An important part of becoming a teacher is to have good knowledge of the educational objectives set by the Swedish National Agency for Education. The objectives are clearly expressed, however, how to reach them is not mentioned. This leads to different interpretations and uncertainty for many teachers about the best way of teaching grammar and whether textbooks are useful for this purpose. This study aims at exploring whether high school grammar exercises in French as a foreign language could be considered to be in accordance with the stipulated goal of the Swedish National Agency for Education.Four text- and exercise books in French used during two different Curriculums for the upper secondary school and covering a period of 10 years, are analyzed. The purpose of analyzing the exercises in the textbooks is to find out whether they offer communication focused grammar exercises and if these exercises offers opportunities to develop communicative abilities. Furthermore, we also examine potential changes between the different versions of the text -and exercise books, published with an interval of ten years.The results through a mixed methodology approach, using both a quantitative and a qualitative method, showed in particular that the examined books have a large number of grammar and oral exercises. Communication could therefore be considered as reinforced. The exercises offered in the examined books show that they as a general are in accordance with the stipulated goals of the Swedish National Agency for Education.

This document study aims to facilitate an understanding of the differences between the grading criteria for English 5, 6, and 7 (in Swedish upper secondary school) before 2021 and after. It also aims to facilitate an awareness of reactions to the changes among actors within the educational system. The study investigates Swedish documents published online by The Swedish National Agency for Education as well as Swedish articles including reactions from teachers, a professor, and a chairperson of a teachers’ union. The first part of the studied material contains documents showing the old and the new grading criteria as well as documents containing explanations of why the changes were made, from The Swedish National Agency for Education. The other part of the material consists of four articles from four different journals for educators, with reactions from a total of seven different people. The method of the study was content analysis. The results from the study show that aspects of knowledge and details were removed from the grading criteria. For example, the knowledge criterion of students using different strategies when listening and reading was moved to core content. The major reason for changing the grading criteria was to make them clearer. Opinions from a few of the people in the study were that the changes will not matter because they were not big enough and that the changes have not made the grading criteria clearer. However, several people thought that the grading criteria have become clearer, and one person thinks that they will help teachers to carry out a better overall assessment. / Denna dokumentstudie syftar till att underlätta förståelsen av skillnaderna mellan betygskriterierna för engelska 5, 6, och 7 (i svensk gymnasieskola) före 2021 och därefter. Den syftar också till att underlätta en medvetenhet om reaktioner på förändringar bland aktörer inom utbildningssystemet. Studien undersöker svenska dokument publicerade på nätet av Skolverket samt svenska artiklar inklusive reaktioner från lärare, en professor och en ordförande i ett lärarförbund. Den första delen av det studerade materialet innehåller dokument som visar de gamla och de nya betygskriterierna samt dokument som innehåller förklaringar till varför förändringarna gjordes, från Skolverket. Den andra delen av materialet består av fyra artiklar från fyra olika tidskrifter för pedagoger, med reaktioner från totalt sju olika personer. Metoden för studien var innehållsanalys. Resultaten från studien visar att kunskapsaspekter och detaljer togs bort från betygskriterierna. Till exempel flyttades kunskapskriteriet om att elever ska använda olika strategier för att lyssna och läsa till centralt innehåll. Det främsta skälet till ändringarna av betygskriterierna var att göra dem tydligare. Åsikter från några av personerna i studien var att förändringarna inte kommer att spela någon roll eftersom de inte var tillräckligt stora och att förändringarna inte har gjort betygskriterierna tydligare. Samtidigt tyckte flera att betygskriterierna blivit tydligare och en person tror att de kommer att hjälpa lärare att göra en bättre helhetsbedömning.