No description available.

Adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) is an aggressive lymphoproliferative disorder associated with human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection. Reactivation of telomerase, a critical event in tumor progression observed in late phases of ATL development, has been shown to be caused by HBZ (HTLV-1 bZIP factor), a regulatory protein encoded by the negative strand of the HTLV-1 genome. The HBZ-mediated up-regulation of the telomerase catalytic subunit is dependent on JunD, which in the cellular context occurs in the complex with menin, the product of the MEN-1 tumor suppressor gene. Interaction with menin represses JunD-dependent transcription and converts JunD into a growth suppressor, whereas it acts as a growth promoter in the absence of menin. My results demonstrate that the viral protein HBZ abrogates tumor suppressor function of menin, resulting in the activation of JunD transcriptional activity and finally in the up-regulation of its target gene, the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). I showed that HBZ, JunD and menin can coexist in the same protein complex and that HBZ and menin exert opposite effects on JunD transcriptional activity. Moreover menin inhibits the JunD-mediated activation of the hTERT proximal promoter and HBZ is able to counteract this effect. Finally, I proposed that HBZ, by recruiting p300 histone acetyltransferase, reverses the histone deacetylation conducted by menin-recruited HDACs and therefore up-regulates the expression of the hTERT gene. Altogether, my work led to the identification of the molecular mechanism leading to the functional impairment of the menin tumor suppressor, which results in the deregulation of AP-1 signaling in HTLV-1 infected cells. Finally this work gave new insights into the mechanism of the transcriptional up-regulation of the hTERT gene upon HTLV-1 infection, being a key event during the development of Adult T-cell leukemia and a necessary step towards the progression into more aggressive courses.

La leucémie T de l’adulte (ATL) est une pathologie lympho-proliférative aiguë associée à l’infection par le virus HTLV-1 (human T-cell leukemia virus type 1). La réactivation de la télomérase observée lors de la phase tardive du développement de l’ATL est un évènement crucial dans la progression tumorale. Elle est induite au niveau transcriptionnel par la protéine HBZ (HTLV-1 bZIP factor) et est dépendante du facteur de transcription JunD. Ce dernier est normalement associé en complexe avec le produit du gène suppresseur de tumeur MEN-1, la ménine, dont l’interaction avec JunD réprime la transcription JunD-dépendante et convertit JunD en inhibiteur de croissance.Mes résultats démontrent que la protéine virale HBZ inhibe la fonction suppresseur de tumeur de la ménine, induisant l’activité transcriptionnelle de JunD et donc l’activation de la transcription de son gène cible : la transcriptase inverse télomérase humaine (hTERT). J’ai démontré que HBZ, JunD et la ménine peuvent coexister dans un même complexe protéique et que HBZ et la ménine ont des effets opposés sur l’activité transcriptionnelle de JunD. En effet la ménine inhibe l’activation du promoteur proximal d’hTERT par JunD, alors que HBZ est capable de contre balancer cet effet. Finalement, je propose qu’en recrutant l’histone acétyltransférase p300, HBZ réverse la déacétylation des histones induite par le recrutement des HDACs par la ménine et par conséquent active le promoteur d’hTERT. L’ensemble de ces résultats a permis d’identifier les mécanismes moléculaires aboutissant à l’inhibition fonctionnelle de la protéine suppresseur de tumeur ménine, résultant en la dérégulation de la voie AP-1 dans les cellules infectées par HTLV-1. Finalement, ce travail apporte de nouvelles précisions sur le mécanisme de la surexpression transcriptionnelle de la télomérase lors de l’infection par HTLV-1, une étape importante de la mise en place et du développement de la leucémie T de l’adulte vers des stades plus agressifs. / Adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) is an aggressive lymphoproliferative disorder associated with human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection. Reactivation of telomerase, a critical event in tumor progression observed in late phases of ATL development, has been shown to be caused by HBZ (HTLV-1 bZIP factor), a regulatory protein encoded by the negative strand of the HTLV-1 genome. The HBZ-mediated up-regulation of the telomerase catalytic subunit is dependent on JunD, which in the cellular context occurs in the complex with menin, the product of the MEN-1 tumor suppressor gene. Interaction with menin represses JunD-dependent transcription and converts JunD into a growth suppressor, whereas it acts as a growth promoter in the absence of menin. My results demonstrate that the viral protein HBZ abrogates tumor suppressor function of menin, resulting in the activation of JunD transcriptional activity and finally in the up-regulation of its target gene, the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). I showed that HBZ, JunD and menin can coexist in the same protein complex and that HBZ and menin exert opposite effects on JunD transcriptional activity. Moreover menin inhibits the JunD-mediated activation of the hTERT proximal promoter and HBZ is able to counteract this effect. Finally, I proposed that HBZ, by recruiting p300 histone acetyltransferase, reverses the histone deacetylation conducted by menin-recruited HDACs and therefore up-regulates the expression of the hTERT gene. Altogether, my work led to the identification of the molecular mechanism leading to the functional impairment of the menin tumor suppressor, which results in the deregulation of AP-1 signaling in HTLV-1 infected cells. Finally this work gave new insights into the mechanism of the transcriptional up-regulation of the hTERT gene upon HTLV-1 infection, being a key event during the development of Adult T-cell leukemia and a necessary step towards the progression into more aggressive courses.

Comment la taille d'un organisme est-elle régulée au cours du développement embryonnaire ? Quels sont les mécanismes génétiques à l'origine de l'arrêt de la prolifération pendant la croissance d'un organisme pluricellulaire ? Afin d'identifier des acteurs de la sortie du cycle cellulaire au cours du développement, mon travail s’est orienté sur l’étude de gènes suppresseurs de tumeurs pendant la croissance du toit optique (TO) du médaka Oryzias latipes. Le TO, structure dorsale du cerveau moyen des Vertébrés, est un modèle particulièrement adapté à l’étude de la régulation de la prolifération. Trois zones de la marge vers le centre du TO sont discernables : une zone périphérique de prolifération, une zone intermédiaire de cellules sortant du cycle cellulaire et une zone centrale de cellules différenciées. Un crible d'expression par hybridation In Situ a été réalisé et a permis d'identifier 28 gènes exprimés dans le TO, suggérant leur implication dans le contrôle de la sortie du cycle cellulaire au cours du développement. Dans le but de caractériser in vivo la fonction de gènes issus de ce crible, le gène BTG1 (B-cell Translocation Gene 1) et les membres de sa famille, ont été étudiés au cours du développement du médaka. J’ai mené des expériences fonctionnelles sur BTG1, permettant de mettre en évidence son rôle central pour la morphogenèse du système nerveux central. De plus, une autre partie de mon travail s’est penchée sur l’étude de l’expression des membres de la voie de signalisation Hippo, bien connue et caractérisée chez la drosophile et les Mammifères pour son rôle dans le contrôle de la taille des organes via une régulation de l’arrêt de la prolifération. A l’issu de notre travail, une fonction de la voie de signalisation Hippo dans la formation du TO et des somites a pu être mise en évidence au cours du développement du médaka. / How is an organisms’ size regulated during embryonic development? What are the genetic mechanisms that control the proliferation arrest during multicellular organisms growth? In order to identify a cell cycle exit developmental actor genes, I have analysed the role of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) in the optic tectum (OT) of the medaka Oryzias latipes. This structure is particularly suited for this kind of studies because, during its morphogenesis, there is a strict correlation between the position of a cell and its degree of differentiation. 3 zones can be easily distinguished from the border to the center: a marginal zone made of proliferative cells, an intermediate zone in which cells exit the cycle, and a central zone made of postmitotic cells. Using this criterium, I have performed an in situ hybridization expression screen on 150 TSGs on medaka embryos. The expression patterns of 28 TSGs in the OT suggest their implication in the OT proliferation arrest mechanisms. I focused my study on the BTG1 gene, implicated in many cancers, and for which few developmental data are available. A functional analysis on developing medaka embryos has been performed and permitted to highlight the essential role of BTG1 in central nervous system morphogenesis. Furthermore, I performed an expression study on Hippo signalling pathway components. Hippo pathway is well caracterised for its organ size control function in drosophila and Mammals. Our results show that this pathway could act in OT formation and somitogenesis in medaka fish.

CoordenaÃÃo de AperfeiÃoamento de Pessoal de NÃvel Superior / O carcinoma gÃstrico à a segunda causa de morte por cÃncer no mundo. No Cearà à o segundo mais freqÃente entre os homens e o terceiro entre as mulheres. Dos cÃnceres gÃstricos os adenocarcinomas representam em torno de 95%. A doenÃa tem sido associada a fatores genÃticos e ambientais sendo demonstrada Ãntima relaÃÃo com a infecÃÃo por Helicobacter pylori, principalmente associada à presenÃa do gene cagA e genÃtipos vacAs1m1. Entretanto, apesar dos mecanismos pelos quais a bactÃria promove a carcinogÃnese gÃstrica ainda nÃo estarem esclarecidos, uma das hipÃteses seria atravÃs da inativaÃÃo de supressores tumorais. O objetivo do presente trabalho foi verificar, em adenocarcinomas gÃstricos, se a presenÃa de H. pylori, e de seus genes cagA e vacA, està relacionada com a mutaÃÃo e/ou alteraÃÃo na expressÃo protÃica dos supressores tumorais p53 e p27. Neste estudo, 74 amostras de pacientes foram analisadas quanto à presenÃa de H. pylori, cagA+ e os genÃtipos de vacA, pela reaÃÃo em cadeia da polimerase (PCR). A anÃlise mutacional do gene p53 foi realizada por PCR-SSCP e a detecÃÃo da mutaÃÃo/superexpressÃo do p53 e expressÃo da proteÃna p27 pelo mÃtodo imunohistoquÃmico. A bactÃria foi detectada em 95% das amostras, das quais 63% eram cagA(+). Dentre os alelos de vacA, observou-se predomÃnio de s1 (74%) e m1 (82%), associados em 69% dos casos. Na anÃlise mutacional do p53 verificou-se que 72% dos casos exibiram alteraÃÃo no padrÃo de mobilidade eletroforÃtica, sendo esta associada significativamente à presenÃa do gene cagA. Por outro lado, apenas 29% dos casos apresentaram detecÃÃo pelo mÃtodo imunohistoquÃmico, nÃo sendo encontrada associaÃÃo com a H. pylori. A proteÃna p27 demonstrou acentuada reduÃÃo em sua expressÃo (detectada em apenas 19% dos casos), nÃo demonstrando atividade compensatÃria em relaÃÃo à proteÃna p53 mutada e sem associaÃÃo estatÃstica dos casos negativos com a presenÃa da H. pylori. Finalmente, os resultados sugerem que estes supressores simultaneamente inativados podem ser o ponto chave da desregulaÃÃo do ciclo celular que, associados a outros fatores, favoreÃam o desenvolvimento e progressÃo dos adenocarcinomas gÃstricos. Hà indÃcios de que a presenÃa bacteriana, e dos seus genes cagA(+) e vacA/s1m1, possam influenciar, de forma nÃo esclarecida, as alteraÃÃes moleculares ocorridas nos supressores tumorais p53 e p27. / Gastric carcinoma is the second cause of death by cancer in the world. On State of Ceara-Brazil is the second most frequent type of cancer in men and third in women. Adenocarcinomas account for approximately 95% of all malignant gastric neoplasms. It has been associated to genetic and environmental factors and a intimate relationship between the infection by the bacteria Helicobacter pylori and the gastric carcinoma have been related. The presence of the cagA gene and specific genotypes (s1m1) of the gene vacA have been detected in more pathogenic strains. Although the precise molecular mechanisms by which H. pylori could promote the process of gastric carcinogenesis are under investigation, one hypothesized mechanism involves the tumor supressor genes inactivation. The aim of the present study was to verify if the presence of Helicobacter pylori, cagA and vacA genes is related to mutations in the tumor supressor gene p53 and altered expression of p53 and p27 proteins in gastric adenocarcinomas. Seventy-four (74) samples were analyzed to detect the presence of H. pylori, cagA and genotypes of vacA by Polymerization Chain Reaction (PCR). The mutational analysis of p53 gene was performed by PCR-SSCP (Polymerization Chain Reaction for analysis of the Single-strand Conformation Polymorphism). Analysis of mutation or overexpression of p53 protein and p27 expression was detected by the immunohistochemical method. The bacteria was detected in 95% of the samples, 63% was cagA(+). Among the vacA allele it was observed prevalence of s1 (74%) and m1 (82%), associated in 69% of the cases. Mutation analysis of p53 demonstrated 72% of the cases with altered electrophoretic mobility; The alterations were significatively more frequent in the presence of the cagA gene. Immunohistochemical analysis detected only 29% of cases with the expression of p53 protein. The protein p27 showed accentuated reduction in its expression (detected in only 19% of the cases), it has not demonstrated compensatory activity in relation to the p53 altered protein, neither association to H. pylori presence. Finally, these data suggest that simultaneous inactivation of these tumor suppressors genes may be the key point of deregulation of the cellular cycle that, associated to the other factors, favor the development and progression of the gastric cancer. There is some evidence that the bacterial presence, cagA and vacA/s1m1 genes, may influence, in a not understood way, the alterations observed in the tumor suppressors p53 and p27.

No description available.

Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly (MCPH) is a congenital neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by a reduced occipital-frontal head circumference (OFC) of less than -3 SDs below the population mean for age and sex. It is a genetically heterogeneous disorder caused by mutations in one of the following 10 MCPH genes: MCPH1 (microcephalin 1), WDR62 (WD repeat domain 62), CDK5RAP2 (cyclin-dependent kinase 5 regulatory associated protein 2), CASC5 (cancer susceptibility candidate 5), CEP152 (centrosomal protein 152 kDa), ASPM (asp [abnormal spindle] homolog, microcephaly associated [Drosophila]), CENPJ (centromeric protein J), STIL (SCL/TAL1-interrupting locus), CEP135 (centrosomal protein 135 kDa) and CEP63 (centrosomal protein 135 kDa). The MCPH1 (microcephalin 1) gene is located on chromosome 8p23.1. Microsatellite analysis has previously shown LOH at the markers D8S518 and D8S277 flanking the MCPH1 locus in 1/21 oral tumors. Furthermore, LOH at the markers D8S1742 and D8S277 flanking the MCPH1 locus has also been observed in 2/32 hepatocellular carcinomas. MCPH1 has been found to be mutated in breast and endometrial cancers. Additionally, it was found to be downregulated at the transcript level in 19/30 ovarian cancer tissues and the protein level in 93/319 breast cancer tissues. Decreased MCPH1 protein levels are associated with triple negative breast cancers and a lower transcript level of MCPH1 correlates with lesser time for metastasis to occur in breast cancer patients. Interestingly, MCPH1 knockout mice in a null TP53 background show susceptibility to cancer.So far, studies have indicated that MCPH1 is a DNA repair protein. MCPH1 is required for the formation of DNA repair foci, chromatin relaxation, HR and NHEJ. It regulates G1/S and G2/M cell cycle checkpoints. Also, depletion of MCPH1 leads to genomic instability and centrosome amplification. Hence, the defect in the function of MCPH1 can lead to plethora of anomalies including cancer. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that MCPH1 may also function as a tumor suppressor (TS) gene, in addition to its role in the brain development. The purpose of this study was to test if MCPH1 also functions as a TS gene using different approaches in OSCC (oral squamous cell carcinoma). OSCC is the sixth most common type of cancer. It includes the cancer of the lips, anterior 2/3rd of the tongue, buccal mucosa, floor of the mouth, retromolar trigone and gingiva. Despite the advances in the treatment of oral cancer, the five-yr survival rate has not increased. Hence, the effective treatment of OSCC requires the identification of molecular targets to design appropriate therapeutic strategies. LOH, mutations and promoter methylation in tumors are the hallmarks of TS genes. In order to ascertain the TS roles of MCPH1, we carried out LOH analysis in 81 matched blood/normal and tumor oral tissues using D8S1819, D8S277 and D8S1798 markers flanking the MCPH1 locus. The results showed LOH at one or more markers in 14/71 (19.72%) informative samples across the tumor stages from T1 to T4. The entire coding region and the exon-intron junctions of the MCPH1 gene were sequenced for mutations in 15 OSCC samples and 5 cancer cell lines (viz., A549, HeLa, KB, SCC084 and SCC131). In total, three mutations namely c.1561G>T(p.Glu521X), c.321delA(p.Lys107fsX39) and c.1402delA(p.Thr468fsX32) were identified. The expression of MCPH1 was analysed at both the transcript and protein levels by real-time quantitative RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry, respectively, in OSCC samples. MCPH1 was downregulated in 51.22% (21/41) of OSCC samples at the transcript level. The MCPH1 protein was downregulated in 76% (19/25) of the OSCC samples. In order to elucidate if the MCPH1 promoter was methylated in OSCC tissues, we retrieved the MCPH1 promoter from the database TRED (Transcriptional Regulatory Element Database). The promoter was analysed for the presence of CpG islands using the CpG Plot/CpG Report program. Two CpG islands (CpGI and CpGII) were identified within the MCPH1 promoter. Both the CpG islands were analysed for methylation in 40 OSCC samples by COBRA (Combined Bisulfite Restriction Analysis). CpGI showed no methylation in 40 OSCC samples. However, CpGII showed methylation in 4/40 (10%) OSCC samples and the methylation was absent in their corresponding normal oral tissues. To analyse the methylation of the MCPH1 promoter in cancer cell lines, HeLa, KB, SCC084 and SCC131 cells were treated with 5’-2-deoxy azacytidine (AZA), a methyltrasferase inhibitor. HeLa and KB cells did not show any change in the MCPH1 transcript level after the AZA treatment. However, SCC084 and SCC131 cells showed upregulation of MCPH1 after the treatment, suggesting methylation of the MCPH1 promoter. To validate these observations, we examined the methylation status of both the CpG islands in these cell lines. We found methylation of CpGII only in SCC084 cells. HeLa, KB and SCC131 cells showed no methylation of CpGI and CpGII. The results obtained by COBRA in these cell lines were further confirmed by bisulfite sequencing of CpGI and CpGII islands. Further, the upregulation of MCPH1 after azacytidine treatment in SCC131 cells can be attributed to a promoter independent mechanism or due to methylation of the CpG sites not examined by us. To elucidate the biological effects of MCPH1 in a cancer cell line, we generated stable clones overexpressing MCPH1 in KB cells. The results showed that MCPH1 overexpression decreased cellular proliferation, cell invasion, anchorage-independent growth in soft-agar and tumor growth in nude mice. Further, MCPH1 overexpression lead to apoptosis. A low frequency of LOH, mutations and promoter methylation suggested that they might not be the major mechanisms of downregulation of MCPH1 in OSCC. We then speculated that MCPH1 could be regulated by miRNAs. We therefore used five miRNA target prediction softwares to identify miRNAs targeting MCPH1. The programs identified two binding sites for miR-27a within the 5.4 kb region of the 3’-UTR of MCPH1. The luciferase assay showed that both the seed regions of MCPH1 were binding to miR-27a. In addition, transient transfection of the premiR-27a construct in KB cells decreased the protein level of MCPH1. Additionally, in a small panel of 10 OSCC samples, there was a negative correlation between the levels of miR-27a and MCPH1. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report showing any miRNA regulating the MCPH1 gene. It is important to note that tumor suppressors can serve as potential biomarkers with prognostic value. Hence, we analysed the correlation of the expression levels of MCPH1 with clinico-pathological parameters such as TNM, gender, age and site of the cancer by Fischer’s exact test. No statistical correlation was observed between the transcript or protein levels with any of the clinico-pathological parameters. In summary, the results of the present study have suggested that the primary microcephaly gene MCPH1 shows several hallmarks of TS genes and functions as a tumor suppressor in OSCC, in addition to its role in brain development. We have for the first time shown that miR-27a targets MCPH1 and regulates its level. It is interesting to note that none of the other 10 MCPH genes have been shown to be regulated by any miRNA yet. Our study will be useful in designing novel therapeutic methods for the treatment of OSCC either by overexpression of MCPH1 or reducing the level of miR-27a by an antagomir.