Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T20:39:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Soraya Rodrigues Martins.pdf: 1224691 bytes, checksum: 40577b58a5ec77b839aa07fad18ab467 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-05-12 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico / The central subject throughout this study is the suffering in work. This study is based on psichoanalytical listening and reading, on the Psichodynamics of work and in several authors of political sociology. The clinical-theoretical analysis axis is built on selected pieces (scenes) of clinical files (1992 2005) of consultations (individual and group ones) to people which have gotten ill in work, according to the following subjects: pleasure and suffering relation, identifications, and defensive resources. This research analyses the psichodynamic processes that promote the denial of suffering, such as: the establishment of perverse pacts and the deployment of defense strategies (individual and collective ones), in order to establish the body s refuse and to avoid the thinking activity on the working context. The gathered clinical data show that the processes of getting ill in work are associated to: (1) moral violence; (2) the capturing from the subject to the perverse scene contained in working relations / O tema central desse estudo é o sofrimento no trabalho. Esse estudo está apoiado na escuta e literatura psicanalítica, na psicodinâmica do trabalho e em diferentes autores da sociologia política. O eixo de análise clínicoteórica está constituído a partir de fragmentos (cenas) selecionados de registros clínicos (1992 - 2005) de atendimentos (individual e em grupo) a pessoas que adoeceram no trabalho. A análise está configurada na perspectiva dos seguintes temas: relação prazer e sofrimento, identificações e recursos defensivos. A pesquisa procura esclarecer, em relação ao trabalhador, os processos psicodinâmicos promotores da negação do sofrimento, com destaque no estabelecimento de pactos perversos e o uso de estratégias de defesa (individuais e coletivas), a fim de promover a recusa do corpo (apercepção) e evitar a atividade de pensar sobre o contexto de trabalho. Os dados clínicos demonstram que os processos de adoecimento no trabalho estão associados a: (1) violência moral; (2) captura e alienação do sujeito em relação à cena perversa contida pelas relações de trabalho

RODRIGUES, Maiza Ferreira. Do Corpo falado ao corpo falante: interseções entre a cultura e a clínica psicanalítica. 2008. 165 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Psicologia) – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento de Psicologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, Fortaleza-CE, 2008. / Submitted by moises gomes (celtinha_malvado@hotmail.com) on 2012-03-14T19:31:36Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2008_dis_MFRodrigues.PDF: 1373406 bytes, checksum: a3b88ced723176775c4388cdfd393810 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Maria Josineide Góis(josineide@ufc.br) on 2012-03-22T12:36:02Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2008_dis_MFRodrigues.PDF: 1373406 bytes, checksum: a3b88ced723176775c4388cdfd393810 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2012-03-22T12:36:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2008_dis_MFRodrigues.PDF: 1373406 bytes, checksum: a3b88ced723176775c4388cdfd393810 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 / Men’s concern with the body is a phenomenon which has crossed the centuries and is brought up to date in the imaginary of each age of mankind. Body is not a synonym for “biologic”, taking into account that it is marked, as well, by the historical, psychic and social dimensions. From this point of view, the “body talks and is talked”. Therefore, this work takes into account the medical, hygienistic, publicitary and psychoanalistic methodological points of view about the body to comprehend, based on interviews with psychoanalysts, which are the psychic suffering’s new forms of presentation and also how they are related to the body idealization/submission nowadays. From the articulation between the interviews and the theoretical basis some categories were developed: “Psychic suffering: a meaning to the symptom” and “body and contemporary subjectivities”. This research stands out that, understood as an “ideal of completeness”, the body rules and suffers and makes the remnants of its inadequacies to the aesthetical rules of contemporaneity, based on the trinity beauty-health-youth, to be listened to within the psychoanalytical clinic. As a result, we are able to assert that the contemporary culture, with its aesthetical references, has an important rule in the so-called “new symptoms”. / A preocupação do homem com o corpo é um fenômeno que atravessa séculos e se atualiza no imaginário de cada época. O corpo não é sinônimo de biológico, tendo em vista que ele é marcado, também, pelas dimensões histórica, psíquica e social. Nesta perspectiva, o “corpo é falado e falante”. Assim, o presente trabalho toma os discursos médico, higienista, publicitário e psicanalítico sobre os corpos e, procura compreender através de entrevistas realizadas com psicanalistas, quais são as novas formas de apresentação do sofrimento psíquico, examinados a partir das demandas de análise, e suas possíveis relações com a idealização/submissão do corpo na atualidade. Da articulação entre o conteúdo das entrevistas e o referencial teórico utilizado emergiram as seguintes categorias temáticas: “Sofrimento psíquico: um sentido para o sintoma” e “Um olhar sobre o corpo e as subjetividades contemporâneas”. Este estudo ressalta que, tomado como “ideal de completude”, o corpo reina e padece e faz ressoar na clínica psicanalítica os resquícios da sua inadequação aos padrões estéticos da atualidade, sustentados na tríade beleza-saúde-juventude. A partir das entrevistas realizadas, pode-se afirmar que a cultura contemporânea, com suas referências estéticas, opera na construção dos ditos “novos sintomas”

Les personnes SDF et leurs chiens restent à la marge de la majorité des dispositifs sociaux et sont l’objet d’un contre-transfert social généralement négatif. L’objectif de ce travail est de comprendre pourquoi certaines personnes ont des chiens dans la rue. En s’appuyant sur un référentiel psychanalytique, cette recherche se fonde sur les discours d’acteurs rencontrés sur le terrain et sur des entretiens semi-directifs réalisés auprès de neuf SDF possédant au moins un chien, rencontrés au sein d’un CAARUD et d’un CHRS. Les entretiens ont été traités à l’aide de l’analyse de contenu (Bardin, 1977 ; Castarède, 1983) et d’une analyse clinique de cas (Castro, 2005 ; Pedinielli, 2005). Les résultats soulèvent un paradoxe. D’une part, le chien apparaît notamment comme un support d’étayage aux besoins du moi (Roussillon, 2008a); comme un objet de relation (Gimenez, 2002) et la relation à l’animal comme une voie d’accès à l’aire transitionnelle (Winnicott, 1971b) où œuvrent les processus d’identification projective normale et d’identification introjective (Bion, 1962, 1967). D’autre part, cette relation peut incarner une défense psychique contre une souffrance psychosociale et une stratégie de survie conduisant, paradoxalement, ces personnes à se suradapter à leurs conditions de vie délétères sans pouvoir le penser. Seules une véritable préoccupation sociétale et des prises en charges adaptées pourront soutenir le chien comme un moyen par lequel le sujet peut négocier sa souffrance psychique, son identité et développer sa subjectivité. Comprendre cette relation implique par ailleurs une approche en santé mentale, soucieuse des ressources du sujet et de son environnement. / Homeless people and their dogs remain on the fringe of most social structures and are subject to a generally negative social counter-transference. This study aims at a better understanding of why some people living on the street have a dog. Within a psychoanalytical frame of reference, this research is based on speeches of actors encountered on the field and includes semi-directive interviews conducted on nine homeless people possessing at least one dog encountered in a CAARUD and a CHRS. A content analysis (Bardin, 1977; Castarède, 1983; Pedinielli, 2009) was conducted on all these interviews. The nine dog owners were each object of a clinical case study (Castro, 2005; Pedinielli, 2005; Schauder, 2012; Thurin, 2012). The results showed a paradox. On the one hand, the dog appeared as a way of supporting the needs of the ego (Roussillon, 2008a) and as an object of relation (Gimenez, 2002). Similarly the relationship with the animal appeared as a means of gaining access to the transitional area (Winnicott, 1971b) where processes of normal projective identification and introjective identification develop (Bion, 1962, 1967). On the other hand, this relationship may embody a psychic defense against psychosocial suffering and a survival strategy paradoxically leading these people to unconsciously over-adapt to their nefarious living conditions. Only real societal concern and appropriate care can support the dog as a way for the subject to become a real subject and for him a way to soothe the psychical pain and shore up his identity. Understanding this relationship also implies using a mental health approach, taking into account the resources of the subject and his environment.