In the frame of the Department of phototrophic organisms -- Algatech, future Center of algal biotechnologies of the Institute of Microbiology AS CR, v. v. i. in Třeboň, the economic effectiveness in the frame of another activity will be analysed. The first vision of this institution will be suggested, the long term goals will be set and a suggestion for reaching these goals will be made.

Public research institutions (PRIs) are tasked with generating new knowledge, as well as adding value to existing knowledge in order to come up with innovations that can contribute to national competitiveness. To this end, government provides discretionary or parliamentary grants to allow the public research institutions to execute their mandates by carrying out exploratory activities and exploitative activities in research and development.The study aimed to establish the role of the parliamentary grant in supporting the research and development endeavours of a public research institute, with a particular focus on the management of exploration and exploitation tensions in investing the parliamentary grant. The sustainability of the PRI was sus assessed using operating profits as a proxy. The relationships between levels of investment in exploratory and exploitative actives were assessed, as was the role of the innovation system in influencing the sustainability of the PRI. We use the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) the largest scientific research entity in South Africa, and its operational units as a case study.Consistent with information that is available in the literature, the data from this study shows that the discretionary grant plays a critical role as a funding stream for public research institutes, contributing to the effective execution of research and development activities of the entity. The discretionary grant is key in seeding new national competencies, and is a key initial investment in enabling the PRI to establish itself, generate outputs and outcomes that herald its competencies and thus position itself to earn other forms of income.The discretionary grant is invested for exploratory and exploitive activities. Exploratory activities generate new knowledge, which is necessary for competitiveness. Exploitative activities utilise existing knowledge to provide innovations that find utility in industries and the public sector. The manner in which the investment is split between exploration and exploitation was shown to be critical to the long term sustainability of the enterprise. Skewing investment in either exploration or exploitation alone is detrimental to sustainability.The optimal split of the discretionary grant between exploration and exploitation was found to be dependent on several factors, to include, the technology bases of the industries in which the entity operates and the connectivity and paths of knowledge flow in the innovation systems nationally and globally.Inability to earn other forms of income is in itself a threat to the long term sustainability, particularly in fiscally constrained environments that are typical of emerging economies. The ability to earn external income provides options for investment of the PG in building its capability base. Notable here is the fact that the absorptive capacity of the industry sector in the first place, the innovation system in which the entity operates and the connectedness of the entity within the system appear to have important influences on ability to earn other forms of income. In such cases, strategic decisions have to be made on whether the sector remains strategic enough for the country in deciding on continued investment.While the information derived from this study is very specific to the CSIR, a combination of the data and information in the literature provides insights that are applicable to other public research institutes, particularly in developing economies. / Dissertation (MBA)--University of Pretoria, 2012. / Gordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS) / unrestricted

Partant d’un manque de consensus académique quant à l’efficacité des différents dispositifs de soutien à l’innovation, cette thèse s’intéresse aux politiques de financement de la R&D dans un contexte où les entreprises peuvent coordonner leurs effortsde R&D et se rapprocher d’un secteur public de la recherche. Dans une première partie, nous présentons des éléments de la littérature économique sur les mesures incitatives de promotion de la R&D. Nous choisissons par ailleurs de contextualiser notre approche autour de la politique des pôles de compétitivité menée en France. Dans une seconde partie, nous proposons une modélisation théorique originale, à même d’étudier conjointement trois instruments publics de soutien à la R&D : encouragement aux stratégies coopératives de R&D, soutien financier à la R&D privée et soutien financier au secteur public de la recherche. Nos résultats théoriques nous permettent ainsi de proposer plusieurs recommandations de politique publique. Premièrement, nous mettons en avant le rejet de tout effet d’éviction de l’intervention publique sur les activités privées de recherche. Nous montrons également qu’une politique de financement d’un secteur public de la recherche peut représenter unealternative efficace à la politique visant à soutenir la R&D privée, sous condition que la recherche publique génère d’importants effets de débordement. Enfin, la répartition optimale du budget public destiné au soutien à l’innovation s’avère êtreplus généreuse envers le secteur public à mesure que les entreprises privées se situent à proximité de l’acteur public de la recherche. A l’inverse, le soutien public à l’innovation doit se faire davantage en faveur des entreprises privées à mesure que ces dernières sont soumises à une concurrence forte et à des difficultés d’appropriation de leur recherche. / Observing a lack of academic consensus about R&D public supports efficaciency, we focus on public R&D funding policies by considering R&D cooperation and proximity between firms and a public research sector. In a first way, we introduce how economic literature studies incentives to promote R&D efforts. In addition, we decide to illustrate our theorotical approach through french cluster policy called « politique des pôles de compétitivité ». In a second way, we develop an original theorotical modelisation able to evaluate the efficacity of three public instruments that promote R&D efforts and innovation : promote R&D cooperation, subsidizing private R&D sector and funding to public research sector. Our theorotical results lead us to make some recommandations to the policy makers. First, we conclude to an additionality effect of public policies on R&D efforts, that means we reject all crowding-out effect of public intervention. Moreover, we show that funding a public research sector (SPU policy) leads to better performance than the policy consisting to subsidize private R&D efforts (SPR policy) but only if the level of public spillovers is strong enough. Then, about the distribution of public fundings between public and private sector (SPM policy), we conclude that the proportion allocated to private sector always increases with the level of inter-firm spillovers and with the concentration of the industry if and only if the level of inter-firm spillovers is high enough. In the opposite, this proportion allocated to private sector decreases with the level of public knowledge externalities to the private sector, due to a closer proximity between public and private bodies, regardless of whether firms cooperate or not in R&D.

<p>This thesis investigates, describes and understands the extensive process of technology commercialization. What stages there are, important aspects and implications. It is structured as a case analysis of project CHRISGAS development. CHRISGAS is a Swedish project, based in Värnamo, developing the technique of direct gasification of biomass to fuels.</p><p>The work has its origin in the debate of the imminent climate changes, where society needs to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels. The automotive sector (particularly transport) is significantly reliant. However, current attempts to transition to biofuels have not completely succeeded. New, efficient technologies must be commercialized, and the technology of wood gasification is said to be particularly promising for launching the next generation of biofuels.</p>

The public's demand for accountability will have a significant impact on research universities' revenue resources in the future. Driving the demand is a perceived lack of institutional productivity. Undergraduate students' graduation rates represent one product of public research universities. States have already latched onto these rates as a measure of institutional performance; and as a result, states have provided a basis for public research universities to use the relationship between dollars invested in the institution and undergraduate students' graduation rates to respond to accountability issues. Current research provides little insight into this relationship. Research in this study uses concepts from the higher education production function, the resource dependency theory, and the Principal-Agent Model to investigate undergraduate students' four-year and six-year graduation rates as an institutional product. The research provides a greater degree of transparency into the relationship between dollars invested in public research universities and undergraduate students' graduation rates than has previously been shown. As a result of this relationship analysis, the research enables the development of a model for predicting undergraduate student graduation rates relative to dollars invested in the institution from different sources.

Mundialmente a inovação é um dos principais assuntos das agendas políticas e econômicas. Por meio da inovação, as empresas adquirem vantagens competitivas sustentáveis, e alavanca o desenvolvimento econômico do país ou de sua região. A fim de minimizar os custos e adaptar as exigências do mercado interno e externo, a participação do instituto público de pesquisa (IPP) é fundamental para dar mais agilidade no desenvolvimento de novos produtos e processos, pois foca na pesquisa aplicada. Assim, uma integração harmônica deveria ocorrer entre o setor produtivo e o IPP, porém há entraves contratuais e burocráticos que podem, inclusive, prejudicar um projeto de inovação entre estes entes. A partir do problema apresentado, surge a questão: como negociar os aspectos da formalização da transferência de tecnologia por meio de um instrumento contratual entre o IPP e o setor produtivo? Para tanto, este trabalho faz uma revisão bibliográfica sobre a pesquisa, definição e características do IPP, a transferência de tecnologia e os aspectos de propriedade intelectual, bem como a negociação contratual. Propõe a revisitar o conceito de transferência de tecnologia, das suas formas de contratação, bem como da propriedade intelectual e dos aspectos pertinentes na negociação dos instrumentos contratuais. A metodologia de pesquisa utilizada foi de estudo exploratório e qualitativo com estratégia de pesquisa de casos em 04 (quatro) IPPs de países localizados na América Latina, do Brasil, México e Uruguai. Verificou-se que em todos os IPPs são negociados caso a caso os aspectos de propriedade industrial que incidem nos contratos de transferência de tecnologia, porém diferem em razão da legislação de seu país ou de suas diretrizes institucionais. Recomenda-se para trabalhos futuros a ampliação deste escopo para os demais IPPs localizados nos países que compõem a América Latina, bem como nos Estados Unidos, Japão, e Europa, a fim de aprimorar a negociação dos aspectos, tornando mais ágil a contratação dos IPPs junto ao setor produtivo. / Innovation is one of the main issues of political and economic globally agendas. Through innovation, companies acquire sustainable competitive advantages, and leverage the economic development of the country or its region. In order to minimize costs and adapt the requirements of the internal and external market, the participation of the public research institute (PRI) is fundamental to give more agility in the development of new products and processes, as it focuses on applied research. Thus, a harmonic integration should occur between the productive sector and the PRI, however there are contractual and bureaucratic barriers that can even harm an innovation project between these ones. From the problem presented, the question arises: how to negotiate aspects of formal technology transfer through a contractual instrument between the PRI and the productive sector? To do so, this work makes a bibliographic review about research, definition and characteristics of PRI, technology transfer and intellectual property aspects, as well as contractual negotiation. Proposes to revisit the concept of technology transfer, its forms of hiring, as well as intellectual property rights and relevant aspects in the negotiation of contractual instruments. The research methodology used was an exploratory and qualitative study with a strategy to investigate cases in four (4) PRIs from countries located in Latin America, such Brazil, Mexico and Uruguay. It has been found that in all PRIs negotiate case-by-case aspects of industrial property that deal with technology transfer contracts, but differ according to the legislation of their country or their institutional guidelines. It is recommended to further work of this scope enlargement to others PRIs located in others Latin America countries, as well as in the United States, Japan and Europe, in order to improve the trading aspects, making it more agile hiring of PRIs by productive sector.

Este trabalho investiga os projetos cooperativos de pesquisa coordenados por institutos públicos de pesquisa tecnológica (IPPs), com a participação de universidades, empresas e outros agentes do sistema de inovação. Considera-se que estas iniciativas possam ser um mecanismo para promover e acelerar a produção de inovações tecnológicas avançadas, tanto por permitir a reunião de diferentes e complementares capacitações, como por possibilitar a alavancagem de recursos financeiros. Nestes projetos, os IPPs têm aproveitado sua experiência em atividades nas fases intermediárias do processo de inovação para assumir o desafio de reunir os conhecimentos das ciências básicas e aplicadas, produzidos nas universidades, às suas capacitações tecnológicas, e aos conhecimentos das firmas sobre a produção e os seus negócios, com o objetivo de oferecer novas tecnologias para o mercado. Este trabalho também realiza um levantamento sobre as características dos IPPs e as formas como estas instituições têm se relacionado com as universidades e empresas. Para uma análise mais aprofundada destas experiências, foram selecionados três casos para a pesquisa de campo: o Fraunhofer Innovation Clusters, programa coordenado pelos Institutos Fraunhofer, na Alemanha, que apoia o desenvolvimento de projetos cooperativos entre agentes pertencentes a uma mesma região; o National Flagship Program, coordenado pela Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), na Austrália; e por fim, os projetos Mobile Harbour e Online Electric Vehicle (OLEV), coordenados pelo Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), na Coreia do Sul. A decisão de apresentar a experiência do KAIST, apesar da instituição ser uma universidade, deve-se ao fato de esta ser enriquecedora para os propósitos deste trabalho. Os casos estudados indicaram o elevado investimento público destas iniciativas. As equipes destas instituições também mostraram que a qualidade das pesquisas é o ponto de partida para que as empresas queiram cooperar com os IPPs. Em seguida, os pesquisadores apontaram a relevância da capacidade de gestão dos projetos pelas equipes dos IPPs. Os casos apresentados tornaram evidente que gerar inovação pressupõe a capacidade de administrar os diversos assuntos que poderão afetar a adoção das tecnologias e que as empresas podem contribuir nestes processos. As experiências indicaram também que as universidades têm participado nos projetos, solucionando problemas científicos que impedem o desenvolvimento das tecnologias. Os resultados mostram que estas iniciativas têm contribuído para a produção de inovação para seus países. / This thesis investigates cooperative research coordinated by public research institutes (PRIs), with participation of universities, companies and other agents of the innovation system. It is considered that these initiatives may be a mechanism to promote and accelerate the development of advanced technological innovations, both by allowing the gathering of different and complementary capabilities, such as by allowing the leveraging of financial resources. In order to develop these projects, PRIs are assuming the challenge of joining the university basic and applied knowledge with their technological capabilities and the firms product development knowledge to propose high market value technologies. It is also identified some PRI characteristics and the ways these institutions have been working with universities and companies. For a more detailed analysis of their experiences, three cases were selected for field research: the Fraunhofer Innovation Clusters, a program coordinated by the Fraunhofer Institutes in Germany, which supports the development of cooperative projects between agents belonging to the same regions; the National Flagship Program, coordinated by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), in Australia; and finally, the Mobile Harbour and Online Electric Vehicle (OLEV) projects, coordinated by the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), in South Korea. The intention of presenting the KAIST experience is due to the fact that this may contribute to the purposes of this study, although it is a university. Cases studied indicated the high level of public investment in these initiatives. These institutions have also pointed the research quality as the starting point for cooperation with industry. Then, it was emphasised the ability of PRI members in project management. Experiences clarified that producing innovation requires the ability of managing various issues that may affect the adoption of technologies. It was also pointed that companies can contribute to these processes. These cases also showed that universities are participating by solving scientific problems that hinder the technology development. Conclusions are that these PRI initiatives are managing to contribute to produce relevant innovation to their countries.

The business network that is linked to flexibility, aggressiveness and strategy has become increasingly important in recent years. Several studies suggest that such networks potentially have a profound impact on firm performance, including Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). The role of SMEs in enhancing global and local economic growth is undeniable, particularly in the context of developing countries such as Malaysia. Although numerous researches have been conducted in this field, the majority of them limit their focus to the relationship between firm capabilities (i.e. innovation and dynamic capabilities) and firm performance in specific industries. Research on the synergy impact of business networks, innovation and dynamic capabilities on SME performance remains scarce. This has become a significant gap, which this research seeks to address. This research investigates the roles of dynamic capabilities and innovation capabilities as a moderator and mediator in the relationship between business networks and firm performance, based on the model developed from the concepts of the Resource Base View (RBV) and Dynamic Capability (DC) theories. The model was justified through the Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) technique using AMOS version 23. Taking Malaysia as a research context, the model was tested against a total of 463 SMEs across different industries and categories (i.e. micro, small, and medium SMEs) through face-to-face surveys with 130 owners, 41 CEOs, 79 managers and 213 executives. This study presents five important findings: (1) there exists no direct relationship between business network and firm performance; (2) there exists a direct relationship between innovation, dynamic capabilities and firm performance; (3) the existence of the relationship between business network and firm performance is conditioned by innovation capabilities; (4) dynamic capabilities do not moderate the relationship between business network and firm performance; however (5) dynamic capabilities moderate the relationship between business networks and innovation capabilities. To conclude, the synergy of business networks, innovation capabilities and dynamic capabilities will significantly affect SME performance. This implies that SME performance will not be affected by the business network, as a single variable. The research offers three key contributions. Firstly, it enhances our understanding of the important synergies between business networks, innovation capabilities and dynamic capabilities in elevating SME firm performance. Second, the findings provide a new perspective on how the application of RBV and DC theories can be used as a conceptual lens to analyse the factors affecting SME performance. Lastly, the result signposts practical approaches for SME decision-makers by providing assistance to boost firm performance.

This thesis investigates, describes and understands the extensive process of technology commercialization. What stages there are, important aspects and implications. It is structured as a case analysis of project CHRISGAS development. CHRISGAS is a Swedish project, based in Värnamo, developing the technique of direct gasification of biomass to fuels. The work has its origin in the debate of the imminent climate changes, where society needs to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels. The automotive sector (particularly transport) is significantly reliant. However, current attempts to transition to biofuels have not completely succeeded. New, efficient technologies must be commercialized, and the technology of wood gasification is said to be particularly promising for launching the next generation of biofuels.

Este trabalho investiga os projetos cooperativos de pesquisa coordenados por institutos públicos de pesquisa tecnológica (IPPs), com a participação de universidades, empresas e outros agentes do sistema de inovação. Considera-se que estas iniciativas possam ser um mecanismo para promover e acelerar a produção de inovações tecnológicas avançadas, tanto por permitir a reunião de diferentes e complementares capacitações, como por possibilitar a alavancagem de recursos financeiros. Nestes projetos, os IPPs têm aproveitado sua experiência em atividades nas fases intermediárias do processo de inovação para assumir o desafio de reunir os conhecimentos das ciências básicas e aplicadas, produzidos nas universidades, às suas capacitações tecnológicas, e aos conhecimentos das firmas sobre a produção e os seus negócios, com o objetivo de oferecer novas tecnologias para o mercado. Este trabalho também realiza um levantamento sobre as características dos IPPs e as formas como estas instituições têm se relacionado com as universidades e empresas. Para uma análise mais aprofundada destas experiências, foram selecionados três casos para a pesquisa de campo: o Fraunhofer Innovation Clusters, programa coordenado pelos Institutos Fraunhofer, na Alemanha, que apoia o desenvolvimento de projetos cooperativos entre agentes pertencentes a uma mesma região; o National Flagship Program, coordenado pela Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), na Austrália; e por fim, os projetos Mobile Harbour e Online Electric Vehicle (OLEV), coordenados pelo Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), na Coreia do Sul. A decisão de apresentar a experiência do KAIST, apesar da instituição ser uma universidade, deve-se ao fato de esta ser enriquecedora para os propósitos deste trabalho. Os casos estudados indicaram o elevado investimento público destas iniciativas. As equipes destas instituições também mostraram que a qualidade das pesquisas é o ponto de partida para que as empresas queiram cooperar com os IPPs. Em seguida, os pesquisadores apontaram a relevância da capacidade de gestão dos projetos pelas equipes dos IPPs. Os casos apresentados tornaram evidente que gerar inovação pressupõe a capacidade de administrar os diversos assuntos que poderão afetar a adoção das tecnologias e que as empresas podem contribuir nestes processos. As experiências indicaram também que as universidades têm participado nos projetos, solucionando problemas científicos que impedem o desenvolvimento das tecnologias. Os resultados mostram que estas iniciativas têm contribuído para a produção de inovação para seus países. / This thesis investigates cooperative research coordinated by public research institutes (PRIs), with participation of universities, companies and other agents of the innovation system. It is considered that these initiatives may be a mechanism to promote and accelerate the development of advanced technological innovations, both by allowing the gathering of different and complementary capabilities, such as by allowing the leveraging of financial resources. In order to develop these projects, PRIs are assuming the challenge of joining the university basic and applied knowledge with their technological capabilities and the firms product development knowledge to propose high market value technologies. It is also identified some PRI characteristics and the ways these institutions have been working with universities and companies. For a more detailed analysis of their experiences, three cases were selected for field research: the Fraunhofer Innovation Clusters, a program coordinated by the Fraunhofer Institutes in Germany, which supports the development of cooperative projects between agents belonging to the same regions; the National Flagship Program, coordinated by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), in Australia; and finally, the Mobile Harbour and Online Electric Vehicle (OLEV) projects, coordinated by the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), in South Korea. The intention of presenting the KAIST experience is due to the fact that this may contribute to the purposes of this study, although it is a university. Cases studied indicated the high level of public investment in these initiatives. These institutions have also pointed the research quality as the starting point for cooperation with industry. Then, it was emphasised the ability of PRI members in project management. Experiences clarified that producing innovation requires the ability of managing various issues that may affect the adoption of technologies. It was also pointed that companies can contribute to these processes. These cases also showed that universities are participating by solving scientific problems that hinder the technology development. Conclusions are that these PRI initiatives are managing to contribute to produce relevant innovation to their countries.