Pluripotency is defined as the capacity to differentiate into cells from each of the three primary germ layers, the ectoderm, mesoderm and endoderm. This is a property of cells located in the inner cell mass (ICM) of preimplantation blastocysts and in the epiblast layer of postimplantation, presomite embryos. Preimplantation and postimplantation pluripotency can be captured indefinitely in cultured embryonic stem (ES) cells and epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs) respectively. Preimplantation pluripotency in ES cells is regulated by a network of genes centred on three transcription factors (TFs) Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog. Oct4 and Sox2 form a mutually-reinforcing circuit and cooperatively stimulate transcription of downstream genes, including Nanog. All three TFs are expressed in EpiSCs and in the postimplantation epiblast. Functional studies established a role for Oct4 and Nanog in the specification of ICM cell identity, and a role for Oct4 in the maintenance of postimplantation pluripotency. Although the role of Sox2 in preimplantation ICM cells is unclear, it is critical for the establishment of egg cylinder following implantation and indispensable for ES cell pluripotency. However, despite the presence of Sox2 in postimplantation pluripotent cells the role of Sox2 in postimplantation pluripotency is unknown. In this thesis the role of Sox2 in the regulation of postimplantation pluripotency was examined. In contrast to the situation in the preimplantation ICM, Sox2 and Nanog are expressed in opposing gradients in the gastrulation-stage postimplantation epiblast, with Sox2 highest anteriorly and Nanog highest posteriorly. Interestingly the posterior epiblast of neural-plate (NP)-staged embryos was shown not to be pluripotent. Furthermore, forced expression of Sox2 but not Oct4 in this region rescued pluripotency. The ability of Oct4 to reinstate pluripotency in the somitogenesis-stage embryo is limited to Sox2-positive tissues. This strongly suggests that coexpression of Sox2 and Oct4 is important for establishing postimplantation pluripotent identity. Sox2HIGH cultured EpiSCs were not positively correlated with NanogHIGH cells. This reciprocal relationship emerged during the transition from ES cells to EpiSCs in culture. Using mutant cells with reduced levels of Sox2 or Nanog, Sox2 positively influences Nanog but Nanog negatively influences Sox2 expression post-transcriptionally. The negative influence of Nanog on Sox2 protein level was confirmed using doxycycline-inducible Nanog overexpressing EpiSCs. This negative relationship indicates that the regulation of Sox2 expression is different in postimplantation pluripotency and that Nanog may negatively regulate Sox2 on the protein level in the posterior epiblast. Sox2 is expressed at a lower level in EpiSCs than ES cells and the significance of this was further investigated by microarray transcription profiling using cells in which a fluorescent reporter (tdTomato) was knocked in to the Sox2 gene. Sox2- tdTomatoHIGH cells cultured in LIF/FCS/GMEMβ correlate with an undifferentiated cell identity and Sox2-tdTomatoLOW cells are associated with non-neural differentiation. Interestingly the global profile of ES cells and EpiSCs that share similar Sox2-tdTomato signal are non-identical. This suggests that Sox2 has different roles in different pluripotent states. ES cells with enforced Sox2 expression were unable to enter the EpiSC state, while ES cells with lowered Sox2 levels were inefficient in neural differentiation. Therefore, levels of Sox2 are critical for cell fate decisions. Strikingly, given the apparent requirement for Sox2 during Oct4-induced reinstatement of post-implantation pluripotency, deletion of Sox2 had no effect on the maintenance of EpiSC pluripotency. This is likely due to the presence of redundant Sox factors and indeed Sox3 is able to rescue the Sox2-null phenotype in ES cells. Taken together, these results suggest the hypothesis that postimplantation pluripotency is maintained by multiple Sox factors, while Nanog negatively regulates Sox2 post-transcriptionally to repress neural specification in the posterior epbilast. The positive influence of Sox2 on Nanog protein level suggests a possible negative feedback loop to balance the proneural and pluripotent properties of Sox2 in postimplantation pluripotency.

Embryonic stem (ES) cells are maintained in an undifferentiated state by a gene regulatory network centred on the triumvirate of transcription factors Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2. Genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation studies indicate that in many cases target genes contain closely localised binding sites for each of these proteins, as well as additional members of the extended pluripotency transcription factor network. However, the biochemical basis of the interactions between these proteins is largely unknown, as are the mechanisms by which these interactions control ES cell identity. By purifying Nanog from ES cells and identifying co-purified proteins, we determined a Nanog interactome of over 130 proteins including transcription factors, chromatin modifying complexes, phosphorylation and ubiquitination enzymes, basal transcriptional machinery members and RNA processing factors. Validation of interactions was obtained by co-immunoprecipitation of Nanog with putative partners. Sox2 was identified as a robust interacting partner of Nanog and the interaction was investigated further. We show that the interaction is independent of DNA binding and that a region of Nanog known as tryptophan repeat, in which tryptophan is present every 5th residue is necessary and sufficient for the binding of Sox2. Furthermore, mutation of tryptophan residues within the Nanog tryptophan repeat (WR) abolishes the interaction with Sox2. A region of Sox2 known as serine rich region, a triple-repeat motif (S X T/S Y) within a stretch of 21 residues is required for the interaction with Nanog. Mutation of tyrosines to alanine within the three motifs (S X T/S Y) abrogates the Nanog–Sox2 interaction. The disruption of the Nanog-Sox2 interaction results in the alteration of expression of genes associated with the Nanog-Sox2 cognate sequence, and reduces the ability of Sox2 to rescue ES cell differentiation induced by endogenous Sox2 deletion. Substitution of the tyrosines of the motif with phenylalanine rescues both the Sox2–Nanog interaction and efficient self-renewal. These results suggest that aromatic stacking of Nanog tryptophans and Sox2 tyrosines mediates an interaction central to ES cell self-renewal. Together these data shed light on the extent of the interactions of Nanog with protein partners as well as the biochemical nature of the interaction between Nanog and one of the most important partners Sox2, an interaction crucial for maintaining optimal mouse ES cell self-renewal efficiency.

Pluripotent cells have the dual abilities to self-renewal and to differentiate into all three germ layers. Pluripotent cells can be isolated from two different stages of mouse embryogenesis. Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are isolated from the inner cell mass (ICM) of the pre-implantation embryo and are considered to be in a naïve state. On the other hand, cells isolated from epiblast of the post-implantation embryo are referred as epiblast stem cells (EpiSC) and are representative of primed pluripotency. ESCs and EpiSCs are distinct from each other in terms of the morphology, the gene regulatory network and the signalling pathways regulating self-renewal. Under certain conditions, ESCs and EpiSCs can be transitioned into each other. However, the mechanism that regulates this transition from naïve to primed pluripotent state remains to be solved. Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2 form the core gene regulatory network of pluripotency. Additionally, the Id protein family is also important in the maintenance of pluripotency in ESCs. Id proteins function by inhibiting the activity of pro-differentiation factors. Tcf15 is identified as one of the targets of Id inhibition in ESCs. Moreover, Tcf15 has been identified as a repression target of Nanog. In this study, to understand the function of Tcf15, the expression of Tcf15 was characterized in differentiating ESCs. The transient upregulation of Tcf15 mRNA and protein was detected at early stages of differentiation before lineage commitment. Furthermore, Tcf15 protein was heterogeneously expressed in differentiating cells. Mutually exclusive expression of Nanog and Tcf15 proteins were demonstrated in both self-renewing and differentiating ESCs. Further characterization of the effect of Nanog on Tcf15 transcription showed that Tcf15 pre-mRNA was downregulated within 20 minute of Nanog induction. A Nanog binding site was identified at +32kb relative to the Tcf15 transcription start site (TSS). Initially, Nanog binding at this region was confirmed by performing ChIP-PCR experiments. Then, this Nanog binding region was further analysed for its enhancer activity related to the Tcf15 gene. Deletion of the Nanog binding region using CRISPR-Cas9 confirmed that this region acts as Tcf15 enhancer; it was shown that this region was required for the activation of Tcf15 transcription during differentiation. Tcf15 induction experiments were performed in order to the check whether Tcf15 affects Nanog transcription. The results indicate that Nanog is not a direct target of Tcf15, but Tcf15 contributes indirectly to the repression of Nanog. Additional analysis with the Tcf15 enhancer deletion cells showed that Tcf15 is not required for efficient downregulation of naïve markers and the upregulation of primed markers. However, the genes related to the regulation of adhesion properties of cells such as Zyc, Itga3 were induced with lower efficiency in the absence of Tcf15 compared to the wild type cells. In summary, I investigated the reciprocal regulation of Tcf15 and Nanog and the role of Tcf15 for the differentiation. My results suggest that Tcf15 is expressed in the cells that have initiated differentiation but are not lineage-committed. Additionally, Tcf15 can contribute to the regulation of adhesion related genes in order to help the epithelisation of the cells required during the differentiation from naïve to the primed pluripotent state. As a conclusion, Nanog is proposed to help to prevent certain aspects of ESCs differentiation by repressing Tcf15.

Nanog is a transcription factor that plays a central part in the gene regulatory network that maintains and induces pluripotency of embryonic stem cells (ESCs). However, the molecular basis by which Nanog achieves its functions is not fully understood. At the centre of C-terminal domain of Nanog a tryptophan repeat (WR) is located, comprising 10 penta-peptide repeats each starting with a tryptophan. A mutant form of Nanog (Nanog-W10A) in which all 10 tryptophan residues have been substituted by alanine has an impaired capacity to drive LIF-independent self-renewal and a reduced efficiency in reprogramming primed epiblast stem cells to naïve pluripotency. To understand how the WR contributes to Nanog function, Nanog-W10A-ERT2 was introduced into Nanog null cells. Upon hydroxytamoxifen addition, the Nanog-ERT2 fusion proteins were detected on chromatin within 1 hour, allowing a comparison of genome-wide transcriptional responses to Nanog and Nanog-W10A by microarray. When treated with LIF, Nanog-W10A can activate most of Nanog targets as efficiently as Nanog. In contrast, Nanog-W10A did not efficiently repress most Nanog targets, including Otx2 and Tcf15 that were previously suggested to prime ESCs for differentiation. The microarray experiments performed in the absence of LIF signalling showed that Nanog and LIF co-regulate an extensive list of targets, including Klf4 and Mras. When LIF is absent, wildtype Nanog can still activate pro-self-renewal factors, including Esrrb and repress differentiation-priming factor, such as Tcf15 and Otx2. In contrast, in the absence of LIF, the activation of pro-self-renewal factors Klf4 and Mras is reduced. In addition, activation of Esrrb by Nanog-W10A induction delays but does not prevent differentiation. These effects allow the de-repression of Otx2 and Tcf15 by Nanog-W10A to dominate. Therefore, the function of Nanog is not only mediated by the activation of pro-self-renewal genes, but also repression of pro-differentiation signals. The functional significance of the repression of Nanog targets was further exemplified by the robust capacity of Otx2 to dominate over the self-renewal signals and to drive differentiation. The Otx2 protein is a direct interacting partner of Nanog that binds the Nanog WR tryptophan residues. The previously identified Otx2 “tail domain” comprises two imperfectly aligned repeats and aromatic residues of each repeat align with aromatic residues of the Sox2 “SXS/TY” motif previously identified to mediate the interaction between Sox2 and Nanog. Aromatic residues of Otx2 were demonstrated to directly interact with both Nanog and Sox2. The interactions between Otx2, Nanog and Sox2 are essential for Otx2 functions in driving ESCs differentiation, as Otx2 mutants with alanine substitutions of the aromatic residues in both or either of the repeats have reduced efficiency to drive differentiation. As Nanog and Sox2 may co-occupy many loci important in maintaining ESC self-renewal, Otx2 may be able to “read” the Nanog/Sox2 co-binding sites to dissolve the pluripotent networks. In summary, the repression function of Nanog is located within the Nanog WR region and represents an important module of Nanog in fine-tuning the balance between self-renewal and differentiation. This module involving Nanog WR can also be recognised by differentiation-priming factor Otx2 and may represent an initial step during the exit of differentiation.

The transition from pluripotency to differentiation is a key event in the life of all complex multicellular organisms. In the development of the mouse, the pluripotent epiblast undergoes gastrulation and gives rise to three multipotent germ layers, which will in turn form the tissues of the adult body. The events leading up to gastrulation have been extensively studied in vivo in developing embryos, and modelled in vitro making use of embryonic stem (ES) cells. Bone morphogenic protein (BMP) signalling plays a key role in these processes. BMP can in fact maintain ES cells in a self-renewing state by inhibiting their differentiation into neural ectoderm, whilst at the same time being required for the specification of mesoderm in the developing embryo (Winnier et al. 1995, Ying et al. 2003a). A key intracellular target of BMP is the transcriptional regulator Id1, which can recapitulate the effects of BMP in the preservation of ES cell pluripotency and in the inhibition of neural specification from pluripotent cells (Ying et al. 2003a). This thesis will focus on understanding the roles of this molecule in the early decisions affecting the transition from pluripotency to differentiation. In particular, I aim to study the expression pattern of Id1 in cultures of pluripotent cells, and to clarify which extracellular and intracellular molecules regulate the expression of the factor; I aim to understand how forced Id1 expression inhibits the differentiation of pluripotent cells, and whether Id1 may play a similar role in the regulation of the asynchronous exit from pluripotency observed in differentiating wild-type cells; finally, I aim to characterise the expression pattern of Id1 in the early stages of post-implantation development at the single-cell resolution, and to understand how the expression of the molecule correlates with the previously characterised expression patterns of key signalling molecules and transcription factors. The generation of a reporter ES cell line expressing the yellow fluorescent protein Venus fused to the C-terminus of Id1 allowed me to assess the expression of the factor in culture on a single-cell basis, making use of immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. I observed that expression of Id1 is reliant on active BMP signalling and low Activin/Nodal signalling, and I characterised the combinatory effects of the two pathways on Id1 expression. Furthermore, I demonstrated that high Nanog expression is incompatible with high Id1 expression in ES cell cultured in the presence of LIF and serum, which raises the possibility that Nanog may be affecting the expression of Id1 in vivo, both in pre-implantation and in post-implantation embryos. I generated ES cell lines overexpressing Id1 and observed that the factor inhibits differentiation of pluripotent cells into neural ectoderm by delaying their exit from a post-implantation epiblast-like pluripotent state, and ultimately favouring mesodermal specification. This suggests that Id1 is acting at a specific stage of differentiation and that the differentiation process itself is following a similar developmental pathway to what is observed in the peri-gastrulation stage embryo. I performed single-cell transcriptional analysis on differentiating wild-type ES cells and observed that Id1 is not expressed at an appropriate point in time to affect the asynchronous the exit from pluripotency observed in neural adherent monolayer differentiation, which suggests that other factors must be responsible for this phenomenon. Finally, I addressed the expression pattern of Id1 protein in the embryonic tissue of gastrulating mouse embryos by imaging chimaeric embryos generated using the Id1- Venus reporter ES cells. I observed that Id1 is expressed in the proximal regions of streak stage embryos; in the epiblast and migrating mesendoderm of bud stage embryos; in cardiac, lateral and allantoic mesoderm and in foregut endoderm in headfold stage embryos. These expression patterns fit with the reported expression of BMP molecules at these stages of development, and suggest that Id1 expression is primarily dependent on BMP expression in early post-implantation embryos. However, I also observed Id1 expression in a ring of cells surrounding the node in headfold stage embryos, a previously uncharacterised expression pattern not directly attributable to BMP expression. This raises the intriguing question of what is regulating Id1 expression and what roles Id1 may be playing in this key embryonic structure.

As mitocôndrias são organelas semiautonômicas, portadoras do próprio DNA, o mtDNA e responsáveis pela produção de energia celular na forma de ATP, através do processo de fosforilação oxidativa. Atualmente, diferentes tipos de doenças, como distrofias musculares e diversos tipos de câncer, estão associadas à alteração nas moléculas de mtDNA. Na década de 70 um modelo a partir do cultivo celular com brometo de etídio (EtBr) foi desenvolvido com o objetivo de se criar uma linhagem celular depletada de cópias de mtDNA. Desde então os mais variados estudos foram realizados e diversos tipos celulares foram submetidos à depleção do mtDNA. Este projeto teve como objetivos criar um modelo de cultivo celular somático na espécie bovina com depleção de cópias de mtDNA para investigar a resposta da célula a esta condição; avaliar como as células depletadas se comportam na ausência de EtBr, além da utilização destas células no processo de reprogramação celular por indução gênica na tentativa de avaliar o efeito do numero de cópias de mtDNA na indução na espécie bovina. Para tanto foram desenvolvidos três experimentos; Experimento 1- Depleção de mtDNA a partir da utilização do brometo de etídeo; Experimento 2 Repleção do mtDNA; e Experimento 3 Utilização de células bovinas depletadas no sistema de reprogramação nuclear. Todos os experimentos foram avaliados quanto a quantidade de cópias de mtDNA e expressão gênica para os genes Bax, Bcl2 e Tfam. Ademais, os experimentos 1 e 2 foram avaliados quanto a viabilidade celular e apenas o experimento 1 foi avaliado quanto ao crescimento e morfologia celular. O experimento 1 foi avaliado durante o cultivo celular nos períodos D0, D4, D7, D10 e D13, com os grupos experimentais controle (EtBr-C) e tratado com 100 ng/mL de brometo de etídio (EtBr-T), quanto a núero de cópias do mtDNA, o grupo EtBr-T diferiu do grupo EtBr-C (P=0,0459), apresentando menor número de cópias de mtDNA; menor taxa crescimento celular (P<0,05), porém sem alteração na morfologia celular, e na expressão dos genes descritos acima. No experimento da repleção, não houve diferença no número de cópias de mtDNA, entre os grupos EtBr-T e EtBr-R, indicativo de que as células atingiram o estado rho 0 ou que necessitam de mais tempo para ativar a replicação do mtDNA; quanto a viabilidade celular, houve diferença entres os grupos, quanto a expressão gênica, com aumento do Bax e do Bcl-2 para o grupo EtBr-T; O grupo EtBr-R apresentou queda do Bcl-2; para o Tfam houve aumento para o grupo EtBr-T e uma queda para o grupo EtBr-R. Quanto ao experimento 3, não foi possível observar sinais de pluripotência, porém foi detectada uma queda na quantidade de mtDNA dos dois grupos tratados por EtBr (EtBr com e sem Stemcca) e o grupo controle com Stemcca. Para analise de expressão gênica, não houve diferenças entre os grupos em relação ao Tfam. Quanto ao Bax, os grupos controle com Stemcca, controle sem Stemcca e EtBr sem Stemcca não diferiram, e o ultimo também não apresentou diferença quando comparado ao grupo EtBr com Stemcca. Para o Bcl-2, os grupos controle sem Stemcca e EtBr com Stemcca não apresentaram diferenças entre si; o grupo controle sem Stemcca não apresentou diferença quando comparado aos grupos controle com Stemcca e EtBr sem Stemcca. Concluindo, este trabalho no nosso conhecimento, descreve pela primeira vez a produção de células bovinas Rho 0 e discute sobre a relação da função mitocondrial e o processo de reprogramação celular. / Mitochondria are semi autonomic organelles which present their own DNA (mtDNA); are in charge of cell energy production as ATP through oxidative phosphorylation. Currently, different types of diseases like muscular distrofy; different types of cancer are associated to alterations of mtDNA molecules. In the 70\'s a model based on cell culture with ethidium bromide (EtBr) was developed in order to create a cell line depleted of mtDNA. Since then, a variety of studies were realized; diverse cell types were submited to mtDNA depletion. This project had as objective creating a model of somatic cell culture in bovine species with depletion of mtDNA copies, in order to investigate cell response to this condition; to analyze depleted cell behavior in the absence of EtBr, besides using this depleteded cell in a reprogramming cell process by genic induction in order evaluate the effect of the number of mtDNA copies during induction in bovine species. Therefore three experiments were developed: Experiment-1 Depletion of mtDNA using ethidium bromide. Experiment-2 repletion of mtDNA; Experiment-3 usage of depleted bovine cells in reprogramming nuclear system. Cell experiments were analyzed according to the quantity of mtDNA copies; genic expression for Bax, BCl2; Tfam genes. Also, experiments 1; 2 were analyzed on cell viability; only experiment 1 was analyzed regarding cell morphology; growth. Experiment-1 was analyzed during cell culture on periods D0, D4, D7, D10, D13, with control experimental groups (EtBr-C),; treated with 100 ng/mL ethidium bromide (EtBr-T); relating to mtDNA quantification the EtBr-T group differed from EtBr-C (P=0,0459) presenting a smaller number of mtDNA copies; smaller growth rate (P<0,05); although there was no differences on cell morphology as there was also no difference related to genic expression of the previous stated genes. Repletion experiment showed no differences about the number of mtDNA copies between EtBr-T; EtBr-R groups, indicating this cells reached Rho0 state or that they need more time to activate mtDNA replication; about cell viability, there were no differences among the groups; relating to genic expression there was an increase of Bax; BCl-2 for EtBt-T group; EtBr-R group showed decrease of BCl-2; for Tfam there was an increase for EtBr-T group; a decrease for EtBr-R. Relating to Experiment-3 it was impossible to notice signs of pluripotency, but we could see a decrease in the amount of mtDNA in both groups treated with EtBr (EtBr with; without STEMCCA) as in control group with STEMCCA. Genic expression analysis didn\'t show differences related to Tfam. Regarding to BAX, both control groups (with; without STEMCCA); EtBr without STEMCCA didn\'t differ from each other,; the last one also didn\'t show any difference when compared to EtBt with STEMCCA group. For BCl-2, control group without STEMCCA; EtBr with STEMCCA didn\'t show differences among each other; control group without SEMCCA didn\'t show differences when compared to control group with STEMCCA; EtBr without STEMCCA. Concluding, this work, regarding our knowledge, describes for the first time, production of bovine Rho0 cells; debates about the relationship among mitochondrial function; the process of cell reprogramation.

Mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) are pluripotent cells capable of differentiating into all three germ layers present in the adult mouse. In this thesis, I have investigated the transcriptional changes that mESCs undergo as they are induced to differentiate towards the mesoderm lineage by 2i/LIF withdrawal and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) treatment. 5 days of differentiation causes significant drops in expression of Sox2 and Oct4 primary transcript, while expression of Nanog and Kit significantly drops after only 1 day. It was determined that DMSO has no effect on the short-term changes in Nanog and Kit expression induced by 2i/LIF withdrawal. An expanded look at pluripotency-associated genes shows significant up-regulation of Oct4 and down-regulation of Klf4 and Stat3 following only 6 hours of 2i/LIF withdrawal. This data indicates that while some aspects of the transcriptional networks underlying pluripotency respond quickly to mesodermal differentiation cues, others remain unchanged for up to 5 days.

Mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) are pluripotent cells capable of differentiating into all three germ layers present in the adult mouse. In this thesis, I have investigated the transcriptional changes that mESCs undergo as they are induced to differentiate towards the mesoderm lineage by 2i/LIF withdrawal and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) treatment. 5 days of differentiation causes significant drops in expression of Sox2 and Oct4 primary transcript, while expression of Nanog and Kit significantly drops after only 1 day. It was determined that DMSO has no effect on the short-term changes in Nanog and Kit expression induced by 2i/LIF withdrawal. An expanded look at pluripotency-associated genes shows significant up-regulation of Oct4 and down-regulation of Klf4 and Stat3 following only 6 hours of 2i/LIF withdrawal. This data indicates that while some aspects of the transcriptional networks underlying pluripotency respond quickly to mesodermal differentiation cues, others remain unchanged for up to 5 days.

No description available.

From the simplest unicellular organisms to complex metazoans, cell polarity is a widespread characteristic that is essential for almost every aspect of biology. Proper polarization of cells is crucial for the establishment and maintenance of higher order structures such as tissue and organs. Cell polarity refers to the asymmetric distribution of various macromolecules and cellular structures, resulting in polarized architecture and function of the cell. Defects in cell polarity lead to various phenotypes, ranging from aberrant signaling, proliferation, cell adhesion and migration, cell fate determination and pluripotency, as well as embryonic lethality, neoplasia and cancer. Given the various roles for cell polarity in development and disease, the characterization of the components involved in polarity and their mechanisms of function is of great importance. My thesis work has encompassed three major projects, each of which is focused on understanding the role of cell polarity in development and disease. Although genetic screens in invertebrates have led to the identification of a number of cell-polarity proteins, similar systematic approach have not been undertaken in mammalian systems. The goal of my first project was to design and implement a high-throughput screen to systematically knockdown individual genes using siRNA, and then assess cell junction integrity as a measure of cell polarity. Given the importance of cell polarity to signaling pathways, I next sought to determine the mechanism by which cell polarity affects TGFβ and Hippo pathways, two important signaling pathways involved in development and disease. Lastly, by studying the acquisition of pluripotency by somatic cells, I uncovered a central role for cell polarity in the establishment and maintenance of pluripotency. Here I will present and discuss our discovery pertaining to the role of cell polarity in cell signaling and pluripotency.