Spelling suggestions: "subject:"boendetrappan"" "subject:"boendetrappor""
1 |
"Att känna att man är en deltagare och inte en åskådare" : En kvalitativ studie om hur vägen ut ur hemlöshet kan se ut och upplevas samt hur personer med erfarenhet av att vara hemlösa kan se på samhällets lösningar kring hemlöshet.Norman-Häggström, Micaela, Blom, Olivia January 2011 (has links)
This study aims to find out how the way out of homelessness can look and be experienced and in what way persons with experience of being homeless might think about our society´s different solutions to this problem. The study is based on five half-structured qualitative interviews with persons who have experience of being homeless. The theoretical perspectives used to analyze the empirism are “Stages of Change” and “The Process of Role Exit”, both dealing with changing processes. Our results show that the way out of homelessness can be long and very hard to achieve, and the change in housing situation can be either a process towards a more and more stable housing or through an opportunity that suddenly appears. Another result shows that people with the experience of being homeless can be negative to the solutions offered by our society but be positive to the idea of Housing First. One conclusion is that a housing of your own can mean more for the individual than just somewhere to sleep. To have a housing of your own can lead to personal development such as trying to get rid of one´s addiction or get better relations with one´s family.
|
2 |
I hemlöshetens namn : En litteraturstudie i vilken modellerna Bostad Först och Boendetrappan jämförs. / In the name of homelessness : A litterature study in which the models Housing First and the Traditional Housing Staircase are comparedTidqvist, Elin, Tahir, Goshina January 2022 (has links)
Syftet med uppsatsen var göra en jämförelse mellan två kommunala insatser mot hemlöshet, Bostad Först och Boendetrappan. Studien genomfördes i form av en allmän litteraturstudie. Litteratursökningen genomfördes i databasen EBSCO och resulterade i nio utvalda artiklar. All empiri analyserades utifrån Fribergs analysmodell. Två teorier användes för att analysera resultatet, empowerment och kritisk praktikteori. Resultatet visade fler fördelar än nackdelar med Bostad Först och fler nackdelar än fördelar med Boendetrappan. Resultatet visade också att det fanns både likheter och olikheter mellan insatserna där likheterna speglade organisatoriska förutsättningar och hinder medan olikheterna visade på olika arbetssätt med klienterna. Slutsatsen i denna studie var att Bostad Först bedömdes vara mer effektivt för långsiktig lösning av hemlöshet. / The aim of this study was to make a comparison between two municipal social services efforts against homelessness, Housing First and the Traditional Housing Staircase Model. The study was conducted in the form of a general literature study. The literature search was performed in the EBSCO database and resulted in nine selected articles. All empirical data was analyzed using Fribergs analytical model. Two theories were used to analyze the result, empowerment, and critical practice theory. The result showed more advantages than disadvantages with Housing First, and more disadvantages than advantages with the Traditional Housing Staircase Model. The result also showed that there were both similarities and differences between the two social service efforts where the similarities reflected organizational conditions and obstacles, while the similarities showed different methods of working with the clients. The conclusion of this study was that Housing First was assessed to be more effective for a long-term solution of homelessness.
|
3 |
”... att alltid ge bifall. Slippa avslagen. Men det funkar ju inte.” : Frontlinjebyråkrater och handlingsutrymme / “...to always grant. Avoid refusal. But that won’t work, though.” : A qualitative study into the tone and emphasis of today’s municipal work against homelessness and the reflections of social workers on changeRintamaa, Johan January 2010 (has links)
This investigation aimed to shed light on the terms of the dispensing and the retaining of municipal social benefits granted by Swedish social services, this in regard of a less visible societal subgroup; citizens who cannot attain or retain housing of their own. Through qualitative interviews with six municipal social workers in Skåne, the plight of these citizens is revealed from a policy-making perspective in respect of views on discretion and individual appreciation. How may the applicant impact the application process and how does social subletting operate as a service effort? Further analysis of the accounts of informants’ views on change and the reasons for change, sketched an image of a society where public acceptance and tolerance are crucial factors for citizens hoping to achieve a homestead through means of municipal intervention. In conclusion, flexible attitudes towards job description are of major import to the possibility of offering client support in under-staffed municipal environs. Furthermore, reflexive social workers allying with the applicant throughout the process, from application to intervention are decisive for efficacious, long-term social work.
|
Page generated in 0.0566 seconds