Das Dokument bietet einen Vergleich von sechs Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen - Zotero, Citavi, Mendeley, RefWorks, EndNote und JabRef. Es wurden Versionen mit Stand 06/2018 getestet. Folgende Kriterien finden Berücksichtigung: Allgemeines und Installation, Import- / Exportvarianten, Dateneingabe und -bearbeitung, Anzeige und Suche, Zitieren und Literaturlisten, Kooperation, Wissensorganisation, Besonderheiten und Support. Der Vergleich schließt mit einer Gesamtbewertung der Stärken und Schwächen und gibt zielgruppenspezifische Auswahlempfehlungen.

Das Dokument enthält einen Vergleich von sechs Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen - Zotero, Citavi, Mendeley, RefWorks, EndNote und JabRef. Es wurden Versionen mit Stand 11/2016 getestet. Folgende Kriterien wurden berücksichtigt: Allgemeines und Installation, Import- / Exportmöglichkeiten, Dateneingabe und -bearbeitung, Anzeige und Suche, Kooperation, Zitieren und Literaturlisten, weitere Funktionen und Benutzung. Der Vergleich schließt mit einer Gesamtbewertung der Stärken und Schwächen und gibt zielgruppenspezifische Auswahlempfehlungen.

The last few years have been characterised by increasing online communication and the emergence of social media, made possible by Web 2.0. In society as well as in research, social media is used for knowledge produc- tion and networking. One example of this is Mendeley, a social reference management tool. With answers from users all over the world, this study investigates the use of Mendeley, if the respondents use other social media and if all of this affects scientific communication. The aim is also to study what the respondents think about the future of scientific communication and if this can be related to current tendencies. The theoretic framework for this study is based on Leah Lievrouws research on the Cycle of Scientific Communication and the relationship between the ”Little Science 2.0”-scenario and the ”Big Science Retrench- ment”-scenario. A qualitative web based survey was conducted (41 answers) and complemented with an interview with a professor in environmental sciences. The main purpose with the interview was to study how Mendeley can be used in collaborations. The results show that Mendeley is used by researchers to store and organize references, read and annotate pdf:s, cite, share articles in groups, search for new references and to present their research and make new ac- quaintances. The answers show that one effect that Mendeley and other social media has on scientific communi- cation is facilitating cooperation across traditional divides. At the same time, some respondents have not seen an effect on their scientific communication yet. Methods to measure impact in social media are requested, which would complement standard citation analysis. Mendeley’s related research function is found valuable in theory, but is in need of significant improvements. The respondents think that the future will be characterized by an increase in openness and sharing, but a tendency to keep scientific results copyrighted and locked behind pay- walls is also present. This is a two years master’s thesis in Library and Information science.

Das Dokument bietet einen Vergleich von fünf Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen - Zotero, Citavi, Mendeley, EndNote und JabRef. Es wurden Versionen mit Stand 10/2021 getestet. Folgende Kriterien finden Berücksichtigung: Allgemeines und Installation, Import- / Exportvarianten, Dateneingabe und -bearbeitung, Anzeige und Suche, Zitieren und Literaturlisten, Kooperation, Wissensorganisation, Besonderheiten und Support. Der Vergleich schließt mit einer Gesamtbewertung der Stärken und Schwächen und gibt zielgruppenspezifische Auswahlempfehlungen.

The document offers a comparison of five literature management programmes - Zotero, Citavi, Mendeley, EndNote and JabRef. Versions as of 10/2021 were tested. The following criteria are taken into account: General and installation, import / export variants, data entry and editing, display and search, citation and bibliography, cooperation, knowledge organisation, special features and support. The comparison concludes with an overall assessment of strengths and weaknesses and provides target group-specific selection recommendations.

Submitted by Priscilla Araujo (priscilla@ibict.br) on 2018-08-07T18:37:30Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Tobias Sombra-Mestrado-2018.pdf: 2977663 bytes, checksum: b45309648a3be783327111ae5673abab (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-07T18:37:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Tobias Sombra-Mestrado-2018.pdf: 2977663 bytes, checksum: b45309648a3be783327111ae5673abab (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-03-22 / Este trabalho apresenta uma pesquisa exploratória usando o algoritmo Naive Bayes com capacidade para classificar documentos no Mendeley usando até cinco classes de saída, definidas com base na quantidade de leitores dos documentos. Usando uma série de atributos que foram encontrados durante a coleta de dados, é realizada a classificação para tentar identificar padrões nos atributos, a fim de reconhecer lógicas sociais dos cientistas, que envolve tanto o comportamento quanto sua dinâmica nas redes sociais científicas. Para fins de concretização deste trabalho, foi aplicada uma Revisão Sistemática de Literatura, a fim de buscar o estado da arte de pesquisas que envolvam o uso de Reconhecimento de Padrões em Redes Sociais Científicas, além da aplicação de um método que envolve o uso de algoritmos desenvolvidos para o tratamento automático de todos os dados coletados no Mendeley. / This work is an exploratory research using the Naive Bayes algorithm with the ability to classify documents in Mendeley using the output classes, based on the amount of reading of the documents. Using a series of data that was found during a data collection, a classification is given to check the patterns in the attributes, an end to recognize the social logics of the scientists, that involve both the behavior and its dynamics in scientific social networks. For the purpose of this work, a literature systematic review was applied, with emphasis on the use of methods that involve the use of social networking concepts, as well as the application of a method for the use of algorithms. Created for automatic processing of all data collected at Mendeley.