A disponibilidade de sítios reprodutivos influencia tanto o comportamento de machos quanto de fêmeas em espécies cujo sistema de acasalamento depende da defesa de recursos. Usando uma abordagem meta-analítica, testamos cinco previsões direta ou indiretamente relacionadas à teoria de sistemas de acasalamento. Esperávamos que a limitação de sítios reprodutivos promoveria: (1) aumento na competição masculina pela posse de recursos; (2) aumento na variância do sucesso reprodutivo dos machos, gerando valores alto de oportunidade para a seleção sexual; (3) aumento da intensidade da seleção sobre características masculinas relacionadas à posse de recursos; (4) aumento no risco de competição espermática e (5) diminuição da qualidade do cuidado paternal. Compilamos informações de estudos observacionais e experimentais que compararam o comportamento reprodutivo de indivíduos da mesma espécie em situação de alta e baixa disponibilidade de sítios reprodutivos. Encontramos que, quando os sítios reprodutivos são escassos, há um ligeiro aumento na competição masculina, com maiores taxas de roubo de ninhos e interações agonísticas, e um ligeiro aumento no gradiente de seleção sobre características masculinas, com machos bem sucedidos tendendo a ser maiores do que machos mal sucedidos em monopolizar recursos. A disponibilidade de sítios reprodutivos não teve nenhum efeito consistente sobre a oportunidade para a seleção sexual e o risco de competição espermática. Entretanto, machos territoriais investiram mais em gônadas e perderam menos paternidade quando os sítios reprodutivos eram escassos. Não encontramos nenhum efeito da disponibilidade de sítios reprodutivos sobre a qualidade do cuidado paternal. Em conjunto, nossos resultados indicam que as previsões sobre como a disponibilidade de sítios reprodutivos influencia diversos aspectos de sistemas de acasalamento baseados na defesa de recursos têm fraco respaldo empírico. Tais previsões não consideram a plasticidade nas táticas de acasalamento de machos e fêmeas, tornando-as demasiadamente simplistas. Adicionalmente, desde a formulação original da teoria de sistemas de acasalamento, nossa compreensão sobre competição espermática aumentou. Sabemos atualmente que previsões acuradas sobre a intensidade e direção da seleção sexual devem levar em consideração processos pré- e pós-copulatórios. Finalmente, a interconexão entre seleção sexual e cuidado parental é complexa e a teoria original de sistemas de acasalamento não provê elementos suficientes para a construção de previsões claras e de amplo escopo taxonômico
22

Sexual Selection On Elephant Tusks

Chelliah, Karpagam 02 1900 (has links) (PDF)
Darwin was troubled by elaborate male traits observed in many species that are seemingly maladaptive for survival, the peacock’s tail being the most iconic of all. He wrote "The sight of a feather in a peacock’s tail, whenever I gaze at it, makes me sick" because it challenged his theory of evolution by natural selection for adaptive traits. The extreme length of the tail may render a peacock more vulnerable to predation and therefore maladaptive for survival. To account for the evolution of apparently maladaptive traits he proposed the theory of sexual selection, wherein, traits that directly enhance mating success may be selected for, either as weapons in male-male competition for mates or as ornaments preferred by females. Male and female elephants in the proboscidean evolutionary radiation have had tusks and show extreme exaggeration in size and form. However, tusk in the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) is sexually dimorphic as it is expressed only in the males, hinting at a possibility that opposing selection (sexual selection advantage to males and natural selection disadvantage to females) may have been the processes behind this pattern of tusk expression. Intriguingly, tuskless males (male dimorphism with respect to tusk) also occur at fairly high frequencies in some Asian elephant populations (∼50% in norteastern India and ∼95% in Sri Lanka). Theory states that dimorphic males can also occur in a population in stable frequencies as a consequence of sexual selection. I explored sexual selection on elephant tusks as possible mechanism leading to the observed patterns of tusk dimorphism in the elephants. All elephant populations on earth have been harvested for ivory, therefore, artificial selection (selective poaching of tusked elephants for ivory) is another possible cause of tusk dimorphism. I developed mathematical models of population genetics, population dynamics and conducted field observations of mating behavior of Asian elephant in Kaziranga National Park, Assam to understand the evolution of tusk dimorphism in elephants. Darwin’s sexual selection theory was controversial when proposed in 1871 and continues to remain so in 2014. In the introduction of my thesis I have discussed Darwin’s two classical mechanisms of sexual selection, namely, male-male combats for mates and female mate choice based on male traits. The latter was viewed with considerable skepticism by his con-temporary Alfred Russell Wallace and more recently deemed "fundamentally flawed" by Joan Roughgarden. Therefore, I have also discussed the arguments against female mate choice for male traits found in literature. I have reviewed current knowledge about sexual selection for sexually dimorphic male traits of body size and musth, in the African and Asian elephant and state why I have hypothesized that tusks may also be under sexual selection. Sexually selected traits are expected to be genetically determined, therefore, I explored mathematically (Chapter 1) the genetic basis of evolution of sexual dimorphism. Fisher proposed that sexually selected male display traits originate in both the sexes but are suppressed in the females by modifier genes, when the trait becomes deleterious to females. Thus, sexually antagonistic selection on a trait and sex-specific gene expression can lead to the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Tusk is sexually monomorphic in the probocideans that are ancestral to both the African (Loxodonta africana) and Asian elephant (Elephas maximus). Tusk continues to remain monomorphic in the African elephant but has become sexually dimorphic in the Asian elephant. Tusk, therefore could be a sexually selected male trait that evolved according to the Fisherian model. Intriguingly, tuskless males occur at very high frequencies in some Asian elephant populations. The tusked and tuskless male morphs could be alternate male mating strategies, occurring at evolutionarily stable frequencies. Alternatively, the observed male tusk dimorphism, could be a consequence of artificial selection against tusked individuals, due to selective harvest of tusked males. Furthermore, male African elephants are more intensely poached for ivory than female elephants. Yet the frequency of tuskless individuals has increased more rapidly among females than in males. In essence, sexual dimorphism could be evolving among such poached populations. Is such rapid, contemporary evolution of sexual dimorphism, possible through the Fisherian modifier gene mechanism? A 2-loci genetic model (with X-linked trait gene and an autosomal modifier gene) (Rice 1984), a slight variant of the model (with X-linked modifier gene, and an autosomal trait gene) and an entirely autosomal model, were analyzed for the rate of evolution of sexual dimorphism, under different selection pressures for tusk possession. Negative frequency dependent selection was introduced into the model of tusk evolution in accordance with Gadgil’s model for the evolution of male dimorphism as consequence of sexual selection (Gadgil 1972). In two of the 2-loci models (in which tusk gene in autosomal), tusklessness evolved much more rapidly in females than in males, under equal negative selection pressures. The models predict several combinations of time-lines and negative selection pressures for effecting a particular change in the frequency of tusklessness. Model predictions were com-pared with observed changes in the frequency of female tusklessness, in one South Ugandan, African elephant population (∼2% to 10% in 5 to 9 generations) and male tusklessness (∼5% to 50% in 25 to 40 generations) in one north eastern Indian, Asian elephant population. The models predict strong selection pressures of 30% to 50% reduction in fitness, that can effect an 8% increase in tusklessness, in the African elephant population, within time-lines of 9 to 5 generations (∼225 to 125 years) respectively. For the male Asian elephants, natural selection against tusked males on an already sexually dimorphic population, must have been in operation and shifted the population to 5% male tusklessness. The models predict that artificial selection with 20 to 30% fitness cost to tusked males, operating for 40 to 25 generations (∼1000 to 600 years) respectively, can further shift the population from ∼5% to ∼50% tusklessness. Asian elephant populations may already have been in a transient phase of evolution, tending towards tusklessness, with recent artificial selection hastening the process. The two major pre-dictions from this modeling exercise are (1) artificial selection could have played a significant role in the evolution of male tusk dimorphism in the Asian elephant (2) a lack of or very mild current sexual selection on tusks in the male Asian elephant. Both these predictions may be empirically verified. Chapters 2 and 3 are attempts at empirical verification of prediction (1) and Chapters 4 and 5 of prediction (2). From historical references to elephant harvest in Assam, we do know that artificial selection has been in operation, but whether it has played a major role in causing male tusk dimorphism needs to be established. It may be possible to detect signatures of significant past harvest from current demographic structure of an elephant population. Sustained biased harvesting of a particular sex and or age class from an animal population alters the sex ratio and age structure (relative proportion of individuals in each age and sex class) of a population considerably (Sukumar 1989). It may be possible to back infer the harvest scenario by studying the deviation of current age and sex ratios from natural age and sex ratios. In Chapter 2, I explored models of population dynamics under different harvest regimes and its effect on age and sex ratios. I described a method to infer unknown harvest rates and numbers from age and sex ratios, namely, adult female to male ratio, male old-adult to young-adult ratio, and proportion of adult males in the population using Jensen’s(2000) 2-sex, density-dependent Leslie matrix model. The specific combination of male and female harvest rates and numbers can be deter-mined from the history of harvest and an estimate of population size. I validated this model with published data on age and sex ratios of one Asian and African elephant population with fairly reliable data on elephant harvest as well. In Chapter 3, I applied this model to the demographic data that I collected from a wild Asian elephant population in Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India (where more than 50% of the adult males are tuskless). Male polymorphism of sexually-selected male traits occur at stable frequencies in populations of several species. The different male morphs of the trait are hypothesized to be alternate male mating strategies with equal life time reproductive fitness. Male Asian elephants of Kaziranga National Park, Assam are dimorphic with respect to tusk possession: ∼50% of the males are tuskless (and are locally called makhnas). Makhnas could be trading tusk for either longevity, larger body size, testicular volume and or duration of musth as alternate mating strategies. On the other hand makhnas may have increased to a very high frequency primarily due to selective removal (captures for domestication and hunting for ivory) of tusked males from the population for centuries. The aim of Chapter 3 was to examine the role of artificial selection in the evolution of makhnas. Prolonged male-biased harvest(removal from the population) is bound to alter the demographic structure of the population and leave a signature of the intensity and type of harvest on the residual population structure. The Kaziranga elephant population was considered as representative of elephant populations of north east India; A harvest modeling approach (described and validated in Chapter 2) was used to infer unknown harvest of elephants from demographic parameters estimated by sampling this elephant population during 458 field days in the dry season months of 2008–2011. The Kaziranga elephant population appears to have been harvested approximately for the past 700 to 1000 years with adult tusked males being harvested at approximately twice the rate of adult tuskless males, adult females and their immature offspring of both the sexes. The currently observed high frequency of tuskless males in Kaziranga therefore, may be a consequence of sustained artificial selection against tusked males for several centuries. The previous two Chapters have only examined some mechanisms for the loss of tusks in elephants. I proceeded to examine the possibility of evolution of tusks through Darwin’s mechanisms of male-male competition for mates and female mate choice. Elephant tusks are cited as an example of a male trait that has evolved as a weapon in male-male combats. In Chapter 4 I examined the role of tusks in establishing dominance along with two other known male–male signals, namely, body size and musth (a temporary physiologically heightened sexual state) in an Asian elephant population in northeastern India with equal proportions of tusked and tuskless males. I observed 116 agonistic interactions with clear dominance outcomes between adult (>15 years) males during 458 field days in the dry season months of 2008–2011. A generalized linear mixed-effects model was used to predict the probability of winning as a function of body size, tusk possession and musth status relative to the opponent. A hierarchy of the three male–male signals emerged from this analysis, with musth overriding body size and body size overriding tusk possession. In this elephant population tusk possession thus played a relatively minor role in male–male competition. An important implication of musth and body size being stronger determinants of dominance than tusk possession is that it could facilitate rapid evolution of tuskless males in the population under artificial selection against tusked individuals, which are poached for ivory. If not a weapon, tusks could be a male ornament that female elephants find attractive. I explored the interplay of the three male traits (body size, musth and tusk), male mating strategies and female mate choice in Chapter 5. In some species males obtain mating opportunities by harassment of females. Given the striking size difference between an adult male and female elephant, with males weighing at least 30% more than females, male coercion of females to mate is a possibility. A detailed study of the courtship behavior revealed that overt male harassment of females is rare and the ability of a male to mount and stay mounted on a female for copulation is under female control. Therefore female Asian elephants can exercise choice to mate but this is subtly different from exercising mate choice itself. Age-related male mating strategy (reported for the first time in the Asian elephant) exists in the Kaziranga elephant population and this strategy limits the ability of females to exercise choice. Young males (<25 years) predominantly show a sneak mating strategy. Middle-aged males (25–40 years), when in musth, mate–guarded oestrous females from sneakers and attempted mating but sometimes resorted to sneak mating when out of musth. Old males (> 40 years) attempted mating only during their musth phase and were seldom sneakers. Large/musth males received positive responses from estrous females towards courtship attempts significantly more often than did small/non–musth males. Tusked non–musth males attempted courtship significantly more often than did their tuskless peers, and had a higher probability of receiving positive responses than did tuskless males. A positive response, however, may not translate into mating because of mate–guarding by the dominant male. Females permitted large/musth males to stay mounted significantly longer than small/non-musth males. Musth and large body size may be signals of male fertility. Female mate choice in elephants thus seems primarily for traits that signal direct benefits of assurance of conception. Tusked males may attain sexual maturity faster than tuskless males. Therefore it is worth exploring if tusks function as signals of male fertility when males are young (15 to 25 years); this may be possible through hormonal and behavioral profiling of young tusked and tuskless males from 10 to 20 years of age. Overall all musth and body size appear to play a larger role in enhancing male mating success than tusks. Tusked males appear to have a weak sexual selection advantage (male-male domi-nance and female preference) over their tuskless peers, only in the young age class (15 to 25 years) in this population. Males in this age age class, seldom come into musth that would over-ride tusk as a signal of male dominance. Current sexual selection on tusks in this population, appeared to be insignificant and this may be verified through genetic analysis of paternity success. An important implication of musth and body size being stronger determinants of mating success than tusk possession is that, it could facilitate rapid evolution of tuskless males in the population under artificial selection against tusked individuals, even in a slow breeder such as the elephant. Musth may have evolved much later than tusks in elephants, therefore it is possible that tusks evolved under sexual selection before musth evolved. However, body size, in mammals in gen-eral appear to be under both natural and sexual selection. Gould has shown that the absurdly large and palmate antlers of the extinct Irish elk, scales allometrically with body size (Gould & Lewontin 1979). Phylogenetic studies of elephant evolutionary radiation indicate a general trends towards increase in body-size with size reduction and tendency towards dwarfism occurring only in island habitats (Palombo 2001). Tusk development, which is essentially tooth development may be closely linked to cranium development. Cranium development in turn may be linked to body size through allometric scaling laws. If so, any selection on body size is bound to act on tusk size. I propose that the evolution of elaborate tusks seen in elephants is primarily due to natural and or sexual selection acting on body size, and tusk just hitched a ride with body size. Tusks may be maintained in spite of tuskless males occurring in the population only because of a rather weak sexual selection advantage to tusk possession in contests in which males are symmetrical with respect to body size and musth status.
23

To be “Pavarotti” in a crowded concert hall? Song competition between bushcricket males in natural choruses.

Anichini, Marianna 19 August 2019 (has links)
Bei vielen Laubheuschreckenarten produzieren nur die Männchen Gesänge, hauptsächlich um arteigene Weibchen anzulocken und sich mit Rivalen zu messen. Die Produktion der durch sexuelle Selektion ausgewählten akustischen Signale kostet das singende Männchen Energie. Die Gesangsleistung kann aufgrund der unterschiedlichen Körperqualität von Männchen zu Männchen variieren, was zu relevanten Konsequenzen für das Ergebnis der sexuellen Selektion führt. In dieser Arbeit soll die Auswirkung sexueller Selektion auf sekundäre Merkmale der Männchen untersucht werden, wie die Größe der Organe zur Schallproduktion und die Struktur akustischer Signale. Der Fokus liegt dabei auf den Faktoren, die die Qualität des Signalgebers und die Zusammensetzung des sozialen Umfelds bestimmen. Um diese Ziele zu erreichen, werden zwei Laubheuschreckenarten Poecilimon ampliatus und Poecilimon v. veluchianus untersucht. Die morphologischen Befunde zeigen, dass die positive Selektion auf klangproduzierende Strukturen mit der Präferenz von Weibchen für schwerere Männchen übereinstimmt und daher Rückschlüsse von der Körpermasse der Männchen auf die Größe der schallerzeugenden Organe gezogen werden können. Die Ergebnisse der akustischen Daten betonen die entscheidende Relevanz der Kombination verschiedener Umweltfaktoren. Sie zeigen, wie Männchen auf akustische Signale reagieren, die von benachbarten Konkurrenten erzeugt werden, indem sie ihre Signalerzeugung kohärent an die Stärke der Konkurrenz und ihren persönlichen energetischen Status anpassen. Männchen beider Arten zeigen eine interindividuelle Variation in der Fähigkeit, ihre Signalproduktion anzupassen, die sowohl durch Faktoren wie die Körpermasse des Männchens und der Populationsdichte beeinflusst wird. In zukünftigen Untersuchungen könnte der Frage nachgegangen werden, wie Männchen in der Natur von ihrer Kondition abhängige Signale und alternative Verhaltensstrategien entwickeln. / Behaviours and structures related to mating are under sexual selection. Due to their costs, these traits honestly reflect the quality of the signaller. Using structures located on the wings, bushcricket males signal to attract females and repel rivals. Sound performance can vary between individuals of different body conditions, leading to relevant consequences for the outcome of sexual selection. This thesis aims to investigate the effect of sexual selection on secondary male traits, such as the size of sound production organs and the structure of acoustic signals. The focus is on the factors that determine the quality of the signaller and the composition of the social environment. To fulfil the aims, two bushcrickets species were used: Poecilimon ampliatus and Poecilimon v. veluchianus. In P. ampliatus, sexual selection plays a role in determining the size of morphological structures that are responsible for producing female-preferred acoustic signals. A positive relationship between body condition and size of sound-producing organs was found. Heavier and larger males had larger wing and longer stridulatory file with disproportionally longer and less dense stridulatory teeth. A further effect of sexual selection is highlighted during the acoustic contest. In both species, only heavy males shown plasticity in acoustic behaviour. Moreover, the sound produced in competition honestly reflects the males’ body condition. In P. ampliatus heavier males signal at higher effort than lighter males and increased their activity when the light rival was placed at a closer distance. In P. v. veluchianus heavy males increased their signal activity only when the number of light rivals increased. Future endeavour will be to study how males in nature evolve condition-dependent signalling and alternative behavioural strategies.

Page generated in 0.1712 seconds