• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 9
  • 7
  • 5
  • 4
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 30
  • 21
  • 10
  • 7
  • 6
  • 6
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 4
  • 4
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Downside-Upside Duality: The Role of Ambidexterity in Enterprise Risk Management

Lauria, Emanuel V, Jr 03 May 2015 (has links)
Enterprise risk management (ERM) is a widely studied management control process, representing an important advancement from the traditional methods by which firms control the risks they face. This study steps back from attempts to quantify the relationship between ERM and firm performance. Instead, it explores how non-financial institutions with significant time and resource commitments to ERM configure those resources to effectuate a downside-upside duality as ERM is adopted, using for the first time in ERM research the theoretical lens of ambidexterity as a dynamic capability. This duality is the simultaneous engagement in mitigating existing and emerging risks while pursuing new value contributions from risk management processes. Empirical evidence indicates that the downside-upside duality is asymmetric, and challenges exist in quantifying the upside. The upside value component is most closely associated with raising the level of the risk discourse in firms. This is accomplished structurally by establishing new ERM-focused organizational subunits, and contextually by stretching capabilities. Dynamic capabilities emerge as firms sense, seize and reconfigure resources in the operationalization of ERM to supplant core competencies associated with traditional modes of risk management. Practitioners will gain from this research a richer understanding of the fit, form and function of ERM informed by empirical data and extrinsic theory.
2

Risco downside e CoVaR no mercado brasileiro de ações / Downside risk and CoVaR in the Brazilian stock market

Alexandrino, Thiago Basso 29 November 2013 (has links)
Um dos objetivos deste estudo é testar modelos de precificação de ativos financeiros, especialmente o de risco downside de Ang et al. (2006), em todas as ações da Bovespa, para o período que se estende de janeiro de 1999 a julho de 2012. Para atingi-lo, aplica-se o método de regressões Fama e MacBeth (1973) com retornos um período à frente. A quase totalidade dos modelos testados é rejeitada, inclusive a existência de um eventual prêmio para o risco downside. A exceção é o modelo que inclui com o beta tradicional e o seu quadrado, o que permite rejeitar o CAPM devido a não linearidade no risco de mercado. A relação existente entre o beta e o retorno das ações seria positiva até beta igual a 0,642 e depois negativa. Outra meta desta dissertação é comparar as estimações condicionais às não condicionais do modelo CoVaR de Adrian e Brunnermeier (2011) para as 16 ações da Bovespa utilizadas por Almeida et al. (2012), que obtiveram apenas estimações não condicionais para o Brasil em um período semelhante. Os resultados daqui mostram uma baixa e não estatisticamente significante correlação com os de Almeida et al. (2012). Para este estudo, tem-se que as duas formas de calcular o CoVaR são similares para o teste de estresse, mas não para o risco sistêmico. / This research pursues as an objective to test cross-sectional returns of some asset pricing models, specially the downside risk suggested by Ang et al. (2006). To accomplish this goal, all the Brazilian Bovespa\'s stocks are used, from January 1999 to July 2012, in one month forward returns Fama-MacBeth regressions. Not only the downside risk model is rejected: almost all models, including the traditional CAPM and versions of the 3 factors Fama-French. A nonlinear CAPM (beta and beta squared) is the exception in the universe of tested models, which produces the best predictions and a positive relationship between betas and forward returns until beta equals 0,642, after this value, the relationship becomes negative. Another issue followed by this study is to compare conditional estimates of the CoVaR model of Adrian and Brunnermeier (2011) with the unconditional ones for the sixteen stock used by Almeida et al. (2012) unconditionally estimates. The results show low and not statistically significant correlation with Almeida\'s estimates. For the sample used here, comparing the conditional and the unconditional methodologies suggests a great similarity for the stress test, but not so close results for the systemic risk.
3

Risco downside e CoVaR no mercado brasileiro de ações / Downside risk and CoVaR in the Brazilian stock market

Thiago Basso Alexandrino 29 November 2013 (has links)
Um dos objetivos deste estudo é testar modelos de precificação de ativos financeiros, especialmente o de risco downside de Ang et al. (2006), em todas as ações da Bovespa, para o período que se estende de janeiro de 1999 a julho de 2012. Para atingi-lo, aplica-se o método de regressões Fama e MacBeth (1973) com retornos um período à frente. A quase totalidade dos modelos testados é rejeitada, inclusive a existência de um eventual prêmio para o risco downside. A exceção é o modelo que inclui com o beta tradicional e o seu quadrado, o que permite rejeitar o CAPM devido a não linearidade no risco de mercado. A relação existente entre o beta e o retorno das ações seria positiva até beta igual a 0,642 e depois negativa. Outra meta desta dissertação é comparar as estimações condicionais às não condicionais do modelo CoVaR de Adrian e Brunnermeier (2011) para as 16 ações da Bovespa utilizadas por Almeida et al. (2012), que obtiveram apenas estimações não condicionais para o Brasil em um período semelhante. Os resultados daqui mostram uma baixa e não estatisticamente significante correlação com os de Almeida et al. (2012). Para este estudo, tem-se que as duas formas de calcular o CoVaR são similares para o teste de estresse, mas não para o risco sistêmico. / This research pursues as an objective to test cross-sectional returns of some asset pricing models, specially the downside risk suggested by Ang et al. (2006). To accomplish this goal, all the Brazilian Bovespa\'s stocks are used, from January 1999 to July 2012, in one month forward returns Fama-MacBeth regressions. Not only the downside risk model is rejected: almost all models, including the traditional CAPM and versions of the 3 factors Fama-French. A nonlinear CAPM (beta and beta squared) is the exception in the universe of tested models, which produces the best predictions and a positive relationship between betas and forward returns until beta equals 0,642, after this value, the relationship becomes negative. Another issue followed by this study is to compare conditional estimates of the CoVaR model of Adrian and Brunnermeier (2011) with the unconditional ones for the sixteen stock used by Almeida et al. (2012) unconditionally estimates. The results show low and not statistically significant correlation with Almeida\'s estimates. For the sample used here, comparing the conditional and the unconditional methodologies suggests a great similarity for the stress test, but not so close results for the systemic risk.
4

A Treatise on Downside Risk

Artavanis, Nikolaos 24 April 2013 (has links)
This dissertation is comprised of two papers. The first paper (Chapter 1) provides the theoretical foundation for the estimation of systematic downside risk. Using a new approach, I derive a measure of downside systematic risk, downside beta, that is free of the endogeneity problem and thus straightforward to calculate. Since there is no consensus in the literature regarding the appropriate method for the estimation of downside beta, I review the alternative specifications proposed in the past. I explicitly show that the derived formula here is more efficient in capturing downside risk on both theoretical grounds and in terms of empirical results. Using this efficient specification of systematic downside risk, I show that downside beta has increased explanatory power towards the cross-section of equity returns as compared to unconditional beta. In particular, downside beta predicts larger and more significant future premia, insignificant intercepts in portfolio cross-section tests and cannot be subsumed by additional risk factors proposed in the past literature. I attribute this superior performance to the ability of downside risk to capture distress risk and to the fact that it does not penalize (reward) good (bad) events in good states. In the second paper (Chapter 2) that is co-authored with my advisor, Gregory Kadlec, we exploit the notion of downside risk to explain a long-withstanding market anomaly; the long-term stock return reversals. We show that downside betas of past losers are significantly greater than downside betas of past winners, and the inclusion of downside beta in Fama-Macbeth regressions subsumes the reversal effect. / Ph. D.
5

Essays on Real Estate Investment Trusts

Wang, Yunqing 08 August 2007 (has links)
The first essay of this dissertation investigates the relationship between downside risk and returns of real estate investment trusts (REITs) and assesses the performance of real estate mutual funds (REMFs). We measure the asymmetric risk through downside and upside betas and through the measures incorporated higher moments such as coskewness and Leland's beta. We do not find significant contemporary relationship between the asymmetric risk and returns of REITs. There are only a small portion of REITs reacting to up and down market conditions differently. We find weak evidence that this asymmetric movement of REITs to market may be due to small and value components embedded in REITs. We evaluate the performance of real estate mutual funds (REMFs) from the asymmetric risk perception. According to our results, most of REMFs do not outperform the market. The downside risk helps to explain some of the abnormal returns associated with REMFs. However, the evaluation may be sensitive to the choices of the model and the market index being used. The second essay examines the liquidity of Asian REITs. We use various measures to assess the liquidity of JREITs and SREITs. The overall evidence indicates that the liquidity of JREITs is greater than that of SREITs. Comparing to non-REIT stocks, JREITs are less liquid than Japanese common stocks while there is no significant difference in liquidity between SREITs and Singaporean common stocks. There is also strong evidence that US REITs have smaller spreads and are traded more often than both JREITs and SREITs. We also find that the primary determinants of JREIT spreads are turnover and return volatility. The secondary factors that affect the spread of JREITs are life and property holdings. The dominant factors affecting SREITs' spreads are price, return volatility, and life. The significance of life suggests that there is a learning effect existed in both JREIT and SREIT markets in 2005.
6

An Analysis of the Contagion Effect, Systematic Risk and Downside Risk in the International Stock Markets during the Subprime Mortgage Crisis

Tsai, Hsiu-Jung 10 October 2010 (has links)
This study tests whether contagion effects existed during the ¡§subprime mortgage crisis¡¨ among the equity markets of the US, the EU, Asia and emerging markets. The time-varying correlation coefficients are estimated by the dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) of Engle (2002), using a multivariate GJR-GARCH with AR (1) model. The empirical findings show that the conditional correlation coefficients of stock returns between the U.S. and others countries were positive and that the contagion effect exists among stock markets. Financial markets displayed contagion effects, in that the global equity markets were confronted with elevated systematic risk at the same time. Therefore, this study further examines the role of systematic risk in the equity market of each country. I used the rolling formulae, the MV-DGP, and DCC-GARCH (1, 1) models to estimate the CAPM beta and downside betas. This study found higher systematic risk (downside systematic risk) in the stock markets of the United States, Germany, France and Brazil, which had beta values nearly above one, while the Chinese stock market had the lowest systemic risk and served as a hedge for investors and fund managers. Finally, the results demonstrate that DCC-HW beta can capture some downside linkages between the market portfolios and expected stock returns, while these linkages cannot likely be captured by the CAPM beta.
7

Modèles d'évaluation et d'allocations des actifs financiers dans le cadre de non normalité des rendements : essais sur le marché français

Hafsa, Houda 12 November 2012 (has links)
Depuis quelques années, la recherche financière s'inscrit dans une nouvelle dynamique. La nécessité de mieux modéliser le comportement des rendements des actifs financiers et les risques sur les marchés pousse les chercheurs à trouver des mesures de risque plus adéquates. Ce travail de recherche se situe dans cette évolution, ayant admis les caractéristiques des séries financières par des faits stylisés tels que la non normalité des rendements. A travers cette thèse nous essayons de montrer l'importance d'intégrer des mesures de risque qui tiennent compte de la non normalité dans le processus d'évaluation et d'allocation des actifs financiers sur le marché français. Cette thèse propose trois chapitres correspondant chacun à un article de recherche académique. Le premier article propose de revisiter les modèles d'évaluation en prenant en compte des moments d'ordres supérieurs dans un cadre de downside risk. Les résultats indiquent que les downside co-moments d'ordres supérieurs sont déterminants dans l'explication des variations des rendements en coupe transversale. Le second chapitre propose de mettre en relation la rentabilité financière et le risque mesuré par la VaR ou la CVaR. Nous trouvons que la VaR présente un pouvoir explicatif plus élevé que celui de la CVaR et que l'approche normale est plus intéressante que l'approche basée sur l'expansion de Cornish-Fisher (1937). Ces deux résultats contredisent les prédictions théoriques mais nous avons pu démontrer qu'ils sont inhérents au marché français. Le troisième chapitre propose une autre piste, nous revisitons le modèle moyenne-CVaR dans un cadre dynamique et en présence des coûts de transaction / This dissertation is part of an ongoing researches looking for an adequate model that apprehend the behavior of financial asset returns. Through this research, we propose to analyze the relevance of risk measures that take into account the non-normality in the asset pricing and portfolio allocation models on the French market. This dissertation is comprised of three articles. The first one proposes to revisit the asset pricing model taking into account the higher-order moments in a downside framework. The results indicate that the downside higher order co-moments are relevant in explaining the cross sectional variations of returns. The second paper examines the relation between expected returns and the VaR or CVaR. A cross sectional analysis provides evidence that VaR is superior measure of risk when compared to the CVaR. We find also that the normal estimation approach gives better results than the approach based on the expansion of Cornish-Fisher (1937). Both results contradict the theoretical predictions but we proved that they are inherent to the French market. In the third paper, we review the mean-CVaR model in a dynamic framework and we take into account the transaction costs. The results indicate that the asset allocation model that takes into account the non-normality can improve the performance of the portfolio comparing to the mean-variance model, in terms of the average return and the return-to CVaR ratio. Through these three studies, we think that it is possible to modify the risk management framework to apprehend in a better way the risk of loss associated to the non-normality problem
8

Análise dos modelos baseados em lower partial moments: um estudo empírico para o Ibovespa e Dow Jones através da distância Hansen-Jagannathan

Herrera, Christian Jonnatan Jacobsen Soto 01 March 2017 (has links)
Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2017-06-28T19:37:30Z No. of bitstreams: 1 christianjonnatanjacobsensotoherrera.pdf: 883027 bytes, checksum: 3ee1cf348a7392e28d4ef150125ad72c (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2017-08-07T21:48:11Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 christianjonnatanjacobsensotoherrera.pdf: 883027 bytes, checksum: 3ee1cf348a7392e28d4ef150125ad72c (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-07T21:48:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 christianjonnatanjacobsensotoherrera.pdf: 883027 bytes, checksum: 3ee1cf348a7392e28d4ef150125ad72c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-03-01 / Esta dissertação propõe testar empiricamente, através de otimizações in sample, os modelos de downside risk, Sortino, Upside Pontential Ratio, Omega e Kappa, comparado-os com o tradicional CAPM, derivado a partir da fronteira de média e variância, utilizando as ações listadas no Ibovespa e Dow Jones (DJIA) para construção de carteiras de mercado para cada um dos modelos. Estas duas classes de modelos distinguem-se quanto aos pressupostos e à mensuração do risco. Enquanto o CAPM considera apenas os dois primeiros momentos da distribuição de retornos, as outras medidas levam em conta os momentos superiores. Através da distância Hansen-Jagannathan, que mede o erro de mensuração do Stochastic Discount Factor (SDF) gerado pelos modelos, observou-se grande distinção dos modelos nos dois mercados. Enquanto o CAPM performou melhor no Dow Jones, os modelos de downside risk apresentaram melhores resultados para o Ibovespa, sugerindo vantagem na utilização destes modelos em mercados com menor liquidez e maior assimetria. / This dissertation proposes empirically test the downside risk models, Sortino, Upside Pontential Ratio, Omega and Kappa, by comparing them with the traditional CAPM, derived from the mean and variance boundary, using the listed shares in the Ibovespa and Dow Jones (DJIA) for the construction of market portfolios for each of the models. These two classes of models are distinguished in terms of assumptions and risk measurement. While the CAPM considers only the first two moments of the returns distribution, the other measures take into account the higher moments of such distributions. The Hansen-Jagannathan distance, which measures the Stochastic Discount Factor (SDF) measurement error generated by the models, showed a great distinction of the models in the two markets. While the CAPM performed better in the Dow Jones, the downside risk models presented better results for the Ibovespa, suggesting an advantage in the use of such models in markets with lower liquidity and greater asymmetry.
9

Gestion des actifs financiers : de l’approche Classique à la modélisation non paramétrique en estimation du DownSide Risk pour la constitution d’un portefeuille efficient / The Management of financial assets : from Classical Approach to the Nonparametric Modelling in the DownSide Risk Estimation in Order to Get an Optimal Portfolio

Ben Salah, Hanene 23 November 2015 (has links)
La méthode d'optimisation d'un portefeuille issue de la minimisation du DownSide Risk a été mise au point pour suppléer les carences de la méthode classique de Markowitz dont l'hypothèse de la normalité de la distribution des rendements se trouve défaillante très souvent. Dans cette thèse, nous proposons d'introduire des estimateurs non paramétriques de la moyenne ou de la médiane conditionnelle pour remplacer les rendements observés d'un portefeuille ou des actifs constituant un portefeuille dans le cas du DownSide Risk. Ces estimateurs nous permettent d'obtenir des frontières efficientes lisses et facilement interprétables. Nous développons des algorithmes itératifs pour résoudre les différents problèmes d'optimisation permettant d'obtenir des portefeuilles optimaux. Nous proposons aussi une nouvelle mesure de risque dit risque conditionnel qui tient compte des anticipations des valeurs futures des différents rendements. Pour le définir nous avons fait appel aux prédicteurs non paramétriques basés sur l'estimation de la moyenne conditionnelle. Enfin, nous avons testé et validé toutes nos méthodes sur des données issues de différents marchés et nous avons montré leur performance et leur efficacité comparées aux méthodes classiques / The DownSide Risk (DSR) model for portfolio optimization allows to overcome the drawbacks of the classical Mean-Variance model concerning the asymmetry of returns and the risk perception of investors. This optimization model deals with a positive definite matrix that is endogenous with respect to the portfolio weights and hence leads to a non standard optimization problem. To bypass this hurdle, we developed a new recursive minimization procedure that ensures the convergence to the solution and gives a smooth portfolio efficient frontier. Our method consists in replacing all the returns by their nonparametric estimators counterpart using kernel mean or median regressions. This technique provides an effect similar to the case where an infinite number of observations is available. We also develop a new portfolio optimization model where the risks are measured through conditional variance or semivariance. This strategy allows us to take advantage from returns prediction which are obtained by nonparametric univariate methods. The prediction step uses kernel estimation of the conditional mean. Data from different markets are used to test and validate the proposed approaches, and results indicate better overall performance
10

Analýza výkonnosti Ruských fondů / Analysis of performance of russian mutual funds

Hofman, Elena January 2012 (has links)
This thesis is focused on the analysis of performance of chosen russian mutual funds on the basis of achieved yield and risk. After short introduction to the russian market of mutual funds, the paper deals with a theoretical background underlying the performance indicators. Risk perception and following construction of indicators are discussed in detail from the perspective of modern and post-modern portfolio theory. The indicators are interpreted and appropriateness of their application is assessed. The analytic part is devoted to the application of discussed methods on 10 open-ended equity mutual funds. Based on the result, the funds are compared with each other and with selected market index.

Page generated in 0.0961 seconds