Differentiated instruction offers opportunities to improve student academic performance, specifically in students with learning disabilities. However, teachers' perceptions of which differentiated-instruction program works best to support differently abled students were unknown. The purpose of this qualitative case study was to explore teachers' perceptions on whether face-to-face instruction using response to intervention or computer-based learning using TenMarks works best in improving the academic performance of students who are differently abled in mathematics, specifically geometry. Constructivism, social disability theory, and Bandura's social learning theory formed the study's theoretical framework. Research questions guiding the study focused on teachers' perceptions of the advantages and challenges of traditional face-to-face instruction versus TenMarks when educating differently abled students. Data were collected through one-on-one interviews and member checking using a purposeful sample with six high school mathematic teachers. Thematic data analysis followed an open coding process to identify emergent themes. The findings showed that teachers perceived advantages and challenges with both instructional models. Further, teachers believed combining the two approaches would be most beneficial as the strengths and weaknesses of the two approaches are complementary, which correlates with disability's social and critical models. This study contributes to positive social change through school administrators and teachers in guiding school policies and practices related to differentiated-instruction approaches in classrooms that include differently abled students.

Mémoire numérisé par la Division de la gestion de documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal

Many children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are included or mainstreamed in general education classrooms, yet general education teachers receive little, if any, formal training for working with children with ASD. The conceptual framework for this study was differentiated instruction, which is a best practice intended to improve educational experiences for children diagnosed with ASD. The purpose of this research study was to explore general education teachers' perceptions of providing differentiated instruction to these students. The research questions examined teachers' perceptions of barriers that can affect their ability to differentiate instruction in their classrooms and strategies teachers use to facilitate the process of providing differentiated instruction in their classrooms for their students diagnosed with ASD. Eight elementary and middle school teachers participated in this phenomenological study. Content analysis of interview data provided information regarding the barriers of outdated resources and the need for additional training of general education teachers to work with students diagnosed with ASD. In addition, the participants identified 2 models used as strategies to adapt instructional practices to promote students' social and academic outcomes. Professional development could assure that teachers and administrators are aware of the latest best practices needed to teach children with ASD in the general education classrooms. By providing teachers with effective strategies needed to work with students diagnosed with autism, social change can be realized, and students with ASD can receive educational services possibly leading to a better quality of life.

No description available.

No description available.

The use of technology in assisting educators to use student data in well-devised ways to enhance the instruction received by students is gaining headway and the support of federal dollars across the nation. Since research has not provided insight as to whether or not reading coaches are using data technology tools with teachers, this mixed methods study sought to examine what behavioral intentions reading coaches have in using data technology tools with teachers, what variables may influence their behavioral intentions, and what trends may emerge in their views about using technology data tools with teachers. A mixed methods approach was deployed via a survey embedded in an email, and data from 61 Florida reading coaches from elementary, middle, and high schools in a large urban school district were examined using an adaptation of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The results showed that collectively all reading coaches have a high level of behavioral intentions towards using a data technology tool with teachers. The study also showed that elementary, middle, and high school reading coaches vary in their degree of behavioral intentions in using a data technology tool based on different variables. Trends in data showed that reading coaches think data technology tools are helpful, but that trainings are needed and that technology tools should be user-friendly. Discussion is provided regarding the implications of the study results for all stakeholders.

This study aims at examining capacity building for Foundation Phase Mathematics teachers in curriculum differentiation in Limpopo Province. Proceeding within the framework of inclusive education, it takes as its point of departure two issues which are collectively critical for learner performance in Mathematics, namely, teacher capacity and differentiated instruction. The study revolves around the view that for improved learner achievement in Mathematics, particularly in lower grades, instructional practices aimed at supporting learners should be differentiated; and, that for this to be possible, teachers should be equipped with the capacity needed to carry out curriculum differentiation. This view emerges from the convergence of three problems which constitute the motivation for conducting this study. The first problem is poor learner achievement in Mathematics in South Africa, which is a subject dominating the public media and scientific discourse. The second problem is a documented general lack among teachers of appropriate knowledge, skills and attitudes needed for modification and adaptation of curriculum to the differentiated needs of learners. The last problem is the changing curriculum policy context in which teachers work as represented by the current national curriculum policy taking place against the backdrop of the broader South African education transformation agenda, geared towards inclusion. Underlying these problems is the recognition of curriculum as constituting one of the barriers to inclusive education.Based on an assumption that poor performance of learners in the Foundation Phase Mathematics is due to teachers’ inability to differentiate curriculum and their lack of the necessary capacity, this study adopts a qualitative research design and follows a qualitative approach to examine the problem. Data was collected by means of interviews, observations and document analysis. Twelve Mathematics teachers from three purposively selected schools and one curriculumadvisor from one circuit participated in the study. Data were analysed by means ofBraun and Clarke’s method of thematic analysis. The results present the challenges that Foundation Phase Mathematics teachers face, which include inability to respond to learner diversity and inadequate training in curriculum differentiation. / Inclusive Education / M. Ed. (Inclusive Education)

There are mounting concerns to ensure that children are prepared for the literacy demands of the 21st century. Reading inability at 9 years of age portends a lifetime of illiteracy for the majority of struggling readers. Given the greater weight placed on expository text from the junior grades onwards, children with reading disabilities become increasingly constrained by their reading deficits, putting them at risk of falling ever further behind their normally achieving peers. This ethnographic study, extending over an 8 month period and finishing on the last day of the school year, targeted older poor readers at the junior level. Less is known about their reading deficits, relative to younger struggling readers. Therefore, the first of three principal objectives aimed to extend understanding of the processes whereby older poor readers interact with expository text by providing a qualitative finer-grained assessment of their particular difficulties than presently exists. The second objective was focused on developing and implementing a cohesive program of research-based interventions that targeted critical requirements of successful interactions with expository text, including the ability to summarize, locate information, and attend to text structure. The third objective involved establishing and describing a collaborative, intensive research partnership with two classroom teachers at the junior level to implement and evaluate research-grounded interventions for their students with reading difficulties, working within the context of the regular classroom. The dual researcher role, as collaborator with the teachers and instigator of the intervention program, shaped a reconfigured model of special education, responsive to a diverse range of student needs and abilities, and situated within a content-rich, challenging curriculum. Parallel lessons afforded the opportunity to tier instruction with increasing intensity for the children with the highest needs. Results showed the critical importance of aggressively promoting self-efficacy, self-regulation, and metacognitve awareness for older struggling readers. As these children’s strategic repertoire increased, so, too, did their comprehension and comprehension-monitoring. Differentiated instruction that was tiered, flexible, and responsive supported social inclusion and social collaboration. Social context and authentic content became interwoven and instrumental in engaging the children, maintaining their motivation and sustaining their commitment to read to learn. / Thesis (Ph.D, Education) -- Queen's University, 2010-01-27 15:10:03.202

Au Québec, des ressources considérables sont investies pour assurer la réussite scolaire des élèves handicapés et en difficulté, tant au plan des apprentissages, de la socialisation que de la qualification. Pour des raisons évoquées d’équité et d’accès à la formation générale, les politiques éducatives privilégient l’intégration de ces élèves en classe ordinaire (Ministère de l'Éducation, 2008; Ministère de l'Éducation du Québec, 1999, 2004a). Ces politiques appellent de profonds changements dans l’organisation scolaire et conduisent inévitablement les enseignants à adopter des pratiques d’individualisation de leur enseignement. En dépit de l’importance de l’individualisation de l’enseignement pour favoriser la réussite des élèves intégrés, les pratiques pédagogiques mises en œuvre par les enseignants québécois demeurent méconnues. Cette étude vise à obtenir un portrait de ces pratiques. Plus spécifiquement, cette étude vise à obtenir des données sur la fréquence d’utilisation de certaines pratiques, à étudier leur compréhension conceptuelle et appliquée par les enseignants, ainsi qu’à identifier des facteurs personnels et organisationnels pouvant expliquer les différences entre les enseignants. Sur la base de la littérature disponible, une typologie des pratiques d’individualisation a été produite, regroupant quatre pratiques : la différenciation pédagogique, l’enseignement de stratégies, l’accommodation et la modification. Puis, un questionnaire élaboré aux fins de cette étude, permettant d’évaluer empiriquement la prégnance de ces quatre pratiques, a été rempli par 138 enseignants provenant de 35 commissions scolaires du Québec. Parmi ces enseignants, treize ont été sélectionnés et interviewés sur la base des exemples de leurs pratiques mentionnées dans les questions ouvertes du sondage. Fondée sur un devis mixte de type concourant et imbriqué (Creswell, 2003), cette recherche combine une stratégie d’analyse quantitative des données issues du questionnaire à des analyses de contenu des entrevues, de nature qualitative. Les résultats convergent vers trois niveaux de prise en charge de l’hétérogénéité en classe: nuancée, mécanique et réactive. Seuls les enseignants qui ont une prise en charge nuancée démontrent une compréhension et une utilisation des pratiques conformes au cadre conceptuel. Suivant cette hypothèse formulée à partir des données d’entrevue, les résultats d’une ANOVA ont permis de conclure que le tiers des répondants au sondage (n=41) utilisant le plus fréquemment la différenciation pédagogique fait une utilisation significativement peu fréquente de la pratique de la modification. Enfin, des analyses de régression ont révélé que parmi les autres facteurs prédisant l’utilisation des pratiques se trouvent la participation à des activités de formation continue, le niveau d’enseignement, le nombre d’élèves dans le groupe et le nombre d’élèves en difficulté avec des plans d’intervention. Les résultats de cette recherche indiquent un niveau de connaissance inégal des pratiques étudiées chez les enseignants, ainsi qu’une mise en œuvre déficiente des ressources nécessaires à l’intégration scolaire des élèves handicapés ou en difficulté. / Along with the growing number of students with disabilities in regular education classrooms came the need for developing specialized interventions in this setting. Many studies showed that regular education teachers are using only a few individualized adaptations for those children, and that, therefore, many of these students with disabilities don’t have access to curriculum content. This raises the questions of defining appropriate individualized teaching practices, which can be used in regular education class. A review of the literature indicates many individualization options ranging from differentiated instruction to curriculum modification. The aim of the study was to obtain a portrait of use of those practices in the province of Quebec in Canada. The conceptual framework built for this study encompasses four identified individualization options. A web survey along with interviews were conducted to identify individualization practices found in French-language primary schools of Quebec. Carried out using concurrent nested strategy (Creswell, 2003), this mixed method research presents findings regarding frequency and diverse uses of the individualization options by regular teacher. Factors explaining variations were also studied. Study results indicate that the individualization practices most frequently used are those closely resembling regular classroom teaching. Three distinct profiles of teacher response to classroom heterogeneity were identified in the study: nuanced, mechanical and reactive. Only a few teachers among those interviewed had a good conceptual grasp of individualisation practices and were able to use those practices coherently. Results of ANOVA on survey data indicated that teachers who used differentiated instruction frequently—weekly or daily—were significantly less inclined to curriculum and teaching modifications. Regression analysis pointed to in service training as a predictor of frequent use of diffenreciated instruction. Grade level, classroom size and the proportion of students with disabilities were predictors of the use of strategic instruction, accommodation and modification.

This study aims at examining capacity building for Foundation Phase Mathematics teachers in curriculum differentiation in Limpopo Province. Proceeding within the framework of inclusive education, it takes as its point of departure two issues which are collectively critical for learner performance in Mathematics, namely, teacher capacity and differentiated instruction. The study revolves around the view that for improved learner achievement in Mathematics, particularly in lower grades, instructional practices aimed at supporting learners should be differentiated; and, that for this to be possible, teachers should be equipped with the capacity needed to carry out curriculum differentiation. This view emerges from the convergence of three problems which constitute the motivation for conducting this study. The first problem is poor learner achievement in Mathematics in South Africa, which is a subject dominating the public media and scientific discourse. The second problem is a documented general lack among teachers of appropriate knowledge, skills and attitudes needed for modification and adaptation of curriculum to the differentiated needs of learners. The last problem is the changing curriculum policy context in which teachers work as represented by the current national curriculum policy taking place against the backdrop of the broader South African education transformation agenda, geared towards inclusion. Underlying these problems is the recognition of curriculum as constituting one of the barriers to inclusive education.Based on an assumption that poor performance of learners in the Foundation Phase Mathematics is due to teachers’ inability to differentiate curriculum and their lack of the necessary capacity, this study adopts a qualitative research design and follows a qualitative approach to examine the problem. Data was collected by means of interviews, observations and document analysis. Twelve Mathematics teachers from three purposively selected schools and one curriculumadvisor from one circuit participated in the study. Data were analysed by means ofBraun and Clarke’s method of thematic analysis. The results present the challenges that Foundation Phase Mathematics teachers face, which include inability to respond to learner diversity and inadequate training in curriculum differentiation. / Inclusive Education / M. Ed. (Inclusive Education)