Spelling suggestions: "subject:"substantial equality"" "subject:"ubstantial equality""
1 |
OS REFLEXOS DO ESTATUTO DA PESSOA COM DEFICIÊNCIA (LEI N. 13.146-15) NO SISTEMA BRASILEIRO DE INCAPACIDADE CIVIL.Trindade, Ivan Gustavo Junio Santos 14 March 2016 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-10T10:47:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
IVAN GUSTAVO JUNIO SANTOS TRINDADE.pdf: 1386917 bytes, checksum: 8e7aff1b3c6e2338d01c7c463fdfebfb (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-03-14 / After the ratification in 2009 by Brazil of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities, published in 2007, the legal systematic regard to the theory of disability
and its consequences suffered intense modifications. The Brazilian Civil Code,
published in 2002, despite the ability to relate to the constitutional system of
protection of human dignity, not encompassed in its content the admission of full
autonomy of persons with disabilities. Nevertheless, the Federative Republic of Brazil
became a signatory to the International Treaty on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities, which promoted a paradigm shift on the focus of the concept of disability,
which, of course, sparked a significant impact on the study of theories of disabilities
and its corollaries. Brazilian law inclusion of people with disabilities (Law no. 13,146 -
2015), called the Disabled status, in obedience to the fundamental principles of the
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, raised transformation in the
parental system of disability and, consequently, the procedural issues relating to the
protection of the disabled person. The changes brought about by People with
Disabilities Statute generated sequels in the Civil Law inherent institutions such as
marriage and interdiction, and Civil Procedure, like the reflections in prescription and
decay and the institution of the new decision-making tool supported. / Após a ratificação em 2009 por parte do Brasil da Convenção sobre os Direitos da
Pessoa com Deficiência, editada em 2007, a sistemática jurídica atinente à teoria
das incapacidades e seus desdobramentos sofreu modificações intensas. O Código
Civil brasileiro, editado em 2002, em que pese a aptidão para se relacionar com a
sistemática constitucional de proteção da dignidade da pessoa humana, não
abarcou em seu conteúdo a admissão da integral autonomia das pessoas com
deficiência. A despeito disso, a República Federativa do Brasil se tornou signatária
do Tratado Internacional sobre os Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência, sendo
promovida uma mudança paradigmática sobre o enfoque do conceito de deficiência,
o que, naturalmente, deflagrou consequências significativas no estudo das teorias
das incapacidades e seus corolários. A lei brasileira de inclusão da pessoa com
deficiência (Lei nº. 13.146-2015), denominada de Estatuto da Pessoa com
Deficiência, em obediência aos preceitos fundamentais da Convenção sobre os
Direitos das Pessoas com Deficiência, suscitou transformação no sistema pátrio de
incapacidade e, por consequência, nas questões processuais relativas à proteção da
pessoa com deficiência. As mudanças trazidas pelo Estatuto da Pessoa com
Deficiência geraram sequelas em institutos inerentes ao Direito Civil, como o
casamento e interdição, e Processual Civil, a exemplo dos reflexos na prescrição e
decadência e na instituição do novo instrumento de tomada de decisão apoiada.
|
2 |
Constitutionnalisme et exclusion : critique du regard français sur le modèle canadien de pluralisme / Constitutionalism and ExclusionBlanc, Nicolas 08 December 2014 (has links)
La recherche vise à mettre en évidence les relations entre constitutionnalisme et exclusion dans le cadre d’unecritique du regard français sur le modèle canadien de pluralisme. La problématique de l’exclusion, être altériséen raison de l’identité du droit, naît des silences de la comparaison différentielle France – Canada. Une critiqueidentitaire permet de déplacer la triple dialectique de la comparaison : positivisme c. pluralisme, universalisme c.différentialisme et républicanisme c. libéralisme pluraliste. La problématique de l’orientation identitaire du droitest commune aux deux systèmes juridiques. Aussi, la recherche est relative à l’identité du constitutionnalisme.L’exclusion se définit comme le décalage entre l’orientation identitaire du constitutionnalisme et l’identité ducorps du sujet. La méthode d’analyse proposée, afin de traiter de l’exclusion en droit, et déplacer la comparaison,est tripartite : mettre en évidence l’orientation identitaire du constitutionnalisme, en identifier la structureidentitaire, pour, enfin, en déterminer les étrangers ou « Autres. » La recherche vise à déplacer la comparaison enproduisant une phénoménologie de l’exclusion constitutionnelle, ou « dehors constitutifs, » avec une typologiedes étrangers du droit. La démonstration sera faite dans le cadre des conflits de la religion et de l’orientationsexuelle démontrant l’orientation blanche, hétéropatriarcale et hétéronormative du droit constitutionnel. / This research intends on proving how constitutionalism and exclusion collide one against the other through acritique of the french gaze on a supposedly canadian model of pluralism. The negative comparison’s silencesbetween France and Canada gave birth to this question of how one is being excluded and othered based on theidentity of constitutional law. This critique, that focuses on identities, is shifting those three dialectics supportingthe aforementioned negative comparison : positivism v. pluralism, universalism v. differentialism, republicanismv. liberal pluralism. France and Canada share the issue of how legal reality is oriented toward specific identities.This research, then, is a critique of constitutionalism identities. Exclusion is defined as the gap between theorientation of law’s identities and the bodily reality of its subjects. The analytical tool developed here to tackleexclusion in law has three steps : shedding light on the orientations of constitutionalism, its identity structure,and its constitutional Others. This research purports on turning scholars’ critical gaze towards thisphenomenology of constitutional exclusion, its « constitutive outside, » by deciphering a typology ofconstitutional Others. This will be so through the collisions of freedom of religion and sexual orientation.Constitutionalism is per se oriented towards the ascendency of whiteness, patriarcalism and heteronormativity.
|
Page generated in 0.0608 seconds