Submitted by Benjamin Liang (benliang_@yahoo.com) on 2017-12-29T20:26:35Z No. of bitstreams: 1 finanças-liang-versão FINAL.pdf: 1473193 bytes, checksum: f546881d098b6f4160c52d20cee1b999 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Vera Lúcia Mourão (vera.mourao@fgv.br) on 2017-12-29T20:40:50Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 finanças-liang-versão FINAL.pdf: 1473193 bytes, checksum: f546881d098b6f4160c52d20cee1b999 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-02T12:02:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 finanças-liang-versão FINAL.pdf: 1473193 bytes, checksum: f546881d098b6f4160c52d20cee1b999 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-12-05 / Este estudo tem como tema a aplicação de finanças comportamentais nos Fundos de Investimento Imobiliário (FIIs) brasileiros. Finanças comportamentais utilizam a psicologia para estudar o comportamento financeiro dos agentes. O comportamento manada, subtópico de finanças comportamentais analisado neste trabalho, pode ser definido como o movimento sincronizado dos preços dos ativos em uma forma exuberante e irracional que não é justificado pelos fundamentos. Tal questão é pertinente porque finanças comportamentais vai contra as premissas da economia neo-clássica, pilares para a Moderna Teoria de Finanças, das quais as mais relevantes são que os investidores são racionais e tomam decisões de forma independente. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar a existência do comportamento manada em FIIs no Brasil. Para isso, o trabalho adotou uma abordagem quantitativa, através do modelo proposto por Chang et al. (2000), baseada em pesquisa de levantamento de banco de dados disponível no software Economatica dos retornos diários dos FIIs brasileiros. Adicionalmente, o trabalho também investigou se a existência do comportamento manada é influenciada pela utilização de outros indicadores de retorno de mercado, além do retorno médio transversal proposto por Chang et al. (2000), e pela separação da amostra em dias de alta e queda do retorno. O entendimento da dinâmica desta reação é importante para mapear o comportamento dos investidores em diferentes condições de mercado. Diferente das suposições que se encontraria o comportamento manada em mercados emergentes e em produtos onde os investidores são predominantemente pessoas físicas, os resultados deste trabalho apontam para a inexistência de comportamento manada no mercado brasileiro de FIIs. / The subject of this study is the application of behavioral finance on the Brazilian Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). Behavioral finance uses psychology to study the financial behavioral of the agents. Herding effect, a subtopic of behavioral finance analyzed in this study, can be defined as an exuberant and irrational synchronized movement of asset prices which is not justified by their fundamental values. This subject is pertinent because behavioral finance defies neoclassical economics assumptions, keystones for Modern Financial Theory, of which the most relevant are that investors are rational and make decisions independently. The purpose of this study was to investigate the existence of herding effect in the Brazilian REITs. The study adopted a quantitative approach, using the model proposed by Chang et al. (2000), based on daily returns of Brazilian REITs available on the software Economatica. Additionally, the study also investigated if the existence of herding effect is influenced by using other market return indexes, other than the cross-sectional average return proposed by Chang et al. (2000), and by separating the data in days of positive and negative return. Understanding the dynamics of this reaction is important to trace the investors’ behavior under different market conditions. Contrary to the assumptions that herding effect would be found in emerging markets and in investments in which investors are mainly individuals, the results of this study indicate the absence of herding effect in the Brazilian REITs market.

『不動產證券化』是將投資不動產的行為轉變為投資證券，使投資人由原先的投資物權行為，轉為持有類似債權性質之有價證券。國內的『不動產證券化條例』於民國92年7月23日公佈實施後，不動產業者的籌資管道不再侷限於向金融機構借款或預售房屋，轉而向資本市場籌措資金，想要投資不動產的投資人，也不再需要直接購買不動產或買賣營建類股，而可利用較小額的資金獲取風險相對較低、報酬也相對較穩健的證券化商品。由於不動產證券化的實施，替不動產業者找到新的籌資管道，也為投資人增加投資不動產的途徑。 不動產投資信託是受託機構使用從投資人募集的資金投資不動產及不動產相關權利，並委託專業管理機構進行營運管理，再將收益分配給投資人的型態。目前REIT在台灣方興未艾，故本研究主要針對投資人挹注資金到不動產受益證券的績效是否優於投資大盤報酬進行研究討論。因此樣本選擇我國目前掛牌上市超過一年的5檔不動產投資信託證券，各由其發行日起至民國96年6月底時各檔報酬與大盤報酬之績效進行比較，再以夏普指標、崔納指標及詹生阿爾發指標來檢視我國5檔上市不動產信託證券與台股大盤績效之比較。研究結果顯示，我國5檔REIT現階段報酬績效較大盤報酬績效低，不過，研究結果也顯示出對於投資人而言，投資REIT是一項穩健保守，收益較為固定的投資工具，提供投資人投資組合之風險趨避之工具之一。 台灣的REIT自94年3月第一檔掛牌上市的富邦一號至今約已經過4年的時間，其市場發展及規模與日本、美國等市場相較下之規模為小，尚不足以形成特定類股（例如：金融類股、營建類股），隨著市場日益成熟，投資者更加瞭解不動產證劵化金融商品，再加上政府開放開發型不動產受益證劵後，依此類商品多元化及其發行特性可擴大不動產證劵化的市場規模，後續將可再以類股形式與大盤作績效比較。

開發型不動產證券化制度，定義上係以未開發完成之不動產之權利，透過特殊目的機構，在破產隔離之法律關係下，加以小口化、規格化，並發行有價證券表彰該權利且對外募集或私募有價證券之行為。在我國法規範之下，制度上則可包括「不動產投資信託基金投資於開發型不動產」以及「不動產資產信託以開發型不動產作為信託財產私募有價證券」二種型態。證券化對於不動產之開發而言，係一相當有利之融資管道，且同時亦提供了小額投資人投資大型不動產開發案共享獲利之機會。一般均認為開發型不動產係對於證券化需求最大之標的，然而，因開發性不動產本質上具有較已開發不動產更高之風險，故學說、實務及立法上之討論亦有眾多見解主張對於開發型不動產之證券化應予禁止或限制。 我國不動產證券化條例於民國92年公布施行時，對於開發型不動產納入規範係採所謂「分階段立法」之模式，而在民國98年1月6日始由立法院三讀通過不動產證券化條例之修正案，正式將開發型不動產納入我國不動產證券化之法制，惟現行法基於道德危險之防止、風險控管與投資人保護等考量，對於開發型不動產之證券化仍設有多數禁止或限制規範。然而，本文認為風險控管與投資人保護之並非不動產證券化制度唯一或絕對之考量；並且，制度上之限制或禁止應屬投資人保護之最後手段，若尚可透過主管機關之有效監理降低投資風險並保障投資人時，仍應儘量朝「興利同時防弊」之方向運作，不應過度限制該制度之適用範圍，否則反而將使制度之立法目的無法達成。 綜上所述，本文嘗試從開發型不動產證券化之本質、特性與優缺點出發，參酌國外相關立法例，並考量我國民情與資本市場之特色後，分析提出我國開發型不動產證券化制度之走向，主張應修法開放募集之不動產投 資信託基金得投資於一般開發型不動產。另外，針對都市更新及BOT等開發案適用不動產證券化條例之議題，本研究採取否定見解，認為應於各該法律另行立法規範此種特別法上之開發型不動產證券化，而不應以不動產證券化條例規範之。故本研究尚針對現行不動產證券化條例、都市更新條例、促進民間參與公共建設法等法律規範提出修正建議。期能提供開發型不動產證券化制度將來修法及運作上之參考。 / The “development-oriented real estate securitization” could be defined as an arrangement that subdivides and standardizes the right of real estate which is undeveloped or under development, into separate shares through a special purpose vehicle and the bankruptcy-remoteness structure, and the public offering or private placement of the real estate securities representing ownership of such shares. Under the Real Estate Securitization Act of Taiwan, R.O.C. (the “Act”), so called development-oriented real estate securitization could also be construed as either 1) fund investment of REIT into real estate(s) under development, or 2) entrusting real estate(s) under development or to be developed to a REAT. Securitization is a favorable way to finance the development project, also it provides opportunities for investors with limited fund to invest in and profit from the same. Generally, development projects have the strongest needs for securitization financing. However, due to the risks accompanied with development, there are opinions from researchers and legislators for the restriction of their securitization. Upon the Act’s promulgation in 2003, the Legislative Yuan also resolved the guidelines for future amendment that the real estate under development or to be developed shall be included upon the maturity of real estate securitization operation. However, due to legislators’ concerns on moral hazard, risk control and investor protection, the amendment promulgated in 2009 formally adapting the development-oriented real estate securitization was still quite restricted. It is held by this thesis that risk control and investor protection are not the only or supreme purposes of the Act. Meanwhile, the restriction shall be deemed the last resort of investor protection, it is to say, if the monitoring and supervision of competent authority is operable, we shall use them to protect investors instead of legislative restriction. Or some objectives of the Act would be therefore hindered. Based on the analysis of the nature, advantages, disadvantages, comparative law study of development-oriented real estate securitization, and also referring to the customs and capital market structure of Taiwan, this thesis has provided some thoughts and suggestions for other researchers and legislators’ reference. Firstly, it is held that the restriction on publicly offered REIT’s investment in development project shall be removed. Also, the urban renewal and BOT project shall not be applicable under the Act as which shall be exceptional types respectively legislated in Urban Renewal Act and the Law for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects. It is expected that the issues, thoughts and opinions raised or provided by this thesis could encourage further discussions toward the subject to ensure the sound and stable development of real estate securitization in Taiwan.

利用1995-2015年間美國房地產投資信託基金（REIT）的176個初次公開發行為樣本，本研究分析了初步公開說明書（Form S-11）資訊與REITs上市後之當天，短期和長期表現之間的關係。其中，本文著重於探討四個特別領域的相關資訊，包括管理結構，承銷商聲譽，IPO閉鎖期及管理團隊品質。 實證結果顯示，初步公開說明書（Form S-11）包含有價值的資訊，有助於REIT IPO 投資人作投資評估之使用。其中，IPO閉鎖期大於等於產業標準180天的REITs，其在上市後6個月和12個月期間的報酬率高於IPO閉鎖期小於180天的REITs。此外，與過去的IPO研究結果相似，由知名承銷商所銷售之REIT IPOs 在初次公開發行後的短期及長期表現平均優於由知名度較低之承銷商所銷售的REIT IPOs。 然而，儘管過去與REIT相關的研究普遍偏好內部管理，本研究之實證結果支持外部管理的模式。其中，實證結果顯示外部管理的REITs在初次公開發行後的短期及長期表現平均優於內部管理的REITs。 / Using a sample of 176 US REIT IPOs from 1995 to 2015, this study examines the relationship between information provided on the preliminary IPO prospectus (form S-11) and post-IPO initial, short-term and long-term performance of REITs. In particular, this paper focuses on information related to four specific areas: management structure, underwriter reputation, lock-up period, and management quality. The findings of this study suggest that form S-11 carries valuable information, and is useful to investors in evaluating REIT IPOs. The regression results indicate that REIT IPOs with a lock-up period that is at least as long as the industry standard, on average, earn higher post-IPO returns 6-month and 12-month following the IPO date. Moreover, consistent with prior IPO studies, offerings underwritten by prestigious underwriters, on average, yield better post-IPO performance than IPOs underwritten by less reputable underwriters. Yet, unlike prior REIT studies, the findings of this paper tend to favor the external management structure. The results from the sub-sample imply externally managed REITs, on average, earn higher post-IPO short-term and long-term returns than their internally managed counterpart.