本論文以「四靈詩人研究」為題，約七萬字，共分五章。茲述其內容大要如下： 第一章：共分四節。簡述四靈之生平、師承與交游、四靈名稱之概念及其著作，以作 為下文的其礎。 第二章：共分三節。論述四靈之時代背景及其作品之淵源。首先由時代背景與文壇趨 勢兩方面來考察其作品形成的背景，再由文學方面來考察其作品之淵源。 第三章：共分二節及小結。論述四靈作品之形式及內容特色。由形式與內容兩方面來 探討四靈作品之主要特色。 第四章：共分二節。論述四靈作品之風格。首先論述影響四靈詩風格之外在內在因素 ，再敘述四靈詩之主要風格特色。 第五章：結論，共分三節。首先概述四靈詩風，再敘述四靈詩人對南宋末期文壇之影 響及後人對四靈之批評。

許學夷，字伯清，南直隸江陰（今江蘇江陰）人，生於明嘉靖四十二年（1563），卒於崇禎六年（1633）。其以復古派的立場，歷四十年光陰所著成之《詩源辯體》，是一部體大思精的論詩著作，惜因此書傳世甚稀，《四庫全書》又未予著錄，使得這部詩歌批評史上的罕見的鉅製沈寂了三百多年，直到近幾年方才逐漸受到重視。實則《詩源辯體》是明代復古派反擊公安、竟陵二派的總結性論著，其系統之井然，篇幅之龐大，都是宋代以來的詩話傳統所未見的，且是書詳論《詩經》以降的中國歷代詩歌之源流發展，並兼評歷代詩論和詩選集，實質上即是一部完整的詩歌史和簡易的詩歌批評史，其所具有的價值和意義都不容我們忽視。本文以許學夷的《詩源辯體》為研究對象，論文內容除了〈引言〉之外，總計分成七章：第一章〈許學夷其人其事〉與第二章〈詩源辯體的成書〉，先針對許學夷的生平經歷和《詩源辯體》的成書狀況作一番基本的說明，這兩章是屬於外緣問題的探討；第三章至第六章分別為〈詩史觀──詩歌演變歷史的詮釋〉、〈辨體論──詩歌體裁與家數的辨析〉、〈創作論──復古的創作理論與實踐〉以及〈批評研究──理論、實際與批評史〉，這四章則是依據《詩源辯體》的內容和性質，來研究其核心的理論；第七章〈結論〉，則從許學夷詩論的承先啟後以及《詩源辯體》一書的的價值、研究展望等幾個方面，為全文提出最後的總結。《詩源辯體》原本即是系統嚴謹的論著，本文透過個人的詮釋方式，為其書建構另種面貌的理論體系，希望這樣的研究能夠闡發許學夷詩論的精髓，並還給其書一個合理的文學史地位。

Submitted by Patricia Aparecida Antonio (gafinha@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-06-20T19:00:58Z No. of bitstreams: 1 patricia.antonio.tese.2016.pdf: 9361254 bytes, checksum: c219c8de22a557bfc62e6962d2bc67d8 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Juliano Benedito Ferreira (julianoferreira@reitoria.unesp.br) on 2016-06-21T16:54:09Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 antonio_pa_dr_arafc.pdf: 9361254 bytes, checksum: c219c8de22a557bfc62e6962d2bc67d8 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-21T16:54:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 antonio_pa_dr_arafc.pdf: 9361254 bytes, checksum: c219c8de22a557bfc62e6962d2bc67d8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-04-28 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / O presente trabalho tem por objetivo observar como opera a pendularidade entre poesia e crítica da poesia na obra de Murilo Mendes (1901-1975) e Francis Ponge (1899-1988). O brasileiro e o francês procedem à fusão de discurso da obra e discurso sobre a obra num movimento em que sujeito lírico e crítico (eles mesmos ficcionais) se encontram em permanente tensão. Entendendo poesia e crítica como atividades reflexivas fundamentadas na linguagem, as questões principais às quais pretendemos nos lançar são: a) Como se configura e opera pendularidade e indistinção entre discurso poético e crítico em Murilo Mendes e Francis Ponge? b) Como se configura a voz poético-crítica para se adequar a um ato de dupla face como esse? c) O que se depreende da aproximação ou do distanciamento da conduta lírico-crítica, levando-se em consideração subjetividade e objetividade? Nesse sentido, esta Tese busca ler comparativamente os dois poetas tendo por horizonte poesia e crítica enquanto atos indistintos, de caráter inacabado, em que autor e leitor participam ativamente. Assim, os poemas aparecem como atos que configuram uma prática literária, que é lírica, crítica e criativa, a um só tempo. No centro dessa prática, os sujeitos lírico-críticos manipulam a criação partindo de um corpo-a-corpo com o texto, como fica claro com as obras que selecionamos para este estudo: de Murilo Mendes, O discípulo de Emaús (1945), Convergência (1970), Poliedro (1972) e Retratos-relâmpago (1973); de Francis Ponge, Proêmes (1948), Méthodes (1961), Pour un Malherbe (1965) e La table (1981). Poesia e crítica, então, podem ser compreendidas no sentido da poiesis, de uma construção que coloca em crise (cuja raiz etimológica é a mesma que a da palavra crítica) o lírico, o crítico, a prosa, a poesia, bem como uma ideia fechada de literatura e de gêneros literários. / This study aims at observing how the pendularity between poetry and poetry criticism operates in the work of Murilo Mendes (1901-1975) and Francis Ponge (1899-1988). The Brazilian and the French merge the work’s speech and the speech about the work into a movement in which the lyrical and the critical subject (fictional themselves) find each other in constant tension. Having the understanding of poetry and criticism as reflective activities based in language, the main questions we intend to present are: a) How is the pendularity and indistinctness between poetic and critical speech designed and operated for Murilo Mendes and Francis Ponge? b) How is the poetical and critical voice designed to fit a double-sided act as this one? c) What is interpreted from the approach and distancing from the critical and lyrical behavior, taking into consideration subjectivity and objectivity? On this regard, this Thesis seeks a comparative reading of both poets, having as an outlook, poetry and criticism as indistinct acts of unfinished character in which author and reader are active participants. Thus, the poems are shown as acts that design a literary practice which is lyrical, critical and creative, all at the same time. At the center of this practice, the lyrical and critical subjects manipulate the creation by jostling with the text, as seen in the pieces we have selected for this study: Murilo Mendes’ O discípulo de Emaús (1945), Convergência (1970), Poliedro (1972) and Retratos-relâmpago (1973); and Francis Ponge’s Proêmes (1948), Méthodes (1961), Pour un Malherbe (1965) and La table (1981). Therefore, poetry and criticism can be understood in the same meaning as poiesis, a construction that sets into crisis (whose etymological root is the same as the critical word) the lyrical, the critical, the prose, the poetry as well as an idea of closed literature and literary genders. / Ce travail a pour objectif d’observer comment opère le pendule entre poésie et critique de poésie dans l’œuvre de Murilo Mendes (1901-1975) et Francis Ponge (1899-1988). Le Brésilien et le Français procèdent à la fusion de discours de l’œuvre et discours sur l’œuvre dans un mouvement dans lequel le sujet lyrique et le critique (eux-mêmes fictionnels) se trouvent en une permanente tension. En comprenant poésie et critique comme des activités réflexives fondées sur le langage, voici les questions principales auxquelles nous prétendons nous lancer : a) Comment se configure et opère le pendule et l’indistinction entre discours poétique et critique chez Murilo Mendes et Francis Ponge ? b) Comment se configure la voix poétique-critique pour s’adapter à cet acte à double-face ? c) Qu’est-ce qu’on peut conclure de l’approximation ou du recul de la démarche lyrico-critique, quand on considère subjectivité et objectivité ? À cet égard, cette Thèse cherche une lecture comparative de poètes, en ayant pour horizon la poésie et la critique comme des actes indistincts, de nature inachevée, dans lesquels auteur et lecteur participent activement. Ainsi, les poèmes apparaissent comme des actes qui configurent une pratique littéraire critique, lyrique et créative en même temps. Au centre de cette pratique, les sujets lyrico-critiques manipulent la création par un corps à corps avec le texte, comme nous pouvons le voir nettement dans le corpus de ce travail : de Murilo Mendes, O discípulo de Emaús (1945), Convergência (1970), Poliedro (1972) et Retratos-relâmpago (1973) ; de Francis Ponge, Proêmes (1948), Méthodes (1961), Pour un Malherbe (1965) et La table (1981). De cette manière, la poésie et la critique peuvent être comprises au sens de la poiesis, d’une construction qui porte la crise (dont la racine étymologique est la même que celle de critique) du lyrique, du critique, de la prose, de la poésie, aussi bien qu’une idée fermée de la littérature et des genres littéraires.

This thesis aims to rescue the name of Elisabeth Mulder, a Spanish female poet who started to publish her first poetry books around the rise of the Generation of 1927 in Spain. The importance of this work hinges on the recognition of Mulder as a female poet whose work has been marginalized from the literary canon, like that of many other women of her era. This thesis focuses on Mulde''s third poetry collection, Sinfonâia en rojo, which was published in 1929 and stands out for its symbolic richness and its romantic and modernist features. Part of this research deals with the symbolism of the color red and the meanings that red acquires within the context of the poems. The main leitmotivs of Sinfonâia en rojo are the images of fire and blood, which are used to make reference to both the emotional and the physical world of the poetic voice. The research also focuses on the connections between Mulder's work and that of her contemporaries, and it suggests that she was in contact with the literary world of her era. / by Itxaso del Olmo Lâopez. / Abstract in English. / Thesis (M.A.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2013. / Includes bibliography. / Mode of access: World Wide Web. / System requirements: Adobe Reader.

L’objectif de la thèse est de rassembler des arguments permettant de déterminer si la seconde partie de la légende mariale moyen-néerlandaise Beatrijs (vv. 865-1038) est originale ou plutôt l’œuvre d’un continuateur. Dans la séquence narrative dont il est question, l’auteur développe le thème de la confession, préalable spirituel à la rémission des péchés.<p>En premier lieu, l’analyse stylistique objective (c.-à-d. basée sur des paramètres quantitatifs) de l’ensemble du corpus-texte nous a permis de ne déceler aucune différence notable entre les deux parties de la légende.<p>Ensuite, par l’étude de la structure diégétique, nous avons tenté d’expliquer le rôle du processus pénitentiel dans l’œuvre moyen-néerlandaise. Grâce aux principes d’analyse sémiotique de Propp, Greimas, Courtès et Dundes, nous avons pu remarquer que la légende présente une double articulation narrative reposant sur une double quête :le rejet du péché par le retour à l’espace hétérotopique initial (dans la première partie) et la quête de la pureté originale par la confession des péchés (dans la seconde partie). Cette dernière quête semble donc très logiquement faire partie intégrante de l’œuvre médiévale.<p><p><p>The aim of this thesis is to determine whether the second part of the Middle-Dutch legend Beatrijs (vv. 865-1038) is original. In the final sequences, the author highlights the role of confession in the absolution of sins.<p>In the first part of our work, we carried out a stylistic analysis of the whole legend that rested on quantifiable parameters. As no significant differences could be observed between the two parts, the stylistic homogeneity seemed obvious.<p>In the second part of our research, the emphasis was laid on the narrative structural approach. On the basis of the theories of semioticians (Propp, Greimas, Courtès and Dundes), we could analyse the legend as a bimotifemic « complex tale » in which the success of the first quest in the first part (return to the heterotopic point of departure) must be considered the first stage in the expiation. The second quest in the second part (return to the original purity) can only be achieved through confession. This physical and spiritual movement ensures absolution and salvation :for that reason we can assert that the confession process is an integral part of the medieval legend as a whole. / Doctorat en philosophie et lettres, Orientation langue et littérature / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

Doctorat en philosophie et lettres / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished