This thesis deals with the take-up of social security benefits in Britain. It is well documented that not everyone who is entitled to benefits actually claims them. Nontake- up of benefits has been found to be a problem especially for benefits which are means-tested. So, throughout this thesis, we concentrate on Income Support, the main means-tested benefit in Britain. The latest official estimates on the extent of non-takeup (for 1993/94) suggest that up to 1.4 million persons are not receiving close to £1.7 billion of IS in spite of being entitled to it. The main question this thesis addresses IS what are the factors which determine whether an individual will or will not take-up their benefit entitlement? We consider the problem from an economic perspective by constructing suitable models set in both static and dynamic environments. These models provide some interesting insights about the nature of non-take-up. In tum, they also form the basis to a series of econometric models. Previous empirical evidence has shown that the entitlement level itself is one of the key determinants of whether or not an individual will take-up. In addition, it has long been recognized that - due to the complex nature of the benefit system - determining individual entitlements is, in many cases, error-prone with resulting benefit entitlements that are subject to measurement error. Hence, unlike any other studies thus far, we account for the presence of measurement error in the benefit entitlement when modelling the likelihood of take-up. Finally, we shed new light on the dynamics of take-up by using the information contained in our panel data set. In particular, we consider the effect claiming in the past has on the current decision to take-up and how future changes, expected or known with certainty, influence the decision to take-up or not

No description available.

O objetivo principal deste trabalho é estudar modelos mistos lineares elípticos em que uma das variáveis explicativas ou covariáveis é medida com erros, sob a abordagem estrutural. O trabalho é apresentado numa notação longitudinal, todavia a covariável medida com erros pode ser observada temporalmente ou como medidas repetidas. Assumimos uma estrutura hierárquica apropriada com distribuição elíptica conjunta para os erros envolvidos, porém a inferência é desenvolvida sob uma abordagem marginal em que consideramos a distribuição marginal da resposta e da variável medida com erros. Procedimentos de influência local em que o esquema de perturbação é escolhido de forma apropriada são desenvolvidos. Um exemplo para motivação é apresentado e analisado através dos procedimentos apresentados neste trabalho. Detalhamos nos apêndices os principais procedimentos necessários para o desenvolvimento do modelo proposto. / The aim of this thesis is to study elliptical linear mixed models in which one of the explanatory variables is subject to measurement error under the structural assumption. The work is presented by assuming a longitudinal structure, however the explanatory variable may be observed along the time or as repeated measures. A joint hierarchical structure is assumed for the elliptical errors, but the inference is made under the marginal structure. The methodology of local influence is applied with the perturbation schemes being selected appropriately. A motivation example is presented and analysed by the procedures developed in this work. All the main derivations for the development of the proposed model are presented in the appendices.

O objetivo principal deste trabalho é estudar modelos mistos lineares elípticos em que uma das variáveis explicativas ou covariáveis é medida com erros, sob a abordagem estrutural. O trabalho é apresentado numa notação longitudinal, todavia a covariável medida com erros pode ser observada temporalmente ou como medidas repetidas. Assumimos uma estrutura hierárquica apropriada com distribuição elíptica conjunta para os erros envolvidos, porém a inferência é desenvolvida sob uma abordagem marginal em que consideramos a distribuição marginal da resposta e da variável medida com erros. Procedimentos de influência local em que o esquema de perturbação é escolhido de forma apropriada são desenvolvidos. Um exemplo para motivação é apresentado e analisado através dos procedimentos apresentados neste trabalho. Detalhamos nos apêndices os principais procedimentos necessários para o desenvolvimento do modelo proposto. / The aim of this thesis is to study elliptical linear mixed models in which one of the explanatory variables is subject to measurement error under the structural assumption. The work is presented by assuming a longitudinal structure, however the explanatory variable may be observed along the time or as repeated measures. A joint hierarchical structure is assumed for the elliptical errors, but the inference is made under the marginal structure. The methodology of local influence is applied with the perturbation schemes being selected appropriately. A motivation example is presented and analysed by the procedures developed in this work. All the main derivations for the development of the proposed model are presented in the appendices.

A graphical model is simply a representation of the results of an analysis of relationships between sets of variables. It can include the study of the dependence of one variable, or a set of variables on another variable or sets of variables, and can be extended to include variables which could be considered as intermediate to the others. This leads to the concept of representing these chains of relationships by means of a graph; where variables are represented by vertices, and relationships between the variables are represented by edges. These edges can be either directed or undirected, depending upon the type of relationship being represented. The thesis investigates a number of outstanding problems in the area of statistical modelling, with particular emphasis on representing the results in terms of a graph. The thesis will study models for multivariate discrete data and in the case of binary responses, some theoretical results are given on the relationship between two common models. In the more general setting of multivariate discrete responses, a general class of models is studied and an approximation to the maximum likelihood estimates in these models is proposed. This thesis also addresses the problem of measurement errors. An investigation into the effect that measurement error has on sample size calculations is given with respect to a general measurement error specification in both linear and binary regression models. Finally, the thesis presents, in terms of a graphical model, a re-analysis of a set of childhood growth data, collected in South Wales during the 1970s. Within this analysis, a new technique is proposed that allows the calculation of derived variables under the assumption that the joint relationships between the variables are constant at each of the time points.

The behavior of rank procedures in measurement error models was studied - if tests and estimates stay valid and applicable when there are some measurement errors involved and if not how to modify these procedures to be able to do some statistical inference. A new rank test for the slope parameter in regression model based on minimum distance esti- mator and an aligned rank test for an intercept were proposed. The (asymptotic) bias of R-estimator in measurement error model was also investigated. Besides measurement errors the problem of heteroscedastic model errors was considered - regression rank score tests of heteroscedasticity with nuisance regression and tests of regression with nuisance heterosce- dasticity were proposed. Finally, in location model tests and estimates of shift parameter for various measurement errors were studied. All the results were derived theoretically and then demonstrated numerically with examples or simulations.

In this thesis, using the principles of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the cause-effect concept associated with structural equation modelling (SEM), a new flexible statistical framework for evaluation of climate model simulations against observational data is suggested. The design of the framework also makes it possible to investigate the magnitude of the influence of different forcings on the temperature as well as to investigate a general causal latent structure of temperature data. In terms of the questions of interest, the framework suggested here can be viewed as a natural extension of the statistical approach of 'optimal fingerprinting', employed in many Detection and Attribution (D&amp;A) studies. Its flexibility means that it can be applied under different circumstances concerning such aspects as the availability of simulated data, the number of forcings in question, the climate-relevant properties of these forcings, and the properties of the climate model under study, in particular, those concerning the reconstructions of forcings and their implementation. It should also be added that although the framework involves the near-surface temperature as a climate variable of interest and focuses on the time period covering approximately the last millennium prior to the industrialisation period, the statistical models, included in the framework, can in principle be generalised to any period in the geological past as soon as simulations and proxy data on any continuous climate variable are available.  Within the confines of this thesis, performance of some CFA- and SEM-models is evaluated in pseudo-proxy experiments, in which the true unobservable temperature series is replaced by temperature data from a selected climate model simulation. The results indicated that depending on the climate model and the region under consideration, the underlying latent structure of temperature data can be of varying complexity, thereby rendering our statistical framework, serving as a basis for a wide range of CFA- and SEM-models, a powerful and flexible tool. Thanks to these properties, its application ultimately may contribute to an increased confidence in the conclusions about the ability of the climate model in question to simulate observed climate changes. / <p>At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 2: Manuscript. Paper 3: Manuscript. Paper 3: Manuscript.</p>

Neste trabalho estudamos o modelo de regressão logística com erro de medida nas covariáveis. Abordamos as metodologias de estimação de máxima pseudoverossimilhança pelo algoritmo EM-Monte Carlo, calibração da regressão, SIMEX e naïve (ingênuo), método este que ignora o erro de medida. Comparamos os métodos em relação à estimação, através do viés e da raiz do erro quadrático médio, e em relação à predição de novas observações, através das medidas de desempenho sensibilidade, especificidade, verdadeiro preditivo positivo, verdadeiro preditivo negativo, acurácia e estatística de Kolmogorov-Smirnov. Os estudos de simulação evidenciam o melhor desempenho do método de máxima pseudoverossimilhança na estimação. Para as medidas de desempenho na predição não há diferença entre os métodos de estimação. Por fim, utilizamos nossos resultados em dois conjuntos de dados reais de diferentes áreas: área médica, cujo objetivo está na estimação da razão de chances, e área financeira, cujo intuito é a predição de novas observações. / We study the logistic model when explanatory variables are measured with error. Three estimation methods are presented, namely maximum pseudo-likelihood obtained through a Monte Carlo expectation-maximization type algorithm, regression calibration, SIMEX and naïve, which ignores the measurement error. These methods are compared through simulation. From the estimation point of view, we compare the different methods by evaluating their biases and root mean square errors. The predictive quality of the methods is evaluated based on sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic. The simulation studies show that the best performing method is the maximum pseudo-likelihood method when the objective is to estimate the parameters. There is no difference among the estimation methods for predictive purposes. The results are illustrated in two real data sets from different application areas: medical area, whose goal is the estimation of the odds ratio, and financial area, whose goal is the prediction of new observations.

Neste trabalho estudamos o modelo de regressão logística com erro de medida nas covariáveis. Abordamos as metodologias de estimação de máxima pseudoverossimilhança pelo algoritmo EM-Monte Carlo, calibração da regressão, SIMEX e naïve (ingênuo), método este que ignora o erro de medida. Comparamos os métodos em relação à estimação, através do viés e da raiz do erro quadrático médio, e em relação à predição de novas observações, através das medidas de desempenho sensibilidade, especificidade, verdadeiro preditivo positivo, verdadeiro preditivo negativo, acurácia e estatística de Kolmogorov-Smirnov. Os estudos de simulação evidenciam o melhor desempenho do método de máxima pseudoverossimilhança na estimação. Para as medidas de desempenho na predição não há diferença entre os métodos de estimação. Por fim, utilizamos nossos resultados em dois conjuntos de dados reais de diferentes áreas: área médica, cujo objetivo está na estimação da razão de chances, e área financeira, cujo intuito é a predição de novas observações. / We study the logistic model when explanatory variables are measured with error. Three estimation methods are presented, namely maximum pseudo-likelihood obtained through a Monte Carlo expectation-maximization type algorithm, regression calibration, SIMEX and naïve, which ignores the measurement error. These methods are compared through simulation. From the estimation point of view, we compare the different methods by evaluating their biases and root mean square errors. The predictive quality of the methods is evaluated based on sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic. The simulation studies show that the best performing method is the maximum pseudo-likelihood method when the objective is to estimate the parameters. There is no difference among the estimation methods for predictive purposes. The results are illustrated in two real data sets from different application areas: medical area, whose goal is the estimation of the odds ratio, and financial area, whose goal is the prediction of new observations.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-02T20:06:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 4180.pdf: 1039417 bytes, checksum: d09a61a4895fb47d1c2456468800fc2f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-02-29 / Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos / In this work we consider a new estimator proposed by Ferrari & Yang (2010), called the maximum Lq-likelihood estimator (MLqE), to estimate the parameters of the measurement error models, in particular, the structural model. The new estimator extends the classical maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and its based on the minimization, by means of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, of the discrepancy between a distribuiton in a family and one that modifies the true distribution by the degree of distortion q. Depending on the choice of q, the transformed distribution can diminish or emphasize the role of extreme observations, unlike the ML method that equally weights each observation. For small and moderate sample sizes, the MLqE can trade bias for precision, causing a reduction of the mean square error (MSE). The structural model has the characteristic of non-identifiability. For this reason, we must make assumptions on the parameters to overcome the non-identifiability. We perform a analytical study and a simulation study to compare MLqE and MLE. To gauge performance of the estimators, we compute measures of overall performance, bias, standard deviation, standard error, MSE, probability of coverage and length of confidence intervals. / Neste trabalho utilizaremos um novo estimador proposto por Ferrari & Yang (2010), denominado de estimador de máxima Lq-verossimilhança (EMLqV), na estimação dos parâmetros de modelos com erros de medição estruturais normais. O novo estimador é uma generalização do estimador de máxima verossimilhança (EMV) usual e sua construção baseia-se na comparação, utilizando divergência de Kullback-Leibler (KL), entre duas distribuições, a distribuição inalterada e a distribuição modificada pelo grau de distorção da função de verossimilhança (q). Conforme a escolha para q, a distribuição modificada poderá atenuar ou exaltar o papel das observações extremas, diferentemente do EMV usual que atribui os mesmos pesos a todas as observações. Na comparação entre as duas distribuições pela divergência de KL é inserida certa quantidade de viés no estimador resultante, que é controlada pelo parâmetro q. O aumento do viés do estimador MLqV pode ser compensado com a redução de sua variância, pela escolha apropriada de q. O modelo estrutural possui a característica de ser inidentificável. Para torná-lo identificável faremos suposições sobre os parâmetros do modelo, analisando cinco casos de identificabilidade do modelo. A comparação entre os métodos MLqV e MV na estimação dos parâmetros do modelo será baseada em resultados analíticos e em simulações, sendo calculadas medidas de desempenho global, viés, desvio padrão (DP), erro padrão estimado (EP), erro quadrático médio (EQM), probabilidade de cobertura e amplitude dos intervalos de confiança.