Den här studien undersöker hur outnyttjade platser kan användas genom temporär användning ur ett socialt syfte. Vår uppfattning är att det finns en brist på platser i dagens urbana miljö som bidrar till delaktighet och gemenskap, som kan främja social inkludering och ett mer jämlikt samhälle. Samtidigt finns det outnyttjade platser i staden, vilket kan bero på olika anledningar, som exempelvis ekonomiska aspekter eller väntan på exploatering. Temporär användning är idag en erkänd metod för att aktivera dessa platser under en viss tidsperiod. Frågan går dock att ställa hur detta kan användas ur ett socialt, samt solidariskt perspektiv och således bidra till ett mer jämlikt samhälle. För att besvara denna fråga har vi utfört en empirisk undersökning av det franska temporära projektet Coco Velten, samt projektets grundare Yes We Camp. Genom denna empiriska undersökning, tillsammans med stöd av teorier, har vi kommit fram till att outnyttjade platser kan användas temporärt för att bidra till ett mer inkluderande och jämlikt samhälle. Samtidigt måste inte temporär användning i sig nödvändigtvis bidra till detta, utan det handlar snarare om hur dessa platser utformas, samt dess syfte. I det studerade Coco Velten går det utläsa att projektet svarade upp på olika samhällsproblem genom att hjälpa människor i utsatta situationer. För att åstadkomma detta implementerades flera olika användningsområden i projektet, en av dessa var de gemensamma platserna som utformades genom kollektiva metoder. Genom studien visas att de gemensamma platserna kan ses som särskilt vitala för att öka delaktigheten genom den temporära användningen och skapa förutsättningar för jämlikhet och social inkludering. Studien visar även att dessa projekt bygger på en viss föreningskultur och ett samarbete mellan olika samhällsaktörer. Avslutningsvis belyser studien vissa utmaningar med temporära projekt. Studien visar att den temporära användningen med ett socialt perspektiv kräver ideellt arbete och människors engagemang för att kunna genomföras. Andra utmaningar som studien belyser är tidsaspekten, finansieringen, samt risken för gentrifiering. / This thesis explores how unused spaces can be utilised through temporary use for social purposes. It is our view that there is a lack of spaces in today's urban environment that contribute to participation and community, which can promote social inclusion and a more equal society. At the same time, there are vacant spaces in the city, which may be due to various factors, including economic considerations or a lack of immediate development opportunities. Temporary use is now recognised as a means of activating these spaces for a specified period. However, it is necessary to consider whether this can be used from a social and solidarity perspective, and thus contribute to a more equal society. To answer this question, an empirical study of the French temporary project Coco Velten, and its founder Yes We Camp, was conducted. Through this empirical investigation, together with the support of theories, it was concluded that unused spaces can be used temporarily to contribute to a more inclusive and equal society. It is important to note that temporary use in itself does not necessarily contribute to the desired outcome. Rather, it is about how these places are designed and what they are used for. In the Coco Velten case study, it is evident that the project addressed various societal issues by assisting individuals in vulnerable situations. To achieve this, several different uses were implemented in the project, including common spaces designed through collective methods. The study indicates that the common spaces can be regarded as particularly significant in terms of increasing participation through the temporary use of the spaces and creating conditions for equality and social inclusion. The study also shows that these projects are based on a certain culture of association and collaboration between various social actors. Finally, the study identifies some challenges associated with temporary projects. The study indicates that temporary use with a social perspective requires volunteer labor and people's commitment to be implemented. Other challenges highlighted by the study are the time aspect, financing, and the risk of gentrification.

台北都會區正在面臨轉型，由於老舊建築的生活機能不佳、公共設施也不足，加上安全防災不齊全，所以民間和政府都積極參與都市更新，讓市容煥然一新。這不單只是硬體上拆除重建或建築翻新而已，而是要展現各地方獨特風格形式與魅力，進一步帶動經濟活力，提供下一波成長的競爭力，讓城市每個角落呈現更多創意的嶄新面貌。面對此一目的，本研究希望從此一方向進行探索性研究，探討在都市重生過程中，有時限的閒置空間如何再作利用，帶給企業或機關學校延展性的資源，產生競爭優勢，並且讓空間到期之後，還能順利讓空間重生，提供城市成長的競爭力。 關於再生空間，國內外均有許多實例以文創產業活化閒置空間的案例，但此類再生空間都是以永續經營發展為目標，對於有時限的空間再利用，則鮮少著墨，因此本研究希望了解(1)空間經營組織該如何以文創事業導入都市再生過程中的閒置土地? (2)以文創事業導入都市再生過程中的閒置土地再生空間樣貌為何? (3)空間經營組織在經營再生空間之後，如何建立核心資源?本研究藉由文獻次級資料與報章雜誌的回顧分析，並以都市再生空間為基礎發展出個案研究的基礎架構。選擇之代表研究對象為尚處初步階段的案例，包括城中藝術街區和127公店，希望透過本研究，能給台北都會區發展轉型實務與學術的發展。 本研究初步結論包括：(1) 各組織在動態網絡中，擷取彼此優勢，互賴繁衍生長。(2) 對於使用有年限的再生空間，文創事業不以一般營利為主要導向，給予產業更多靈感。(3)文創事業體的成長是空間經營組織的核心資源。本論文最後進一步提出實務上待克服之地方及後續研究上的建議。 / Due to poor life function of the old buildings, including shortage of public facilities, incomplete security disaster prevention system, and Taipei metropolitan area is force to face urban regeneration which is encouraged by local government and locals. As to the process of urban regeneration, this does not just demolish the old building or reconstruction on the renovation itself, but to show the form of local unique style and charm, to further promote economic vitality by providing growth competitiveness. Therefore, this study wants to be a base for following research in this topic. There are lots of examples of reusing vacant spaces among domestic and foreign countries, but the goal of managing these spaces is making them sustainable. As for reusing time-limited space, the discussion is not mentioned a lot. The purpose of this study is to understand (1) how do organizations that run the vacant spaces cooperate with culture creative industries during urban regeneration process? And what are their relations? (2) What are the space characteristics during culture and creative industry into urban regeneration process? (3) What are the benefits for the organization participating in urban regeneration, and how can the organizations build core resource such as core competence? Through reviewing of secondary data such as literature newspapers and magazines, this study derives the research structure. The cases of this study are still in the initial stage, including UrbanCore Arts Block and store no. 127. This study is hoping to give Taipei metropolitan area practical and academic development in urban regeneration process. The study finds: By cooperation with culture and creative business, companies and organizations learn to develop human resources as the main target. Also, as for time-limited space, cultural and creative business is not lean to consumer-oriented, but to give industry more inspiration. Finally, the growth of cultural creative business is also the core resource for the organizations that run the vacant space. In the end, this paper further proposes difficulties on local practice and recommendations on the follow-up study.