Late 18th Britain was experiencing the beginnings of social unrest fueled in part by the American and French Revolutions. The established two class social system was being challenged by the emergence of a middle class seeking something more than traditional agricultural work. While they subscribed to very different philosophies of mind, both Stewart and Mill saw the solution to potential social chaos in a revised educational system that would open the doors to a peaceful development of that middle class. What the new educational system should look like was a direct function of the theory of mind held by the two protagonists. Employing an enlarged Foucaultian framework, this dissertation examines the various forces at work in transforming British society as it prepares for the unanticipated forthcoming industrial revolution. / Ph. D.

Change all but defines the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in American history. In the midst of these tumultuous times, America experienced a revolution of reform meant to develop and enhance all areas of life from politics to society, which led historians to call this time period the Progressive Era. However, the progress of the nation was not always the winning ideology. At times, the backlash against progressive ideas restrained innovators and caused them to disappear into the mires of history. One reformer who experienced this backlash was Fred Morrow Fling. Although he was an internationally-known historian, he remained a rather invisible history education reformer because his ideas were overshadowed by the enormous human events of his lifetime, including the work of other reformers and his unexpected death in 1934. As a trained scientific historian, Fling was a pioneer of historical method and the application of what became known as “source method” in the classroom and he espoused a radical approach to critical education that sought to embed a scientific approach into the teaching of history that has clear parallels with best teaching practices today. Thus, using traditional historical research methods and archival records from both Bowdoin College and the University of Nebraska, the author presents in this dissertation a biographical portrait of Fling’s life. Through the analysis of these historical documents and the evidence of his life recorded in publications and the public press, this portrait will serve to uncover both how Fred Morrow Fling’s conception of history education influenced his practice as a history professor and researcher and how Fred Morrow Fling’s philosophy of education formed and developed over his lifetime. Specifically, this author will consider: how can the philosophy of history education created by Fred Morrow Fling inform our current history education practices today? By investigating Fling’s life, researchers will finally be able to acknowledge Fling’s myriad contributions to history education, which are vital to composing a fuller picture of the history of social studies education.

Notre thèse a pour but de proposer un modèle d’intelligibilité de la pensée éthique des éducateurs scolaires, obtenu par la mobilisation de concepts issus de la philosophie morale. Pour cela, nous nous appuyons en particulier sur la notion de minimalisme moral qui permet de prendre en compte le fait que certaines postures professionnelles, compatibles avec l’action institutionnelle, relèvent de principes moraux habituellement non reconnus comme valides dans un cadre scolaire, comme par exemple le principe de non-nuisance.Nos réflexions reposent sur une définition de l’acte d’éducation en contexte scolaire conçu comme contribution à une imputation partagée des responsabilités pour permettre l’accès au savoir des élèves. Ces responsabilités relèvent en effet à la fois et de façon toujours située, de l’acteur institutionnel, mais aussi de l’élève lui-même ainsi que des autres personnes qui assurent son éducation et en particulier ses parents. La compétence de l’éducateur scolaire dépend donc de sa capacité à comprendre et utiliser les apports de chaque acteur en fonction des moments éducatifs. Cette conception nous permet de saisir l’intensité de la porosité entre l’école et un monde où le pluralisme axiologique n’est pas l’exception mais la règle.De l’analyse d’entretiens avec des professionnels et à l’aide d’un cadre théorique permettant d’envisager la possibilité d’un recours au minimalisme pour éduquer scolairement dans un mode pluraliste, nous déduisons plusieurs résultats permettant de proposer un modèle de compréhension des repères moraux mobilisés par les éducateurs. Ce modèle permet en particulier de faire apparaître que les positionnements éthiques n’ont pas vocation à être fondés sur une liste finie de principes ou de valeurs, mais sont le produit d’une imagination morale s’attachant à prendre en compte les spécificités des situations. S'impose alors une philosophie du courage, défini comme capacité à l’exercice du jugement dans des situations limites sur le plan éthique, philosophie qui permet de penser l’action dans un environnement éthique complexe et toujours changeant. Le courage d’éduquer est donc pour nous ce qui permet le dépassement, dans des conditions que l’éducateur reconnait comme spécifiques, d’une morale scolaire de sens commun pour laquelle les solutions éthiques préexisteraient aux problèmes. / Our thesis aims at proposing a scheme of understanding of the ethical thought of educators in a school environment, built on the use of concepts originally used to speak of moral philosophy. Hence we base our analysis more specifically on the notion of moral minimalism, a theory which allows to take into account the fact that some professional positions, acceptable as regards the institutional action, arise from moral principle which are normally not considered valid in a school context, like for example, the “no harm done” principle. Our reflexion is based on a definition of the educational action in a school context, thought as a contribution to a sharing of responsibilities aiming at allowing students to have access to knowledge. These responsibilities both –and in a very precise way-arise from the institutional actor and the student, together with the people who are in charge of his education, namely his parents. The school educator’s ability hence depends on his capacity to understand and use the contribution of each actor according to the different educational moments. This belief allows us to understand the importance of the interaction between school and a world in which axiological pluralism is the law. From the discussions we had with professionals and with the help of a theoretical framework allowing the possibility to base education on minimalism in our pluralist world, we came to several conclusions allowing to propose a model of the moral points of reference used by educators. This model shows, in particular, that ethical positioning are not naturally set on a list of principles or values, but on the contrary are the result of a moral imagination which takes into account the specificities of every situation. Then a philosophy of courage is born, which can be defined as a capacity to judge in situations which are borderline in terms of ethics and which allows to think the action in a changing and complex ethical environment. The courage to educate thus permits, in situations which the educator identifies as specific, to push the limits of common sense school ethics, according to which ethical solutions would preceed the occurrence of problems

Tendo como objeto a perda progressiva da autoridade do professor, esta pesquisa foca-se sobre suas condições de possibilidade e emergência no discurso pedagógico brasileiro. Por meio da análise de artigos da Revista Brasileira de Estudos Pedagógicos, publicados entre as décadas de 1940 e 1960, investiga-se o tecido discursivo que deu suporte às teorias da Escola Nova no Brasil, e suas contribuições para que uma nova imagem docente se instaurasse. A peculiaridade do contexto brasileiro, carente de um sistema nacional de educação consolidado, fez com que se aliasse aqui o velho prestígio do ofício docente, com as novas exigências da escola renovada. Progressivamente, teorias e procedimentos de cunho psicológico foram incorporadas ao discurso, transferindo a centralidade do ensino para os alunos, e reclamando ao professor uma atitude investigativa capaz de perscrutar suas personalidades. O papel docente foi então reformulado, calcado em atributos mais íntimos e pessoais, a serem cultivados via formação contínua e por uma atitude reflexiva própria. A dimensão pessoal adentrou então o coração do ensino, fazendo da interioridade a força motriz do trabalho ali realizado. Tanto o professor, como seus alunos, deveriam submeter-se às novas regulações e controles de um governo da interioridade; capaz de transferir ao domínio de si e ao auto-governo a autoridade institucional que outrora reconhecíamos por sua externalidade e intermédio do professor. / This research studies the progressive loss of the teacher´s authority, focusing on its manifestations throughout the Brazilian educational discourse. Based on the analyses of the articles from the journal Revista Brasileira de Estudos Pedagógicos, published between 1940 and 1960, we investigate the discursive scenario that supported the theories of The New School in Brazil, as well as its contributions to the rise of a new image of the teachers. In this unique context, that lacked a consolidated national education system, the reputation of the old teachers was made compatible with the new demands of the reformed school. Progressively, theories and psychological procedures were incorporated to the discourse, transferring the aim of the studies to the students, proclaiming that teachers should investigate their personalities. The teacher´s role was then reformulated, based on intimate and personal attributes, cultivated by continuous educational training as well as a reflexive attitude towards life. This personal dimension became the heart of education, transforming interiority into the driving force of the work that is carried out. Both the teacher and the students are submitted to new regulations and restraints of a government of interiority, which is capable of transferring to self-control and self-government the institutional authority that was once recognized by its exterior form and had the teacher as its mediator.

A presente pesquisa, de natureza teórico-filosófica, argumenta descritivamente a teoria estética do filósofo americano John Dewey, em função do seu chamado \"princípio de continuidade\", próprio do sistema filosófico deweyano como um todo. Nessa empreitada, privilegiou-se o recorte da continuidade entre o estético e o científico, ou entre valor e investigação enquanto característica essencial de tal teoria estética. Na observação dos pressupostos filosóficos gerais do filósofo, verificou-se que sua estética se estabelece, necessariamente, em continuidade ao método experimental das ciências naturais, consolidando proposições características essenciais de sua teoria da arte: Dewey crê na supremacia da contingência do processo que é a própria natureza, contínua, cumulativa, em sentido amplo, o que justifica que o ideal deva deixar de ser contemplativo para se converter num instrumental operativo, ou seja, um método experimental em virtude do meio; assim sendo, a estética deweyana deve ser compreendida, principalmente, em seu caráter investigativo, ou seja, em continuidade à ciência; Dewey rejeita os dualismos filosóficos, a metafísica e a epistemologia tradicionais; logo, sua estética desconsidera igualmente qualquer \"transcendental\" ou \"transcendente\" em termos clássicos; portanto, a arte ou estética, seja ela ato expressivo ou cultura, se daria entre diversos ritmos contínuos, nunca dualistas ou hierárquicos, no sentido da busca de um ideal Absoluto. Segundo a estética de Dewey, o valor reside precisamente no ritmo próprio do processo por exemplo: entre tensão e harmonia, comum e extraordinário, real e ideal etc. Dessa articulação ativa entre os vários aspectos em continuidade é que surgiria o ato expressivo, pela experiência singular imaginativa, e a cultura como um todo, mediante a comunicação. / The present theoretical-philosophical research argues descriptively about the aesthetic theory of the american philosopher John Dewey, in regards to the principle of continuity\" within Dewey\'s philosophical system as a whole. Bearing that in mind, the continuity of the aesthetic and the scientific were focused, as well as value broadly conceived and knowledge viewed as a scientific approach, and as the essential feature of Dewey\'s aesthetic theory. Thus, through the observation of the philosophers general assumptions, it has been verified that his aesthetics is necessarily established in continuity with experimental methods of natural sciences, which consolidates a few of the essential features propositions of his art theory: Dewey\'s supreme belief in the contingent of the process, which is continuous, cumulative, and broadly conceived as nature itself, implies that the ideal must cease to be contemplative and thus become instrumental and operative, which means it should become an experimental method in virtue of the environment. Therefore: Dewey\'s aesthetics must be primarily understood within its investigative character, that is, in its continuity to science; Deweys rejection of traditional metaphysics, epistemology, and philosophical dualisms prevents any classical interpretation of \"transcendental\" or \"transcendent\". Therefore art or aesthetics, as acts of expression or culture, should be continuous to a diversity of rhythms, but never dualistic or hierarchical in the sense of any ideal in pursuit of the Absolute. According to Dewey\'s aesthetics, value resides precisely in the pace of the process itself, such as between tension and harmony, ordinary and extraordinary, real and ideal and so on. From this active articulation between all the aspects of continuity an expressive act would emerge, as the realm of a singular imaginative experience, and of culture as a whole, through communication.

Este trabalho tem como proposta pensar a Educação em Direitos Humanos a partir de uma perspectiva wittgensteiniana. Desse filósofo, Ludwig Wittgenstein, apropriamo-nos de sua concepção de filosofia a partir da qual os problemas filosóficos decorrem de uma má compreensão da linguagem, conduzindo a confusões de natureza conceitual, como também nos apropriamos de sua terapia filosófica, processo pelo qual essas confusões de natureza conceitual podem ser dissolvidas ou evitadas. Com o intuito de desenvolvermos nossa proposta, analisamos as características da Educação em Direitos Humanos em comparação com outras propostas de formação moral. Pudemos perceber, após essa análise, que a Educação em Direitos Humanos tem um potencial formativo que possibilita uma formação diferenciada, ao possibilitar uma reflexão não dogmática sobre os valores. Por se tratar também de uma formação moral, discutimos a partir da filosofia de Wittgenstein alguns equívocos que podem ser evitados. Por exemplo, quando não levamos em conta a distinção existente entre a aprendizagem de certezas e a de conhecimentos, de tal forma que a Educação em Direitos Humanos passa a ser vista apenas como mais um conteúdo na grade curricular. Ou quando acreditamos que a Educação em Direitos Humanos deve ocorrer exclusivamente por meio de estratégias de convencimento do educando. Ou ainda, ao se ter como objetivo, o abandono, por parte do aluno, de certezas que compõem a sua visão de mundo. Por fim, defendemos que uma atitude antidogmática é promovida pela Educação em Direitos Humanos quando diversas visões de mundo são comparadas em suas semelhanças e diferenças, apontando o fundamento convencional que há em cada uma delas, de tal forma que o educando possa ver o mundo também a partir da perspectiva daquele que é o diferente, o discriminado, reconhecendo-se, assim, que essa outra perspectiva também tem o direito de ser respeitada. / This work intends to think about Human Rights Education from a Wittgensteinian perspective. From this philosopher, Ludwig Wittgenstein, we draw upon his conception of philosophy from which philosophical problems derive from a misunderstanding of language, leading to confusions of a conceptual nature, as well as appropriating his philosophical therapy, a process by which these confusions of conceptual nature can be dissolved or avoided. To develop our proposal, we analyze the characteristics of Human Rights Education in comparison with other proposals for moral formation. After this analysis, we can see that Human Rights Education has a formative potential that allows a differentiated formation, allowing a non-dogmatic reflection on values. Because it is also a moral formation, we discuss from the philosophy of Wittgenstein some misconceptions that can be avoided. For example, when we do not consider the distinction between learning certainties and knowledge, in such a way that Human Rights Education is just another content in the curriculum. Or when we believe that Education in Human Rights must occur exclusively through strategies of convincing the student. Or, to have as objective, the abandonment, on the part of the student, of certainties that make up his vision of the world. Finally, we defend that an anti-dogmatic attitude is promoted by Human Rights Education when different worldviews are compared in their similarities and differences, pointing out the conventional basis in each of them, so that the student can see the world too from the perspective of the one who is the different, the discriminated, recognizing, therefore, that this other perspective also has the right to be respected

For African Americans, literacy has historically been rooted in passion, collaboration, and social justice. This study explores two distinct sites of historical African American literacy development: literary societies of the 1800s and print culture of the Harlem Renaissance. Notably, literacy and culture were fundamentally intertwined during these times, creating an urgency and inspiration for literary pursuits not often seen today. In an effort to rekindle this reverence and utility for literacy in classrooms today, a culturally sustaining pedagogy is called for. Culturally sustaining pedagogy seeks to leverage students’ cultural knowledge and skills. By culturally aligning curriculum and instruction, educators position students to experience the transformative power of literacy—a transformative power that was evident in African American literary societies and through the Harlem Renaissance print culture. This study seeks to merge historical and contemporary approaches to literacy development to reconceptualize literacy education and engagement for all students.

A pedagogia de John Dewey (1859-1952) é referência para compreender as alterações no pensamento e na prática do campo educacional do século XX. Suas propostas questionam o modelo escolar tradicional predominante na época, realocando a criança para o centro do processo pedagógico. Apesar de ilustre por suas contribuições à Educação, Dewey assegura seu lugar nas discussões filosóficas tanto pela amplitude temática de seu pensamento quanto pela riqueza analítica de suas ideias. Tido como um dos pioneiros do pragmatismo (ao lado de William James e C. S. Pierce), o filósofo se debruça sobre as mais prementes questões políticas e sociais de seu tempo: o avanço desenfreado do capitalismo lança uma série de novos desafios ao homem, ao mesmo tempo em que ascendem totalitarismos de esquerda e direita na Europa e na Rússia. O horizonte da emancipação humana, representado pela democracia, está sob ameaça de diferentes modos. Essa importante pauta recebe o tratamento de Dewey em escritos que transcendem as fronteiras pedagógicas. Entendemos que a pedagogia de John Dewey é melhor compreendida quando matizada pela concepção de sociedade democrática presente nessas reflexões filosóficas mais amplas. Com o intuito de delinear essa concepção, este trabalho partiu da leitura analítica de Velho e novo individualismo e Liberdade e Cultura. A primeira trata dos descompassos entre indivíduo e sociedade, acentuados diante da lógica capitalista de prevalência do interesse particular sobre o comum. A democracia aparece como forma de organização social que possibilita a harmonia desses lados, zelando tanto pela garantia do desenvolvimento do indivíduo quanto pela busca dos fins sociais. Já o segundo texto afirma que liberdade e democracia devem ser tomadas como aposta moral e não como fins naturalmente prezados pelo homem. A cultura, em interação com a natureza humana, é elemento formador de hábitos, disposições e valores. Com isso, Dewey coloca a manutenção e expansão dos ideais democráticos em mãos humanas enquanto missão que precisa ser deliberadamente empreendida. Uma sociedade livre exige uma cultura livre o que, por sua vez, só se dá pela existência de instituições sociais igualmente libertárias. Em função dessas descobertas, alguns dos principais pontos de sua reflexão pedagógica são repensados a partir de Meu credo pedagógico e Democracia e Educação. Em primeiro lugar, destacamos o papel da educação, enquanto processo social na formação da cultura da sociedade. Se a democracia é uma escolha, a educação pode beneficiar ou dificultar sua construção de acordo com o tipo de cultura que promove. Assim, a preocupação com o interesse da criança diante da matéria e da atividade escolar assume nova tonalidade, pois é expressão de sua preocupação tanto com a preservação da dimensão individual na sociedade massificada, quanto pelo repúdio a práticas antidemocráticas geradoras de sujeitos passivos e acostumados a tarefas não reflexivas. Por outro lado, cabe à escola levar o aluno a compreender-se como ser social, significando seu papel e suas ações em função dos fins da comunidade. Para Dewey, a centralidade do método pedagógico se dá porque meios são tão importantes quanto fins. A democracia não pode ser alcançada senão por meios democráticos: a escola, enquanto instituição social, não pode se furtar desse imperativo. / John Deweys (1859-1952) pedagogy is a key to comprehend changes in educational thought and practice throughout the 20th century. His propositions call in question the predominant traditional school model, shifting the child back to the center of the pedagogical process. Though well known for his contribution on Education, Dewey is present in philosophical discussions due to his wide thematic scope as well as for the analytical power of his ideas. Regarded as one of the pioneering American pragmatist, the philosopher laid effort on the most urgent political and social matters of his time: the ungoverned advance of capitalism puts at stake new challenges to mankind, as left and right-wing totalitarian systems emerge in Europe and Russia. Human emancipation, represented by democracy, is threatened in different ways. Dewey tackles this important issue in works that transcend the pedagogical field. The authors pedagogy seems to be better comprehended when contextualized by his concept of democratic society, stated in broad philosophical reflections. This dissertation clears out this conception through analytical readings of Individualism, Old and New and Freedom and Culture. The former brings out the differences between individuals and society, intensified by the prevalence of private interests over common well-being. Democracy emerges as a form of social organization which makes it possible to achieve balance between those two sides, guaranteeing both individual development and the search for social aims. The latter asserts that liberty and democracy shall be understood as moral choice, instead of as mens natural longing. Thus, Dewey understands the maintenance and expansion of democratic ideals as deliberately undertaken by human hands. A free society requires a free culture that, in its turn, can only exist through free social institutions. Having in mind these findings, some of his main pedagogical ideas from My Pedagogic Creed and Democracy and Education were revisited in this research. Firstly, the role of education is pointed out, as a social process in the formation of culture. If democracy is actually a choice, education can favor or hinder its construction according to the kind of culture it promotes. Hence, the concern for childrens interest on academic content and activities rises new implications, for it reveals an attempt to preserve the individual dimension in mass society, as well as to deny non-democratic procedures that form passive human beings, accustomed to non-reflexive tasks. On the other hand, it is the schools duty to help students understand themselves as social beings, making sense of their roles and actions on account of communal purposes. Dewey believed that pedagogical methods were important because means are as relevant as its ends. Democracy can only be reached through democratic means: school, as a social institution, cannot avoid such principle.

Submitted by Angela Maria de Oliveira (amolivei@uepg.br) on 2017-10-27T11:17:25Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) Daniella do Nascimento Jesus.pdf: 9980481 bytes, checksum: a156f4fe3f46e740abe51e2c367a0d7d (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-27T11:17:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 811 bytes, checksum: e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34 (MD5) Daniella do Nascimento Jesus.pdf: 9980481 bytes, checksum: a156f4fe3f46e740abe51e2c367a0d7d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-08-10 / Este trabalho apresenta o resultado da pesquisa sobre a avaliação do componente curricular Filosofia da Educação. O objetivo da pesquisa foi analisar as contribuições das disciplinas de Filosofia da Educação I e II, do currículo do curso de Licenciatura em Pedagogia da Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG), para a formação docente. A pesquisa foi realizada a partir da seguinte questão: Quais as contribuições do componente curricular Filosofia da Educação, que integra o currículo do curso de Licenciatura em Pedagogia da UEPG, para a formação do pedagogo docente? Foram definidos os seguintes objetivos específicos: discutir os pressupostos teórico-metodológicos da avaliação curricular em diálogo com autores de referência da área; apresentar um panorama histórico da Filosofia da Educação do curso presencial de Licenciatura em Pedagogia da UEPG; compreender as contribuições do ensino de Filosofia da Educação, apontando suas possibilidades e limites para a formação inicial de professores (pedagogo) no referido curso presencial de Licenciatura em Pedagogia da UEPG. O campo de pesquisa foi a UEPG. Os sujeitos participantes do estudo foram: a) docentes que ministraram as disciplinas de Filosofia da Educação no curso de Pedagogia (2005 a 2016); b) os acadêmicos matriculados em 2016 e 2017. O recorte temporal ocorreu em função da publicação das resoluções 01/2002, 02/2002, 01/2005 e 02/2015 – todas relacionadas à formação de professores. A pesquisa foi realizada em uma abordagem qualitativa, do tipo estudo de caso avaliativo. Os procedimentos para coleta de dados foram entrevistas semiestruturadas, observação participante, questionário e pesquisa documental. O referencial teórico foi construído em diálogo com autores de referência quanto aos pressupostos epistemológicos de avaliação educacional e avaliação curricular, tais como Brandalise (2010), Cappelletti (2002; 2010), Lewy (1979), Machado (2013), Rodrigues (1995) e Sacristán (2000; 2008; 2013), no tocante aos estudos curriculares. Os principais resultados apontaram: a análise documental possibilitou um panorama histórico da Filosofia e da Filosofia da Educação no curso da UEPG, e caracterizar os programas das disciplinas fundamentadas pela Filosofia da Educação; o currículo avaliado permitiu identificar e compreender os movimentos do currículo em relação às DCN, ao PPC, às possibilidades de modelagem, à prática docente e aos reflexos da prática; estudos em Filosofia da Educação são fundamentais para a formação do pedagogo; os conteúdos abordados desencadearam processos de reflexão, análise e aprendizagem; a relevância e contribuição da bibliografia selecionada pelos docentes para a compreensão dos conteúdos estudados. Dentre os limites identificados, destacam-se: desvalorização da presença da Filosofia e da Filosofia da Educação; os professores participantes da pesquisa consideram a importância da Filosofia da Educação dialogar com outras áreas, mas no currículo em ação isto ainda não se concretiza; os acadêmicos atribuíram os maiores percentuais para o critério regular para instrumentos de avaliação da aprendizagem, e os maiores percentuais negativos para metodologia de ensino e integração entre professores das disciplinas de Fundamentos; nem sempre os acadêmicos compreendem a complexidade da prática docente. A pesquisa confirmou que o campo da avaliação curricular está aberto para novos estudos. Intenta-se que a presente dissertação seja caminho para futuras investigações acerca da Filosofia da Educação, a partir do referencial específico sobre ensino de Filosofia [da Educação]. / This work presents the result from the curricular component Philosophy of Education. The aim of the research was analyze contributions of the subjects Philosophy of Education I and II from the curriculum of the Faculty in Pedagogy of the State University of Ponta Grossa (Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa – UEPG in Portuguese acronym), for professor training. The research was carried out from the following matter: What are the contributions from the curricular component Philosophy of Education that integrates the curriculum of the graduation in Pedagogy at UEPG, for pedagogue training? The following specific objectives were defined: discussing the curricular evaluation theoretical and methodological assumptions in a dialogue with reference authors in the area; presenting a historical panorama on the Education Philosophy of the Faculty in Pedagogy of the UEPG; understanding the contributions from teaching Education Philosophy by pointing its possibilities and limits for teachers initial training (pedagogue), in the Faculty in Pedagogy offered in UEPG campus. The research field was the UEPG. Participant subjects were: a) professors who lectured the subject Philosophy of Education in the faculty of Pedagogy (2005 to 2016); b) students enrolled in 2016 and 2017. Temporary clipping occurred due to the publication of resolutions 01/2002, 02/2002, 01/2005 and 02/2015 – all of them related to the professors‟ training. The research was performed in a qualitative approach, evaluative case type of study. The procedures for data collection were semi structured interviews, participant observation, questionnaire and documental research. Theoretical reference was built in dialogue with reference authors regarding to the epistemological assumptions of education and curricular evaluations, such as Brandalise (2010), Cappelletti (2002; 2010),, Lewy (1979) ), Machado (2013), Rodrigues (1995) and Sacristán (2000; 2008; 2013), related to the curricular studies. The main results pointed to: documental analysis enabled a historical panorama of Philosophy and Philosophy of Education within UEPG course, and characterizing subject programs based on Philosophy of Education; the curriculum evaluated enabled identify and understand the curriculum movement, regardind to DCN (National Curriculum Guidelines in Portuguese acronym) and to the PPC (Pedagogical Project of the course also in Portuguese acronym), to the possibilities for modeling, teaching practice and practice reflections; studies in Philosophy of Education are fundamental for the Pedagogue training; the contents approached initiated reflections, analysis and learning processes; the relevance and contribution of bibliography selected by lecturers to understand the contents studied. Among limitations identified, we highlight: Philosophy and Philosophy of education devaluation; lecturers participant in the research considered the importance of Philosophy dialogue with other areas; however, it still not happened in the current curriculum; students attributed higher percentile for regular criteria for learning evaluation instruments, and the higher negative percentile for teaching methodology and integration with the subject Fundamentals‟ lecturers; students not always understand the complexity of teaching practice. The research confirmed that curriculum evaluation field is open for new studies. We intend this research as a path for future researches on Philosophy of Education, from the specific reference about Philosophy [of Education].

Este trabalho apresenta uma análise wittgensteiniana de alguns problemas ligados ao ensino de filosofia. Tomando como ponto de partida a difícil relação entre a formação inicial do professor e a cultura escolar, esta dissertação trata as transformações a que a filosofia é submetida na passagem da academia à escola como mudanças nos usos da linguagem filosófica. Esta mudanças são esclarecidas à luz dos conceitos de jogos de linguagem e formas de vida, desenvolvidos na filosofia tardia de Ludwig Wittgenstein, como alternativa a teorias linguísticas referenciais e metafísicas. Examinando os limites das explicações que fundamentam os jogos de linguagem em geral, torna-se compreensível o aspecto do aprendizado dos jogos linguísticos da filosofia que, irredutível à compreensão de razões, reside na vontade do aprendiz que, como tal, só pode ser persuadida. Este é o viés pelo qual será enfrentada a questão didática da motivação dos alunos. Ademais, o problema da persuasão e a atenção aos usos da linguagem filosófica animam, se não um método, uma estratégia de uso da história da filosofia no ensino médio, na qual a história da filosofia se torna uma ocasião para o aluno afrontar os limites do sentido de sua forma de vida. / This work presents a Wittgensteinian analysis of some problems linked to the teaching of philosophy. Taking as starting point the difficult relationship between initial training teachers and school culture, this dissertation deals with the transformations that philosophy is subjected in passing the academy to school as shifts in the uses of philosophical language. The shifts are explained in the light of the concepts of language games and forms of life developed in the later philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein as an alternative to referential language and metaphysical theories. Examining the limits of the reasons that base the language games in general, it becomes understandable the aspect of the linguistic games of philosophy learning that, irreducible to the understanding of learning reasons, lay on the willingness of the learner, as such, can only be persuaded. This is the bias by which will be faced the didactic issue of student motivation. Moreover, the problem of persuasion and attention to the uses of philosophical language animate, if not a method, a strategy of using the history of philosophy in high school, in which the history of philosophy becomes an opportunity for the student to confront the limits of sense of their way of life.