Introdução - A Saúde Pública é um campo complexo de atuação e reflexão, onde existem dois grandes grupos sociais o primeiro formado por acadêmicos e técnicos (especialistas, a quem é atribuída a lógica sanitária, dotada de todo peso legal e técnico) e o segundo por pessoas da população em geral (leigos, a quem cabe a lógica de senso comum, do cotidiano). A ideia de que há necessidade de aperfeiçoar a relação entre especialistas e leigos é aceita e acredita-se que seja possível por meio de políticas e práticas cujo objetivo final é sensibilizar a ambos para que contribuam de maneira mais ativa e autônoma colaborando no processo de alcance de ações mais eficientes e eficazes na Saúde Pública. Objetivo - Conhecer a representação social de profissionais e pacientes de uma unidade de saúde, para saber o que cada um desses grupos pensa a respeito da relação profissional de saúde-paciente. Métodos - Pesquisa qualiquantitativa, com uso do Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo. Resultados - Os entrevistados, de maneira geral, acreditam que o diálogo é fundamental para melhorar os resultados da assistência à saúde, já que é possível, como consequência, uma ganho tanto no que tange à otimização de recursos quanto na qualidade e resultados do atendimento à população. Porém, para uma parcela dos profissionais, este diálogo deve se dar por meio da educação em saúde, entendida como aquela na qual a população deva ser \"educada\" exatamente na direção que o técnico tem interesse, sem levar em consideração a autonomia deste paciente, seus conhecimentos e seus anseios. Conclusões Recomenda-se a implantação de um conjunto de ações coordenadas dos diversos atores envolvidos no processo, para se conseguir colocar as duas lógicas em diálogo, com resultados que possam ser considerados promissores para a saúde pública, utilizando-se dos conteúdos narrativos dos discursos para elaboração de materiais didáticos e de divulgação destinados a especialistas e ao público em geral com o objetivo de fazer avançar a proposta do compartilhamento. / Introduction - Public Health is a complex field of action and reflection, where there are two major social groups the first made up of academics and technicians (specialists, to whom is attributed to sanitary logic, with all legal and technical weight) and the second by people from the general population (laypeople, who fits the logic of common sense, of everyday life). The idea that there is a need to improve the relationship between experts and lay people is accepted and is believed to be possible through policies and practices whose ultimate goal is to sensitize both for contributing in a more active and autonomous collaborating in the process of achieving more efficient and effective actions in public health. Objective - Meet the social representation of professionals and patients of a health unit, to learn what each of these groups think about the health professional-patient relationship. Methods Qualiquantitative research with use of the collective subject discourse. Results Interviewees generally believe that dialogue is critical to improving healthcare outcomes, since it is possible, as a result, a gain both in terms of resource optimization and the quality and outcomes of care to the population. However, for a portion of the professionals, this dialogue must go through health education, understood as that on which the population should be \"educated\" exactly in the direction that the coach has interest, without taking into account the autonomy of the patient, their knowledge and their yearnings. Conclusions - It is recommended the implementation of a set of coordinated actions of the various actors involved in the process, to get the two logics in dialogue, with results that can be considered promising for public health, using the narrative content of the speeches for the preparation and dissemination of teaching materials intended for experts and the general public with the goal of advancing the proposal of sharing.

Introdução - A Saúde Pública é um campo complexo de atuação e reflexão, onde existem dois grandes grupos sociais o primeiro formado por acadêmicos e técnicos (especialistas, a quem é atribuída a lógica sanitária, dotada de todo peso legal e técnico) e o segundo por pessoas da população em geral (leigos, a quem cabe a lógica de senso comum, do cotidiano). A ideia de que há necessidade de aperfeiçoar a relação entre especialistas e leigos é aceita e acredita-se que seja possível por meio de políticas e práticas cujo objetivo final é sensibilizar a ambos para que contribuam de maneira mais ativa e autônoma colaborando no processo de alcance de ações mais eficientes e eficazes na Saúde Pública. Objetivo - Conhecer a representação social de profissionais e pacientes de uma unidade de saúde, para saber o que cada um desses grupos pensa a respeito da relação profissional de saúde-paciente. Métodos - Pesquisa qualiquantitativa, com uso do Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo. Resultados - Os entrevistados, de maneira geral, acreditam que o diálogo é fundamental para melhorar os resultados da assistência à saúde, já que é possível, como consequência, uma ganho tanto no que tange à otimização de recursos quanto na qualidade e resultados do atendimento à população. Porém, para uma parcela dos profissionais, este diálogo deve se dar por meio da educação em saúde, entendida como aquela na qual a população deva ser \"educada\" exatamente na direção que o técnico tem interesse, sem levar em consideração a autonomia deste paciente, seus conhecimentos e seus anseios. Conclusões Recomenda-se a implantação de um conjunto de ações coordenadas dos diversos atores envolvidos no processo, para se conseguir colocar as duas lógicas em diálogo, com resultados que possam ser considerados promissores para a saúde pública, utilizando-se dos conteúdos narrativos dos discursos para elaboração de materiais didáticos e de divulgação destinados a especialistas e ao público em geral com o objetivo de fazer avançar a proposta do compartilhamento. / Introduction - Public Health is a complex field of action and reflection, where there are two major social groups the first made up of academics and technicians (specialists, to whom is attributed to sanitary logic, with all legal and technical weight) and the second by people from the general population (laypeople, who fits the logic of common sense, of everyday life). The idea that there is a need to improve the relationship between experts and lay people is accepted and is believed to be possible through policies and practices whose ultimate goal is to sensitize both for contributing in a more active and autonomous collaborating in the process of achieving more efficient and effective actions in public health. Objective - Meet the social representation of professionals and patients of a health unit, to learn what each of these groups think about the health professional-patient relationship. Methods Qualiquantitative research with use of the collective subject discourse. Results Interviewees generally believe that dialogue is critical to improving healthcare outcomes, since it is possible, as a result, a gain both in terms of resource optimization and the quality and outcomes of care to the population. However, for a portion of the professionals, this dialogue must go through health education, understood as that on which the population should be \"educated\" exactly in the direction that the coach has interest, without taking into account the autonomy of the patient, their knowledge and their yearnings. Conclusions - It is recommended the implementation of a set of coordinated actions of the various actors involved in the process, to get the two logics in dialogue, with results that can be considered promising for public health, using the narrative content of the speeches for the preparation and dissemination of teaching materials intended for experts and the general public with the goal of advancing the proposal of sharing.

<p>Caring for children at hospital with palliative care needs arouses different reactions in nurses and depends on what prior knowledge and experience nurses have. To besides shift focus from to care children palliative to care curative is further a strain and an emotional changeover. The aim of this study was to illuminate nurse’s</p><p>perceptions about caring for children at hospital with palliative care needs, and how they shift focus of care between children with palliative care needs and children with curative care needs. The study has a qualitative approach and data were collected with interviews from two focus groups. The interviews were performed in two different hospitals in the middle of Sweden, and analyzed with a manifest content analysis. Five themes were created from the analysis: create confidence and individualized relations, difference in meeting of children with unlike care needs, acquired experience and ability to reflect, need of support, supervision and distance,</p><p>difficulties to enforce a balance in changing between different care need. The conclusion was that nurses who shift between caring for children with a palliative care or curative care needs are exposed to psychological strain which may lead to psychological ill- health. This is important to prevent through for example continuous supervision which may contribute to the possibility for nurses to obtain more time for reflection and regain new strength.</p> / <p>Sjuksköterskor som arbetar på en barnavdelning möter ofta barn med ett palliativt vårdbehov, vilket väcker olika reaktioner hos sjuksköterskorna beroende på tidigare kunskap och erfarenhet. Att dessutom skifta fokus från att vårda barn palliativt till att vårda kurativt är ytterligare en påfrestande och känslomässig omställning. Syftet med denna studie var att belysa sjuksköterskors uppfattningar om hur det är att vårda barn på barnavdelning i sluten vård med palliativt vårdbehov samt hur det är att växelvis vårda barn med palliativt vårdbehov gentemot barn med kurativt vårdbehov. Studien har en kvalitativ ansats och data har samlats in via intervjuer i två</p><p>fokusgrupper. Intervjuerna genomfördes på två olika sjukhus i mellersta Sverige och analyserades med manifest innehållsanalys. Utifrån analysen skapades fem teman: skapa förtroende och att individanpassa relationen, skillnader i bemötande av barn med olika vårdbehov, förvärvad erfarenhet och förmåga att reflektera, behov av stöd, handledning och distans, svårigheter att upprätthålla en balans i växlingen mellan olika vårdbehov. Slutsatser som drogs var att sjuksköterskor som växelvis vårdar barn med palliativt eller kurativt vårdbehov utsätts för psykiska påfrestningar, vilket kan leda till psykisk ohälsa. Detta är viktigt att förebygga genom att sjuksköterskorna får till exempel kontinuerlig handledning vilket ger tid till reflektion och möjlighet att inhämta nya krafter.</p>

Caring for children at hospital with palliative care needs arouses different reactions in nurses and depends on what prior knowledge and experience nurses have. To besides shift focus from to care children palliative to care curative is further a strain and an emotional changeover. The aim of this study was to illuminate nurse’s perceptions about caring for children at hospital with palliative care needs, and how they shift focus of care between children with palliative care needs and children with curative care needs. The study has a qualitative approach and data were collected with interviews from two focus groups. The interviews were performed in two different hospitals in the middle of Sweden, and analyzed with a manifest content analysis. Five themes were created from the analysis: create confidence and individualized relations, difference in meeting of children with unlike care needs, acquired experience and ability to reflect, need of support, supervision and distance, difficulties to enforce a balance in changing between different care need. The conclusion was that nurses who shift between caring for children with a palliative care or curative care needs are exposed to psychological strain which may lead to psychological ill- health. This is important to prevent through for example continuous supervision which may contribute to the possibility for nurses to obtain more time for reflection and regain new strength. / Sjuksköterskor som arbetar på en barnavdelning möter ofta barn med ett palliativt vårdbehov, vilket väcker olika reaktioner hos sjuksköterskorna beroende på tidigare kunskap och erfarenhet. Att dessutom skifta fokus från att vårda barn palliativt till att vårda kurativt är ytterligare en påfrestande och känslomässig omställning. Syftet med denna studie var att belysa sjuksköterskors uppfattningar om hur det är att vårda barn på barnavdelning i sluten vård med palliativt vårdbehov samt hur det är att växelvis vårda barn med palliativt vårdbehov gentemot barn med kurativt vårdbehov. Studien har en kvalitativ ansats och data har samlats in via intervjuer i två fokusgrupper. Intervjuerna genomfördes på två olika sjukhus i mellersta Sverige och analyserades med manifest innehållsanalys. Utifrån analysen skapades fem teman: skapa förtroende och att individanpassa relationen, skillnader i bemötande av barn med olika vårdbehov, förvärvad erfarenhet och förmåga att reflektera, behov av stöd, handledning och distans, svårigheter att upprätthålla en balans i växlingen mellan olika vårdbehov. Slutsatser som drogs var att sjuksköterskor som växelvis vårdar barn med palliativt eller kurativt vårdbehov utsätts för psykiska påfrestningar, vilket kan leda till psykisk ohälsa. Detta är viktigt att förebygga genom att sjuksköterskorna får till exempel kontinuerlig handledning vilket ger tid till reflektion och möjlighet att inhämta nya krafter.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Uppsala : Univ., 2002. / Härtill 5 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Linköping : Univ., 2002. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Linköping : Linköpings universitet, 2006. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.

Bakgrund: Personer som brukar droger är en särskilt utsatt patientgrupp inom hälso- och sjukvården, bland annat på grund av stigmatisering och dåligt bemötande. Ett dåligt bemötande kan ge negativa konsekvenser för patientens behandling. Syfte: Att utforska faktorer som påverkar hur patienter med substansbrukssyndrom upplever bemötandet av hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal. Metod: Litteraturstudie med kvalitativa originalartiklar. Vid litteratursökning användes PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, ScienceDirect och CINAHL. Resultat: Ett personcentrerat förhållningssätt ger patienter en god upplevelse av bemötande, stigmatisering samt en brist på formell kompetens hos hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal ger en sämre upplevelse av bemötande. Slutsats: De faktorer som påverkar upplevelsen av bemötande är hur väl ett personcentrerat förhållningssätt utövades, om det förekommer stigmatiserande attityder och beteenden, samt sjuksköterskors formella kompetens inom substansbrukssyndrom. Personer med substansbrukssyndrom kan uppleva att hälso- och sjukvårdspersonals bemötande påverkar deras benägenhet att söka vård. Förbättring och utökning av utbildning inom substansbrukssyndrom och bemötande bör prioriteras inom hälso- och sjukvårdsutbildningar. / Introduction: People who use drugs are particularly vulnerable patients within health care, due to stigmatization and poor attitudes from healthcare professionals. Poor treatment can cause negative consequences for the patient’s overall health. Aim: To explore factors affecting how patients with substance use disorder experience treatment from healthcare professionals. Method: Literature review of qualitative studies. Data is collected from databases PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus, ScienceDirect and CINAHL. Result: A person centered approach has a positive effect on the experience of treatment. Stigmatization and lack of formal competence are factors contributing to a negative experience of treatment from healthcare professionals. Conclusion: The factors contributing to the experience of treatment from healthcare professionals are if person centered care is applied, if stigmatizing behaviors and attitudes are present, and the formal nursing education levels related to substance use disorders. Individuals with substance use disorders may experience that treatment received by healthcare professionals affect their decision to seek care. Improvement and extension of nurse’s education related to substance use disorder and treatment within health care should be a priority.

Bakgrund   Personer som har problem orsakade av användandet av opioider kan påträffas inom vården i direkt koppling till deras användande av substansen eller vid uppsökande av vård av andra anledningar. Som sjuksköterska finns möjligheten att identifiera ett beroende eller riskbruk och stötta personen till en förändring i livsstilen eller till egenvård (Skärsäter &amp; Wiklund, 2019). Genom att ge omvårdnad på den egna individens villkor respekteras individens värdighet och integritet vilket är avgörande för individens uppfattning av bemötandet (Svensk Sjuksköterskeförening, 2016).   Syfte   Syftet var att beskriva hur personer som använder opioider upplever mötet med hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal.   Metod   En icke-systematiskt litteraturöversikt utfördes och baserades på 17 vetenskapliga artiklar av kvalitativ design. Artiklarna eftersöktes i databaserna CINAHL och PubMed med hjälp av lämpliga sökord samt så genomfördes även en manuell sökning. Kvalitén på artiklarna granskades utefter Sophiahemmet Högskolas bedömningsunderlag och vidare användes en integrerad analys vilket resulterade i tre huvudkategorier och sex subkategorier.   Resultat  Resultatet bestod av tre huvudkategorier och sex subkategorier. Huvudkategorierna var Patienters upplevelser av vårdpersonalens kompetens, Patienters upplevelser av vårdpersonalens attityder och Patienters upplevelser av samarbetet med vårdpersonal. Subkategorierna var kunskap, kommunikation, stigmatisering, tillit, delaktighet och relationen mellan vårdpersonal och patient. Resultatet visade att majoriteten av patienter upplevt stigmatisering relaterat till deras bruk av opioider. Patienter upplevde även att de inte var delaktiga i sin vård samt förbisedda i sin behandling.   Slutsats  Resultatet från litteraturöversikten påvisade upplevd stigmatisering kring patienter som använder opioider. En stor del av stigmatiseringen kring patientgruppen grundade sig i okunskap hos hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal om “substance use disorder” (SUD). Ett starkt samband mellan vårdpersonalens kunskap om SUD och deras attityder till dessa personer uppmärksammades och det är därför viktigt att kunskapen hos vårdpersonalen ökar när det kommer till denna patientgrupp. Vidare har vårdpersonalens okunskap och stigmatiseringen kring SUD bidragit till att patienter inte tillåtits vara delaktiga i sin egen vård. / Background  People with problems caused by the use of opioids may be found in healthcare, either directly related to their use of the substance or when outreaching for other reasons. As a nurse, you have the opportunity to identify an addiction or risk use, and support the person to a change in lifestyle or to self-care (Skärsäter &amp; Wiklund, 2019). By providing care on the individual's terms, the dignity and integrity of the individual are respected, which is crucial to the individual's perception of the treatment (Svensk Sjuksköterskeförening, 2016).   Aim  The aim was to describe how people who use opioids experience the encounter with health care professionals  Method  A non-systematic literature review was performed and based on 17 scientific articles of qualitative design. The articles were searched in the CINAHL and PubMed databases using the applicable keywords. A manual search was performed. Subsequently, the quality of the articles was examined according to Sophiahemmet University's assessment data and an integrated analysis was further used, resulting in three main categories and six subcategories.   Results  The result consisted of three main categories and six subcategories. The main categories were: Patients’ experiences of Healthcare Professionals competence, Patients’ experiences of Healthcare Professionals’ attitudes and Patients’ experiences of collaboration with Healthcare Professionals. The subcategories were knowledge, communication, stigma, trust, participation and the relationship between healthcare professionals and patients. The results showed that the majority of patients experienced stigma related to their use of opioids.   Conclusions  The results of the literature review show perceived stigma around patients using opioids. Much of the stigma surrounding the patient group has been based on ignorance among health professionals about substance use disorder (SUD). A strong link between healthcare professionals' knowledge of SUD and their attitudes towards these people was recognised and it is therefore important that the knowledge of healthcare professionals increases when it comes to this patient group. Furthermore, the ignorance of healthcare professionals and the stigma surrounding SUD have contributed to patients not being allowed to participate in their own care.

Bakgrund Våld mot kvinnor, vilket innefattar intimt partnervåld (även benämnt våld i nära relationer) är ett erkänt globalt problem där cirka var tredje kvinna blir utsatt någon gång i livet. Många av dessa kvinnor har kontakt med hälso- och sjukvården under tiden de blir utsatta oavsett om det är direkt relaterat till våldet eller ej. Där har hälso- och sjukvården ett ansvar att bemöta och behandla dessa kvinnor på ett tillfredsställande och evidensbaserat sätt som upplevs emotionellt stärkande och hjälpande av den utsatta kvinnan. Syfte Syftet var att belysa den våldsutsatta kvinnans upplevelse av processen kring berättandet om intimt partnervåld för hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal. Metod En icke-systematisk litteraturöversikt gjordes i syfte att sammanställa existerande forskning i ämnet. Datainsamlingen gjordes i september 2021 genom sökningar i databaserna PubMed och CINAHL. Kvalitetsgranskning av inkluderade artiklar gjordes via Sophiahemmet högskolas bedömningsunderlag. Dataanalys gjordes i tre steg utifrån en integrerad modell där huvudteman och underteman identifierades. Resultat Under analysen av de 15 inkluderade artiklarna så återfanns tre huvudteman: upplevelse av barriärer som försvårar berättande, upplevelse under berättande om IPV samt upplevelse av förbättringsmöjligheter efter berättande. Dessa tre teman belyser olika aspekter av kvinnors upplevelse innan, under och efter berättande om intimt partnervåld för hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal. Slutsats Kvinnorna som deltagit i studierna hade många liknande upplevelser av att berätta om intimt partnervåld för hälso- och sjukvården. Många kvinnor beskrev att de upplevt mångabarriärer för att berätta om våldet och att de hade positiva och negativa upplevelser kring hur de blivit bemötta av hälso- och sjukvårdspersonal. För hälso- och sjukvården finns detstora möjligheter till förbättring i området och förslag på hur detta kan göras nämns även av kvinnorna. / Background Violence against women, one aspect of which is intimate partner violence, is a globally recognized problem which approximately one third of all women will be exposed to during their lifetime. Many of these women are in contact with the health care system during the abuse, regardless if they are seeking help for something directly related to the violence or something else. The health care system has an obligation and responsibility to treat these women in a satisfactory and evidence-based way that the women experience as emotionally strengthening and aid-providing. Aim The aim was to illustrate the battered woman's experience of the process surrounding disclosure of intimate partner violence to health care personnel. Method The method of choice was a non-systematic literature review to compile previous research of the subject matter. The collection of data was made in September 2021 through using the databases PubMed and CINAHL. The quality of the included articles was examined using Sophiahemmet University’s template for quality assessment. Data analysis was made using an integrated method where main themes and subthemes were identified. Results During the data analysis of the 15 included articles three main themes were identified: the experience of barriers hindering disclosure, the experience of disclosing intimate partner violence and the experience of opportunities for improvement after disclosure. These three themes illustrate different aspects of women’s experience before, during and after disclosure of intimate partner violence to health care personnel. Conclusions The women who participated in the studies shared many similar experiences related to disclosing intimate partner violence in health care settings. Many women described how they had overcome many different barriers to be able to disclose the violence and that they had both positive and negative experiences when it came to how health care personnel reacted and processed this information. Many improvements can be made in this area within the healthcare system and the women had different suggestions on how these improvements could be made.