“其它”是解構主義中的主題之一。它是指一種不可理解的事物，因此“其它”也成了“混渾”，“無限”等字的同義字。正因為“其它”是不可理解的，德瑞達在他的解構理論中必需運用種種技巧來暗示“其它”的存在。德瑞達一方面運用各種技巧以指出各種理論的局限性。另一方面，德瑞達也利用一些有限的模型來呈現無限的混渾。這篇論文討論的是《印度之旅》中的“其它”。但本文並不是以解構主義來解釋這本小說，而是把《印度之旅》當做一本小說版的解構主義來討論。在討論這本小說中所包含的理論的同時，也希望能展現用一些固定理論來解釋作品的不當。 / The Other is a maJor subJect in Derrida's theory of deconstruction. The Other stands for something incomprehensible. It is therefore identical to chaos or infinity. Since the Other is incomprehensible, Derrida in his theory of deconstruction has to employ various tricks to indicate its existence. Derrida uses certain tricks to point out the self-contradictory elements in various theories to demonstrate their limitations. Since those theories are limited, they fail to comprehend the Other. Derrida also uses some tricks to demonstrate the existence of the infinite other with a finite model. 　　This thesis is about the Other in A Passage to India. But this thesis does not intend to apply the theory of deconstruction in order to get an interpretation of it. Instead, this thesis tries to discuss this novel as a narrative version of Derrida's theory of the Other. By pointing out the similarities between the theory implied in this novel and Derrida's theory, this thesis also hopes to demonstrate that a literary work is not always a prey for the predatory critic.

本論文從「政治性」的概念討論海德格的政治哲學，分別透過卡爾．施密特與戰後法國哲學界對於政治性與共同體的理解，討論海德格如何以存有論回應德國民族共同體問題。他的政治哲學從決斷論出發，探問此有存有的本真性，並將此有與後來1930年代他的思想焦點「共同體」接合起來，讓此有不僅是獨我的存有者，而更應決斷成為政治共同體中的共存者。此共同體為精神的共同體，由大學及哲學引領構成得以抵禦來自法國大革命的文化與政治威脅之德意志民族，海德格以此政治共同體方案回應中立、技術化與非政治化的歐洲精神狀況，並以歷史性、同代人、共同命運等概念探索新的政治之可能性。此可能性亦代表海德格對現代性與虛無主義之思想立場，他從虛無主義批判的角度，討論從藝術如何克服虛無主義並建立國家，即建立新的共同體，構出新的主體間性，進而解構傳統主體與客體對立形成的空間。海德格拒絕了同質性空間的概念，而是藉由在「此」存有的存有者之「實際性」，勾勒各種「差異」，形成異質性空間。因而他以一種解構的政治哲學提出非同一性，反省國家社會主義的種族政治，以解決「德意志問題」所造成的極權主義困境。本論文結論是：海德格對共同體的撤離與重構，正表明了對民族主義問題的克服應在徹底的對虛無主義、現代性、科技的反省深思裡。

Thesis (M.A. (Sociology))--North-West University, Vaal Triangle Campus, 2005.

The aim of this dissertation is to investigate the theoretical views underlying Karl Vennberg's literary criticism, and then to use these views as a starting point for a study of his poetry. Thus, the book is largely divided into two parts. The first deals with Vennberg's reviews and essays, the second with his poetry. As a critic and a modernist poet, Vennberg defends the autonomy of literature, but not from the organicist or aestheticising viewpoint common to post-romantic poetics. Instead, he brings to the fore another part of the heritage from romantic literary theory: the view of literature as ironic, critical and endlessly open. In his concept of irony as an endlessly ambiguous negativity, we encounter an understanding of literature that permeates all of his work. Poetry is, thus, defined by him as a freedom in relation to everything decided - a critical, destructive force that questions ingrained ideas, concepts and ideologies in the name of nothing more than negation. This theoretical stand also characterises Vennberg's relation to mysticism. He obviously feels affiliated to it's negative, critical side, it's via negativa, but does not accept the dialectics through which it reappropriates negativity into religious belief. The final part of the dissertation consists of close readings of specific poems, brought into relief by the theoretical context found in Vennberg's critical writings.

In the year of 2012, a police project called “REVA” was established in Sweden. The goal was to increase efficiency in deporting undocumented migrants from Sweden. Two articles relating to the project were published in Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter. One was an open letter to Attorney General Beatrice Ask, written by the famous author Jonas Hassen Khemiri. The other one was a response to Khemiri’s letter, written by Secretary of state and drama director Jasenko Selimovic. The objective of this essay is to perform a rhetorical analysis of these two articles in order to examine how they are constructed to achieve their persuasive goals. Mainly, I am interested in exploring if Selimovic’s persuasive strategies can be regarded as direct counter-strategies to those of Khemiri. I am also interested in exploring to what extent Selimovic’s strategies deal with the specific problems he faces: countering an effective text with a demonstrable rhetorical power, authored by a writer with a contextually strong ethos - and doing so without harming his own ethos. Through using a theory of argumentation as well as a specially designed theoretical model for persuasive strategies “in both directions”, the analysis shows that Selimovic’s main approach was to directly confront the persuasive strategies used by Khemiri in order to make the latter appear too closely focused on subjective emotional experiences and blind to a wider perspective. Theoretically, this approach could be expected to work well in deconstructing an uneven ethos position, but due to Selimovic’s overly confrontational argumentation style, it rather had the opposite effect, making Selimovic appear too skeptical, critical and unwilling to stay on topic.

The contemporary Islamist extremist/terrorist phenomenon has emerged as one of the most significant threats to both regional and international peace, security, and stability. As the international community struggles to develop a comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon in its present context, the academic community should respond and discuss this subject from all relevant disciplinary backgrounds and perspectives. If effective and successful policies, strategies, and tactics are to be developed in order to adequately confront these transnational actors, all dimensions of the subject need to be explored. This thesis examines certain aspects of the under-theorized geographical dimension of Islamist extremist/terrorism. Focusing on Al Qaeda and other members of the Islamist extremist/terrorist constituency, this thesis explores the geographical and spatial imagination of the Islamist terrorist subject and deconstructs the geographical and spatial imaginings of Islamist extremism/terrorism through critically analyzing the diffuse international structure of Islamist terrorism and its related groups, the cultural ?space? Islamist extremist/terrorist actors occupy, and the function of landscape in the identity and subjectivity of Islamist extremist/terrorism.

The contemporary Islamist extremist/terrorist phenomenon has emerged as one of the most significant threats to both regional and international peace, security, and stability. As the international community struggles to develop a comprehensive understanding of this phenomenon in its present context, the academic community should respond and discuss this subject from all relevant disciplinary backgrounds and perspectives. If effective and successful policies, strategies, and tactics are to be developed in order to adequately confront these transnational actors, all dimensions of the subject need to be explored. This thesis examines certain aspects of the under-theorized geographical dimension of Islamist extremist/terrorism. Focusing on Al Qaeda and other members of the Islamist extremist/terrorist constituency, this thesis explores the geographical and spatial imagination of the Islamist terrorist subject and deconstructs the geographical and spatial imaginings of Islamist extremism/terrorism through critically analyzing the diffuse international structure of Islamist terrorism and its related groups, the cultural ?space? Islamist extremist/terrorist actors occupy, and the function of landscape in the identity and subjectivity of Islamist extremist/terrorism.

No description available.

The thesis is a course that a pre-service teacher gropes after his selfhood¡¦s curricular consciousness. The author has a dig at how he ¡§perceives¡¨ it followed by the notion of the curricular consciousness and Cherryholmes¡¦ viewpoint of deconstruction towards curriculum. Furthermore, the author must ¡§awaken¡¨himself to what the possibilities are to ¡§perceive¡¨ such kind of selfhood¡¦s curricular consciousness. In addition, the author refers to the method of the autobiography on curriculum studies from W. F. Pinar¡¦s conception, and he revises it to meet his study condition moderately to anchor the skeleton of the study. The author initiates the review of the literature concerning the ¡§curricular consciousness¡¨ and¡§Cherryholmes¡¦ viewpoint of deconstruction towards curriculum¡¨. Later, he captures the possible complements between them, and he also attempts to ¡§perceive¡¨ the map of his ¡§selfhood¡¦s curricular consciousness¡¨. After that, he gives retrospects to his past school life and tries to ¡§awaken¡¨ his selfhood to understand what the possibilities are to ¡§perceive¡¨ such kind of a map in the process of the study. Afterwards, the author retraces to the ¡§awakening¡¨ process, and intends to form a ¡§meta- awakening¡¨ to catch on how he ¡§awakens¡¨ himself in the process of the study. Eventually, he looks back to the study, and feels like envisaging his deeds in futurity, and he also offers several suggestions to the advanced study of the field. In the awakening country of the ¡§curricular consciousness¡¨, are you preparing for awakening yourself?

The aim of this thesis study is to understand the significance of today&rsquo / s feminist politics in Turkey for post-identity politics. When it is considered that identity politics is being widely practiced today, whereas there is still much vagueness regarding the ways of doing post-identity politics, in order to achieve the aim of this study it becomes necessary to make a critique of identity politics and to reveal post-identitarian tendencies through this critique of identity-based political mobilization. In this study, feminist identity politics is analyzed and criticized from the perspective of Judith Butler, who is a poststructuralist feminist questioning identity and its relation to gender politics. These issues are questioned through qualitative research method and semi-structured in-depth interviews are used as the data gathering technique. Five in-depth interviews were conducted with women who consider themselves feminist. The interviews aim at providing individual narrations of the participants to be exposed to deconstruction later on through the analysis process. Therefore, participants are not asked direct and categorical questions about their ideas on specific issues / instead, they are encouraged to talk about how they perceive the gendered world around them and how they respond to it and how these ideas are transferred to the political arena. It was found that the participants perceived sex, gender and sexuality in a dualistic framework to a certain extent and this relative fluidity enables them to realize the importance of doing post-identity politics, but they do not have a tendency to transfer this to the political arena in the near future.