BACKGROUND: Prolonged mechanical ventilation for acute medical conditions increases the risk of chronic critical illness (CCI). Close family members are confronted with the life-threatening condition of the CCI patients and are prone to develop posttraumatic stress disorder affecting their health-related quality of life (HRQL). Main aim of the present study was to investigate patient- and family-related risk factors for posttraumatic stress and decreased HRQL in family members of CCI patients. METHODS: In a cross-sectional design nested within a prospective longitudinal cohort study, posttraumatic stress symptoms and quality of life were assessed in family members of CCI patients (n = 83, aged between 18 and 72 years) up to 6 months after transfer from ICU at acute care hospital to post-acute rehabilitation. Patients admitted a large rehabilitation hospital for ventilator weaning. The Posttraumatic Stress Scale-10 and the Euro-Quality of life-5D-3L were applied in both patients and their family members via telephone interview. RESULTS: A significant proportion of CCI patients and their family members (14.5 and 15.7 %, respectively) showed clinically relevant scores of posttraumatic stress. Both CCI patients and family members reported poorer HRQL than a normative sample. Factors independently associated with posttraumatic stress in family members were the time following ICU discharge (β = .256, 95 % confidence interval .053-.470) and the patients\' diagnosis of PTSD (β = .264, 95 % confidence interval .045-.453). Perceived satisfaction with the relationship turned out to be a protective factor for posttraumatic stress in family members of CCI patients (β = -.231, 95 % confidence interval -.423 to -.015). Regarding HRQL in family members, patients\' acute posttraumatic stress at ICU (β = -.290, 95 % confidence interval -.360 to -.088) and their own posttraumatic stress 3 to 6 months post-transfer (β = -.622, 95 % confidence interval -.640 to -.358) turned out to be significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Posttraumatic stress and HRQL should be routinely assessed in family members of CCI patients at regular intervals starting early at ICU. Preventive family-centered interventions are needed to improve posttraumatic stress and HRQL in both patients and their family members.

Background Fatigue often occurs as long-term complication in chronically critically ill (CCI) patients after prolonged intensive care treatment. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) has been established as valid instrument to measure fatigue in a wide range of medical illnesses. Regarding the measurement of fatigue in CCI patients, the psychometric properties of the MFI-20 have not been investigated so far. Thus, the present study examines reliability and validity of the MFI-20 in CCI patients. Methods A convenience sample of n = 195 patients with Critical Illness Polyneuropathy (CIP) or Myopathy (CIM) were recruited via personal contact within four weeks (t1) following the transfer from acute care ICU to post-acute ICU at a large rehabilitation hospital. N = 113 (median age 61.1 yrs., 72.6% men) patients were again contacted via telephone three (t2) and six (t3) months following the transfer to post-acute ICU. The MFI-20, the Euro-Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3 L) and the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders DSM-IV (SCID-I) were applied within this prospective cohort study. Results The internal consistency Cronbach’s α was adequate for the MFI-total and all but the subscale Reduced Motivation (RM) (range: .50–.91). Item-to-total correlations (range: .22–.80) indicated item redundancy for the subscale RM. Confirmatory Factor analyses (CFAs) revealed poor model fit for the original 5-factor model of the MFI-20 (t2/t3, Confirmatory Fit Index, CFI = .783/ .834; Tucker-Lewis Index, TLI = .751/ .809; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, RMSEA = .112/ .103). Among the alternative models (1-, 2-, 3-factor models), the data best fit to a 3-factor solution summarizing the highly correlated factors General −/ Physical Fatigue/ Reduced Activity (GF/ PF/ RA) (t2/ t3, CFI = .878/ .896, TLI = .846/ .869, RMSEA = .089/ .085, 90% Confidence Interval .073–.104/ .066–.104). The MFI-total score significantly correlated with the health-related quality of life (range: −.65-(−).66) and the diagnosis of major depression (range: .27–.37). Conclusions In the present sample of CCI patients, a reliable and valid factor structure of the MFI-20 could not be ascertained. Especially the subscale RM should be revised. Since the factors GF, PF and RA cannot be separated from each other and the unclear factorial structure in the present sample of CCI patients, the MFI-20 is not recommended for use in this context.

Background Oxygen is one of the most commonly used drugs by anesthesiologists. The World Health Organization (WHO) gave recommendations regarding perioperative oxygen administration, but the practice of oxygen use in anesthesia, critical emergency, and intensive care medicine remains unclear. Methods We conducted an online survey among members of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC). The questionnaire consisted of 46 queries appraising the perioperative period, emergency medicine and in the intensive care, knowledge about current recommendations by the WHO, oxygen toxicity, and devices for supplemental oxygen therapy. Results Seven hundred ninety-eight ESAIC members (2.1% of all ESAIC members) completed the survey. Most respondents were board-certified and worked in hospitals with > 500 beds. The majority affirmed that they do not use specific protocols for oxygen administration. WHO recommendations are unknown to 42% of respondents, known but not followed by 14%, and known and followed by 24% of them. Respondents prefer inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) ≥80% during induction and emergence from anesthesia, but intraoperatively < 60% for maintenance, and higher FiO2 in patients with diseased than non-diseased lungs. Postoperative oxygen therapy is prescribed more commonly according to peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), but shortage of devices still limits monitoring. When monitoring is used, SpO2 ≤ 95% is often targeted. In critical emergency medicine, oxygen is used frequently in patients aged ≥80 years, or presenting with respiratory distress, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke. In the intensive care unit, oxygen is mostly targeted at 96%, especially in patients with pulmonary diseases. Conclusions The current practice of perioperative oxygen therapy among respondents does not follow WHO recommendations or current evidence, and access to postoperative monitoring devices impairs the individualization of oxygen therapy. Further research and additional teaching about use of oxygen are necessary.

No description available.

No description available.

Schätzungen über die Gesamtzahl der Vergiftungen in Deutschland belaufen sich auf 150 - 200.000 pro Jahr. In Deutschland machen Vergiftungsfälle 10% der in Notaufnahmen und auf Intensivstationen behandelten Patienten aus. Bis dato gibt es in Deutschland nur wenige strukturiert erfasste epidemiologische Daten von vergiftungsbedingten Todesfällen. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurden die vergiftungsbedingten Todesfälle aus dem Giftinformationszentrum-Nord (GIZ-Nord) für den Zeitraum vom 01.01.1996 bis einschließlich 31.12.2009 retrospektiv analysiert. Insbesondere vor dem Hintergrund der Toxikovigilanz konnten folgende Fragen zu Risikokonstellationen für letale Vergiftungen durch diese Arbeit beantwortet werden: 1. Gibt es bei den vergiftungsbedingten Todesfällen jahreszeitliche Schwankungen? Ja, die vergiftungsbedingten bzw. suizidalen letalen Intoxikationen zeigen jahreszeitliche Schwankungen mit einem maximalen Anteil im Frühling von knapp 30% und dem geringsten Anteil im Herbst mit etwa 20%. 2. Bergen die iatrogen bedingten Vergiftungen ein besonderes Mortalitätsrisiko? Ja, die iatrogenen Vergiftungen weisen die höchste Mortalitätsrate mit knapp 5 &permil; aller iatrogenen Expositionen auf, vor allem bei parenteraler Arzneimittelapplikation. 3. Stellen Adoleszente (Heranwachsende und Jugendliche) und Senioren über 70 Jahre besonders gefährdete Altersgruppen für letale Intoxikationen dar? Ja, beide Populationen stellen besondere Risikogruppen für vergiftungsbedingte Todesfälle dar. Vor allem männliche Heranwachsende repräsentieren eine Risikogruppe für letale Intoxikationen durch Abusus. 30% aller vergiftungbedingten Todesfälle durch Abusus sind bei männlichen Jugendlichen aufgetreten. Senioren (Männer und Frauen) über 70 Jahre sind eine im hohen Maß gefährdete Altersgruppe für letale Vergiftungen. Einerseits ist die relative Mortalitätsrate bezogen auf alle Expositionen dieser Altersgruppe mit knapp 6 &permil; am höchsten. Andererseits zeigen die suizidalen Intoxikationen bei den Senioren eine zunehmende Tendenz. Außerdem bilden Senioren mit einem Anteil von 24% die Gruppe mit dem größten Anteil an den letalen nicht suizidalen Intoxikationen. Mehr als 70% der akzidentellen letalen Intoxikationen und 50% der letalen Vergiftungen durch Verwechslungen betreffen Senioren, dabei sind Frauen mehr als 3fach häufiger betroffen als Männer. Darüber hinaus sind Senioren durch Aspiration schäumender, prinzipiell niedrig toxischer Kosmetika und tensidhaltiger Chemikalien besonders gefährdet. 4. Gibt es bei den gewerblichen Expositionen besondere Risikokonstellationen? Ja, die gewerblichen Expositionen, die mit einer hohen Männerlastigkeit auftreten, bergen eine hohe letale Intoxikationsgefahr. Vor allem bei den gewerblichen inhalativen Expositionen von toxischen Reizgasen besteht eine Gefährdung für die betroffenen Beschäftigten, aber auch für die nicht selbstgeschützten Ersthelfer: 6% der inhalativen gewerblichen Intoxikationen durch Schwefelwasserstoff endeten letal.