Militär och civil verksamhet kan nyttja samma nätverk och vara beroende av samma digitala infrastruktur, vilket innebär att det kan uppstå svårigheter med att göra åtskillnad på vad som är civilt och vad som är militärt i samband med offensiva cyberoperationer. Offensiva cyberoperationers effekter kan dessutom vara svårkontrollerade. Följaktligen uppkommer frågan hur en offensiv cyberoperation ska genomföras med hänsyn till de humanitärrättsliga kraven på att skydda civila personer och objekt.  Syftet med uppsatsen är att undersöka hur befälhavare i Försvarsmakten ska förhålla sig till humanitär rätt vid offensiva cyberoperationer under internationella väpnade konflikter. Med avstamp i detta syfte utgår uppsatsen från följande frågeställningar:  Var går skiljelinjen mellan militära mål och civila i samband med Försvarsmaktens offensiva cyberoperationer under internationella väpnade konflikter? Hur kan sidoskador undvikas i samband med Försvarsmaktens offensiva cyberoperationer under internationella väpnade konflikter?  Frågeställningarna besvaras genom att använda rättsdogmatiskmetod med Tilläggsprotokoll I till Genèvekonventionerna som huvudsaklig rättskälla. Analysen avseende hur sidoskador kan undvikas baseras på Lockheed Martins modell, Cyber kill chain.  Uppsatsens slutsats är att det är ovidkommande för var skiljelinjen går om ett objekt ursprungligen är civilt, om användaren av objektet är civil eller om objektet delvis nyttjas för civila ändamål. Så länge objektet effektivt bidrar till militära operationer och en påverkan av objektet medför en avgjord militär fördel ska det klassificeras som ett militärt mål. Vidare är uppsatsens slutsats att informationsinhämtning och kontroll under hela operationsskedet är nyckeln till att undvika sidoskador i samband med Försvarsmaktens offensiva cyberoperationer under internationella väpnade konflikter. / Military and civilian functions can use the same network and depend on the same digital infrastructure, which means that there can be difficulties when distinguishing civilian objects from military objects during cyber operations. Moreover, the effects of offensive cyber operations can be difficult to control. Consequently, the question arises how an offensive cyber operation should be carried out in the light of the humanitarian law requirement to protect civilians and civilian objects.  The purpose of the thesis is to examine how commanders in the Swedish Armed Forces shall comply with international humanitarian law during offensive cyber operations during international armed conflicts. Based on this purpose, the thesis revolves around the following questions:  Where is the dividing line between military objectives and civilians when the Swedish Armed Forces carry out offensive cyber operations during international armed conflicts?  How can collateral damage be avoided when the Swedish Armed Forces carry out offensive cyber operations during international armed conflicts?  The questions are answered by using legal dogmatic method. Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions is used as the main source of law. The analysis of how collateral damage can be avoided is based on Lockheed Martin's model, Cyber kill chain.  The conclusion of the thesis is that it is irrelevant whether an object is originally civilian, if the user of the object is civilian or if the object is partly used for civilian purposes. As long as the object effectively contributes to military actions and an impact on the object entails a definite military advantage, it shall be classified as a military objective. Furthermore, the thesis concludes that information gathering and control throughout the operation is the key to avoiding collateral damage when the Swedish Armed Forces carry out offensive cyber operations during international armed conflicts.

Checking stations operated during the deer hunting season serve a two-fold purpose. It has long been recognized that such inspection stations aid greatly in the enforcement of hunting laws through the detection of illegal practices, and in many cases have been set up with this as a primary purpose. A more far reaching objective, however, is the collection of information to aid in the solution of the problems of maintenance of the range and the deer herd, and determination of the quality and quantity of the deer removal.

Can we create a historical timeline of disability by using works of fiction during the twentieth century?  Or rather, how do authors use society in their works of fiction, and to what extent, both positively and negatively, is this relevant to disability history? These are the fundamental questions of this essay, to examine three works of fiction in their portrayals of disabled characters, and the society they live in. The books chosen for this essay are: To Kill a Mockingbird, Forrest Gump and Of Mice and Men. The books are examined from both an internalist and externalist point of view. To determine how writers portray disabled characters, and how the treatment the disabled characters compare to the treatment of disabled people in the society the writers lived in. To better understand the subject in question, I chose to use Ervin Goffmans’ stigma theory. The earlier research I found mostly consisted of studies with another theoretical starting point, or about another form of art, mostly film. This essay concludes that the portrayal of disabled characters in the books mostly conformed to the society the writers lived in when writing the books. In other words: society had a large influence on the writers of the books. However, there were cases where the books distinctively separated from societal norms. In all these cases, the disabled characters were shown in a better light than society would allow at the time. The reason for this is difficult to pinpoint, however I discuss that it might be because the writers’ thoughts might be ahead of their time. The twentieth century regarding disability rights were in constant change, and the writers could have been influenced by the disability rights movement.

This thesis examines the identity of the U.S. military personnel (the Marines) through their perceptions of a war television series, Generation Kill. The thesis sampled 38 respondents through an online questionnaire. The thesis uses the encoding and decoding theory to reveal that the Marine respondents demonstrated multiple interpretations of themes and concepts in the official discourses. The negotiated decoding from the respondents shows an interchangeable nature of the concepts that the official discourses and the informal conducts are integral to each other. The thesis makes use of the details in GK to draw out the grunts’ experience of being a Marine. In the end, it shows the Marine identity experienced by individual members is diverse and multilayered, and the identity could be shaped and negotiated. The research not only contributes to the missing research on professional subcultures in audience reception studies, but also engages an interdisciplinary exploration on issues about the military in democratic societies.

<p>  </p> <p>Biomolecular condensates or membrane-less organelles are phase separated proteins and/or other biomolecules that are ubiquitous in eukaryotic cells. While these condensates may be liquid with exchange and diffusion of their components with the rest of the cell (e.g., cytoplasm), they locally concentrate their constituent biomolecules altering their interactions in normal cellular processes. This phenomenon has been exploited for static control of protein activity in <em>E. coli</em>. However, neither dynamic control of protein activity using external triggers nor programmable tuning of protein activity has been explored so far.</p> <p>To address these gaps, I fused proteins of interest to elastin-like polypeptides (ELP) that aggregate in response to an increase in temperature. In so doing, I sequester their fusion partners from the cytoplasm, limiting their ability to participate in cytoplasmic reactions. I have demonstrated this concept<em> in vivo</em> with enzymes and transcription factors for switchable control of protein activity with temperature. For example, I-SceI mediated cleavage of a host genome can be inhibited by increasing the cultivation temperature, creating a simple temperature-sensitive kill switch; accidental release will lower the culture temperature leading to cell death. Similarly, coupled transcription factors exhibit a 2-fold increase in transcription relative to unfused transcription factor controls at elevated temperatures. More importantly, the threshold for coacervate formation and control of protein activity may be tuned through appropriate design of the ELP used for fusion. Furthermore, the temperature response of the ELP fusion is unique to each protein and depends on the structure of the fusion partner, which dictates the structure of the ELP fused aggregate. Our results introduce a simple yet effective, rapid, and tunable approach to control protein activity via induction of coacervate formation that may form a powerful new tool for synthetic biology.</p>

This study focused on the agency of battered women who kill in Turkey by conducting face- to-face interviews and using news articles covering the stories of three battered women who killed their abusers. Using a feminist poststructuralist theory and intersectionality analysis, the study analysed the patterns surrounding the agency of battered women who kill. Male violence in Turkey continues to be an unresolved problem, which continues to only grow. In the mainstream media and discourse, female victims of male violence tend to be portrayed within the victimhood concept. Thus, it creates an image of a weak, passive woman who does not have an agency. However, battered women who kill tend to conflict with the image of a passive victim. The act of killing does not fit the traditional understanding of femininity. The interview findings showed that battered women who killed their abusers were commonly understood as desperate, weak, and ignorant women. While the act of killing was justified, it was through a justification of an act conducted by someone who lacked agency. The news portrayals supported the findings of the interviews and showed that battered women who kill were justified when the woman was portrayed as a victim who killed specifically while she was being battered and was a mother who killed...

This thesis explores the topic of Canadian-Indigenous battered women who killed their intimate abusers and seeks to better understand these women’s experiences, their treatment within the Canadian criminal justice system, and how BWS was used in their cases. A theoretical framework comprised of Indigenous Feminisms and Intersectionality was used to guide this research study and to shed light on the lived experiences of Indigenous battered women who killed their abusers. Various important Indigenous Feminist theorists such as Dian Million (2013) and Patricia Monture-Angus (1998) were drawn upon as well as advocates for Intersectionality such as Patricia Hill-Collins (2019). A qualitative thematic analysis was performed to create four overarching themes from eight cases where Indigenous battered women killed their intimate abusers.

Harper Lee wrote a remarkable novel which provides a great deal of moral insight for its readers; through a use of history, moral instruction, and character development, Lee establishes a foundation for how people in an often intolerant world should live peacefully together. Moreover, she reminds the reader that regardless of socioeconomic status or race everyone deserves to be treated with respect and kindness. In establishing this moral analysis one must consider the historical source of Tom Robinson’s trial, the Scottsboro Trial; the Finch children’s consistent and exemplified instruction from their widowed father, Atticus, their housekeeper, Calpurina, and other close neighbors; and the symbolic representation of the mockingbird as a peaceful and protective creature which generally gets along with other bird species.

Roads can negatively impact the survival of wildlife populations through additional mortality from road kill and population fragmentation caused by road avoidance behaviors. The 11.9 mile section of State Route 101 between the towns of San Luis Obispo and Atascadero, CA, USA, cross a mountain lion movement corridor and an area important to maintaining ecological connectivity between protected lands in the Los Padres National Forest to the north and south. I examined the spatial patterns and landscape and roadway factors associated with road kill occurrence for six taxa; large mammals, mesocarnivores, squirrels, rabbits, birds and raptors. Between 1 May 2009 and 30 June 2010 road kills were documented using vehicle-based surveys. Small mammals were the most common road kill (58.3%), followed by mesocarnivores (10.9%), birds (10.6%), rabbits (5.1%), large mammals (3.3%) and raptors (3.2%). Twenty-nine large mammal road kills were observed during the survey period; eighteen mule deer, six black bears and five feral pigs. Road kill was highest in the middle of the survey area between the top of Cuesta Grade and the southern edge of Atascadero and lowest along the Cuesta Grade. I modeled road kill occurrence using logistic regression to determine which landscape and roadway characteristics were associated with road kill locations. Large mammal and mesocarnivore road kills were more likely to occur near riparian corridors. Mesocarnivore and squirrel road kills were associated with locations with greater roadside tree cover. Squirrel and rabbit road kills were more likely to occur along sections of the road with large grassy center medians. I documented animal activity patterns around the roadway during three survey periods (summer 2009, fall 2009 and spring 2010) using remote cameras placed on game trails and underpasses along the roadway. Mule deer displayed crepuscular activity patterns with peaks in activity in the morning between 05:00h and 07:00h and in the evening between 16:00h and 18:00h. Mesocarnivores generally displayed a nocturnal activity patterns with the majority of activity occurring between 18:00h and 06:00h. I used logistic regression to determine if there was a relationship between animal activity patterns and traffic patterns while controlling for time of day, day of the week, and season. Mule deer and mesocarnivore activity patterns varied significantly by time of day and mule deer activity also varied significantly by season; however only mesocarnivore activity varied significantly in relation to traffic volume suggesting that mesocarnivores are less activity when traffic volume is high. Using traffic volume and animal activity patterns I calculated a collision potential value for both mule deer and mesocarnivores. Collision potential for mule deer was high in the morning, between 06:00h and 08:00h, and in the evening, between 16:00h and 18:00h in all three seasons. Collision potential for mesocarnivores was high in the evening in fall 2009 (18:00h and 21:00) and spring 2010 (17:00h), and high in the morning in summer 2009 (09:00h).

No description available.