Dieser Sammelband bringt alle Vorträge des in November 1995 von der Musikakademie und der Theologischen Fakultät in Ljubljana organisierten Premrl-Symposiums sowie des in Premrls Geburtsort Podananos veranstalteten Symposiums.

No description available.

The goal of this thesis is ultimately to answer the two questions raised and left unresolved in Plato’s Protagoras: What is virtue? Is virtue teachable? Following the dramatic order of Plato’s dialogues as outlined by Catherine Zuckert, I intend to show that the Meno returns to the issues raised and left unresolved in the Protagoras, but now with the idea of recollection. My intention is to look at how the idea of recollection, developed and associated with eros in the intervening dialogues, can help explain the nature of virtue and its teachability. I believe that we can come to answer both questions, “What is virtue?” and “Is virtue teachable?” posed in the Protagoras and the Meno by drawing on the ideas of anamnesis and eros as they appear in the Meno, Phaedrus, and Symposium.

The goal of this thesis is ultimately to answer the two questions raised and left unresolved in Plato’s Protagoras: What is virtue? Is virtue teachable? Following the dramatic order of Plato’s dialogues as outlined by Catherine Zuckert, I intend to show that the Meno returns to the issues raised and left unresolved in the Protagoras, but now with the idea of recollection. My intention is to look at how the idea of recollection, developed and associated with eros in the intervening dialogues, can help explain the nature of virtue and its teachability. I believe that we can come to answer both questions, “What is virtue?” and “Is virtue teachable?” posed in the Protagoras and the Meno by drawing on the ideas of anamnesis and eros as they appear in the Meno, Phaedrus, and Symposium.

No description available.

Die heutige Welt der Menschen wird durch große Dynamik geprägt. Eine Vielzahl verschiedener Prozesse entfaltet sich parallel und teilweise auf unsichtbare Weise miteinander verbunden. Nimmt man z.B. den Prozess der Globalisierung: Hier erleben wir ein exponentielles Wachstum der internationalen Verknüpfungen von der Ebene einzelner Menschen und bis zur Ebene der Kulturen. Solche Verknüpfungen führen uns zum Begriff der Komplexität. Diese wird oft als Produkt der Anzahl der Elemente eines Systems mal Umfang der Verknüpfungen im System verstanden. In anderen Worten, die Welt wird zunehmend komplexer, denn die Verknüpfungen nehmen zu. Komplexität wiederum ist ein Begriff für etwas unverstandenes, unkontrollierbares, etwas unbestimmtes. Genau wie bei einem Menschen: Aus einer Zelle wächst ein Mensch, dessen Verhalten wir im Detail nur schwer vorhersagen können. Immerhin besitzt sein Gehirn 1011 Elemente (Zellen). Wenn also diese dynamischen sozialen Prozesse zu höherer Komplexität führen, müssen wir auch mehr Unbestimmtheit erwarten. Es bleibt zu Hoffen, dass die Unbestimmtheit nicht existenzielle Grundlagen betrifft. Was die Komplexität der Technik angeht, so versucht man hier im Gegensatz zu den gesellschaftlichen Unsicherheiten die Unsicherheiten zu erfassen und gezielt mit ihnen umzugehen. Das gilt für alle Bereiche, ob nun Naturgefahrenmanagement, beim Bau und Betrieb von Kernkraftwerken, im Bauwesen oder in der Schifffahrt. Und so verschieden diese Fachgebiete auch scheinen mögen, die an diesem Symposium teilnehmen: Sie haben erkannt, das verantwortungsvoller Umgang mit Technik einer Berücksichtigung der Unbestimmtheit bedarf. Soweit sind wir in gesellschaftlichen Prozessen noch nicht. Wünschenswert wäre, dass in einigen Jahren nicht nur Bauingenieure, Maschinenbauer, Mathematiker oder Schiffsbauer an einem solchen Probabilistik- Symposium teilnehmen, sondern auch Soziologen, Politiker oder Manager... (aus dem Vorwort) --- HINWEIS: Das Volltextdokument besteht aus einzelnen Beiträgen mit separater Seitenzählung. / PREFACE: The world today is shaped by high dynamics. Multitude of processes evolves parallel and partly connected invisible. For example, the globalisation is such a process. Here one can observe the exponential growing of connections form the level of single humans to the level of cultures. Such connections guide as to the term complexity. Complexity is often understood as product of the number of elements and the amount of connections in the system. In other words, the world is going more complex, if the connections increase. Complexity itself is a term for a system, which is not fully understood, which is partly uncontrollable and indeterminated: exactly as humans. Growing from a single cell, the humans will show latter a behaviour, which we can not predict in detail. After all, the human brain consists of 1011 elements (cells). If the social dynamical processes yield to more complexity, we have to accept more indetermination. Well, one has to hope, that such an indetermination does not affect the basic of human existence. If we look at the field of technology, we can detect, that here indetermination or uncertainty is often be dealt with explicitly. This is valid for natural risk management, for nuclear engineering, civil engineering or for the design of ships. And so different the fields are which contribute to this symposium for all is valid: People working in this field have realised, that a responsible usage of technology requires consideration of indetermination and uncertainty. This level is not yet reached in the social sciences. It is the wish of the organisers of this symposium, that not only civil engineers, mechanical engineers, mathematicians, ship builders take part in this symposium, but also sociologists, managers and even politicians. Therefore there is still a great opportunity to grow for this symposium. Indetermination does not have to be negative: it can also be seen as chance.

The goal of this thesis is ultimately to answer the two questions raised and left unresolved in Plato’s Protagoras: What is virtue? Is virtue teachable? Following the dramatic order of Plato’s dialogues as outlined by Catherine Zuckert, I intend to show that the Meno returns to the issues raised and left unresolved in the Protagoras, but now with the idea of recollection. My intention is to look at how the idea of recollection, developed and associated with eros in the intervening dialogues, can help explain the nature of virtue and its teachability. I believe that we can come to answer both questions, “What is virtue?” and “Is virtue teachable?” posed in the Protagoras and the Meno by drawing on the ideas of anamnesis and eros as they appear in the Meno, Phaedrus, and Symposium.

Thesis--Kyōto Daigaku. / Bibliography: p. 166-167.

Proefschrift--Utricht. / "Stellingen": p. [i-iii] Bibliography: p. ix-xii.

BRAZIL, Vicente Thiago Freire. A temática do homoerotismo e do feminino nos cinco primeiros encômios do banquete platônico. 2017. 206f. Tese (Doutorado) - Universidade Federal do Ceará, Pós-Graduação em Filosofia, Fortaleza (CE), 2017. / Submitted by sebastiao barroso (jrwizard2209@hotmail.com) on 2017-09-25T18:36:55Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2017_tese_vtfbrazil.pdf: 1818636 bytes, checksum: 8d4662a33bcde5523ad45303e5c01416 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Márcia Araújo (marcia_m_bezerra@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-09-26T11:14:21Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2017_tese_vtfbrazil.pdf: 1818636 bytes, checksum: 8d4662a33bcde5523ad45303e5c01416 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-09-26T11:14:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2017_tese_vtfbrazil.pdf: 1818636 bytes, checksum: 8d4662a33bcde5523ad45303e5c01416 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017 / This research aims at the object of the analysis and discussion of the first five speeches that comprise one of the most celebrated Platonic dialogues, The Symposium. Among the justifications that can be presented for the detailed examination of these praises is the fact that they bring a strong proleptic load with respect to the panegyric of Socrates; the treatment that tradition grants them, in a general way, relegates them to an investigative inattention. This is due to the strong centrality that is attributed to the speech of the philosopher, in contraposition to the superficial judgement which is made of the praises of the others as non-philosophical enunciations. However, there is a huge wealth conteudal that Plato deposits in each of the praises of Eros proferred by the symposiasts preceding the philosopher of Athens. Admitting this wealth, the present work will focus on the analysis of two very striking aspects in the culture of classical Greece, which seem to oppose each other. However, in the course of dialogue, they undergo a resignification process through a philosophical approach promoted by Plato. It's homoeroticism and feminine. It will be demonstrated that during the development of the dramatic scene of The Symposium, these themes, of public domain and, perhaps so, impregnated by the doxa, are revisited by Plato through a philosophical education. Finally, in a continuous movement throughout this survey, it will become apparent that the text of The Symposium is also a platonic effort to denounce, take ownership and overcome the theses sophisties – especially those concerning the paideia sophistry –, richly present in all the top five praises to Eros and therefore as an inevitable consequence, as will be pointed out, also in the speech of Socrates. / A presente pesquisa tem como objetivo central a análise e discussão dos cinco primeiros discursos que compõem um dos mais célebres diálogos platônicos, O Banquete. Dentre as justificativas que podem ser apresentadas para o exame pormenorizado desses encômios está o fato de que os mesmos trazem consigo uma forte carga proléptica com relação ao panegírico de Sócrates; o trato que a tradição concede aos mesmos, de maneira geral, relega-os a uma desatenção investigativa. Isto se deve à forte centralidade que se atribui à fala do filósofo, em contraposição ao julgamento superficial que se faz dos encômios dos demais convivas como enunciados não-filosóficos. Entretanto, há uma enorme riqueza conteudal que Platão deposita em cada um dos louvores a Eros proferidos pelos simposiastas que antecedem o Filósofo de Atenas. Admitindo essa riqueza, o presente trabalho privilegiará a análise de dois aspectos muito marcantes na cultura da Grécia Clássica, os quais parecem opor-se entre si. Contudo, no decorrer do diálogo, passam por um processo de ressignificação por meio de uma abordagem filosófica promovida por Platão. Trata-se do homoerotismo e do feminino. Demonstrar-se-á que, durante o desenvolvimento da cena dramática do Banquete, estas temáticas, de domínio público e, talvez por isso, impregnadas pela doxa, são revisitadas por Platão através de uma educação filosófica. Por fim, num movimento contínuo durante toda esta pesquisa, tornar-se-á evidente que o texto do Banquete constitui-se, também, como um esforço platônico de denunciar, apropriar-se e superar as teses sofísticas – de modo especial aquelas relativas à paidéia sofística –, ricamente presentes em todos os cinco primeiros elogios a Eros e, por isso, como consequência inevitável, como será apontado, também no discurso de Sócrates.