L'obtention des données a été subventionnée par CIORA (Canadian Initiative for Outcomes in Rheumatology Care). CIORA a aussi financé l'analyse des données effectuées par Justine Zehr. L'Initiative Canadienne Pour Des Resultats En Soins Rhumatologiques (ICORA) a financé l'obtention des données et une partie de l'analyse statistique présentée dans ce mémoire. / La plupart des femmes ayant été atteintes d’arthrite juvénile idiopathique (AJI) continuent de souffrir d’arthrite à l’âge adulte. Certains des médicaments utilisés dans le traitement de l’arthrite tels que les corticostéroïdes et les antiinflammatoires non stéroïdiens (AINS) ne sont pas recommandés durant la grossesse. Le but de ce mémoire est d’estimer l’impact de la prise de ces médicaments sur les événements néfastes à l’accouchement chez ces femmes et leur bébé. Des données administratives sur les prescriptions de médicaments et les hospitalisations d’une cohorte de 1756 femmes ayant souffert d’AJI sont utilisées. Elles ont permis de reconstruire l’historique de consommation de médicaments contre l’arthrite chez les femmes durant la grossesse et l’année précédente. Pour ce faire, deux sous-cohortes de femmes ayant souffert d’AJI ont été formées : une pour la période grossesse et une autre pour la grossesse et l’année précédant celle-ci. Les événements d’intérêt étaient : malformations congénitales, complications néonatales, complications maternelles et petit poids pour l’âge gestationnel. Les proportions de cas présentant l’un de ces événements variaient entre 11,52% et 37,08%. Les médicaments ont été modélisés en terme d’utilisation ou de durée totale de consommation durant la période d’étude. Pour chaque événement, des modèles logistiques ont été estimés pour mesurer l’association entre la prise de médicaments et l’événement, en ajustant pour des variables de confusion potentielles : hypertension avant la grossesse, âge à l’accouchement et obtention du diplôme de secondaire. La consommation de corticostéroïdes semble augmenter statistiquement significativement le risque de présenter des malformations congénitales mais n’avoir aucun impact sur les autres événements. Aucun lien statistiquement significatif n’a été observé entre la consommation de AINS et les événements d’intérêt. / Most women diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) continue to suffer from arthritis in adulthood. Some of the drugs used to treat arthritis such as corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are not recommended during pregnancy. The objective of this thesis is to estimate the impact of these drugs on adverse birth outcomes in women previously diagnosed with JIA and their baby. Administrative data on drug prescriptions and hospitalizations in a cohort of 1756 women with a history of JIA were used to determine individual histories of drug use for the treatment of arthritis during pregnancy and during the year leading to the pregnancy. Two sub-cohorts of women who suffered from JIA were created : one corresponding to the pregnancy and the other to the pregnancy and the year leading to the pregnancy. The events of interest were : congenital anomalies, neonatal adverse outcomes, maternal adverse outcomes and small for gestational age babies. Proportions of the events ranged between 11,52% and 37,08%. Drugs were modelled in terms of use or duration of use during each of the study periods. Logistic regression models were fitted to measure the association between drugs and each of the events, adjusting for the following potential confounding variables : hypertension before pregnancy, maternal age and graduating from high school. The consumption of corticosteroids was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of congenital anomalies but had no impact on the other adverse events. No statistically significant associations were observed between consumption of NSAIDs and the adverse events of interest.

Os objetivos deste trabalho foram: comparar a força muscular (FM) e as habilidades motoras de pacientes com Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne (DMD) em corticoterapia com a evolução natural da doença (Scott, 1982) e identificar a idade ideal de início da corticoterapia. Noventa pacientes com DMD em seguimento ambulatorial no Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, submetidos à corticoterapia (deflazacort ou prednisolona) por um período variável de um a sete anos, foram avaliados quanto à FM através da escala MRC e quanto às habilidades motoras através da escala Hammersmith motor ability score. Foram incluídos no estudo todos os pacientes com idade entre cinco e 12 anos, que compreendiam comandos verbais e que não haviam sido submetidos a cirurgias ortopédicas corretivas ou interrompido em algum momento a corticoterapia. A relação entre FM e habilidades motoras, a comparação dos dados com aqueles do estudo de Scott et al. e a análise da influência do tempo de tratamento, da idade de início e da idade na avaliação, sobre os valores obtidos nos testes foram submetidas a tratamento estatístico. Concluiu-se que: a progressão da perda da FM e das habilidades motoras em relação à idade foi mais lenta do que a da evolução natural em todas as faixas etárias avaliadas; quanto maior a idade maior a diferença entre os dois estudos; a perda da FM foi mais intensa do que a perda da funcionalidade; a metodologia utilizada não permitiu estabelecer com clareza a influência da idade de início do tratamento sobre os parâmetros avaliados, porém demonstrou a influência positiva do tempo de tratamento sobre a FM e habilidades motoras. / The aims of this study were: to compare muscle strength (MS) and motor abilities of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) patients in use of steroids, with the natural evolution of the disease (Scott, 1982) and to identify the ideal age for starting on steroid therapy. Ninety patients with DMD followed as outpatients at the Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine and submitted to steroid therapy (deflazacort or prednisolone) for a period of one to seven years were assessed for MS using the MRC scale, and for motor abilities with the motor ability score from the Hammersmith scale. All patients aged between five and 12 years who understood verbal commands and who had not been submitted to corrective orthopedic surgery and had no interruption in steroid therapy, were included in the study. Statistical analysis was carried out to assess the relationship between MS and motor abilities and to compare our data against results of Scott\'s study. The influence of length of treatment, age at disease onset and first assessment, on values obtained in the tests was investigated. We concluded that: the progression in loss of MS and of motor abilities with age was slower than the natural evolution across all age groups studied; the higher the age the greater the difference between the two studies; loss of MS was more intense than loss of functionality; the methodology used was unable to clearly ascertain the influence of age at treatment on the parameters assessed, but a positive influence of length of treatment on both MS and motor abilities was identified.

L’allogreffe de cellules souches hématopoïétiques (CSH) est un des seuls traitements curatifs des hémopathies bénignes ou malignes et des déficits immunitaires primitifs. Cependant, les infections notamment virales ainsi que la réaction du greffon contre l’hôte comptent parmi les complications les plus fréquentes des allogreffes associées à une morbidité et une mortalité élevées. Les infections virales surviennent souvent en l’absence de reconstitution immunitaire spécifique dans un contexte d’immunosuppression liée à la GVHD elle-même ou à la prophylaxie ou au traitement de la GVHD. Les traitements médicamenteux anti-viraux préconisés présentent une efficacité inconstante dans ce contexte d’immunodéficience et ne sont pas dénués de toxicité. L’alternative thérapeutique prometteuse est l’immunothérapie adoptive cellulaire notamment celle qui consiste en l’injection de lymphocytes T spécifiques anti-viraux isolés par technique immunomagnétique (VSTs). Cependant, ces lymphocytes T peuvent être la cible des traitements immunosuppresseurs administrés pour la GVHD mais également par eux-mêmes être potentiellement la cause de la survenue ou de la réactivation d’une GVHD. Nous avons montré dans ce travail que l’efficacité des VSTs, qui repose sur leur expansion in vivo lors de la rencontre avec le virus circulant, est principalement permise par les sous-populations lymphocytaires les plus immatures, même si elles ne sont présentes qu’en faible proportion. Nous défendons dans ce travail le fait que l’efficacité des VST ainsi que leur persistance repose prioritairement sur la présence des sous-populations lymphocytaires T les plus immatures et ce quel que soit le degré de compatibilité HLA entre les VSTs et le receveur. De plus, leur sensibilité modérée aux corticoïdes, que nous avons étudiée in vitro, ne justifie pas la modulation de l’immunosuppression lors de l’injection des ADV-VSTs, comme observé in vivo dans le protocole clinique multicentrique de phase I/II que nous avons mené entre 2012 et 2015. En effet, ce protocole clinique ne rapporte aucune GVHD de novo après injection d’ADV-VSTs ; en revanche, la modulation de l’immunosuppression peut potentiellement être incriminée dans la réactivation de GVHD dans les semaines suivant l’injection des ADV-VSTs. La réalisation d’un essai comparatif de phase II permettra de prouver très clairement le rôle des VSTs dans la réactivation de GVHD. / Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is one of the only curative treatments for benign or malignant hematological diseases and primary immune deficiencies. However, viral infections and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are among the most frequent complications after HSCT associated with high morbidity and mortality. Viral infections often occur in the absence of specific immune reconstitution in the context of immunosuppression related to GVHD itself or to the prophylaxis or treatment of GVHD. The recommended anti-viral drug treatments have an inconsistent efficacy in this context of immunodeficiency and are not devoid of toxicity. The promising therapeutic alternative is adoptive immunotherapy, in particular the infusion of specific anti-viral T lymphocytes isolated by immunomagnetic technique (VSTs). However, these T lymphocytes may be targeted by immunosuppressive treatments administered for GVHD, but also may be the cause of the onset or reactivation of GVHD. We have shown in this work that the efficacy of VSTs, which is based on their in vivo expansion when they encounter the circulating virus, is mainly allowed by the most immature lymphocyte subpopulations, even in a small proportion. We argue in this work that the efficacy of VSTs and their persistence is mainly based on the presence of the most immature T lymphocyte subpopulations and this regardless of the degree of HLA compatibility between the VSTs and the recipient. Moreover, their moderate sensitivity to corticosteroids, which we have studied in vitro, does not justify the modulation of immunosuppression at the time of infusion of ADV-VSTs, as observed in vivo in the multicenter phase I / II clinical trial we conducted between 2012 and 2015. Indeed, this clinical trial does not report any de novo GVHD after ADV-VSTs infusion. On the other hand, modulation of immunosuppression may potentially be incriminated in the reactivation of GVHD within weeks of ADV-VST infusion. A Phase II comparative trial will bring the evidence of efficacy and will clearly determine the role of VSTs in the reactivation of GVHD

Os objetivos deste trabalho foram: comparar a força muscular (FM) e as habilidades motoras de pacientes com Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne (DMD) em corticoterapia com a evolução natural da doença (Scott, 1982) e identificar a idade ideal de início da corticoterapia. Noventa pacientes com DMD em seguimento ambulatorial no Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, submetidos à corticoterapia (deflazacort ou prednisolona) por um período variável de um a sete anos, foram avaliados quanto à FM através da escala MRC e quanto às habilidades motoras através da escala Hammersmith motor ability score. Foram incluídos no estudo todos os pacientes com idade entre cinco e 12 anos, que compreendiam comandos verbais e que não haviam sido submetidos a cirurgias ortopédicas corretivas ou interrompido em algum momento a corticoterapia. A relação entre FM e habilidades motoras, a comparação dos dados com aqueles do estudo de Scott et al. e a análise da influência do tempo de tratamento, da idade de início e da idade na avaliação, sobre os valores obtidos nos testes foram submetidas a tratamento estatístico. Concluiu-se que: a progressão da perda da FM e das habilidades motoras em relação à idade foi mais lenta do que a da evolução natural em todas as faixas etárias avaliadas; quanto maior a idade maior a diferença entre os dois estudos; a perda da FM foi mais intensa do que a perda da funcionalidade; a metodologia utilizada não permitiu estabelecer com clareza a influência da idade de início do tratamento sobre os parâmetros avaliados, porém demonstrou a influência positiva do tempo de tratamento sobre a FM e habilidades motoras. / The aims of this study were: to compare muscle strength (MS) and motor abilities of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) patients in use of steroids, with the natural evolution of the disease (Scott, 1982) and to identify the ideal age for starting on steroid therapy. Ninety patients with DMD followed as outpatients at the Clinics Hospital of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine and submitted to steroid therapy (deflazacort or prednisolone) for a period of one to seven years were assessed for MS using the MRC scale, and for motor abilities with the motor ability score from the Hammersmith scale. All patients aged between five and 12 years who understood verbal commands and who had not been submitted to corrective orthopedic surgery and had no interruption in steroid therapy, were included in the study. Statistical analysis was carried out to assess the relationship between MS and motor abilities and to compare our data against results of Scott\'s study. The influence of length of treatment, age at disease onset and first assessment, on values obtained in the tests was investigated. We concluded that: the progression in loss of MS and of motor abilities with age was slower than the natural evolution across all age groups studied; the higher the age the greater the difference between the two studies; loss of MS was more intense than loss of functionality; the methodology used was unable to clearly ascertain the influence of age at treatment on the parameters assessed, but a positive influence of length of treatment on both MS and motor abilities was identified.

Background: Evidence-based treatment algorithms, successfully established for asthma, are missing for atopic eczema (AE). Objectives: To investigate whether treatment according to an evidence-based algorithm is an effective and applicable concept for the management of AE. Methods: Based on a systematic literature review, we developed an evidence-based severity-score-oriented treatment algorithm for AE and compared its effectiveness to that of an individualised symptom-oriented treatment (individual therapy) in a randomised controlled trial. Sixty-three participants were randomised to algorithm (n = 32) or individual therapy (n = 31) and treated accordingly for 12 months. Study end points included difference between baseline SCORAD and mean SCORAD under treatment (primary end point), quality of life and treatment utilisation. Analysis was by intention to treat (registration: ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00148746). Results: No statistically significant differences in clinical or subjective response were observed between groups. Treatment following the algorithm and individual treatment both effectively controlled AE. Mean SCORAD reductions were 47% (95% confidence interval, CI = 38–55; algorithm) and 42% (95% CI = 29–54; individual). Clinical response was paralleled by improved quality of life in both groups. Physicians adhered to the algorithm option in 93% of their treatment decisions. Conclusion: Treatment following an evidence-based algorithm is an effective and applicable concept for the management of AE but does not show clear advantages compared to individualised treatment in a dermatological setting. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Background: Pimecrolimus cream (Elidel®, SDZ ASM 981), a non-steroid inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines, is effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). We assessed whether early treatment of AD signs/symptoms reduces the need for topical corticosteroids. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in the long-term management of adult AD. Methods: 192 adults with moderate to severe AD were randomised (1:1) for twice daily (b.i.d.) treatment of early signs or symptoms of AD with either pimecrolimus cream 1% or vehicle cream (control group) to prevent progression to flares. Treatment was given as needed for 24 weeks. In the event of flares, a moderately potent corticosteroid (prednicarbate 0.25% cream) was permitted as rescue medication in both groups. The percentage of days on which a topical corticosteroid was used to treat disease flares was the main outcome measure. Results: Corticosteroid medication was used on 14.2% (95% confidence interval, CI: 8.3–21.1) of the days of the 24-week treatment period in the pimecrolimus group and on 37.2% (95% CI: 30.4–44.0) of the days in the control group (p < 0.001). In total, 44.8% (43/96) of patients in the pimecrolimus group did not experience a flare compared with 18.8% (18/96) of patients in the control group. The median time to first flare was 144 days in the pimecrolimus group and 26 days in the control group (p < 0.001). Pimecrolimus treatment was also associated with improvement in signs and symptoms of AD, pruritus, patients’ self-assessment and quality of life. Conclusions: Pimecrolimus cream 1% b.i.d. is an effective, well-tolerated, long-term treatment for AD in adults, substantially reducing the number of flares compared to a conventional therapy and consequently reducing or eliminating the need for corticosteroid treatment. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Myasthenia Gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease affecting neuromuscular transmission, in which the thymus is considered pathogenic organ. Earlier ideas suggesting that MG is only the receptors disease have been proven wrong. There are immunopathological changes in both target structures [specific receptors for acetylcholine (AChR] muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) and low-density lipoprotein 4 (Lrp4)], the thymus, as well as in peripheral lymphoid organs. Initial findings of the humoral immunity defect with the decisive role of the pathologic autoantibodies, were corrected with findings of the immune dysregulation at the level of T lymphocytes. According to today's knowledge, the development and maintenance of MG involves almost all cell types of immune function in the autoimmune inflammation: helper CD4+ T lymphocytes, cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes, regulatory CD4+CD25+ T lymphocytes, Th17 lymphocytes, B lymphocytes and plasma cells. Thymus plays a dominant immunopathogenetic role in younger patients with MG, while extrathymic mechanisms are applied in older patients. As a result of that, the thymectomy (TE) is generally accepted as part of treatment for MG. However, there is still no data verified by a prospective controlled study, which would demonstrate a useful result of this treatment...

La bioéquivalence, une mesure de substitution de l'innocuité et de l'efficacité à différents stades du processus de développement des médicaments, est tout particulièrement importante lors du développement d'un médicament générique. Entre autres critères, la bioéquivalence garantit que les médicaments génériques sont équivalents aux produits innovateurs ou de références approuvés en termes d’efficacité clinique et d’innocuité tout en contournant le long cours et le coût élevé des essais chez les animaux et des essais cliniques chez les patients exigés pour les médicaments innovants. Malgré les avancées dans le développement d'approches robustes au cours des dernières décennies, la pratique actuelle de la bioéquivalence fait toujours l'objet de controverses. Le but de cette thèse est d'explorer certaines de ces controverses et de les aborder en proposant des approches nouvelles et alternatives. L'une des questions les plus controversées dans la pratique actuelle de la bioéquivalence est l'extrapolation des résultats d'études de bioéquivalence d'une population à une autre. La majorité des études de bioéquivalence portant sur des formes pharmaceutiques orales efficaces par voie systémique reposent sur les critères de pharmacocinétique obtenus chez des sujets sains, alors que la population cible est constituée de patients. Ceci est basé sur l'hypothèse que si deux produits sont bioéquivalents dans une population, ils devraient l'être dans une autre. L'extrapolation des résultats des études de bioéquivalence ne se limite pas à celle des sujets sains aux patients. Depuis 2007, une proportion croissante d'études de bioéquivalence pharmacocinétique portant sur des soumissions génériques nord-américaines ou européennes a été réalisée auprès de populations géographiques/ethniques autres que celles visées, en raison du coût moins élevé de ces études en dehors de l'Amérique du Nord et de l'Europe. Dans le premier volet de cette thèse, nous avons examiné si les résultats de la bioéquivalence obtenus dans une population géographique ou ethnique pouvaient être extrapolés à une autre. À cette fin, nous avons extrait les résultats des études de bioéquivalence pharmacocinétique disponibles publiquement et provenant de soumissions génériques à Santé Canada et à la Food and Drug Administration des États-Unis. Pour dix médicaments différents, nous avons calculé l'effet d’un repas normalisé sur le produit de référence et comparé les résultats obtenus chez deux populations ethniques, les indiens et les nord-américains. Cette approche novatrice est basée sur le raisonnement suivant: si l'effet d’un repas sur le produit de référence est le même chez les populations indienne et nord-américaine, le produit générique et sa référence qui se sont révélés bioéquivalents dans la population indienne devraient également l'être dans la population nord-américaine. Pour 90% des médicaments à l'étude, une différence statistiquement significative a été détectée entre les deux populations après un repas. Pour 30% de ces médicaments, la différence s'est révélée d'une pertinence clinique possible. Les résultats de cette étude ont mis en évidence que l’extrapolation des résultats de bioéquivalence d’une population à l’autre devrait possiblement être reconsidérée pour certains médicaments. Les défis dans le contexte de la bioéquivalence ne se limitent pas toujours aux études pivots où la performance d’un produit générique est comparée à celle de la référence. En effet, une étude pilote peut être menée afin d’établir un protocole d’étude approprié pour cette étude pivot. Par conséquent, les résultats inexacts provenant d'une étude pilote, tels qu'une estimation imprécise du moment ou de la durée d’administration optimale de la dose lors de la comparaison du produit testé par rapport à la référence, pourront affecter négativement les résultats de l’étude de bioéquivalence. Ceci est particulièrement crucial pour les produits indiqués pour un usage topique dermatologique dont les corticostéroïdes constituent un cas d’espèce. En effet, leur bioéquivalence est démontrée par une mesure pharmacodynamique, le blanchiment cutané, à différents temps après application topique. L’intensité du blanchiment est comparée entre le produit générique et le produit de référence à une durée d’administration spécifique d’une dose donnée, la DD50, soit la durée associée à 50% de l’effet maximal observé. Par conséquent, cette durée d’administration de la dose doit d’abord être déterminée dans le cadre d’une étude pilote. L’agence réglementaire américaine recommande l’utilisation d’une approche populationnelle basée sur la modélisation non linéaire à effets mixtes pour l'estimation de la DD50 et ce, quelle que soit la méthode d'analyse. Étant donné qu’il existe différents types de méthodes d’analyse non linéaire à effets mixtes, chaque commanditaire peut en choisir une différente. Dans le deuxième volet de cette thèse, nous avons examiné si les mêmes estimations de DD50 pouvaient être obtenues en utilisant différentes méthodes non linéaires à effets mixtes. À cette fin, nous avons ajusté les données de blanchiment de la peau d’onze études avec deux méthodes non linéaires à effets mixtes différentes : le maximum de vraisemblance avec maximisation de l’espérance (MLEM) et l'estimation conditionnelle de premier ordre (FOCE). Les résultats ont favorisé MLEM, compte tenu d’une meilleure puissance discriminative pour l’estimation de la DD50 de population et d’une meilleure minimisation de la variabilité interindividuelle. Bien que l'approche de la bioéquivalence fondée sur la pharmacocinétique ait contribuée de manière significative au développement de versions génériques de haute qualité des formes pharmaceutiques orales indiquées pour un effet systémique, la disponibilité de versions génériques pour les produits dermatologiques topiques demeure limitée et ce, par manque de méthodes acceptées par les agences réglementaires pour l'évaluation de la bioéquivalence de ces produits. Dans le troisième volet de cette thèse, une nouvelle approche pour l’évaluation de la bioéquivalence de formulations de crème topique d’acyclovir a été développée en utilisant une analyse basée sur un modèle de données d’exposition locales récupérées à partir d’échantillons de peau abrasée prélevés à une seule durée d’administration de la dose, la DD50 à l’aide de bandes adhésives. Un seul échantillonnage de peau effectué à la DD50 a non seulement assuré que les données pharmacocinétiques étaient recueillies à la durée d’administration de la dose ayant le meilleur pouvoir discriminant pour détecter une différence au niveau des formulations, mais a également permis de diminuer considérablement le nombre d'échantillons à analyser. Et surtout, cette nouvelle approche a permis de générer un profil pharmacocinétique au niveau même de la peau. Ce faisant, nous avons pu utiliser l'analyse compartimentale populationnelle et contourner les nombreuses hypothèses et calculs sophistiqués requis par les méthodes précédentes. Notre approche a également permis de générer de nouveaux paramètres pharmacocinétiques permettant de décrire la vitesse et le degré d’exposition cutanée pour l'évaluation de la biodisponibilité et de la bioéquivalence topiques. Finalement, cette méthode a le potentiel de discerner une formulation bioéquivalente d’une autre qui ne l’est pas. / Bioequivalence is a surrogate measure of safety and efficacy in different stages of drug development process with the most pronounced significance in the development of generic drugs. Bioequivalence, among other standards, ensures that generic drugs are equivalent to their approved innovator or reference products in terms of clinical efficacy and safety while circumventing the lengthy-time course and high cost of animal and clinical trials in patients required for innovator drugs. Despite the advancements in development of robust bioequivalence approaches over the past decades, there are still controversies in the current practice of bioequivalence. The aim of this thesis is to explore some of these controversies and address them by putting forward new and alternative approaches. One of the most controversial issues in the current practice of bioequivalence is the extrapolation of bioequivalence study results from one population to another. The majority of bioequivalence studies for systemic effective oral dosage forms are conducted based on pharmacokinetic endpoints in healthy volunteers whilst the targeted population is patients. This is based on the assumption that if two products are bioequivalent in one population, they should be bioequivalent in another one. The extrapolation of bioequivalence study results is not limited to that from healthy volunteers to patients. Since 2007, an ever-increasing proportion of pharmacokinetic bioequivalence studies for North American or European generic submissions have been performed in geographical/ethnic populations other than the intended ones, due to the lower cost of these studies outside North America and Europe. In the first part of this thesis, we investigated whether the bioequivalence results obtained in one geographical or ethnic population can be extrapolated to another one. To this purpose, we extracted pharmacokinetic bioequivalence studies results from generic submissions to Health Canada and the US Food and Drug Administration. We calculated food effect for ten different reference drug products and compared the results for each product between two ethnic populations, Indians and North Americans. This is based on the reasoning that if food effect is found to be the same between the Indian and North American populations, then the generic product and its reference that were found to be bioequivalent in the Indian population should also be bioequivalent in North American population. For 90% of the study drugs, statistically significant difference was detected in the food effect between two populations. For 30% of these drugs, the difference was found to be of possible clinical relevance. The results of this study raised a flag for extrapolating the bioequivalence results from one population to another. Challenges in the context of bioequivalence are not always limited to the pivotal studies where the performance of a generic product is compared to that of Reference. Prior to pivotal bioequivalence studies, a pilot study may be conducted to establish an appropriate study design for the pivotal bioequivalence study. Therefore, inaccurate results from a pilot study, such as inaccurate estimation of time point or dose duration for comparison of test versus reference, can affect the bioequivalence outcomes adversely. An example to this case is the comparison of the extent of skin blanching, the pharmacological effect of generic versus reference products of topical dermatological corticosteroids at specific dose duration, DD50, where the effect is half maximal. This dose duration should initially be determined in a pilot study. The US FDA 1995 Guidance document recommends the use of non-linear mixed effect population modeling for the estimation of DD50, irrespective of the method of analysis. Given the availability of different types of non-linear mixed effect modeling methods, each sponsor could choose a different one. In the second part of this thesis we investigated whether the same DD50 estimates can be obtained when different non-linear mixed effect modeling methods are used. To this purpose, we fitted the skin blanching data from eleven studies with two different non-linear mixed effect modeling methods, the Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization (MLEM) and the First Order Conditional Estimation (FOCE). The results favored MLEM given its lower population DD50 estimates that would locate in a more discriminative portion of the Emax curve and better minimization of inter-individual variability. Although the pharmacokinetic-based bioequivalence approach has contributed significantly to the development of high-quality generic versions of systemic effective oral dosage form, the availability of generic versions of topical dermatological products remains constrained due to the limited methods accepted for bioequivalence evaluation of these products. In the third part of this thesis, a novel approach for the bioequivalence assessment of topical acyclovir cream formulations was developed based on the model-based analysis of local exposure data recovered from tape stripping of the skin at a single dose duration, DD50. Conducting the stripping procedure only at DD50 not only ensured that the PK data was collected at the dose duration that is most discriminative of formulation differences, but it also decreased the number of samples to be analyzed significantly. More importantly, our novel approach in generating the local PK profile in the skin (dermatopharmacokinetic profile) and the implementation of population compartmental analysis circumvented the numerous assumptions and sophisticated calculations that were inherent to previous methods, while yielding the PK parameters relevant for topical bioavailability and bioequivalence assessment (rate and extent of exposure to the skin). This method successfully concluded bioequivalence and its absence.

Background: Evidence-based treatment algorithms, successfully established for asthma, are missing for atopic eczema (AE). Objectives: To investigate whether treatment according to an evidence-based algorithm is an effective and applicable concept for the management of AE. Methods: Based on a systematic literature review, we developed an evidence-based severity-score-oriented treatment algorithm for AE and compared its effectiveness to that of an individualised symptom-oriented treatment (individual therapy) in a randomised controlled trial. Sixty-three participants were randomised to algorithm (n = 32) or individual therapy (n = 31) and treated accordingly for 12 months. Study end points included difference between baseline SCORAD and mean SCORAD under treatment (primary end point), quality of life and treatment utilisation. Analysis was by intention to treat (registration: ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00148746). Results: No statistically significant differences in clinical or subjective response were observed between groups. Treatment following the algorithm and individual treatment both effectively controlled AE. Mean SCORAD reductions were 47% (95% confidence interval, CI = 38–55; algorithm) and 42% (95% CI = 29–54; individual). Clinical response was paralleled by improved quality of life in both groups. Physicians adhered to the algorithm option in 93% of their treatment decisions. Conclusion: Treatment following an evidence-based algorithm is an effective and applicable concept for the management of AE but does not show clear advantages compared to individualised treatment in a dermatological setting. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

Background: Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a non-steroid, selective inflammatory cytokine inhibitor indicated for atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1%-based treatment versus conventional therapy in adults with moderate AD. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive pimecrolimus cream 1% (n = 62) or vehicle (n = 68) at the first signs/symptoms of AD, for 24 weeks as required. A moderately potent topical corticosteroid (prednicarbate 0.25% cream) was allowed in both groups to treat flares. Results: Corticosteroids were required on fewer days in the pimecrolimus group, compared with the vehicle group (9.7 vs. 37.8%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, 59.7% of pimecrolimus-treated patients experienced no flares during the study period, compared with 22.1% of vehicle-treated patients (p < 0.001). Pimecrolimus cream 1% was well tolerated throughout the study. Conclusion: For adults with moderate AD, pimecrolimus cream 1% is well tolerated, reduces the incidence of flares, reduces/eliminates corticosteroid use, improves long-term disease control and enhances the patients’ quality of life. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.