No description available.

No description available.

Orientador: Fernando Silva Teixeira Filho / Banca: Maria Lívia Tourinho Moretto / Banca: Abilio da Costa Rosa / Resumo: Este trabalho discute as passagens de discurso produzidas em uma experiência de educação em saúde e prevenção às DST/HIV-Aids realizada junto a equipes da Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF) a partir da teoria dos quatro discursos de Jacques Lacan. Baseado nos impossíveis freudianos, - a saber: governar, educar, analisar - Lacan estabelece os quatro discursos como laços sociais, uma forma de aparelhar a linguagem ao campo do gozo para que seja possível a relação do sujeito com o outro. São eles: Discurso do Mestre (governar), Discurso Universitário (educar), Discurso do Analista (analisar) e Discurso da Histérica (fazer desejar). Para tanto, dividimos este trabalho em três eixos de discussão. Realizamos uma revisão bibliográfica sobre o contexto das práticas educativas em Saúde e sua relação com a produção de saber e de sujeitos. Para leitura de nossa experiência utilizamos os operadores da psicanálise lacaniana. A partir de nosso material pessoal, elegemos uma equipe da ESF e apresentamos alguns fragmentos para ilustrar as passagens de discurso. Dialogamos com as práticas educativas em saúde e sua implicação com a questão do saber e da produção de sujeitos. Pode-se verificar que é pelo deslocamento (ou suspensão) do lugar de mestria, e do saber ocupado pelo educador, que os sujeitos a quem se dirigem podem vir a ocupar o lugar de agente do Discurso da Histérica, que é o único, segundo Lacan, capaz de produzir um saber do próprio sujeito, que se diferencia do saber enciclopédico do Discurso Universitário e de sua relação com o sujeito tomado como objeto. Não se trata de produzir um saber de conteúdo, mas sim um novo saber sobre o gozo. Para isso é preciso saber escutar a dimensão... (Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo) / Abstract: Based on Jacques Lacan‟s fundamental concepts on discourse, this dissertation discusses the discourse shifts occurred on an experience in health education and STD/HIV- Aids prevention with a Family Health Strategy (FHS) group. Lacan, based on Freud‟s impossible professions (governing, educating and analyzing), establishes four discourses as a social bond as a way of putting together language and enjoyment (jouissance) to enable the relation between the subject and the other. The discourses are called Master (governing), University (educating), Analyst (analyzing) and Hysteric (desiring). This study is structured in three sections. First, we propose a review of the literature concerning practices and discourses in health education contexts and their relation to the production of knowledge (savoir) and subjects. Second, we establish the conceptual foundations of the interpretation of our experience. At last, based on our personal notes of the experience (reports, diaries), we selected one group of FHS and presented it to illustrate some discourses shifts. We try to dialogue with some practices in health education and their implication to knowledge (savoir) and to the production of subject. We verified that is by the displacement/suspension of the master position and, by the knowledge placed by the educator, that the subjects to whom the speech is concerned can occupy the place of the agent in the Hysterical Discourse. According to Lacan, this is the only place by which it is possible to produce a subject‟s own knowledge that is different from the University... (Complete abstract click electronic access below) / Mestre

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:29:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2009-12-21Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T20:38:03Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 fiochi_picq_me_assis.pdf: 490373 bytes, checksum: 7dd42fe6f1ad2bc4a5beb78343995480 (MD5) / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / Este trabalho discute as passagens de discurso produzidas em uma experiência de educação em saúde e prevenção às DST/HIV-Aids realizada junto a equipes da Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF) a partir da teoria dos quatro discursos de Jacques Lacan. Baseado nos impossíveis freudianos, - a saber: governar, educar, analisar – Lacan estabelece os quatro discursos como laços sociais, uma forma de aparelhar a linguagem ao campo do gozo para que seja possível a relação do sujeito com o outro. São eles: Discurso do Mestre (governar), Discurso Universitário (educar), Discurso do Analista (analisar) e Discurso da Histérica (fazer desejar). Para tanto, dividimos este trabalho em três eixos de discussão. Realizamos uma revisão bibliográfica sobre o contexto das práticas educativas em Saúde e sua relação com a produção de saber e de sujeitos. Para leitura de nossa experiência utilizamos os operadores da psicanálise lacaniana. A partir de nosso material pessoal, elegemos uma equipe da ESF e apresentamos alguns fragmentos para ilustrar as passagens de discurso. Dialogamos com as práticas educativas em saúde e sua implicação com a questão do saber e da produção de sujeitos. Pode-se verificar que é pelo deslocamento (ou suspensão) do lugar de mestria, e do saber ocupado pelo educador, que os sujeitos a quem se dirigem podem vir a ocupar o lugar de agente do Discurso da Histérica, que é o único, segundo Lacan, capaz de produzir um saber do próprio sujeito, que se diferencia do saber enciclopédico do Discurso Universitário e de sua relação com o sujeito tomado como objeto. Não se trata de produzir um saber de conteúdo, mas sim um novo saber sobre o gozo. Para isso é preciso saber escutar a dimensão... / Based on Jacques Lacan‟s fundamental concepts on discourse, this dissertation discusses the discourse shifts occurred on an experience in health education and STD/HIV- Aids prevention with a Family Health Strategy (FHS) group. Lacan, based on Freud‟s impossible professions (governing, educating and analyzing), establishes four discourses as a social bond as a way of putting together language and enjoyment (jouissance) to enable the relation between the subject and the other. The discourses are called Master (governing), University (educating), Analyst (analyzing) and Hysteric (desiring). This study is structured in three sections. First, we propose a review of the literature concerning practices and discourses in health education contexts and their relation to the production of knowledge (savoir) and subjects. Second, we establish the conceptual foundations of the interpretation of our experience. At last, based on our personal notes of the experience (reports, diaries), we selected one group of FHS and presented it to illustrate some discourses shifts. We try to dialogue with some practices in health education and their implication to knowledge (savoir) and to the production of subject. We verified that is by the displacement/suspension of the master position and, by the knowledge placed by the educator, that the subjects to whom the speech is concerned can occupy the place of the agent in the Hysterical Discourse. According to Lacan, this is the only place by which it is possible to produce a subject‟s own knowledge that is different from the University... (Complete abstract click electronic access below)

Thesis advisor: Frances Restuccia / What qualifies a work as distinctly modernist or postmodernist? Moving beyond the idea that modernism and postmodernism are primarily distinguishable on a temporal basis, D’Errico instead argues that the key difference between these two movements lies on a theoretical level. Grounded in a framework of contemporary theory put forth by Žižek, Lacan, Deleuze, and Badiou, D’Errico proposes that the Real-Symbolic relation manifests differently in modernist and postmodernist works; the structural paradigms of the torus and rhizome are helpful to illuminate this fundamental theoretical difference. Expanding on Žižek’s definitions of modernism and postmodernism (from Looking Awry ), D’Errico posits that a torus-shaped Real-Symbolic relation accords with modernism and that a rhizomatic Real-Symbolic relation accords with postmodernism. This interdisciplinary analysis of twentieth-century art mainly focuses on literature, but also invokes poetry, visual art, theatre, and film. Overall, D’Errico dissects the theoretical structures of The Sun Also Rises, Waiting for Godot, The Trial, White Noise, and Caché to qualify the alignment of each with either the modernist or postmodernist canon. / Thesis (BA) — Boston College, 2020. / Submitted to: Boston College. College of Arts and Sciences. / Discipline: Departmental Honors. / Discipline: English.

Fragmented speech, the discovery of which forms the basis of this dissertation, provides the aim and direction of our thesis. The aim is to clarify precisely what fragmented speech is, and subsequently define its application. In this thesis, we begin by providing the historical background to the initial collision between psychoanalysis and literature. This broad base provides the impetus needed in order to formulate certain conclusions regarding the unconscious and the dialogic. Our methodology involves a combination of Freudo-Lacanian theory and Bakhtinian linguistics. As we approach an understanding of our subject, it becomes increasingly necessary to develop the issues surrounding the significance of fragmented speech. The significance of our work becomes focused when we provide an analysis of a `psychotic discourse', namely, the Memoirs of My Nervous Illness, by President Schreber – using the methodology described. In the final stages of our thesis fragmented speech becomes a symptom of psychosis. Under pressure from the unconscious, the image of speech may fragment. It is the interaction between the body image and the speech image that provides us with a speech complex. Consequently, this dissertation discovers fragmented speech at the very heart of the psychoanalytic session.

En principe le droit traite les deux sexes à égalité tandis que les lieux communs mènent la pensée dans les impasses d’une paix portée par les femmes et de guerres portées par les hommes. De tout temps, la part de criminalité féminine est restée moindre que celle des hommes. Depuis des analyses croisées d’historiens, juristes, criminologues, sociologues, et psychologues, les chercheurs mobilisent des sources abondantes et multiples qui nous donnent à voir la complexité des représentations des femmes criminelles, construites et sédimentées depuis plus de vingt siècles. Aujourd’hui, l’augmentation des infractions féminines constitue un nouveau champ de recherches interdisciplinaires. Mieux interroger le malaise dans la civilisation d’une tendance actuelle à la violence féminine c’est rouvrir la boite à Pandore par ce thème ancestral de la femme criminelle. Sous cette empreinte féminine qui caractérise notre monde actuel, cette thèse nous engage sur les chemins d’une recherche en psychanalyse dans ses rapports au passage à l’acte depuis une pratique clinique en milieu carcéral. Position féminine n’étant pas à confondre avec la jouissance féminine, qu’est-ce que cette touche du réel du hors-la-loi vient-elle nous enseigner ? Devant l’échec du fantasme, les violences ne cessent pas d’échapper à la machine signifiante. A partir du développement de l’enseignement freudien et orientés par cette logique non œdipienne introduite par la théorie des jouissances lacanienne, nous interrogerons la mise en acte comme court-circuit de la réalité inconsciente. / On principle, right treats equally the two sexes while servants domains lead thought in apeace’s deadlock brought by the women and wars brought by the men. Feminine crime hasalways remains minor towards mens. Since crossed analysis from historicians, jurists,criminologists, sociologists and psychologists, groups of researchers mobilize abundant andmultiple sources that reveals the complexity of criminal women’s representations built andsedimented for centuries. Today feminine’s infractions rise forms a new field ofinterdisciplinary research. Better questionning civilization and its discontents on the currenttrend towards feminine violence consists in reopening the Pandora box by this ancestral themeof criminal woman. Under this feminine print which characterises our current world thisthesis initiate us in the path of psychoanalysis researches in its reports with the acting outfrom a clinical practice in prison environment. Feminine’s position is not to be confused withthe feminine jouissance, what this touch of the real from the out-law comes to teach us ?Before failure of the phantasm, both in neurosis and psychosis, violences never ceased toescape (the chain of signifier ou the signifier machine). From the enlightement of freudian’steaching and direct by this non oedipal’s logic introduced by the theory of Lacanianjouissance, we question the violent enactment as a short-circuit of unconscious reality

This research report presents a pilot study exploring the possibility of applying a Lacanian clinical methodology for analyzing unconscious dynamics in extra-analytic material. This research initially investigates the legitimacy and utility of this endeavour, followed by immersion in Lacanian thinking and the subsequent selection of potentially relevant data sets; samples of extra-analytic textual material. As this stage a recursive interaction between reading Lacanian theory and reflecting on the text is enacted. Five Lacanian concepts are identified (mirror phase, the three orders of the imaginary, the symbolic and the real, as well as the paternal agency). Although these concepts are, in process inextricable from another, they are presented as though discrete entities given that this allows for the foregrounding of different aspects in the process. The interaction between these concepts is considered with respect to Lacan‟s requirement in clinical practice of a tentative preliminary diagnosis of the patient into one of three diagnostic categories; perversion, neurosis and psychosis. Consequently, in a step that mirrors the clinical process, the textual subject of the data sets is tentatively classified as a (Lacanian) psychotic whose characteristic psychic structure is constituted out of foreclosure. Ways of discerning this structure in textual matter outside of the analytic setting are then considered. Four ways are proposed here. These are the unified or unbounded use of personal pronouns; evidence of thinking towards resolution or disintegration; denial or tolerance of difference and fourthly, the manifestation of regressive or libidinal speech actions. These four provide the basis for approaching the analysis of the selected data sets, which consist of carefully selected instances of Jacob Zuma‟s ostensibly unscripted public utterances. It is proposed that the four ways identified can be used in the analysis of other extra-analytic material.

Abstract This research report explores the process of narrating survival in Primo Levi’s If This Is A Man and The Drowned and The Saved. The central objective is to understand the process of psychological survival is narrated in Levi’s autobiographical narrative. To this end, I have used a psychoanalytical framework to understand the traumatic impact of Auschwitz on subjectivity as well as to position subjectivity in relation to autobiographical narrative. I shall argue that the trauma of Auschwitz resulted in an eroded and shattered subjectivity and that narrative offers a space in which the reconstruction of that subjectivity can be negotiated.

Não há garantias para o sujeito que ama; o relacionamento com o outro é uma tentativa de busca da felicidade, mas também é ao amar que o sujeito se torna mais suscetível ao sofrimento. A psicanálise aponta para esse paradoxo desde Freud e Lacan lança mão do paradoxo como figura de linguagem possível para falar de amor. O principal aforisma lacaniano sobre o tema é amar é dar o que não se tem, mas, para chegar até esse ponto de seu ensino, Lacan se debruçou sobre inúmeras questões ao longo de seus seminários. Desse modo, o objetivo deste trabalho foi investigar o uso que Jacques Lacan fez do paradoxo para falar sobre o amor. A Análise do Discurso Pêcheutiana (AD) contribuiu para elucidar a interpelação do indivíduo em sujeito e a identificação com formações discursivas dominantes sobre o amor, sendo essa identificação fundadora de uma unidade imaginária. Visto que algumas obras de arte foram utilizadas para ilustrar a relação entre amor e paradoxo, foi a partir da AD que tais obras foram analisadas e incorporadas aos resultados. Além disso, essa metodologia indiciária auxiliou na interpretação do percurso empreendido por Lacan, principalmente no seminário VIII no qual ele se utiliza do texto O Banquete, de Platão, para relacionar, por exemplo, o conceito de falta com o tema do amor, análise esta cuja compreensão foi fundamental para o cumprimento do objetivo proposto neste trabalho. Foi possível então apontar, como um dos principais resultados dessa análise, que o objeto que o sujeito busca no desejo, em suas mais variadas formas, nunca é aquilo que ele encontra. Essa falta é central na relação de objeto, do ponto de vista psicanalítico, uma vez que a frustração inerente a essa busca faz do dom algo mais importante do que a presença ou ausência do objeto em si, pois o que está realmente em questão é o amor daquele que pode fazer do objeto um dom. Dessa forma, existe algo para além da relação amorosa, que falta a ela e só pode ser oferecido enquanto falta. É só quando algo falta ao amor, tornando-o imperfeito e diferente de uma fusão, que ele pode acontecer entre dois sujeitos que nunca, já que são sujeitos, poderiam passar a ser um só ou a desejarem a mesma coisa. Conclui-se, portanto, que em uma sociedade capitalista que valoriza investimentos lucrativos e seguros, amar significa mergulhar em vulnerabilidade e encarar a falta constitutiva que esburaca qualquer tentativa de controle e escancara impossibilidades. Iluminar o caráter paradoxal do amor é uma alternativa para defendê-lo dos discursos securitários que acabam matando as chances que a experiência amorosa tem de trazer algum sentido à vida / There is no guarantee for the subject that loves; The relationship with the other is an attempt to seek happiness, but it is also in loving that the subject becomes more susceptible to suffering. Psychoanalysis points to this paradox since Freud and Lacan uses the paradox as a possible figure of speech to talk about love. The main Lacanian aphorism on the subject is \"to love is to give what you do not have,\" but to get to that point of his teaching, Lacan dwells on countless questions throughout his seminars. Thus, the purpose of this work was to investigate Jacques Lacan\'s use of the paradox to talk about love. The Pêcheutian Discourse Analysis (AD) contributed to elucidate the subject\'s interpellation into subject and the identification with dominant discursive formations on love, being this identification founder of an imaginary unit. Since some works of art were used to illustrate the relation between love and paradox, it was from AD that such works were analyzed and incorporated into the results. In addition, this indexing methodology helped to interpret Lacan\'s course, especially in Seminary VIII in which he uses Plato\'s text \"The Banquet\" to relate, for example, the concept of lack with the theme of love, An analysis whose understanding is fundamental for the accomplishment of the objective proposed in this work. It was then possible to point out, as one of the main results of this analysis, that the object that the subject seeks in desire, in its most varied forms, is never what he finds. This lack is central to the object relationship from the psychoanalytic point of view, since the frustration inherent in this search makes the gift something more important than the presence or absence of the object itself, because what is really in question is the love of one who can make the object a gift. In this way, there is something beyond the love relationship, which is lacking in it and can only be offered while lacking. It is only when something is lacking in love, making it imperfect and different from a fusion, that it can happen between two subjects who never, since they are subjects, could become one or desire the same thing. In conclusion, therefore, in a capitalist society that values lucrative and secure investments, to love means to plunge into vulnerability and to face the constitutive lack that bursts any attempt of control and opens impossibilities. To illuminate the paradoxical character of love is an alternative to defend it from security speeches that end up killing the chances that the love experience has to bring some meaning to life