Diploma thesis on strategy of a specific business project discusses a formation of the common European hockey league and its penetration into the European market. Based on an analysis of the newly created project strategy, survey with fans of the Czech hockey team and information obtained from the stakeholders, biggest challenges for the competition were set and recommendations for improvement were proposed.

Analysis of a position of a czech medium company on the czech market. Proposal of an entrance strategy of a medium company Prádelna a čistírna Jihlava, s.r.o. to an austrian market.

The aim of the thesis is focused on the strategic analysis of the farmers' cooperation Dušejov. The first part of the thesis describes theoretical-methodological procedures, the second part deals with the application of selected analyses to the chosen company. The synthesis is represented by the overall SWOT analysis that determines a suitable company strategy.

The diploma deals with the strategic management in small and medium-sized companies. The strategic management is applied to a specific company operating in the field of mechanical engineering. The main goal of the diploma is to propose strategic variants focused mainly on the company's' development and resulting from the external and internal analyses. The results from both analyses are further used for the SWOT analysis which summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of the company influenced from the "outside" as opportunities and threats. SWOT analysis led to the definition of two strategic variants. First one is focused on the development of a new product; second one is more about searching for new opportunities on the market and marketing. After evaluating both proposals and considering dis/advantages only one has been recommended for the realization -- the second proposal.

Analysis of the company using internal and external analysis, integrated management model. Description of the competitive environment, market size and existing marketing activities. Outline the trends and developments in the industrial sector. Result of this work is optimize the financial issues, analysis of the internal state of the company and the possibility of change, proposal of company strategy.

Thesis on "Insolvency Law in Practice - Personal Bankruptcy" deals with a form of resolving insolvency or impending insolvency of due non-business entities, and that is the debt relief so-called personal bankruptcy. This thesis monitors the amount of submitted and rejected proposals to permit discharge and summarizes the most common reasons for their submissions and errors in the rejected proposals. The thesis analyzes the development of debt relief since 2008 with a focus on southern Bohemia. The conclusion is mentioned debt relief legislation in Austria.

The main goal of the master's thesis is to understand the actual needs of Czech Generation Y and propose a mobile services product fitting the best their needs. The topic is approach from both theoretical and practical perspective. Theoretical part proposes a better understanding of researched topic and conducts a deep market analysis. The practical part follows with the research and precise definition of the target group, its buying habits and the major unmet needs.

This diploma thesis deals with the tax reform 2008 in the Czech Republice and its results. The aim is to assess how satisfied fiscal and socio-economic objectives of tax reform in 2008 in the Czech republic. The first chapter focuses on tax reform and tax theory. The second chapter presents a tax reform proposal to set targets. The third chapter focuses on the evaluation of the objectives set.

Submitted by Nadir Basilio (nadirsb@uninove.br) on 2018-04-03T18:33:23Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Sergio Tinoco Cordeiro Filgueiras.pdf: 1542185 bytes, checksum: b59f8efc7c666ea92de17e1ca8a6591f (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-04-03T18:33:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Sergio Tinoco Cordeiro Filgueiras.pdf: 1542185 bytes, checksum: b59f8efc7c666ea92de17e1ca8a6591f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-02-22 / Public management has been going through a process of modernization in Brazil, adopting new techniques. Mechanisms of management have been developed in public projects seeking for improvements in the results so as to meet the demands of the population. The budgetary resources required to accomplish these projects are naturally scarce, aggravated by the current crisis. The manager needs to decide what to do and this decision must be made efficiently, using resources in a rational way so that its application turns out beneficial to the society. One of the instruments used in project management in the public sector is the Annual Budget Law (ABL), based on the multiannual plan. The ABL is the result of a budgetary proposal of the organization that must contain all projects of subsistence, modernization and innovation. The budgetary Proposal, therefore, must be aligned with the organization strategy and the demands of the society. Thus, the selection of the projects that will become part of the proposal represents a relevant step to this direction. Establishing rational criteria to decide, select, or manage is not simple. The choice of a model depends on the people, the environment, type of activity, the objectives and strategies of the organization, among other possibilities. This dissertation project aims to achieve the goal of proposing a method for the selection of projects for the budget proposal in the Federal Justice in São Paulo. To do this, it will apply a qualitative research approach, using a strategy of design science research (DSR). DSR is characterized by the detection of the problem, the construction of an artifact to solve this problem and its dissemination. The artifact of this study is the proposed method and was elaborated by means of survey and interviews with the participants in previous budget processes and research of documents related to the process. Likewise, the criteria to be applied in project selection were generated. The method and criteria were the objects of analysis of an exploratory focus group and another one, confirmatory for validation. The proposed method presents arguments for conference, verification and objective selection of projects, with clear criteria for decision making. Both method and criteria can contribute in practice to other public sector organizations in generating budgets. / A gestão pública vem passando por um processo de modernização no Brasil, com adoção de novas técnicas. Nos projetos públicos são desenvolvidos mecanismos de gestão para melhorar seus resultados com o propósito de prover as demandas da população. Os recursos orçamentários necessários para consecução desses projetos são escassos, naturalmente, agravado com a crise atual. O gestor precisa decidir o que fazer, e essa decisão deve ser feita com eficiência, utilizando os recursos de maneira racional para que sua aplicação seja transformada em benefício à sociedade. Um dos instrumentos utilizado no Judiciário Federal na gestão de projetos é a Lei Orçamentária Anual (LOA), baseada no Plano Plurianual. A LOA é o resultado de uma proposta orçamentária da organização que deve conter todos os projetos de subsistência, modernização e inovação. A proposta orçamentária deve estar, portanto, alinhada à estratégia da organização e às demandas da sociedade. Selecionar bem seus projetos, portanto, representa um passo relevante nessa direção. Estabelecer critérios racionais para decidir, selecionar ou gerir, não é simples, depende das pessoas, do ambiente, do tipo de atividade, dos objetivos e das estratégias da organização, entre outras possibilidades. Esta dissertação propôs um método para a seleção de projetos na proposta orçamentária para a Justiça Federal em São Paulo (JFSP). Para isso, aplicou uma abordagem de pesquisa qualitativa, utilizando uma estratégia de design science research (DSR). O DSR caracteriza-se pela detecção do problema, construção de um artefato para a solução desse problema e sua disseminação. O artefato deste estudo é o método proposto e foi elaborado por meio de questionários, entrevistas com os participantes dos processos orçamentários anteriores e pesquisas em documentos relacionados ao seu processo. Do mesmo modo foram gerados os critérios a serem aplicados na seleção dos projetos. O método e os critérios foram objetos de análise de um focus group exploratório e outro confirmatório para validação. O método proposto apresenta argumentação para conferência, verificação e seleção objetiva dos projetos, com critérios claros para a tomada de decisão. Ambos, método e critérios, podem contribuir na prática com outras organizações do setor público na geração dos orçamentos.

Syftet med studien var att analysera Moderaternas argument till att slopa straffrabatt för unga lagöverträdare. Studien utgick från en kvalitativ metod och använde en argumentationsanalys för att besvara syftet. Moderaternas motion är en offentlig handling och användes som urval. Den teoretiska utgångspunkten i studien var Garlands teori “acting out”. Teorin problematiserar olika politiska strategier. För att undersöka argumenten i motionen applicerades pro et contra-metoden. En teoretisk modell användes vid sammanvägning av argumentens beviskraft. Resultatet i studien visade att argumenten i Moderaternas motion innehöll moraliska värderingar snarare än faktabaserad information. Resultatet visade även att motionen innehöll otydliga motiveringar till att slopa straffrabatt för unga lagöverträdare. Tesen som framförts i motionen var enligt resultatet inte styrkt av de argument som tagits fram. Argumenten lyfte inte fram någon lösning på den problematik som framförts, utan var enbart något som Moderaterna själva ansåg vara mer rättvist. Vidare tolkades det som att Moderaterna argumenterar på ett sätt som ökar medborgarnas förtroende genom att använda känslostyrda formuleringar. För framtida studier rekommenderas det att analysera argument skrivna av andra politiska partier, som diskuterar straffrättsliga åtgärder för unga lagöverträdare. Det kan bidra till bredare perspektiv och förståelse. / The aim of this study was to analyse the Moderate party´s arguments to remove penalty reduction for young offenders. The study was based on a qualitative method and used an argumentation analysis to answer the purpose of this study. The Moderate party´s proposal is a public document and was used as a sample. The theoretical framework in this study was Garlands theory “acting out”. Acting out problematizes different political strategies. To be able to examine the arguments in the proposal we used the pro et contra-method. A theoretical model was used to put together the arguments probative value. The results in the study showed that the arguments in the proposal contained morale values rather than information based on facts. The results also showed that the proposal contained unclear motivations for removing penalty reduction for young offenders. The thesis in the proposal was according to the results not confirmed by the arguments that were brought up. The arguments did not conclude any solutions on the problem that the proposal mentioned. The arguments were solely built on something that the moderate party considered as fair. Moreover, it was interpreted that the Moderate party uses arguments in ways that increases the citizens trust by using sentences based on emotions. For future studies it is recommended to also do analyse arguments on other political parties that discusses criminal proceedings for young offenders. It can contribute to a broader perspective and understanding.