Esta dissertação tem por objetivo comparar a leitura de diversos intérpretes marxistas que trabalham com a categoria dinheiro, em sua noção mais basilar. Ademais, colima também delimitar um espaço teórico para formulação de uma teoria monetária especificamente marxista, assim como mostrar o atual estado das artes da teoria monetária marxista. Para isso, necessário se faz localizar as aproximações conceituais e as divergências existentes. O objetivo prioritário desde estudo não é apresentar um ponto de vista próprio, porém expor as posições mais significativas já existentes sobre a questão do dinheiro. Nesse sentido, o esforço aqui é o de sintetizar as várias compressões marxistas sobre a categoria dinheiro. Para tanto, necessário se fez mostrar o debate por temas, ao invés de construir uma exegese de cada autor/texto de maneira isolada. / This dissertation aims to compare the reading of the several Marxist authors works with concept of Money in its most basic sense. Furthermore, it also aims outline a theoretical place to formulate a specifically monetary theory Marxist, namely, expose the current state of the art of the Marxist theory of money. To do this, it is necessary to find similarities and differences conceptual. The major objective of the inquiry is expose the most significant expose the most understanding existing positions on the matter of money, instead of presenting a point of view itself. In this sense, main task is to synthesize the various compressions Marxists on the Money category. For this, it was necessary to expose the debate by subject, rather than building an exegesis of each author/text singly.

Orientador: Alcides Hector Rodriguez Benoit / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-17T07:32:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Cressoni_AndredeGoes_M.pdf: 784110 bytes, checksum: 32b9834a1e0be1fdaa933411b96cfcbc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2010 / Abstract: Inside the investigational context on the expositive method of Karl Marx's The Capital, this dissertation looks foward to pointing out directions to a better comprehension of the method of abstraction operated on this work. A long discussed thematic on the Marxist literature, the method of abstraction is of fundamental importance for comprehending the dialectics on his critique of the political economy. To establish the position the abstraction aquires in the arquitetonic of The Capital, we elaborated a dialogue with the Hegelian logic as it appears on his Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences. By this, we pursued to solve our problematic with a conjunctural analysis of the dialectical passages: abstract-concrete, essence-apearence, possibility-efectivity as it apears on Hegel. On this reading key, we scrutinized the main categories Marx offers us on the Third Book of The Capital, weaving its dialectical unity with the two former books of the same work. This done, we seek to defend the thesis that the abstraction consists on positioning the logical conditions of possibility in the categorial development of The Capital, remaking the system's internal determinacional movement in its concrete reality. / Mestrado / Filosofia / Mestre em Filosofia

Orientador: Martha Rosa Pisani Destro / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Educação / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-15T19:56:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 LiraNeto_JoaquimFranciscode_M.pdf: 992288 bytes, checksum: c992eb47460d169ef0b8426a2b404819 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 / Resumo: O presente trrabalho constiu-se numa pesquisa que teve como objetivo investigar os meios através dos quais o futebol foi e ainda pode ser utilizado como uma forma de reforço às idéias e valores que legitimam as relações capitalistas de produção. ...Observação: O resumo, na íntegra, poderá ser visualizado no texto completo da tese digital / Abstract: This work is based on a survey that aimed to investigate the ways in which football was and can still be used as a way of reinforcing the ideas and values that legitimize the capitalist relations of production. There has been an investigation of how football has been addressed by current approaches to Physical Education. In addition, the research works of authors from the historical-critical pedagogy revealed elements that an approach to Physical Education must have to make it possible to learn football in a view contrary to the dominant ideology. First, we examined specific ideological uses of football. To this end, we chose the periods of dictatorship of the New State and 1964-1985, on the understanding that were historic moments in football that was often used ideologically to serve the interests of the state. Later on, we present the analysis of the ideological use of football on the ground works of authors who studied the football and that, somehow, defend ideas that contribute to the legitimacy of capitalist relations of production. In the analysis of how football is present in the approaches of Physical Education, was made a division between approaches non-critical and critical, so that, without ignoring the contributions of the first, it was emphasized the point: the perception of the objective conditions of culture body that the latter approached a systematization that provides space for the teacher aims to combat the dominant ideology. In the last chapter, corresponding to the analysis of works by artists from the historical-critical pedagogy, which were investigated fundamental aspects of this trend can support a pedagogical teaching the elements of body culture contrary to the dominant ideology, where the football is intercepted in its relations with the concrete material conditions of social existence, in which it is built, and at the same time, this is the prospect of overcoming these conditions. These fundamentals can be summarized as follows: 1) the perception of constraints and objectives of education in the case of Physical Education, the body culture; 2) directiveness; 3) an education that addresses the relationship between content and practice the broader social - which is insufficiently explored, even by critical approaches of Physical Education, which still have attached to the field of experience of the elements of body culture. It is a literature review, and the theoretical and methodological framework adopted here is the dialectical and historical materialism, which is based on historical-critical pedagogy, so named by Dermeval Saviani / Mestrado / Historia, Filosofia e Educação / Mestre em Educação

Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2016-10-31T17:19:03Z No. of bitstreams: 1 deniseadeliavieira.pdf: 297206 bytes, checksum: 1c27181afd2b2375cc2f5fc0c9d09dbd (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2016-12-15T13:16:56Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 deniseadeliavieira.pdf: 297206 bytes, checksum: 1c27181afd2b2375cc2f5fc0c9d09dbd (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2016-12-15T13:18:10Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 deniseadeliavieira.pdf: 297206 bytes, checksum: 1c27181afd2b2375cc2f5fc0c9d09dbd (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-12-15T13:18:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 deniseadeliavieira.pdf: 297206 bytes, checksum: 1c27181afd2b2375cc2f5fc0c9d09dbd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2004-12-15 / Esta dissertação procura analisar a temática proletária nas letras brasileiras, propondo o seguinte recorte cronológico e temático: do socialismo e anarquismo da Belle Époque, ao comunismo do entre-guerras. Para tanto, os três capítulos da dissertação exploram desde as primeiras leituras da doutrina marxista no Brasil, passando pela literatura anarquista, até a produção dos romances proletários. O trabalho registra as referências de Machado de Assis e Euclides da Cunha a Marx. Conta também a trajetória anarquista de Lima Barreto e seu apoio à Revolução Russa de 1917, além de discutir a relação dos intelectuais com o comunismo desde o ano de 1922 até a década de 30. Finalmente, destaca o romance proletário através de três obras: O Gororoba (1931), de Lauro Palhano, Cacau (1933), de Jorge Amado, Parque Industrial (1933), de Patrícia Galvão. Objetivou-se, dessa maneira, resgatar, entre nós, a temática proletária, esquecida à margem pelo cânone. / This dissertation aims to analyse the proletarian theme in the Brazilian literature, suggesting the following chronological cut: from the socialism and anrchism of the belle époque to the communism of the period between the First and Second Wars. To do so, the three chapters of the dissertation explit since the first readings of Marxist doctrine in Brazil, passing through anarchist literature until the production of proletarian literature. The work registers the references from Machado de Assis and Euclides da Cunha until Marx. It also tells the anarchist trajectory of Lima Barreto and his support to the Russian Revolution of 1917.The work discusses the relationship of the intellectuals with Communism since the year of 1922 until the 30's. Finally, the proletarian novel is emphasised through three works: O Gororoba (1931) by Lauro Palhano, Cacau (1933) by Jorge Amado, Parque Industrial (1933) by Patrícia Galvão. It was the goal rescue the proletarian thematic among us, since it was forgoteen by the canon.

FundaÃÃo de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Cearà / A crise na estrutura do capital (MÃszÃros, 2000) gera tensÃes em diferentes setores da prÃtica social, impelindo o sistema à busca de mecanismos que restabeleÃam seus patamares de acumulaÃÃo. O campo educacional, tido como inadequado Ãs demandas atuais da ânova ordem mundialâ, apresenta-se como um complexo fundamental Ãs disposiÃÃes ideolÃgicas necessÃrias à reproduÃÃo do sistema. Desse modo, torna-se comum a disseminaÃÃo de pseudo teorias que ratificam a lÃgica do capital, a exemplo da teoria da complexidade, nosso objeto de investigaÃÃo, difundida por Edgar Morin como a perspectiva imperiosa à operacionalizaÃÃo da reforma do pensamento que, para ele, à o urgente desafio a ser enfrentado se almejarmos romper com a prÃ-histÃria da humanidade. Este trabalho tem como objetivo apontar os encontros ideolÃgicos entre a perspectiva moriniana da Complexidade (pensamento complexo) e a formaÃÃo da sociabilidade exigida pelo capital atualmente, que tem no projeto de educaÃÃo para o futuro um de seus artifÃcios nucleares. Tal projeto, liderado por organismos a serviÃo da reproduÃÃo da ordem vigente, entre eles o Banco Mundial e a UNESCO, à legitimado atravÃs de eventos de Ãmbito global e da adoÃÃo de teorizaÃÃes que corroboram, de uma forma ou de outra, com as determinaÃÃes por eles fixadas. Ao confrontarmos o ideÃrio reformista de Morin com os objetivos postos em curso pelo capital, concluÃmos que as proposiÃÃes do autor francÃs sÃo uma importante contribuiÃÃo aos anseios burgueses, tanto pela supressÃo da contradiÃÃo inconciliÃvel entre trabalho e capital que resulta na presente condiÃÃo da sociedade de classes, a qual impede a verdadeira histÃria do mundo dos homens, quanto pelo fato da proposta de Morin nÃo ultrapassar, sob qualquer aspecto, os limites permitidos pela lÃgica da produÃÃo de mercadorias, sendo esta, diga-se de passagem, o vetor primÃrio da fragmentaÃÃo do conhecimento por ele mesmo criticada. Disso decorre que o ideÃrio moriniano situa-se no campo das teorizaÃÃes que apontam para a possibilidade de humanizaÃÃo do capital, o que tem se mostrado uma preciosa mistificaÃÃo (MÃszÃros, 2009). Nossa anÃlise trouxe como fundamentaÃÃo teÃrica a ontologia marxiana-lukacsiana, apontando, por essa via, que a emergÃncia da autÃntica humanidade sà à possÃvel mediante a completa superaÃÃo da ordem do capital, horizonte em direÃÃo ao qual a reforma do pensamento alardeada por Morin à incapaz de nos fazer caminhar.

Orientador: Fausto Castilho / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-20T03:08:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Azara_H.O._D.pdf: 1631494 bytes, checksum: e26383ca657090125921c431f8e9d7e5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 / Resumo: Esta tese procura reconstituir as categorias essenciais do "conceito marxiano de capital como tal", entendido como o núcleo da crítica de Marx à Economia Política e à sociedade capitalista, a que esta ciência corresponde. Nessa reconstituição nosso fio condutor é o uso heurístico feito por Marx de operadores da Lógica hegeliana. Procuramos explicitar o modo como Marx se utiliza da dialética da finitude, que tem como operadores lógicos as noções de limite e barreira, para caracterizar a subjetividade do capital, uma subjetividade marcada pela infinitude da vontade de valor e mais-valor. Essa vontade infinita de valorização se constitui no traço característico do capital como tal, ou seja, o não reconhecimento de limites ou a transformação reiterada de seus próprios limites em barreiras e sua consequente superação. Procuramos mostrar em que consiste a afirmação do capital como relação, isto é, como o capital tem o poder de fixar e subordinar a si o seu outro, o trabalho assalariado. Buscamos explicitar ainda como o capital, seguindo seu impulso sem limites por mais-valor, irá revolucionar completa e incessantemente as bases técnicas e científicas da produção e com isto gerar o processo de negação do trabalho vivo pelo morto que caracteriza a contradição-capital / Abstract: The thesis intends a reconstruction of the essential categories of the "marxian concept of capital as such", which is understood as a pivotal Marx's critique both the political economy and capitalist society in which this science is related. We aim to perceive the heuristic use done by Marx with the operators of the hegelian logic. We seek to demonstrate how Marx takes into account the Hegel's dialectic theory of finitude - which has as logic operators the notions of limit and barriers - to characterize the subjectivity of the capital, which is defined by the infinitude of the will of the value and surplus value. This will infinity of valorization is a fundamental feature of the capital as such. It does not recognize the limits of its own limits in barriers and your consequent overcoming. Furthermore we demonstrated what means the statement of the capital as a relation, this is, how it has the power to fix and subordinate itself and the others - the wage labor. Moreover we addressed how the capital following its momentum without limits from surplus value will increase both the structure of the technique and science production, engendering therefore the process of the denial of living labor by the dead labor which features the contradiction-capital / Doutorado / Filosofia / Doutor em Filosofia

This dissertation politically analyses the principles of literary evaluation (here called "axiology") argued and applied by the English critics Christopher Caudwell, Raymond Williams, and Terry Eagleton. The paradoxical fact that all three claim to be working within a Marxist framework while producing mutually divergent rationales for literary evaluation prompts a detailed examination of Marx and Engels. Moreover, since Caudwell and Eagleton acknowledge Leninism to be Marxism, and, further, since Eagleton and I both in our own ways argue that Trotskyism--as opposed to Stalinism--is the continuator of Leninism, the evaluative methods of Lenin and Trotsky also become relevant. Examined in light of that revolutionary tradition, however, and in view of the (English) critics' high political self-consciousness, the latter's principles of "literary" evaluation reveal definitive political differences between each other and with Marxism itself, centrally over the question of organised action. Thus, each of the chapters on the English critics begins with an examination of the chosen critic's purely political profile and its relationship to his general theory of literature. Next, I show how the contradictions of his "axiology" express those of his politics. Finally, with Hardy as a focus, I show the influence of each critic's political logic on his particular "literary" assessment of individual authors and texts. The heterogeneity of these critics' evaluations of Hardy, the close correspondence of each critic's general evaluative principles to his political beliefs, and the non-Marxist nature of those beliefs themselves all concretely suggest that none of the three English critics is strictly a Marxist. I do not know whether a genuinely Marxist axiology is inevitable; however, I do admit such a phenomenon as a logical possibility. In any case, I argue, this possibility will never be realised unless aspiring Marxist axiologists seek to match their usually extensive knowledge of literature with an active interest in making international proletarian revolution happen. And, since it can only happen if it is organised, the "Marxist" axiologist without such an orientation will be merely an axiologist without Marxism. / Arts, Faculty of / English, Department of / Graduate

The diploma thesis deals with Marxist philosophy in Czechoslovakia between 1956 and 1968, it focuses especially on Marxist humanism. The XX. Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in 1956 and the Khrushchev's critique of Stalinism gave opportunity for critical approach in Marxist philosophy. Marxist humanism came with the turn to questions of man and his world and it refused the dehumanizing system of Stalinism. The campaign against revisionism was led in regimes of the Eastern Block between 1956 and 1960 as a reaction to critical efforts in Marxist theory and practice. The campaign against revisionism was led in Czechoslovakia against efforts of separation philosophy from ideology or emphasis to Hegelian origins of Marxism. Areas where was evolving critical thinking and original approach to Marxism were arising in the 1950s and especially in 1960s in Czechoslovakia. Examples of this areas were the Institute of Philosophy of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences and the dialogue between Marxists and Christians. In this thesis I examine thinking of Karel Kosík, Robert Kalivoda and Milan Machovec on questions of history and man. Through these themes I show different approaches to Marxist humanism in Czechoslovakia between the 1950s and 1960s. Marxist humanism is often seen as an unitary...

(in English): This thesis deals with the sociology of art, its prevailing discourse and the search for other possible ways of taking a sociological approach to art. The text is divided into three complementary sections. The first section addresses the problem of the representation of art through the interpretation of art history as the history of display and the resulting conceptual duality of illusion versus schematicity. In the second section, the focus is on analysing the assumptions underlying the dominant stream of art sociology. These are the social determinations of artistic discourse, the denial of the axiology of art, the legitimisation of art on the basis of its social function, and the unequal approach of the perception of art in society. The relevance of these propositions is, in the present work, parsed in much the same way as the unifying theoretical framework underlying these premises, namely the Marxist aesthetic theory. The work presented in this thesis therefore identifies Marxist materialism as an agent of determinism and the levelling of values in the sociology of art, based on well-founded arguments, and concludes that the Marxist approach to art is unsatisfactory and destructive to sociology. In the end, the work seeks other ways for the sociological reflection of art, through...

No description available.