by Fong Man Kim. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 127-137). / Abstracts in English and Chinese. / Thesis committee --- p.i / Acknowledgements --- p.ii / Abstract --- p.iii / List of figures --- p.viii / List of tables --- p.xi / Abbreviations --- p.xii / Table of contents --- p.xiv / Chapter CHAPTER 1 --- GENERAL INTRODUCTION --- p.1 / Chapter CHAPTER 2 --- LITERATURE REVIEW --- p.3 / Chapter 2.1 --- MIH from Penaeus vannamei --- p.3 / Chapter 2.1.1 --- General Introduction to P. vannamei --- p.3 / Chapter 2.1.1.1 --- Morphology --- p.3 / Chapter 2.1.1.2 --- Geographical distribution --- p.5 / Chapter 2.1.1.3 --- Economic value --- p.5 / Chapter 2.1.2 --- Physiology of Molting in Crustacean --- p.7 / Chapter 2.1.2.1 --- The molt cycle --- p.7 / Chapter 2.1.2.2 --- Physiological effects of ecdysone --- p.8 / Chapter 2.1.2.3 --- Regulation of the secretion of ecdysone --- p.9 / Chapter 2.1.2.4 --- Physiological effects of Molt-inhibiting hormone --- p.10 / Chapter 2.1.3 --- Cloning of MIH cDNA from P. vannamei --- p.14 / Chapter 2.1.3.1 --- Molecular identity of MIH --- p.14 / Chapter 2.1.3.2 --- Cloning of MIH cDNA --- p.15 / Chapter 2.1.3.3 --- Comparison of the cloned MIH-like cDNA with the CHH/MIH/VIH peptide family --- p.16 / Chapter 2.2 --- Plants as Bioreactors --- p.20 / Chapter 2.2.1 --- Principles & Techniques --- p.20 / Chapter 2.2.2 --- Advantages of plant bioreactors --- p.21 / Chapter 2.2.3 --- Tobacco expression system --- p.22 / Chapter 2.2.3.1 --- Tobacco as model plants --- p.22 / Chapter 2.2.3.2 --- Transformation methods --- p.23 / Chapter 2.2.4 --- Phaseolin --- p.26 / Chapter CHAPTER 3 --- EXPRESSION OF MIH IN TRANSGENIC TOBACCO --- p.28 / Chapter 3.1 --- Introduction --- p.28 / Chapter 3.2 --- Materials & Methods --- p.29 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- Chemicals --- p.29 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- Plant materials --- p.29 / Chapter 3.2.3 --- Bacterial strains and plasmid vectors --- p.30 / Chapter 3.2.4 --- Construction of chimeric genes - --- p.30 / Chapter 3.2.4.1 --- PCR amplification of MIH --- p.30 / Chapter 3.2.4.2 --- Cloning of PCR-amplified MIH into vector pET --- p.31 / Chapter 3.2.4.3 --- Cloning of MIH into vector pBK/Phas-sp and pTZ/Phas --- p.31 / Chapter 3.2.4.4 --- Cloning of MIH into binary vector pBI121 --- p.32 / Chapter 3.2.5 --- Transformation of Agrobacterium with pBI121/Phas-sp-MIH and pBI121 /Phas-MIH by electroporation --- p.39 / Chapter 3.2.6 --- Transformation of tobacco --- p.40 / Chapter 3.2.7 --- Selection of transgenic plants --- p.41 / Chapter 3.2.8 --- GUS assay --- p.42 / Chapter 3.2.9 --- Extraction of leaf genomic DNA --- p.43 / Chapter 3.2.10 --- Extraction of total RNA from developing seeds --- p.44 / Chapter 3.2.11 --- Synthesis of DIG-labeled DNA and RNA probes --- p.45 / Chapter 3.2.12 --- Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA --- p.47 / Chapter 3.2.13 --- Reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) --- p.47 / Chapter 3.2.14 --- Northern blot analysis of total RNA --- p.48 / Chapter 3.2.15 --- Protein extraction and tricine-SDS-PAGE --- p.49 / Chapter 3.2.16 --- Purification of 6xHis-tag proteins --- p.50 / Chapter 3.2.17 --- Western blot analysis --- p.50 / Chapter 3.2.18 --- In vitro transcription & translation --- p.52 / Chapter 3.2.18.1 --- Construction of transcription vector containing the chimeric MIH gene --- p.52 / Chapter 3.2.18.2 --- In vitro transcription --- p.56 / Chapter 3.2.18.3 --- In vitro translation --- p.56 / Chapter 3.2.19 --- Particle bombardment --- p.57 / Chapter 3.2.19.1 --- Construction of MIH-GUSN fusion chimeric genes --- p.57 / Chapter 3.2.19.2 --- Conditions of particle bombardment --- p.63 / Chapter 3.2.20 --- Codon modification of MIH gene --- p.63 / Chapter 3.3 --- Results --- p.73 / Chapter 3.3.1 --- Construction of chimeric MIH genes --- p.73 / Chapter 3.3.2 --- "Tobacco transformation, selection and regeneration" --- p.73 / Chapter 3.3.3 --- Detection of GUS activity --- p.74 / Chapter 3.3.4 --- Southern blot analysis --- p.79 / Chapter 3.3.5 --- Detection of MIH transcript in transgenic tobacco --- p.83 / Chapter 3.3.5.1 --- RT-PCR --- p.83 / Chapter 3.3.5.2 --- Northern blot analysis --- p.86 / Chapter 3.3.6 --- Detection of MIH protein by Tricine-SDS-PAGE --- p.86 / Chapter 3.3.7 --- Detection of MIH protein by western blot analysis --- p.88 / Chapter 3.3.7.1 --- Western blot analysis using Anti-MIH antibody --- p.88 / Chapter 3.3.7.2 --- Western blot analysis using Anti-His antibody --- p.90 / Chapter 3.3.7.3 --- Western blot analysis using Anti-MIHA & Anti-MIHB antibodies --- p.90 / Chapter 3.3.8 --- Purification of 6xHis-tag proteins by Ni-NTA column --- p.94 / Chapter 3.3.8.1 --- Western blot analysis of proteins purified by Ni-NTA column --- p.97 / Chapter 3.3.9 --- In vitro transcription and translation --- p.100 / Chapter 3.3.9.1 --- In vitro transcription --- p.100 / Chapter 3.3.9.2 --- In vitro translation --- p.100 / Chapter 3.3.10 --- Particle bombardments --- p.103 / Chapter 3.3.10.1 --- Transient expression of MIH in soybean & tobacco leaves --- p.103 / Chapter CHAPTER 4 --- DISCUSSION --- p.107 / Chapter 4.1 --- Transient expression of MIH genes --- p.109 / Chapter 4.1.1 --- In vitro transcription and translation --- p.109 / Chapter 4.1.2 --- Particle bombardments --- p.220 / Chapter 4.2 --- Post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) --- p.114 / Chapter 4.2.1 --- Post-transcriptional cis-inactivation --- p.114 / Chapter 4.2.2 --- Post-transcriptional trans-inactivation --- p.116 / Chapter 4.2.3 --- MIH gene and PTGS --- p.118 / Chapter 4.3 --- Codon usage --- p.119 / Chapter 4.3.1 --- Codon usage of MIH in plants --- p.120 / Chapter 4.3.2 --- Codon modification of MIH and further study on MIH expression in plants --- p.122 / Chapter 4.4 --- Post-translational protein degradation --- p.123 / Chapter 4.4.1 --- Construction of LRP-MIH fusion proteins --- p.123 / CONCLUSION --- p.125 / REFERENCES --- p.127

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

In this laboratory study, the role of juvenile hormone (JH) and ecdysone in regulating wing polyphenism was investigated in the non-model organism Gerris buenoi. Topical application of the JH analog methoprene elicited reduced pronotum, wing defects, and nymphal-adult intermediates but no changes to wing morph. Similarly, while microinjection of the ecdysone derivative 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) elicited aberrant phenotypes there was again no influence on the wing morph. Using data from a transcriptomics experiment, RNAi knockdown of the differentially expressed 20E induced receptor gene, Hr4, caused high mortality rates (> 90 %) which resulted in a sample size too small to draw any inferences of Hr4’s involvement in G. buenoi wing polyphenism. My results indicate that both JH and ecdysone are involved in several developmental processes including wing development, but they do not seem to be important for determining wing polyphenism. However, several factors are important to consider in future research which means that the potential role of JH and ecdysone in G. buenoi wing polyphenism should not be dismissed at this stage.

Drosophila is host to the steroid hormone ecdysone, which regulates development and immune functions using a common group of transcription factors. Developmentally-induced ecdysone pulses activate the expression of the EcR, BR-C, HR46, Eip74EF, Eip75B, Eip78C, and Eip93F, which assume control of hundreds of other genes involved in the transition from larva to pupa stage. Many of the transcription factors are related to mammalian nuclear hormone receptors by homology. In addition to these transcription factors, the ecdysoneregulated GATA factors SRP and PNR are required for the proper expression of the peptidoglycan sensor PGRP-LC, which belongs to a conserved class of proteins in innate immunity. Although the transcriptional network has been elucidated in development, it is unclear why ecdysone control of PGRP-LC gene activity involves these nine transcription factors and how ecdysone is regulated in the context of an infection in vivo. An ecdysone-activated enhancer was located upstream of the PGRP-LC locus using a reporter plasmid. Female flies that lacked the enhancer had reduced PGRP-LC expression, but survived infection. Male flies did not experience these changes. Therefore, PGRP-LC enhancer appears to be a female-specific cis-regulatory element. The lack of survival phenotype could be caused by using an improper injection site. Bioinformatics software was used to identify putative individual and overlapping binding sites for some transcription factors. Site-directed mutations of the motifs reduced PGRP-LC promoter activity without abolishing the signal. These results suggest that the transcription factors assemble at multiple locations on the PGRP-LC enhancer and form strong protein-protein bonds. Septic injury led to elevated ecdysone in whole flies, which could be a neuroendocrine response to stress similar to the mammalian system. Steroid hormone regulation of immune receptors is a common theme in humans and flies, and these results could advance our understanding of the transcriptional regulation of related genes and gender differences observed in innate immune responses at the transcriptional level.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.