Cette étude vise à comprendre comment les leviers stratégiques de la gestion des revenus en restauration sont utilisés par les restaurants à service complet en période de reprise après la sixième vague de la Covid-19. Elle permet également de découvrir si les restaurateurs à service complet ont recours à de nouvelles pratiques de gestion des revenus en restauration et ainsi, de contribuer à la mise à jour de la littérature sur la gestion des revenus en période post pandémie. Le contexte théorique de cette étude a été développé en se basant sur un examen évolutif de la littérature en gestion des revenus suggéré par (Denizci-Guillet, 2020). En effet, un examen de l'évolution de la gestion des revenus en restauration à travers une ligne de temps de 1989 à 2021 met en évidence le recours à différentes pratiques. Ces pratiques ont été regroupées notamment par Rohlfs (2021a, 2021b, 2021c) en deux grandes catégories : les pratiques d'optimisation de la gestion de la demande (segmentation, prix de vente, tarification dynamique, ingénierie des menus et prévision de la demande) et les pratiques d'optimisation de la gestion de l'offre (gestion de la capacité, combinaison des tables, surréservation, gestion de la durée des repas, canaux de distribution), ainsi que les indicateurs de mesure de la performance. Afin d'explorer l'évolution des pratiques, une étude qualitative exploratoire a permis de récolter des données sur les pratiques de gestion des revenus en restauration auprès de neuf répondants qui représentaient cent-quarante restaurants de type casual et fine dining en période de reprise après la sixième vague de la Covid-19. Le dixième répondant n'étant pas gestionnaire de restaurant, il a été interrogé en tant qu'expert en restauration. Ce travail vient compléter les résultats des recherches antécédentes sur les pratiques de gestion des revenus en restauration, en mettant en évidence de nouvelles pratiques de la gestion des revenus en restauration. Telles que, les ressources humaines, la diminution du menu et la vente de plats à emporter. En conclusion, cette recherche a atteint son objectif en observant que les restaurants à service complet ont utilisé différemment les pratiques de gestion des revenus en restauration en période post-Covid-19 : telle que, la gestion de la durée des repas. De plus, les résultats ont mis en évidence un nouveau levier à prendre en considération dans la gestion des revenus en restauration, c'est la main-d'œuvre. D'autre part, les restaurants à service complet ont eu recours à des pratiques inhabituelles de gestion des revenus en restauration; plus particulièrement, la diminution du menu et la vente de plats à emporter. / This study aims to understand how the strategic levers of restaurant revenue management are used by full-service restaurants in the recovery period after the sixth wave of Covid-19. It also makes it possible to discover whether full-service restaurateurs are using new restaurant revenue management practices and thus contribute to updating the literature on revenue management in the post-pandemic period. The conceptual framework was developed based on the variables identified by Denizci-Guillet (2020) in an evolving review of the revenue management literature across a timeline from 1989 to 2021. Those variables were grouped according to Rohlfs (2021a, 2021b, 2021c) categories: namely, demand management practices (segmentation, selling price, dynamic pricing, menu engineering and demand forecasting) and supply management practices (capacity management, table combining, overbooking, meal duration management, distribution channels), as well as performance measurement indicators. To explore the evolution of practices, an exploratory qualitative study collected data on restaurant revenue management practices from nine respondents who represented one hundred and forty casual and fine dining restaurants in times of recovery from the sixth wave of Covid-19. As the tenth respondent was not a restaurant manager, he was interviewed as a restaurant expert. This work complements the results of previous research on revenue management practices in restaurants, by highlighting new practices in revenue management in restaurants. Such as, human resources, shrinking the menu and selling takeout. In conclusion, this research achieved its objective by observing that full-service restaurants used restaurant revenue management practices differently in the post-Covid-19 era: practices such as, managing the duration of meals for example. In addition, the results have highlighted a new lever to be taken into consideration in the management of restaurant revenues, it is the workforce. On the other hand, full-service restaurants have resorted to unusual restaurant revenue management practices; in particular, the reduction of the menu and the sale of takeaways.

Bullying is a widespread public health issue that disproportionately impacts LGBTQ+ youth and is linked to a host of adverse outcomes. Although LGBTQ+ youth are more likely to be bullied and experience poorer mental health outcomes than heterosexual youth, few studies have examined these associations using population-based samples. Moreover, no published study has included an investigation of these associations during the COVID-19 pandemic. To address this knowledge gap, the links between bullying victimization and mental health among LGBTQ+ and heterosexual youth were examined in a population-based sample of 2231 Canadian students (50.2% boys, 45.2% girls, 4.6% gender diverse) in Grades 7 to 12 (ages 12-19). Results indicated that bullying victimization prevalence rates were higher among LGBTQ+ middle (Grades 7-8) and high school students (Grades 9-12) than among heterosexual students during the pandemic. LGBTQ+ high school students were at particular risk for being bullied during the pandemic compared to their heterosexual classmates. Bullied LGBTQ+ high school students also reported more mental health problems during the pandemic compared to heterosexual students who were bullied. These associations also varied by gender. Gender diverse students in both middle and high school experienced the highest rates of bullying victimization and reported more mental health problems because they were bullied compared to cisgender girls and boys. Girls also reported more mental health problems because they were bullied than boys. These findings are consistent with existing evidence which indicates that LGBTQ+ and gender diverse students are at elevated risk for being bullied at school and are more likely to experience mental health problems in relation to being bullied. Findings from my thesis highlight the urgent need for schools to invest in LGBTQ+ and gender diverse-specific anti-bullying intervention and prevention initiatives to buffer against adverse mental health outcomes. Implementing anti-bullying programs in schools will help mitigate risk and promote a safe and inclusive social learning environment for gender and sexual minority youth during and following the pandemic.

Bakgrund: I december 2019 upptäcktes ett nytt virus som snabbt spred sig över hela världen och blev klassat som en pandemi. Covid-19 är en variant av SARS-Cov-2 med symtom som påminner om en vanlig förkylning. Viruset är nytt och okänt och det saknar tydliga riktlinjer för både patienterna och sjuksköterskorna om hur de ska förhålla sig till sjukdomen. Detta leder till en ökad brist av resurser sam skapar utmaningar för sjuksköterskorna under pandemin. Tidigare forskning visar att patienterna har svårt att tolka symtomen och känner en rädsla och skam relaterat till sjukdomen. Anhöriga erfar oro och frustration över bristande kunskap och tillgång till resurser. Syftet: Att kartlägga sjuksköterskors erfarenheter av att vårda patienter med konstaterad Covid-19. Metod: En allmän litteraturöversikt som inkluderar åtta kvalitativa artiklar, en kvantitativ artikel och en artikel med mixad metod. Resultat: Analysen av samtliga 10 artiklar identifierade tre kategorier ” Känslomässiga reaktioner”, ” Förändringar i organisationen” och ”Professionell utveckling”. Slutsats: Covid-19 hade en negativ påverkan på sjuksköterskorna och omgivningen, med betydande rädsla och stress relaterat till bristande kunskap och ökad arbetsbelastning. Det understryker behovet av förbättrade resurser och stöd för sjuksköterskorna under framtida pandemier.

This explanatory sequential mixed methods study was designed to determine, from the perspective of beginning teachers, the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic affected their intentions to remain in teaching. There were two additional goals in conducting the study: (a) to determine the key practices, supports, or events that played a role in impacting teachers' intentions to remain in teaching during a crisis; and (b) to determine the key practices, supports, or events teachers believe the district or school could do that might further impact their intention to remain in teaching during a crisis. In Phase 1, a survey was administered to teachers who began employment in the studied district in academic years 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021. In Phase 2, a semi-structured focus group interview was conducted with volunteer participants who had taken the survey to develop a deeper understanding of the patterns observed from the survey responses. While this study was designed to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on teachers' intentions to remain in teaching, a statistically significant result was not identified. This study identified practices, supports, and events that impacted beginning teacher retention, focusing on what was effective, ineffective, and could have been added to increase effectiveness. Beginning teachers self-identified that mentorship within their subject and grade level, salary and benefit increases, and supportive cultures were helpful in retention. In contrast, strategies deemed ineffective included a lack of preparation for the challenges that they faced and impractical professional development. Beginning teachers explained that retention might have been increased if school leaders allowed greater opportunities for networking, as well as a greater focus on training teachers in technology and software systems for classroom use.

This work addresses the underlying issues surrounding COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Hispanic and Latinx communities in the Northeast region of Tennessee. A qualitative, phenomenological research approach was used to conduct interviews and data from the interviews was used to inform a survey instrument. The interview guide in the qualitative phase of the study was based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) developed by Rosenstock (Rosenstock, 1974). A quantitative approach was then used by piloting the survey instrument in the study population. Common themes found through the interviews were: previous negative experience with COVID-19 vaccination, previous negative experience as a result of COVID-19 disease and being in a role of a caretaker that drove vaccination uptake. Most participants in the survey identified as women (81%) (n=13), received a COVID-19 vaccine (87%) (n=14), lived in a multi-generational household (53%) (n=9) and had private or employer healthcare insurance (69%) (n=11). Only 50% (n=7) of those who were vaccinated had received an updated booster vaccine, indicating a reduction in COVID-19 vaccine uptake after the initial vaccine doses. Future research is needed to identify and analyze factors related to the uptake of booster vaccines against COVID-19 to maintain immunity against COVID-19 and tailor outreach in Hispanic and Latinx communities.

Bakgrund: År 2019 utbröt en rad lunginflammationer i Kina som skulle visa sig bli starten på en världsomfattande pandemi. Världshälsoorganisationen (WHO) klassade snart utbrotten som ett hot mot människors hälsa och pandemin fick namnet covid-19. Sjuksköterskor är de som vårdar smittade patienter och löper därav större risk att smittas av viruset. Tidigare utbrott av liknande pandemier visar att sjuksköterskorna upplevde negativa känslor vid vårdandet av smittade patienter. Bristande kunskap om viruset påverkade även omvårdnadenav patienterna. Genom att kartlägga sjuksköterskors upplevelser av att vårda patienter med covid-19 kan den personcentrerade vården stärkas och bidra till bättre förutsättningar inför kommande pandemier. Syfte: Syftet var att kartlägga befintlig kunskap gällande sjuksköterskornas upplevelse av att vårda patienter med Covid-19. Metod: En litteraturöversikt med kvalitativ design som innefattade tio original artiklar.Studien följde Fribergs analysmodell.  Resultat: Resultatet utmynnade i tre huvudkategorier med sex underkategorier. Huvudkategorierna var svårigheter vid Covid-19, att arbeta i en utmanande arbetsmiljö och att utvecklas tillsammans.  Slutsats: Studien visade att sjuksköterskorna upplevde fysiska och psykiska utmaningar när det kom till vårdandet av patienter med covid-19. Trots de negativa upplevelserna kände ändå sjuksköterskorna stolthet till sin profession och att de hade stöd ifrån varandra.

Background. In parallel with public health responses, health systems have had to rapidly implement infection control strategies during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. Various technologies, such as digital contact tracing (DCT), have been implemented to enhance case investigations among healthcare workers' (HCWs). Currently, little attention has focused on the perspectives of those who have implemented DCT innovations and those who have adopted such technologies within a healthcare environment. -- Objective. This study aimed to describe the implementation, acceptance, and outcomes of a web-based DCT tool used extensively at a specialized pediatric acute-care hospital in Ontario during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of key stakeholders. -- Methods. Using an exploratory qualitative design, this research involved 21 semi-structured interviews with healthcare administrators (n=6; 29%), occupational health specialists (n=8; 38%), and healthcare workers (n=7; 33/%) at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario. Interview protocols and analysis were guided by the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework. The interviews lasted on average 33.6 minutes in length and were audio-recorded. Verbatim transcripts were subjected to thematic analysis using NVivo software. -- Results. The implementation of DCT during the COVID-19 pandemic was viable and well-received among stakeholders. End-users cited that their engagement with the DCT tool was facilitated by its perceived ease of use and the ability to gain awareness of probable COVID-19 exposures; however, risk-assessment consequences and access concerns were present as barriers (reach). Stakeholders commonly agreed that the DCT tool exerted a positive outcome on the hospital's capacity to meet the demands of COVID-19, notably through the facilitation of timely case investigations and by informing decision-making processes (effectiveness). Implementors and occupational specialists conveyed staffing impacts, and the loss of nuanced information as unintended consequences (effectiveness). Safety-focused communication strategies and having a technology that was human-centered were crucial factors driving staff adoption. Conversely, adoption was challenged by the misaligned delivery of the DCT tool with HCWs standard practices, alongside the evolving perspectives of COVID-19. Some end-users expressed an initial disconnect towards the DCT tool, raising questions about the fidelity of the implementation. However, stakeholders collectively agreed on the viability of the DCT approach and its applicability to infectious disease practices (maintenance). -- Conclusion. Stakeholders reported DCT in the hospital context to be acceptable and efficient in meeting the demands of the COVID-19 pandemic. Recommendations for optimized DCT use include education and training for relevant personnel, improved access and usability, and integration into clinical systems. The findings contribute to evidence-based practices and guide future scale-up initiatives focused on digital surveillance in the hospital context.

Despite the fact that principals have faced exceptional challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, and play a critical role in school building and district success, particularly in times of crisis, their voices are not being heard and their needs are not being met by district-level leadership. While the literature on the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on education is growing, it still tends to focus on pedagogy or the challenges for students, teachers, parents, and even central/district administrators, as opposed to studies that explore the plight of school-based administrators through data elicited from the viewpoint of school principals directly. Therefore, the purpose of this qualitative collective case study was to describe the lived experiences of grade K to 8 New York City public school principals leading during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, within-case and cross-case analysis of combined data from in-depth individual interviews and one focus group discussion with diverse New York City public school principals (n=5), resulted in the identification of five themes evident across all cases, with each theme representing predominant patterns within principals’ self-described lived experiences of leading during the pandemic – Response to District Policy and Governance, Community, Processing Own Trauma, Resonance of George Floyd, and Concepts of Leadership and Leadership Success. Furthermore, interpretation of these findings through the lens of the study’s conceptual framework illuminated the extent to which the experience of leading during the COVID-19 pandemic is grounded in established theories of crisis management, trauma, and culturally relevant leadership.

Mit dem Auftreten des SARS-CoV-2 Virus im Jahr 2020 war der Informationsgewinn für vulnerable Patientengruppen essentiell. Ziel dieser Arbeit war es maternale Charakteristika und das klinische Bild SARS-CoV-2 positiver Frauen mit Notwendigkeit einer intensivmedizinischen Behandlung während der Schwangerschaft und postpartal darzustellen, und diese Kohorte mit den SARS-CoV-2 positiven Schwangeren ohne intensivmedizinischen Handlungsbedarf zu vergleichen. Die Daten stammten aus dem deutschen CRONOS-Register, einem prospektiven, multizentrischen Register für SARS-CoV-2 positive schwangere Frauen. Eingeschlossen wurden alle schwangeren und postpartalen Frauen, die während ihrer SARS-CoV-2 Infektion auf eine ITS aufgenommen wurden. Diese wurden hinsichtlich maternaler Charakteristika, Krankheitsverlauf, sowie Outcomes verglichen. In 101 von 2650 Fällen (4%) der Patientinnen des CRONOS-Registers, kam es zu einer Aufnahme auf die ITS. Als invasivste Form der COVID-19 Behandlung war bei 6 Patientinnen nur eine Überwachung notwendig, 30 Patientinnen benötigten eine Sauerstoffinsufflation, 22 wurden nicht-invasiv beatmet, 28 erhielten eine invasive Beatmung und bei 15 Frauen wurde die Behandlung zur ECMO-Therapie eskaliert. Es wurden keine klinisch signifikanten Unterschiede zwischen Patientinnen gefunden, die unterschiedliche Behandlungsformen benötigten. Die Gruppe der ITS und Non-ITS Patientinnen unterschied sich statistisch signifikant beim Einfluss von Alter, BMI bei Einschluss und der Herkunft. Die Prävalenz der Frühgeburtlichkeit war unter den invasiv behandelten Patientinnen signifikant höher und auch im Vergleich der ITS mit den Non-ITS Patientinnen zeigte sich ein signifikanter Unterschied. Vier Frauen verstarben an COVID-19 und sechs Feten der ITS-Gruppe waren Totgeburten. Diese Kohorte zeigt, dass schwere COVID-19 Erkrankung bei schwangeren Frauen und Wöchnerinnen selten sind. Die Frühgeburtenrate ist hoch und COVID-19 mit Notwendigkeit einer Atemunterstützung erhöht das Risiko für ein schlechtes maternales und neonatales Outcome. Unter anderem ein höheres Alter und BMI sind mit einem höheren Risiko für eine ITS-Aufnahme verbunden. / With the spreading of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the year 2020, gain of information regarding vulnerable groups of patients was essential. We aimed to describe maternal characteristics and clinical presentation of SARS-CoV-2 positive women requiring intensive care treatment for COVID-19 during pregnancy and postpartum period, based on data of a comprehensive German surveillance system in obstetric patients. Data from COVID-19 Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS), a prospective multicenter registry for SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women, was analyzed with respect to ICU treatment. All women requiring intensive care treatment for COVID-19 were included and compared regarding maternal characteristics, course of disease, as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes. Also the ICU-cohort was compared to the cohort of pregnant and postpartum women not requiring intensive care treatment searching for characteristics and risk factors. Of 2650 cases in CRONOS, 101 women (4%) had a documented ICU stay. As the most invasive form of COVID-19 treatment interventions, patients received either continuous monitoring of vital signs without further treatment requirement (n = 6), insufflation of oxygen (n = 30), non-invasive ventilation (n = 22), invasive ventilation (n = 28), or escalation to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 15). No significant clinical differences were identified between patients receiving different forms of ventilatory support for COVID-19. Prevalence of preterm delivery was significantly higher in women receiving invasive respiratory treatments as well as in women receiving intensive care treatment in general. Four women died of COVID-19 and six fetuses were stillborn. Our cohort shows that progression of COVID-19 in pregnant and postpartum women with admission to ICU is rare. Preterm birth rate is high and COVID-19 requiring respiratory support increases the risk of poor maternal and neonatal outcome. Admission to ICU in this cohort was associated with a higher maternal age and maternal BMI before pregnancy.

Die vorliegende Studie befasst sich mit internen bzw. externen ressourcenbezogenen Lernstrategien als Moderatoren zwischen Stresserleben und Lernerfolg während des durch die Covid-19-Pandemie bedingten Fernunterrichts im Jahr 2020. Theoretisch wird angenommen, dass interne ressourcenbezogene Lernstrategien (intrinsische und extrinsische Motivation, Zeitmanagement und Aufmerksamkeit) bzw. externe ressourcenbezogene Lernstrategien (Lernumgebung, nicht-personale Hilfen und personale Hilfen) den negativen Zusammenhang zwischen Stresserleben und Lernerfolg während des durch Covid-19 bedingten Fernunterrichts moderieren. Die Ergebnisse der moderierten Regressionsanalysen bei N = 96 Schüler:innen sind nicht signifikant. Folgerungen der Befunde werden diskutiert. / Pupils´ resource management strategies while distance learning during the Covid-19 pandemic – an empirical study of the moderation of internal resource-based learning strategies and external resource management strategies and the correlation between stress and success of distance learning. The present study examines the moderation of pupils´ internal resource-based learning strategies and external resource-based learning strategies on the negative correlation between stress and success of distance learning during the Covid-19 pandemic-related school closings. The question is discussed on the theoretical basis of the transactional stress model (Lazarus, 1966) and the regulation of the self (Boekaerts, 1999). These suggest that internal resource management strategies (intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, time management and self-regulation of attention) and external resource management strategies (learning environment, non-personal help-seeking and personal help-seeking) moderate the negative correlation between stress and success of distance learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. Results of moderated regressions analysis from N = 96 pupils reveal no significance. Implications of these results are discussed.