31 |
Relations between Empathy and Anxiety in Children as Moderated by Inhibited Temperament and Parent EmotionWagers, Keshia B. 10 July 2020 (has links)
No description available.
|
32 |
Assimilation Analyses of Cognitive Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Multiple Case StudyGray, Michael Andrew 26 April 2010 (has links)
No description available.
|
33 |
Why Does Effortful Control Moderate the Relationship between Worry and Subjective Reports of Physiological Hyperarousal?Toh, Gim Y. 29 December 2014 (has links)
No description available.
|
34 |
Relationships Between Gratitude and Latent Dimensions of Depression and Generalized Anxiety DisorderVan Dusen, John Patrick January 2017 (has links)
No description available.
|
35 |
A Taxometric Investigation of Generalized Anxiety DisorderThompson, Rachel Diane 05 October 2007 (has links)
No description available.
|
36 |
Examining Generalized Anxiety Disorder During Social Interactions: Cardiac Activity, and the Influence of AffectPiedmont, Joanna I. January 2015 (has links)
No description available.
|
37 |
Evaluating a Brief Emotion Regulation Training in Reducing Worry and Rumination in Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive DisorderPlate, Andre J. January 2016 (has links)
No description available.
|
38 |
Testing the Cognitive Control Model of Pathological Worry Using Objective Measures of Cognitive Control and Autonomic ArousalFree, Matthew Lee 26 July 2017 (has links)
No description available.
|
39 |
Is attentional bias towards threat a hallmark of chronic worry?Preston, Jennifer L. 12 September 2006 (has links)
No description available.
|
40 |
Attentional Bias for Affective Stimuli: Evaluation of Disengagement in Persons with and without Self-reported Generalized Anxiety DisorderBlackmore, Michelle A. January 2011 (has links)
A core feature of GAD, excessive and uncontrollable worry, may be indicative of poor attentional control and difficulty disengaging attention from threatening or emotional information (e.g., Fox, 2004; Mathews, Fox, Yiend, & Calder, 2003; Yiend & Mathews 2001). The current study examined the performance of college students with and without self-reported GAD (N = 63) on measures of attentional control and a spatial cueing task designed to assess engagement-disengagement processes from emotionally valenced (aversive, pleasant) and neutral picture stimuli. Attentional control abilities were examined using the Stroop Color-Word Association Test (SCW Test) and Trail-Making Test (TMT). Separate analyses of variance (ANOVAs) demonstrated that GAD participants performed more poorly on the Stroop Color subtest and the TMT: Part B than non-GAD participants. Mixed ANOVAs of response times measured during the spatial cueing task revealed significant main effects for Cue Valence and Cue Validity, as well as several significant interactions of these variables with GAD status. The significant Cue Valence x Cue Validity x GAD status interaction indicated that GAD participants were slower to disengage their attention from aversive stimuli, relative to pleasant or neutral stimuli, than non-GAD participants who did not exhibit this bias. This interaction effect, however, did not remain significant upon covarying for depression. Together, these findings suggest that individuals with GAD evidence poorer attentional control and demonstrate difficulties disengaging from threatening stimuli compared to persons without the disorder. Impairment in these attentional processes may, therefore, contribute to the etiology and maintenance of GAD. / Psychology
|
Page generated in 0.0923 seconds