Spelling suggestions: "subject:"USS liberty"" "subject:"USS iberty""
1 |
以色列海軍之研究江炘杓 Unknown Date (has links)
本研究採文獻分析法和戰史研究法,並從戰略——目的、手段、方法——之研究途徑切入。
研究重點首先從以色列之海域環境和威脅來源著眼,探討以色列國家安全戰略與防衛戰略構想;由於以色列之兵役制度與軍隊訓練情形,實為支持其遂行防衛戰略,達成其國家安全之重要支柱,故亦予分析。
其次,針對以色列海軍參與之重要戰爭,包括獨立戰爭、六日戰爭(美海軍情報船自由號被以色列海空軍擊沈事件和以色列埃拉特號驅逐艦被埃及飛彈快艇擊沈事件)、十月戰爭(以敘「拉塔基亞海戰」與以埃於紅海戰線之對決)、以及其他零星之重要衝突加以析論。
第三,探討以色列海軍之兵力建設與準則發展狀況,析出以色列海軍建軍發展之三個階段,研究其硬體建設(水面作戰艦艇、潛艦、突擊隊)、海軍任務、海軍作戰準則、反恐作戰準則與行為規範之發展情形。
最後,分析以色列海軍面臨之挑戰、探討其國防資源之分配問題、海軍高科技武器發展以及其於未來之展望。
具體研究成果包含找出以色列海軍影響深遠之戰役——拉塔基亞海戰,瞭解以色列海軍建軍發展之歷程,並且發現以色列海軍邁向新時代之發展趨勢。
研究心得有三點:第一,以—阿海軍戰爭之啟示;第二、以色列海軍發展之啟示;第三,研究以色列海軍之啟示。 / The Study of the Israeli Navy was made use of literature analysis and war history research method. It was written within the approach of the strategy research which of the aims, the means, and the ways.
The paper will (1) introduce the sea environment of Israel and sources of the threats, discuss Israel national security and its defense strategic conception, and Israeli conscriptions and its military training; (2) examine the significance and importance of the Israeli Navy war history; (3) give a description of structures of the Navy and its doctrines; and (4) propose the challenge of the Navy, analyze its problem of the defense budget distribution, open its hi-tech weapon systems, and observe its future development.
The results of this paper include: (1) excavate the most valuable warfare among the Israeli Navy war history which is the Battle of Latakia; (2) understand the structures of the Navy; and (3) find out the trend of the Navy future development.
|
2 |
Sovereignty, Peacekeeping, and the United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF), Suez 1956-1967: Insiders’ PerspectivesHilmy, Hanny 13 February 2015 (has links)
This research is concerned with the complex and contested relationship between the sovereign prerogatives of states and the international imperative of defusing world conflicts. Due to its historical setting following World War Two, the national vs. international staking of claims was framed within the escalating imperial-nationalist confrontation and the impending “end of empire”, both of which were significantly influenced by the role Israel played in this saga. The research looks at the issue of “decolonization” and the anti-colonial struggle waged under the leadership of Egypt’s President Nasser. The Suez War is analyzed as the historical event that signaled the beginning of the final chapter in the domination of the European empires in the Middle East (sub-Saharan decolonization followed beginning in the early 1960s), and the emergence of the United States as the new major Western power in the Middle East.
The Suez experience highlighted a stubborn contest between the defenders of the concept of “sovereign consent” and the advocates of “International intervention”. Both the deployment of the United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF) and its termination were surrounded by controversy and legal-political wrangling. The role of UNEF and UN peacekeeping operations in general framed the development of a new concept for an emerging international human rights law and crisis management. The UNEF experience, moreover, brought into sharp relief the need for a conflict resolution component for any peace operation. International conflict management, and human rights protection are both subject to an increasing interventionist international legal regime. Consequently, the traditional concept of “sovereignty” is facing increasing challenge.
By its very nature, the subject matter of this multi-dimensional research involves historical, political and international legal aspects shaping the research’s content and conclusions. The research utilizes the experience and contributions of several key participants in this pioneering peacekeeping experience. In the last chapter, recommendations are made –based on all the elements covered in the research- to suggest contributions to the evolving UN ground rules for international crisis intervention and management. / Graduate / hilmyh@uvic.ca
|
Page generated in 0.0423 seconds