A biologia da reprodução de plantas é um campo de grande interesse, já que a maioria dos alimentos consumidos pelo homem é composta de partes reprodutivas das plantas (frutos e sementes). O pistilo é o órgão reprodutivo feminino, composto de estigma, estilete e ovário. Devido à importância central do pistilo no sucesso da reprodução de plantas, faz-se necessário um melhor conhecimento dos genes e processos que regulam seu desenvolvimento e funcionamento. Estudos comparativos da expressão gênica nos órgãos vegetativos e reprodutivos de Nicotiana tabacum revelaram genes de expressão preferencial nos órgãos reprodutivos, entre eles alguns codificando proteínas de função ainda desconhecida. Um destes genes foi caracterizado e denominado SCI1 (Stigma/style Cell-cycle Inhibitor 1), por apresentar um papel importante no desenvolvimento do estigma/estilete, atuando como um inibidor de ciclo celular tecido-específico (DePaoli et al., 2011). O presente trabalho teve como objetivo estudar os mecanismos moleculares pelos quais NtSCI1 regula o ciclo celular, investigando seus parceiros de interação. Em um ensaio de pull-down, utilizando-se extrato proteico nuclear de estigmas/estiletes de N. tabacum, vários putativos reguladores de ciclo celular foram identificados, sendo a interação entre NtSCI1 e NtCDKG;2 confirmada por BiFC e localizada no nucléolo. Uma biblioteca de cDNAs de estigmas/estiletes de N. tabacum, no sistema de duplo-híbrido de levedura, foi construída com sucesso. O screening desta biblioteca, utilizando BD-NtSCI1 como \"isca\", permitiu a identificação de vários parceiros de interação com NtSCI1, entre eles: uma helicase de RNA DEAD-BOX, a proteína 14-3-3D2, dois fatores de transcrição (HOMEOBOX-22 e STOREKEEPER), um fator de splicing portador do domínio SWAP, uma quinase de adenosina e uma transposase. As interações entre NtSCI1 e os três primeiros parceiros citados já foram confirmadas por BiFC (observadas no núcleo e nucléolo) e a interação entre NtSCI1 e Nt14-3-3D2 foi confirmada também por co-imunoprecipitação. O envolvimento de NtSCI1 com a regulação do ciclo celular foi corroborado pela interação entre NtSCI1 e a proteína NtCICLINA-L1 (subunidade regulatória de CDKG;2), confirmada por duplo-híbrido e por BiFC, no nucléolo. A interação entre NtSCI1 e NtCICLINA-RELATED também foi confirmada por BiFC. Para entender a dinâmica de NtSCI1 no nucléolo, foi estudada a localização subcelular da proteína de fusão NtSCI1-GFP durante as fases do ciclo celular. NtSCI1-GFP foi observada no nucléolo de células BY-2 em interfase e prófase, desaparecendo na metáfase e anáfase e reaparecendo no nucléolo no final da telófase, mostrando que a presença de NtSCI1 na célula é controlada pelo ciclo celular. A construção de uma primeira versão do interactoma de NtSCI1 mostrou seu envolvimento direto e indireto com proteínas relacionadas ao metabolismo de RNAs, controle da transcrição e regulação do ciclo celular. Estes resultados sugerem que NtSCI1 possa atuar no controle do ciclo celular de forma não canônica, por meio de múltiplos processos paralelos que interconectam aspectos da regulação da transcrição e o processamento de RNAs com o controle do ciclo celular. / The biology of plant reproduction is a field of great interest, since most of the food consumed by humans is composed of reproductive parts of plants (fruits and seeds). The pistil is the female reproductive organ, composed of stigma, style and ovary. Due to the central importance of the pistil in the success of plant reproduction, a better knowledge of the genes and processes that regulate pistil development and function is necessary. Comparative studies of gene expression in vegetative and reproductive organs of Nicotiana tabacum have revealed genes preferentially expressed in the reproductive organs, among them some encoding proteins of unknown function. One of these genes was characterized and denominated SCI1 (Stigma/style Cell-cycle Inhibitor 1), since it has an important role in stigma/style development, acting as a tissue-specific cell-cycle inhibitor (DePaoli et al., 2011). The objective of the present work was to study the molecular mechanisms through which NtSCI1 regulates the cell cycle investigating its interaction partners. In a pull-down assay, using nuclear protein extracts from N. tabacum stigmas/styles, several putative cell cycle regulators were identified. Among them, the interaction between NtSCI1 and NtCDKG;2 was confirmed by BiFC and localized in the nucleolus. A N. tabacum stigma/style cDNA library in the yeast two-hybrid system was successfully constructed. The screening of this library, using BD-NtSCI1 as bait, allowed the identification of several NtSCI1 interaction partners, among them: a DEAD-BOX RNA helicase; the 14-3-3D2 protein; two transcription factors (HOMEOBOX-22 and STOREKEEPER); a splicing factor containing a SWAP domain; an adenosine kinase; and a transposase. The interactions between NtSCI1 and the first three mentioned partners have already been confirmed by BiFC (observed in the nucleus and nucleolus) and the interaction between NtSCI1 and Nt14-3-3D2 was also wconfirmed by co-immunoprecipitation. The NtSCI1 involvement in cell cycle regulation was corroborated by the interaction between NtSCI1 and the NtCYCLIN-L1 (a regulatory subunit of CDKG;2), which was confirmed by two-hybrid and BiFC in the nucleolus. The interaction between NtSCI1 and NtCYCLIN-RELATED was also confirmed by BiFC. To understand the dynamics of NtSCI1 in the nucleolus, the subcellular localization of the fusion protein NtSCI1-GFP was studied during the different cell cycle phases. NtSCI1-GFP was observed in the nucleolus of BY-2 cells at interphase and prophase, disappearing at metaphase and anaphase and reappearing in the nucleolus at the end of telophase, showing that NtSCI1 presence in the cell is controlled by the cell cycle. The construction of the first version of NtSCI1 interactome showed its direct and indirect involvement with proteins related to RNA metabolism, transcription control and cell cycle regulation. These results suggest that NtSCI1 may act in cell cycle control in a non-canonical way, through multiple parallel processes interconnecting aspects of transcription regulation, RNA processing and cell cycle control.

Comment le plan d’organisation d’un organisme est-il mis en place est une question centrale de la biologie du développement. Les séquençages complets de plusieurs génomes de métazoaires ont montré qu’un nombre restreint de molécules régulatrices soutiennent la diversité des plans d’organisation des animaux, suggérant que ces molécules sont utilisées de manière répétée dans des contextes différents. Cela soulève la question de la diversité d’action : comment ces molécules acquièrent-elle une diversité fonctionnelle ? De plus, la plupart des molécules régulatrices partagent des motifs (fonctionnels/structuraux) communs, soulevant la question de la spécificité : comment des molécules partageant des propriétés biochimiques similaires contrôlent-elles des programmes développementaux spécifiques ?Mon équipe d’accueil s’intéresse à ces questions en utilisant les facteurs de transcription Hox de la Drosophile comme paradigme d’étude.Durant ma thèse, j’ai développé trois lignes de recherches : (1) J’ai adapté la technique de complémentation bi-moléculaire de fluorescence (BiFC) de visualisation des interactions protéines-protéines à l’embryon de drosophile en développement.(2) J’ai employé la BiFC pour disséquer la formation des complexes Hox-protéines PBC. Mes résultats remettent en question le paradigme établit : (a) en soulignant la multiplicité des modes d’interaction Hox-PBC existants, (b) en démontrant que cette diversité peut être source de spécificité d’action.(3) La BiFC a ensuite été exploitée dans un crible par approche gènes candidats pour identifier de nouveaux partenaires des protéines Hox. / My current laboratory aims to tackle the issue of specificity and diversity of regulatory molecules, taking the Drosophila Hox transcription factors as a paradigm for the analysis. During my PhD, I developed three connected research lines.Project 1: Visualization of protein interactions in living Drosophila embryos by the BiFC assayOur results establish the general suitability of BiFC for revealing and studying protein interactions in their physiological context during the rapid course of Drosophila embryonic development.Project 2: Investigation of Hox/PBC complex formation in vivo using BiFC Our findings challenge the current paradigm of Hox/Pbx complex assembly: (a) highlighting the existence of alternative modes of Pbx recruitment, (b) demonstrating that unique Hox-PBC interaction modes can provide specific regulatory function in absence of DNA-binding selectivity.To achieve this project BiFC was also performed with vertebrate Hox proteins in chicken embryos.Project 3: Realization of a candidate interaction screen based on BiFC to identify novel Hox protein partners in vivo(a) We have revealed that Hox proteins establish specific interactions with different subunits of the general mediator complex. These results constituted one of the rare studies making a direct link between the Hox regulators and components of the basal transcriptional machinery, in a physiological context.(b) We have discovered that Hox proteins can interact with importin proteins. This result allows us to assess the importance of controlling the nuclear localization of Hox proteins for controlling their regulatory activities during embryogenesis.

The development of multi-cellular organisms requires extensive cell-cell communication to coordinate cell functions. However, only a handful of signaling pathways have emerged to mediate all the intercellular communications; therefore, each of them is under an array of regulations to achieve signaling specificity and diversity. One such signaling pathway is the Janus Kinase/ Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway, which is the primary signaling cascade responding to a variety of cytokines and growth factors in mammals and involved in many developmental processes. This signaling pathway is highly conserved between mammals and Drosophila, but the Drosophila JAK/STAT pathway possesses only three ligands: Unpaired (Upd), Upd2 and Upd3. Co-localized expression patterns of the ligands at several developmental stages raise the possibility that they physically interact. This work was aimed at testing the protein-protein interactions between Upd-family ligands and exploring possible outcomes of ligand oligomerization. Physical interactions between Upd-family ligands were tested using a Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC) assay. The data suggested that homotypic interactions of Upd2 and Upd3 were stronger than their respective heterotypic interactions with Upd, and the homotypic interaction between Upd molecules was the weakest. In addition, the homotypic interaction of Upd3 was confirmed using yeast two-hybrid interaction assays. To identify protein domains critical for Upd3/Upd3 interaction, a series of poly-alanine substitutions were made to target the 6 conserved domains of Upd3. All 6 substitutions altered the strength of Upd3/Upd3 interaction and drastically reduced Upd3-induced JAK signaling activity. In addition, poly-alanine substitutions of some domains also affected Upd3 extracellular localization or protein accumulation. Potential outcomes of interactions between Upd-family ligands were tested both in vitro and in vivo. The interaction between Upd and Upd3 did not significantly change the level of JAK signaling activity. However, loss of Upd3 restricted the distribution of Upd in egg chambers and consequently altered the follicle cell composition. Therefore, Upd/Upd3 interaction is likely to affect the range rather than the intensity of JAK signaling in egg chambers. In summary, this study suggested the possibility of ligand oligomerization as a mechanism for regulating signaling pathways in order to achieve signaling specificity and diversity during development.

(anglicky) Alba-family proteins were identified in Archaea and Eucarya and are classified among the oldest and the most conserved nucleic acid-binding proteins. The binding preferences and roles differ among certain evolution clades. In Crenarchaea they represent chromatin-binding proteins, while their role in RNA metabolism is suggested in Euryarchaea and Eukaryotes. ALBA proteins are well characterized in human, where they play a role in the RNAse P/MRP complex and in unicellular parasites, such as Plasmodium and Trypanosoma, where an involvement in the life cycle regulation is confirmed. In plants, their role is not yet well understood. The aim of this thesis is to increase a knowledge about the Alba-family proteins in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Based on a minimal changes to development and reproduction in single mutants and high sequence similarity, a functional redundancy of the proteins was assumed. For better understanding of the ALBA proteins function, three smaller members of the family were edited by the same metod. The obtained triple mutant showed delay in flowering. ALBA dimer formation was confirmed in many organisms. BiFC method was used to determine Arabidopsis ALBA homodimerization. The data analysis showed potential homodimerization in most of them.

3-Deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate (DAHP) synthase (DHS) catalyzes the first step of the shikimate pathway - a pathway involved in Tyrosine (Tyr), Tryptophan (Trp) and Phenylalanine (Phe) biosynthesis - by condensation of phosphoenolpyruvate and erythrose-4-phosphate to DAHP. Our lab previously demonstrated that Arabidopsis thaliana shikimate pathway flux is regulated by Tyr and Trp. This project suggests that A. thaliana DHS1 overexpressor lines have increased Trp accumulation with Tyr treatment, and that an A. thaliana DHS2 overexpressor line treated with Tyr has unchanged Trp accumulation, indicating that AtDHS2 is Tyr-sensitive. Confocal microscopy of all 3 AtDHS isoforms fused to yellow fluorescent protein demonstrates chloroplast localization. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation indicates that protein-protein interactions occur in the cytoplasm, and not in the chloroplast, for AtDHS1 and AtDHS2 with the metabolic regulator At14-3-3ω. These findings suggest that protein-protein interactions could regulate accumulation of AtDHS2 in the chloroplast, and are perhaps modulated by Tyr.

Selon le modèle classique, le signal reçu par les récepteurs couplés aux protéines G (RCPG) se propage suite à des interactions transitoires et aléatoires entre les RCPGs, les protéines G et leurs effecteurs. Par les techniques de transfert d’énergie de résonance de bioluminescence (BRET), de complémentation bimoléculaire de protéines fluorescentes (BiFC) et de co-immunoprécipitation, nous avons observé que les récepteurs, les protéines G et les effecteurs forment un complexe stable, avant et après l’activation des récepteurs. L’interaction entre l’effecteur Kir3 et le dimère Gbetagamma se produit initialement au réticulum endoplasmique et est sensible à un agoniste liposoluble des récepteurs beta2-adrénergiques. Bien que peu de spécificité pour les nombreux isoformes des sous-unités Gbetagamma ait été observée pour l’activation du canal Kir3, les interactions précoces au RE sont plus sensibles aux différentes combinaisons de Gbetagamma présentes. En plus de son rôle dans la régulation des effecteurs, le dimère Gbetagamma peut interagir avec de nombreuses protéines possédant des localisations cellulaires autres que la membrane plasmique. Nous avons identifié une nouvelle classe de protéines interagissant avec la sous-unité Gbeta, autant en système de surexpression que dans des extraits de cerveaux de rats, soit les protéines FosB et cFos, qui forment le complexe de transcription AP-1, suite à leur dimérisation avec les protéines de la famille des Jun. La coexpression du dimère Gbetagamma réduit l’activité transcriptionnelle du complexe AP-1 induit par le phorbol 12-,myristate 13-acetate (PMA), sans toutefois interférer avec la formation du complexe Fos/Jun ou son interaction avec l’ADN. Toutefois, le dimère Gbetagamma colocalise au noyau avec le complexe AP-1 et recrute les protéines histones déacétylases (HDAC) afin d’inhiber l’activité transcriptionnelle du complexe AP-1. / Based on the classical model of G protein activation, signal transduction occurs by transient and random interactions between the receptor, the G protein and the effectors. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay (BiFC) and co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that receptor, heterotrimeric G proteins and effectors were found in stable complexes that persisted during signal transduction. Kir3 channel and Gbetagamma dimer interacts first in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and this interaction can be modulated by the membrane-permeable beta2-adrenergic agonist cimaterol. Little specificity has been reported for several isoforms of the Gbetagamma dimer in the activation of the Kir3 channel. However, we found that the “precocious” interaction in the ER is sensitive to the presence of different combination of Gbeta and Ggamma subunits. Recently, a number of new proteins, which are not classical effectors at the plasma membrane have been shown to interact with GbetagammaThese include histone deacetylases 4 and 5 (HDAC)[1, 2] and the glucocorticoid receptor. We identified a novel interaction between Gbetagamma subunit and the Fos proteins, which form the transcription factor AP-1 following their dimerization with Jun proteins. Gbetagamma and Fos interactions can be detected in HEK 293 cells overexpressing the two proteins as well as in brains from rats pre-treated with amphetamine. Gbetagamma/Fos interaction favours the nuclear translocation of Gbetagamma dimer and inhibits AP-1 transcriptional activity. Gbetagamma did not block Fos/Jun dimerization or the interaction of AP-1 with DNA but recruited HDACs to the AP-1 complex.

3-Deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate (DAHP) synthase (DHS) catalyzes the first step of the shikimate pathway - a pathway involved in Tyrosine (Tyr), Tryptophan (Trp) and Phenylalanine (Phe) biosynthesis - by condensation of phosphoenolpyruvate and erythrose-4-phosphate to DAHP. Our lab previously demonstrated that Arabidopsis thaliana shikimate pathway flux is regulated by Tyr and Trp. This project suggests that A. thaliana DHS1 overexpressor lines have increased Trp accumulation with Tyr treatment, and that an A. thaliana DHS2 overexpressor line treated with Tyr has unchanged Trp accumulation, indicating that AtDHS2 is Tyr-sensitive. Confocal microscopy of all 3 AtDHS isoforms fused to yellow fluorescent protein demonstrates chloroplast localization. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation indicates that protein-protein interactions occur in the cytoplasm, and not in the chloroplast, for AtDHS1 and AtDHS2 with the metabolic regulator At14-3-3ω. These findings suggest that protein-protein interactions could regulate accumulation of AtDHS2 in the chloroplast, and are perhaps modulated by Tyr.

Selon le modèle classique, le signal reçu par les récepteurs couplés aux protéines G (RCPG) se propage suite à des interactions transitoires et aléatoires entre les RCPGs, les protéines G et leurs effecteurs. Par les techniques de transfert d’énergie de résonance de bioluminescence (BRET), de complémentation bimoléculaire de protéines fluorescentes (BiFC) et de co-immunoprécipitation, nous avons observé que les récepteurs, les protéines G et les effecteurs forment un complexe stable, avant et après l’activation des récepteurs. L’interaction entre l’effecteur Kir3 et le dimère Gbetagamma se produit initialement au réticulum endoplasmique et est sensible à un agoniste liposoluble des récepteurs beta2-adrénergiques. Bien que peu de spécificité pour les nombreux isoformes des sous-unités Gbetagamma ait été observée pour l’activation du canal Kir3, les interactions précoces au RE sont plus sensibles aux différentes combinaisons de Gbetagamma présentes. En plus de son rôle dans la régulation des effecteurs, le dimère Gbetagamma peut interagir avec de nombreuses protéines possédant des localisations cellulaires autres que la membrane plasmique. Nous avons identifié une nouvelle classe de protéines interagissant avec la sous-unité Gbeta, autant en système de surexpression que dans des extraits de cerveaux de rats, soit les protéines FosB et cFos, qui forment le complexe de transcription AP-1, suite à leur dimérisation avec les protéines de la famille des Jun. La coexpression du dimère Gbetagamma réduit l’activité transcriptionnelle du complexe AP-1 induit par le phorbol 12-,myristate 13-acetate (PMA), sans toutefois interférer avec la formation du complexe Fos/Jun ou son interaction avec l’ADN. Toutefois, le dimère Gbetagamma colocalise au noyau avec le complexe AP-1 et recrute les protéines histones déacétylases (HDAC) afin d’inhiber l’activité transcriptionnelle du complexe AP-1. / Based on the classical model of G protein activation, signal transduction occurs by transient and random interactions between the receptor, the G protein and the effectors. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay (BiFC) and co-immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that receptor, heterotrimeric G proteins and effectors were found in stable complexes that persisted during signal transduction. Kir3 channel and Gbetagamma dimer interacts first in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and this interaction can be modulated by the membrane-permeable beta2-adrenergic agonist cimaterol. Little specificity has been reported for several isoforms of the Gbetagamma dimer in the activation of the Kir3 channel. However, we found that the “precocious” interaction in the ER is sensitive to the presence of different combination of Gbeta and Ggamma subunits. Recently, a number of new proteins, which are not classical effectors at the plasma membrane have been shown to interact with GbetagammaThese include histone deacetylases 4 and 5 (HDAC)[1, 2] and the glucocorticoid receptor. We identified a novel interaction between Gbetagamma subunit and the Fos proteins, which form the transcription factor AP-1 following their dimerization with Jun proteins. Gbetagamma and Fos interactions can be detected in HEK 293 cells overexpressing the two proteins as well as in brains from rats pre-treated with amphetamine. Gbetagamma/Fos interaction favours the nuclear translocation of Gbetagamma dimer and inhibits AP-1 transcriptional activity. Gbetagamma did not block Fos/Jun dimerization or the interaction of AP-1 with DNA but recruited HDACs to the AP-1 complex.

The development of plant flowers represents a complex process controlled by numerous mechanisms. The creation of double homozygous mutant of both β subunits (sometimes also referred to as basic transcription factor 3) of nascent polypeptide associated complex in Arabidopsis thaliana (further referred to as nacβ1 nacβ2) caused quite a strong defective phenotype including abnormal number of flower organs, shorter siliques with a reduced seed set, and inferior pollen germination rate together with a lower ovule targeting efficiency. Previously, NAC complex was described to be formed as a heterodimer composed of an α- and β-subunit, which binds ribosome and acts as a chaperone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In plants, NACβ is connected to stress tolerance and to plant development as a transcription regulator. However, little is known of NAC heterodimer function in plants. In this thesis, yeast two hybrid system (Y2H) and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays were used to verify the NAC heterodimer formation in A. thaliana and to establish any potential interaction preferences between both NACβ paralogues and five NACα paralogues. To deepen the understanding about molecular mechanisms behind the nacβ1 nacβ2 phenotype, flower bud transcriptome of the nacβ1 nacβ2 double homozygous mutants...

Les récepteurs couplés aux protéines G (RCPGs) constituent la plus grande classe de récepteurs membranaires impliqués dans la transmission des signaux extracellulaires. Traditionnellement, la transmission de la signalisation par les RCPGs implique l’activation d’une protéine G hétéro-trimérique qui pourra à son tour moduler l’activité de divers effecteurs intracellulaires. Ce schéma classique de signalisation s’est complexifié au fils des années et l’on sait maintenant qu’en plus d’interagir avec les protéines G, les RCPGs s’associent avec une panoplie d’autres protéines afin de transmettre adéquatement les signaux extracellulaires. En particulier, la découverte d’une famille de protéines transmembranaires modulant la fonction des RCPGs, baptisées protéines modifiant l’activité des récepteurs (« receptor activity-modifying proteins » ; RAMPs), a changé la façon de concevoir la signalisation par certains RCPGs. Dans le cas du récepteur similaire au récepteur de la calcitonine (« calcitonin-like receptor » ; CLR), l’association avec les RAMPs permet l’acheminement à la surface cellulaire du récepteur tout en modulant ses propriétés pharmacologiques. Lorsqu’il est associé avec RAMP1, le CLR fonctionne comme un récepteur du peptide relié au gène de la calcitonine (« calcitonin gene-related peptide » ; CGRP), alors qu’il devient un récepteur de l’adrénomedulline lorsqu’il interagit avec RAMP2 ou RAMP3. D’autre part, en plus d’interagir avec des protéines accessoires transmembranaires telles les RAMPs, les RCPGs peuvent aussi s’associer entre eux pour former des oligomères de récepteurs. Dans cette thèse, nous nous sommes penchés sur les interactions entre les RCPGs et les RAMPs, et plus particulièrement sur l’interrelation entre ce type d’association RCPG/RAMP et l’assemblage en oligomères de récepteurs, en utilisant le récepteur du CGRP comme modèle d’étude. Une première étude nous a tout d’abord permis de confirmer l’interaction entre le récepteur CLR et RAMP1, dans un contexte de cellules vivantes. Nous avons démontré que ce complexe CLR/RAMP1 active la protéine G et recrute la protéine de signalisation -arrestine suite à une stimulation par le CGRP. Ensuite, nous avons déterminé que même s’il doit obligatoirement former un hétéro-oligomère avec les RAMPs pour être actif, le CLR conserve malgré tout sa capacité à interagir avec d’autres RCPGs. En plus d’observer la présence d’homo-oligomère de CLR, nous avons constaté que tout comme les RCPGs, les RAMPs peuvent eux-aussi s’associer entre eux pour former des complexes oligomériques pouvant comprendre différents sous-types (RAMP1/RAMP2 et RAMP1/RAMP3). Cette observation de la présence d’homo-oligomères de CLR et de RAMP1, nous a amené à nous questionner sur la stœchiométrie d’interaction du complexe CLR/RAMP1. Dans une deuxième étude ayant pour but d’établir la composition moléculaire du récepteur CGRP1 in vivo, nous avons développé une nouvelle approche permettant l’étude de l’interaction entre trois protéines dans un contexte de cellules vivantes. Cette technique baptisée BRET/BiFC, est basée sur le transfert d’énergie de résonance de bioluminescence entre un donneur luminescent, la Renilla luciférase, et un accepteur fluorescent, la protéine fluorescente jaune (YFP), reconstituée suite au ré-assemblage de ces deux fragments. En utilisant cette approche, nous avons pu déterminer que le récepteur CGRP1 est constitué d’un homo-oligomère de CLR interagissant avec un monomère de RAMP1. En démontrant un assemblage oligomérique asymétrique pour le récepteur CGRP1 à partir d’une nouvelle approche biophysique, nous croyons que les travaux présentés dans cette thèse ont contribué à élargir nos connaissances sur le fonctionnement de la grande famille des RCPGs, et seront utile à la poursuite des recherches sur les complexes protéiques impliqués dans la signalisation. / G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest family of membrane receptors involved in signal transduction. Traditionally, signal transduction by GPCRs involves the activation of a hetero-trimeric G protein which will then modulate the activity of several intracellular effectors. We can now appreciate the fact that in addition to their interaction with G proteins, GPCRs also associate with several other proteins, in order to allow proper signal transduction. In particular, the discovery of a family of proteins called receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs) has challenged the traditional views of signal transduction by some GPCRs. In the case of the calcitonin-like receptor (CLR), the association with RAMPs allows the proper cell surface targeting of the receptor in addition to modulate it’s pharmacological properties. Co-expression of CLR with RAMP1 leads to a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor, whereas CLR association with RAMP2 or RAMP3 promotes the formation of an adrenomedullin receptor. In addition to their interaction with transmembrane accessory proteins such as RAMPs, GPCRs can also interact with other receptors to form receptors oligomers. In this thesis, we were interested in the interactions between GPCRs and RAMPs, and particularly, in the link between these GPCR/RAMP interactions and the assembly of receptor oligomers, using CGRP1 receptor as a model. We first confirmed the interaction between CLR and RAMP1 in living cells. We showed that this CLR/RAMP1 complex activates G proteins and recruits the signalling protein -arrestin upon CGRP stimulation. Next, we demonstrated that even if the CLR requires hetero-oligomeric assembly with RAMPs in order to be active, this receptor can still interact with other GPCRs. In addition to CLR homo-oligomers, we observed that RAMPs can also self-associate to form oligomeric complexes which can involve different subtypes (RAMP1/RAMP2 and RAMP1/RAMP3). This observation of the presence of CLR and RAMP1 homo-oligomers raised the question of the stoiechiometry of interaction of the CLR/RAMP1 complex. In order to establish the molecular composition of the CGRP1 receptor in vivo, we developed a novel approach allowing the detection of the interaction between three proteins in living cells. This method called BRET/BiFC is based on the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer between a luminescent energy donor, Renilla luciferase, and a fluorescent energy acceptor, the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP), reconstituted after the re-association of its two fragments. Using this approach, we showed that the CGRP1 receptor consist of a homo-oligomer of CLR interacting with a monomer of RAMP1. By demonstrating the asymmetrical organization of the CGRP1 receptor complex using a novel biophysical approach, we believe that the results presented herein have contributed to increase our knowledge of the mechanisms of function of the large family of GPCRs and will be useful for the pursuit of research on protein complexes involved in signalling pathways.