This thesis presents the design for a novel haptic interface for large-format touchscreens. Techniques such as electrovibration, ultrasonic vibration, and external braked devices have been developed by other researchers to deliver haptic feedback to touchscreen users. However, these methods do not address the need for spatial constraints that only restrict user motion in the direction of the constraint. This technology gap contributes to the lack of haptic technology available for touchscreen-based upper-limb rehabilitation, despite the prevalent use of haptics in other forms of robotic rehabilitation. The goal of this thesis is to display kinesthetic haptic constraints to the touchscreen user in the form of boundaries and paths, which assist or challenge the user in interacting with the touchscreen. The presented prototype accomplishes this by steering a single wheel in contact with the display while remaining driven by the user. It employs a novel embedded force sensor, which it uses to measure the interaction force between the user and the touchscreen. The haptic response of the device is controlled using this force data to characterize user intent. The prototype can operate in a simulated free mode as well as simulate rigid and compliant obstacles and path constraints. A data architecture has been created to allow the prototype to be used as a peripheral add-on device which reacts to haptic environments created and modified on the touchscreen. The long-term goal of this work is to create a haptic system that enables a touchscreen-based rehabilitation platform for people with upper limb impairments.

Stroke is a rapidly increasing disease worldwide, and speech and language impairments are common in stroke patients. A patient’s ability to speak, listen, read and write is reduced after stroke which affects the patient's independently living and quality of life. After an initial evaluation at the hospital, the stroke survivors are referred to the stroke rehabilitation centre where the speech therapists assist them in their challenging and long journey towards speech and language relearning. To enhance the patient's quality of life and to facilitate the speech therapists, technology-enhanced systems can play an important role. However, the currently used software applications such as online speech and language relearning applications are not specifically designed after the user’s need, and the user’s participation and empowerment are compromised. Medical caregivers and stroke patients are the main stakeholders and potential users of these software applications. Therefore, this study is aimed to understand the medical caregivers and the stroke patients’ needs for technology-enhanced speech and language relearning from medical caregivers’ viewpoint.  Design science research strategy was adopted to create, implement and evaluate the artefact. Some important stakeholders such as speech therapists, a stroke specialist doctor, information and technology professionals and one stroke survivor participated in this study. Following the speech therapist’s expert opinion, an application for speech and language assessment was developed as an artefact. The application was then evaluated for technology acceptance with the speech therapists. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) was used as the theoretical foundation for making the interview questions and data analysis.  The user's requirements for software application differ from one patient to another depending upon the patient's overall health after stroke, their age, social life, the level of speech and language loss, and previous experience with technology use. Stroke is common in adults and adults like to participate in designing their relearning process; therefore, adults should be involved in deciding the learning objectives, and adult learning principles are helpful to understate their needs for speech and language relearning. Due to impaired physical and cognitive conditions, the patients need a bigger interface with larger fonts and pictures and more constructive colours than usual. Tablets with touch pens are preferred hardware. The speech therapist should have the possibility to change the exercises runtime according to the patient's abilities and stamina to do the exercises.  The technology acceptance evaluation showed that the developed application was easy to use and efficient for speech therapists. The study participants also highlighted some critical issues for better usability and technology acceptance. The application should be synchronized with speech therapists’ existing workflow and routines, and it should directly be connected to the hospital records system so that the patients’ data can easily be transferred to their journals.  The role of facilitating conditions such as proper education and training about the system, and personalised support is also important in technology acceptance. The user’s trust in the system’s security and privacy and their personal integrity were also highlighted as main determinants for technology adoption and use. To achieve better coherence between the users and technology, all the tasks/exercises and sub-tasks in the application should be designed in close collaboration with speech therapists and stroke patients. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, only one stroke survivor was interviewed in this study. However, the patients’ perspective is of utmost importance, and in future research, they will be involved in the design and development of such technology-enhanced systems.

To assess the reliability of duration of treatment time measured by physiotherapy staff in early-stage stroke patients. DESIGN: Comparison of physiotherapy staff's recording of treatment sessions and video recording. SETTING: Rehabilitation stroke unit in a general hospital. SUBJECTS: Thirty-nine stroke patients without trunk control or who were unable to stand with an erect trunk without the support of two therapists recruited to a randomized trial evaluating the Oswestry Standing Frame. Twenty-six physiotherapy staff who were involved in patient treatment. MAIN MEASURES: Contemporaneous recording by physiotherapy staff of treatment time (in minutes) compared with video recording. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Intraclass correlation with 95% confidence interval and the Bland and Altman method for assessing agreement by calculating the mean difference (standard deviation; 95% confidence interval), reliability coefficient and 95% limits of agreement for the differences between the measurements. RESULTS: The mean duration (standard deviation, SD) of treatment time recorded by physiotherapy staff was 32 (11) minutes compared with 25 (9) minutes as evidenced in the video recording. The mean difference (SD) was -6 (9) minutes (95% confidence interval (CI) -9 to -3). The reliability coefficient was 18 minutes and the 95% limits of agreement were -24 to 12 minutes. Intraclass correlation coefficient for agreement between the two methods was 0.50 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Physiotherapy staff's recording of duration of treatment time was not reliable and was systematically greater than the video recording.

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito do biofeedback (BIO) associado à terapia ocupacional (TO) e à estimulação elétrica funcional (FES) na espasticidade, movimento ativo e função do membro superior de pacientes hemiplégicos. Este estudo foi realizado na Divisão de Medicina de Reabilitação do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. Cinqüenta e nove pacientes acometidos por acidente vascular cerebral participaram do estudo por um ano; 31 receberam TO+FES duas vezes por semana + BIO uma vez por semana e 28 receberam somente TO+FES duas vezes por semana. Os pacientes foram avaliados inicialmente, após 6 meses e após 1 ano através da Avaliação da Função Manual, do Teste de Destreza Manual Minnesota, do Teste de Amplitude de Movimento e da Escala de Ashworth modificada. TO+FES+BIO melhoraram significativamente a amplitude de movimento e função dos membros superiores após 6 meses e 12 meses, quando comparado com somente TO+FES. Ambos os grupos melhoraram significativamente a espasticidade, após 6 meses e 12 meses, com diferença não significante entre eles. O uso adicional do biofeedback mostrou efeito positivo em amplitude de movimento e recuperação da função do membro superior no grupo estudado e pode representar uma importante ferramenta para a reabiltação de pacientes hemiplégicos / The objective of this was to study the effect of biofeedback (BIO) associated to occupational therapy (OT) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) on spasticity, range of motion and upper extremity function of hemiplegic patients. The study took part at the Division of Rehabilitation Medicine of the Hospital das Clínicas of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine. Fifty-nine stroke patients were studied for one year; 31 received OT+FES twice a week + BIO once-a-week and 28 received only OT+FES twice-aweek. The patients were evaluated initially, after six months and after one year with the use of Manual Function Evaluation, Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test, Range of Joint Motion Test and Modified Ashworth Scale. OT+FES+BIO significantly improved range of motion and upper extremity function after 6 months and 12 months, compared to only OT+FES. Both groups showed significant improvement of spasticity, after 6 months and 12 months, with no significant difference between them. The additional use of BIO had a positive effect in range of motion and function recovery of upper extremity in the studied group and may represent an important therapeutic tool for stroke rehabilitation

Made available in DSpace on 2015-07-22T20:49:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2008-07-30 / Introdução: A Terapia por Contensão Induzida (TCI) ou Constraint-induced Movement Therapy é uma intervenção que tem como objetivo a recuperação do membro superior afetado de pacientes hemiparéticos devido à lesão encefálica. É aplicada através de um tratamento intensivo durante duas semanas consecutivas, com seis horas diárias de exercícios e uso de uma tipóia, durante 90% do dia, no membro superior não-afetado. O ganho motor da TCI é validado através das escalas funcionais de avaliação do membro superior (EFAMS) Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) e Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Objetivo: Realizar uma análise comparativa entre ambas as EFAMS. Métodos: As EFAMS foram aplicadas em quatro períodos distintos em 17 pacientes com o diagnóstico de acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico, que realizaram individualmente a TCI durante duas semanas com seis horas diárias de exercícios e após foi feito uma análise comparativa entre as EFAMS em relação ao tempo de aplicação, tempo de preparação da mesa, reprodutibilidade e análise fatorial. Resultados: Diminuição no escore da EFAMS WMFT e aumento no escore da EFAMS ARAT pós TCI, não houve variação significativa dos escores entre os períodos pré e pós TCI das EFAMS, diminuição do tempo de preparação da mesa e aplicação de ambas as EFAMS pós TCI e a análise fatorial detectou dois e três componentes qualitativos na EFAMS ARAT e WMFT, respectivamente. Conclusões: Ambas as EFAMS conseguem mensurar o ganho motor da TCI, com alta reprodutibilidade, sendo que o tempo de aplicação e preparação da mesa é menor na EFAMS ARAT e somente a EFAMS WMFT apresenta o componente qualitativo “lateralidade”. / The Constraint-induced Movement therapy (CIMT) is an intervention which main goal is the recuperation of affected upper extremity in hemiparetic patients with acquired encephalic lesion. Its protocol consists by an intensive treatment of two consecutive weeks with six hours of exercises and the wear of arm sling in non affected upper arm during 90% of daily activities. The motor improvement of CIMT is validity by the functional evaluation scales of upper extremity (FESUE) Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Objective: Realize a comparative analysis between both scales. Methodology: The FESUE had been applied during four different times in 17 patients with diagnosis of ischemic stroke, who made individually the CIMT during two weeks and six hours of exercises and after made a comparative analysis between the FESUE by time for application, time for preparation of the table, reproducibility and factorial analysis. Results: Decreased in score of FESUE WMFT and increased in score of FESUE ARAT after CIMT, no significant variation in the score between before and after CIMT of the FESUE, decreased in time to preparation the table and application of FESUE in both scales and the factorial analysis showed two and three qualitative components in FESUE ARAT and WMFT, respectively. Conclusions: Both FESUE can measure the therapeutics gains of CIMT, with high reproducibility, but the time for application and preparation of the table are minor in FESUE ARAT and only the FESUE WMFT shows the qualitative component “laterality”. / TEDE / BV UNIFESP: Teses e dissertações

O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito do biofeedback (BIO) associado à terapia ocupacional (TO) e à estimulação elétrica funcional (FES) na espasticidade, movimento ativo e função do membro superior de pacientes hemiplégicos. Este estudo foi realizado na Divisão de Medicina de Reabilitação do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. Cinqüenta e nove pacientes acometidos por acidente vascular cerebral participaram do estudo por um ano; 31 receberam TO+FES duas vezes por semana + BIO uma vez por semana e 28 receberam somente TO+FES duas vezes por semana. Os pacientes foram avaliados inicialmente, após 6 meses e após 1 ano através da Avaliação da Função Manual, do Teste de Destreza Manual Minnesota, do Teste de Amplitude de Movimento e da Escala de Ashworth modificada. TO+FES+BIO melhoraram significativamente a amplitude de movimento e função dos membros superiores após 6 meses e 12 meses, quando comparado com somente TO+FES. Ambos os grupos melhoraram significativamente a espasticidade, após 6 meses e 12 meses, com diferença não significante entre eles. O uso adicional do biofeedback mostrou efeito positivo em amplitude de movimento e recuperação da função do membro superior no grupo estudado e pode representar uma importante ferramenta para a reabiltação de pacientes hemiplégicos / The objective of this was to study the effect of biofeedback (BIO) associated to occupational therapy (OT) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) on spasticity, range of motion and upper extremity function of hemiplegic patients. The study took part at the Division of Rehabilitation Medicine of the Hospital das Clínicas of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine. Fifty-nine stroke patients were studied for one year; 31 received OT+FES twice a week + BIO once-a-week and 28 received only OT+FES twice-aweek. The patients were evaluated initially, after six months and after one year with the use of Manual Function Evaluation, Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test, Range of Joint Motion Test and Modified Ashworth Scale. OT+FES+BIO significantly improved range of motion and upper extremity function after 6 months and 12 months, compared to only OT+FES. Both groups showed significant improvement of spasticity, after 6 months and 12 months, with no significant difference between them. The additional use of BIO had a positive effect in range of motion and function recovery of upper extremity in the studied group and may represent an important therapeutic tool for stroke rehabilitation

No description available.

Die technikgestützte Rehabilitation wird im Rahmen der Schlaganfallbehandlung als therapeutisches Verfahren zur Wiedererlangung der motorischen Bewegungsfähigkeit oberer Extremitäten eingesetzt. Zudem wächst durch die Digitalisierung des Alltags und den demographischen Wandel das Forschungsinteresse an telerehabilitativen Behandlungskonzepten, die die Schlaganfallversorgung durch den Einsatz von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien ergänzt sowie erweitert. Dabei wird das Ziel verfolgt, einen dauerhaften und nachhaltigen Therapieerfolg zu ermöglichen. Durch die Möglichkeit zur Vernetzung der stationären sowie ambulanten Rehabilitation mit der Nachsorge soll eine kontinuierliche, über die notwendigen Gesundheitssektoren der Schlaganfallbehandlung hinweg, eine Begleitung der Patient:innen durch die betreuenden Behandler:innen gewährleistet werden. Der erfolgreiche Einsatz entsprechender Therapiesysteme in der Nachsorge verlangt einen benutzerzentrierten Entwicklungsprozess. Ausgangspunkt sollten die von den beteiligten Nutzer:innengruppen gestellten Anforderungen an derartige Systeme sein. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit besteht darin, auf verschiedene Aspekte des Technikeinsatzes und die damit einhergehende Zufriedenheit sowie Akzeptanz der technikgestützten Schlaganfallrehabilitation und Nachsorge der beteiligten Nutzer:innengruppen einzugehen. Eine Kombination aus drei explorativen Untersuchungen, einer Grundlagenbefragung und zwei empirischen Feldstudien, analysieren abhängige Faktoren des Technikeinsatzes, um entsprechende Auswirkungen auf die Entwicklung und Praxis abzuleiten. Im Rahmen der Grundlagenbefragung werden das Nutzungsverhalten sowie die Nutzungsbereitschaft von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien von Schlaganfallpatient:innen und Behandler:innen analysiert. Daraus abgeleitet werden notwendige Ressourcen, die bereitgestellt werden müssen, um technikgestützte Verfahren sowohl in der Rehabilitation als auch Nachsorge zu ermöglichen. Die erste empirische Studie untersucht Veränderungen im Nutzer:innenerleben, der Zufriedenheit und Technikakzeptanz, zwischen zwei Therapiegeräten in der klassischen Versorgung mit zwei experimentellen Therapiesystemen mit visuellem und zum Teil haptischem Feedback. In einer zweiten Feldstudie werden zeitbezogene Veränderungen untersucht, die bei längerfristiger Nutzung über zehn Behandlungseinheiten mit dem Bi-Manu-Interact auftreten können. / Using technically assisted rehabilitation in stroke treatment as a therapeutic procedure to regain motor mobility of upper extremities. In addition, the digitalisation of everyday life and demographic change are increasing research interest in telerehabilitative treatment concepts, which supplement and expand stroke care by using information and communication technologies. The aim is to achieve lasting and sustainable therapeutic success. The possibility of integrating in-patient and out-patient rehabilitation with aftercare is intended to ensure that patients are continuously accompanied by the attending physicians across the necessary health sectors of stroke treatment. The successful use of appropriate therapy systems in aftercare requires a user-centered development process. The starting point should be the requirements placed on such systems by the user groups involved. The aim of the present study is to deal with different aspects of the use of technology and the associated satisfaction as well as acceptance of the technology-supported stroke rehabilitation and aftercare of the participating user groups. A combination of three explorative studies, a basic survey and two empirical field studies analyse dependent factors of the use of technology in order to determine corresponding effects on development and practice. The basic survey analyses the usage behaviour and readiness of stroke patients and therapists to use information and communication technologies. From this, resources are derived to enable technology-supported procedures in rehabilitation and aftercare. The first empirical field study investigates changes in user experience, satisfaction and technology acceptance between two therapy devices in classical care with two experimental therapy systems with visual and partly haptic feedback. The second field study investigates time-related changes that can occur with long-term use of more than ten therapy units with the therapy system "Bi-Manu-Interact".

Introduction: Les professionnels de la réadaptation de l’accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) ont la responsabilité d’offrir des services de qualité ancrés dans les données probantes. Cette responsabilité relève du rôle d’érudit selon le cadre de compétences CanMEDS. Quelle place occupe par ce rôle en clinique? Objectifs : 1) Documenter les perceptions, expériences et vécus en lien avec le rôle d’érudit chez les professionnels de la réadaptation de l’AVC. 2) Identifier les facteurs perçus comme facilitant ou entravant ce rôle clinique. Méthodologie : Étude qualitative exploratoire d’orientation phénoménologique par entrevue individuelle de professionnels travaillant en réadaptation de l’AVC depuis au moins deux ans. Codification des verbatim avec le logiciel QDA-Miner. Résultats : Les participants (âge moyen 40,7 ans ± 11,2) sont majoritairement des femmes (9/11) et leur expérience de travail en AVC varie de 3 à 23 ans. Les principaux thèmes identifiés sont: 1) Les savoirs tacites sont perçus comme synonyme du rôle d’érudit; 2) L’expérience de travail et l’intuition clinique amènent confiance et confort dans les pratiques; 3) L’insatisfaction quant au manque de partage des connaissances; 4) L’importance de la diversification dans les tâches cliniques et 5) La pratique réflexive est peu développée. Les quatre facteurs influençant le rôle d’érudit sont: la motivation; l’incident critique, les stagiaires et le manque de temps. Conclusion : Le rôle d’érudit apparaît peu valorisé par les participants. Il existe un écart entre le rôle d’érudit tel que décrit dans les cadres de compétences et la façon dont il est actualisé en pratique clinique. / Introduction: Stroke rehabilitation clinicians are responsible for offering quality services through evidence-based practice. This responsibility springs from the Scholar Role described in the CanMEDS framework. How is this role fulfilled in the clinical setting? Objective: 1) To explore the perceptions, experiences, and attitudes of rehabilitation professionals regarding their role as Scholar in their practice; 2) To identify factors that facilitate or hinder this role as scholar. Methods: Qualitative design with a phenomenological orientation. Face-to-face interviews were conducted among professional with at least two years experience in stroke rehabilitation using a pre-tested interview guide; Verbatims were coded using QDA-Miner software. Results: Mean age of the participants was 40.7 years ± 11.2. Participants were mostly women (n = 9/11). The role of scholar emerged as not having great value for the participants. Main themes emerging from the analysis include the following: 1) emphasis on tacit knowledge; 2) experience and clinical intuition leading to self-confidence and comfort in clinical practice; 3) dissatisfaction with the lack of knowledge sharing among clinicians; 4) importance of diversifying clinical tasks; 5) underdevelopment of reflective practice. The four factors influencing the role of scholar: motivation, critical incident as a trigger of reflective practice and interns facilitating reflective practice; lack of time acted as an obstacle. Conclusion: There is a discrepancy between the role of the scholar as described by the canMEDS framework and how it is actualized in clinical practice.

Introduction: Les professionnels de la réadaptation de l’accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) ont la responsabilité d’offrir des services de qualité ancrés dans les données probantes. Cette responsabilité relève du rôle d’érudit selon le cadre de compétences CanMEDS. Quelle place occupe par ce rôle en clinique? Objectifs : 1) Documenter les perceptions, expériences et vécus en lien avec le rôle d’érudit chez les professionnels de la réadaptation de l’AVC. 2) Identifier les facteurs perçus comme facilitant ou entravant ce rôle clinique. Méthodologie : Étude qualitative exploratoire d’orientation phénoménologique par entrevue individuelle de professionnels travaillant en réadaptation de l’AVC depuis au moins deux ans. Codification des verbatim avec le logiciel QDA-Miner. Résultats : Les participants (âge moyen 40,7 ans ± 11,2) sont majoritairement des femmes (9/11) et leur expérience de travail en AVC varie de 3 à 23 ans. Les principaux thèmes identifiés sont: 1) Les savoirs tacites sont perçus comme synonyme du rôle d’érudit; 2) L’expérience de travail et l’intuition clinique amènent confiance et confort dans les pratiques; 3) L’insatisfaction quant au manque de partage des connaissances; 4) L’importance de la diversification dans les tâches cliniques et 5) La pratique réflexive est peu développée. Les quatre facteurs influençant le rôle d’érudit sont: la motivation; l’incident critique, les stagiaires et le manque de temps. Conclusion : Le rôle d’érudit apparaît peu valorisé par les participants. Il existe un écart entre le rôle d’érudit tel que décrit dans les cadres de compétences et la façon dont il est actualisé en pratique clinique. / Introduction: Stroke rehabilitation clinicians are responsible for offering quality services through evidence-based practice. This responsibility springs from the Scholar Role described in the CanMEDS framework. How is this role fulfilled in the clinical setting? Objective: 1) To explore the perceptions, experiences, and attitudes of rehabilitation professionals regarding their role as Scholar in their practice; 2) To identify factors that facilitate or hinder this role as scholar. Methods: Qualitative design with a phenomenological orientation. Face-to-face interviews were conducted among professional with at least two years experience in stroke rehabilitation using a pre-tested interview guide; Verbatims were coded using QDA-Miner software. Results: Mean age of the participants was 40.7 years ± 11.2. Participants were mostly women (n = 9/11). The role of scholar emerged as not having great value for the participants. Main themes emerging from the analysis include the following: 1) emphasis on tacit knowledge; 2) experience and clinical intuition leading to self-confidence and comfort in clinical practice; 3) dissatisfaction with the lack of knowledge sharing among clinicians; 4) importance of diversifying clinical tasks; 5) underdevelopment of reflective practice. The four factors influencing the role of scholar: motivation, critical incident as a trigger of reflective practice and interns facilitating reflective practice; lack of time acted as an obstacle. Conclusion: There is a discrepancy between the role of the scholar as described by the canMEDS framework and how it is actualized in clinical practice.