Spelling suggestions: "subject:"environmental health tasks""
1 |
How Are Environmental Health Risks Communicated?Belford, Angel 31 May 2006 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Newly Emerging Environmental Health Risks in a Risk Society: A case study of the public perception of food allergiesHarrington, Daniel W. 10 1900 (has links)
<p>Pre-modern societies were subjected to risks attributed to fate, and human-made hazards that were considered manageable. Late-modern society is increasingly exposed to emerging environmental health risks that are products of the modernization process itself (e.g. genetically modified organisms). These risks result from broad changes in the environment and/or human activity. Some of these provoke high public perceptions of risk, and often institutions and communities must respond to these in the absence of scientific knowledge.</p> <p>This dissertation explores the determinants of the perception of food allergies – a recent addition to the environmental risk landscape. A recently assembled national database on food allergies was analyzed using multivariate logistic regression (n=3,462). In parallel, a media analysis of nine years of Canadian newspaper coverage of food allergy issues (n = 598 articles) explored the role of a primary source of risk communication.</p> <p>Results revealed a number of important determinants at the individual-level , as well as a number of experiential (e.g. exposure to food allergy-related information) and attitudinal covariates . The policy environment, was also implicated as an important modifying factor for risk perceptions. The media analysis revealed how food allergies are being constructed by different social actors through the news media, with substantial implications for public understanding. The dissertation concludes with a description of a conceptual framework for characterizing public response to emerging environmental health. This tool may prove crucial for increasing the understanding of the links between people, perceptions, and places as new environmental risks continue to emerge on the landscape.</p> / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
|
3 |
Environmental health risks associated with firewood induced volatile rganic compounds in Senwabarwana Villages, Republic of South AfricaSemenya, Khomotso 10 1900 (has links)
Firewood is a dominant household fuel type used in many developing countries. Even in
countries where there is improved access to electricity, most households still rely on firewood
for their energy needs. Harvesting of some wood is illegal, however the high poverty rate,
absence of alternative fuels and lack of law enforcement means even the protected wood
species will continue to be used, with consequent pressure on the forests. Furthermore, the
combustion of firewood for domestic use takes place in poorly ventilated homes emitting
hazardous pollutants, which causes indoor air pollution and affect human health.
The use of firewood as a household fuel can be superimposed nearly perfectly on that of socioeconomic development. Additionally, the use of household firewood is invariably associated
with poverty in countries, in communities within a country and in households within a
community. Indoor air pollution studies on human health should then consider socio-economic
factors which seem to be one of the determinants of both firewood use and ill health, a
determinant which is often neglected in most indoor air pollution studies. Domestic inhalation
of firewood smoke is one of the mechanisms linking socio-economic (poverty) to disease.
The current study sought to determine a baseline of wood usage and health risks caused by
volatile organic compounds in Senwabarwana villages. This study integrated observations,
ethnobotanical meta-analysis and experimental into one comprehensive integrated
environmental health risk assessment framework to assess the risks associated with exposure
to volatile organic compounds from firewood combustion. Basic information about firewood
usage, socio-economic dynamics and perceived health problems related to volatile organic
compounds was collected using a structured questionnaire. The Vac-U-Chamber was used to
sample the air.
The results show that firewood is extensively used in poorly ventilated kitchens for cooking
and home heating in Senwabarwana villages. Ten priority firewood plant species are frequently
used in the study area, namely Mohweleri (Combretum apiculatum), Moretshe (Dichrostachys
cinera), Motswiri (Combretum imberbe), Mokgwa (Acacia burkei), Mushu (Acacia tortilis),
Motshe (Cussonia paniculate), Mokata (Combretum hereroense), Mphata (Lonchocarpus
capassa), Mokgalo (Ziziphus mucronate) and Mogwana (Grewia monticola), in their order of
preference. The results also indicated thirteen common reasons or factors that influence the hoice of firewood plant species by households, the main four being: (i) the embers formed
during combustion, (ii) heat value, (iii) low ash content and (iv) availability of the firewood
plant species. Further analysis revealed several uses and ranking thereof, including reviewing
the national status and legal profile of each identified plant species. The study found that most
of the firewood species used in Senwabarwana Village were indigenous. Major drivers of
firewood use are household income, educational status of breadwinners, family sizes, and place
of residence, fuel affordability and accessibility, among others.
Concentrations of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene per plant species were studied to
assess the risk exposed to the Senwabarwana community. Literature indicates that these
pollutants have several health effects associated with acute exposure such as eye, nose and
throat irritation, headaches, dizziness, nausea and vomiting. Both hazard quotient and hazard
index were found to be less than one indicating no risk exists with the use of plant species used
for firewood in Senwabarwana even to sensitive individuals. The risk of developing health
effects due to the presence of the studied volatile organic compounds can be assessed as
negligible.
Since firewood is a more convenient source of energy, it is recommended that the size of the
windows be extended for ventilation. Agroforesty should also be implemented as a
conservation method. The wood that emits less concentration of pollutants be used for
firemaking. / Environmental Sciences
|
4 |
Skapande och Förgänglighet : Resultatet av ett utforskande av arbetsmiljörisker, och psykologiska försvarsmekanismer i relation till en konstnärlig skapandeprocess. / Creativity and impermanence : The result of an exploration of work environment risks, and psychological defense mechanisms in relation to an artistic creation process.Widegren, Jonathan January 2023 (has links)
Vilken arbetsmiljö möter vi som konstnärer? Vad får våra kroppar hantera? I mitt konstnärliga utforskande har jag intresserat mig för de risker vi utsätter oss för i vår arbetsmiljö på Konstfack. Vardagen i verkstäderna för med sig många exempel på de utmaningar våra kroppar ställs inför. Vi testar gärna nya tekniker, nya material, plaster och kemikalier med främmande egenskaper att förhålla sig till. Kroppen, materialet och arbetsmiljön har varit centralt närvarande i min process, men kanske framför allt frågan om varför vi så gärna bortser från de risker vi utsätter oss för. Hur hanterar vi vetskapen om hoten på ett psykologiskt plan? Genom skulptur, hantverkstekniker och materialval har jag undersökt det luftburna hotet, ett ämne som lämnar utrymme för subjektivitet. Det är idén av ett hot, något abstrakt och osynligt, ibland förnimbart, ibland inte. Vad vi väljer att tro på kan i vissa fall ha större effekt än den faktiska materiella inverkan på våra kroppar. Något som länge ansetts vara helande kan plötsligt ses som skadligt – en dualitet som jag gett uttryck för i min gestaltning. Den mångbottnade upplevelsen av dessa hot har en förmåga att påverka varje del av våra liv. För att ge en upplevelse av kontroll och avdramatisera kroppens sårbarhet skapar vi undermedvetet nya beteendemönster, eller förändrar hela vår verklighetsuppfattning. Men vad händer om vi förlikar oss med det som rör sig i det undermedvetna? Kan vi internalisera vetskapen om kroppens sårbarhet? / What work environment do we encounter as artists? What can our bodies handle? In my artistic exploration, I have taken an interest in the risks we expose ourselves to in our work environment at Konstfack. Everyday life in the workshops brings many examples of the challenges our bodies face. We like to test new technologies, new materials, plastics, and chemicals with strange new properties to deal with. The body, the material, and the work environment have been central in my process, but perhaps above all the question of why we are so happy to ignore the risks we expose ourselves to. How do we deal with the knowledge of these threats on a psychological level? Through sculptural techniques and choice of materials, I have explored the airborne threat, a subject that leaves room for subjectivity. It is the idea of a threat, something abstract and invisible, sometimes tangible, sometimes not. What we choose to believe in can in some cases have a more significant effect than the actual material impact on our bodies. Something that has long been considered healing can suddenly be seen as harmful – a duality that I have expressed in my artistic exploration. The multifaceted experience of these threats has the ability to affect every part of our lives. To give an experience of control, and downplay the subconscious presence of the body's vulnerability we create new behavior patterns or change our entire perception of reality. But what happens if we come to terms with what moves in the subconscious? Can we internalize the knowledge of the body's vulnerability?
|
Page generated in 0.0802 seconds