The buildings that are designed according to the building codes generally perform well at severe performance objectives (like life safety) under high earthquake hazard levels. However, the building performance at low performance objectives (like immediate occupancy) under low earthquake hazards is uncertain. The motivation of this research is to modify the design and detailing rules to make the traditional systems perform better at multi-level hazards. This research introduces two new structural steel systems: hybrid Buckling Restrained Braced Frames (BRBF) and hybrid steel Moment Frames (MF). The "hybrid" term for the BRBF system comes from the use of different steel material including carbon steel (A36), high-performance steel (HPS) and low yield point (LYP) steel. The hybridity of the moment frames is related to the sequence in the plastification of the system which is provided by using weaker and stronger girder sections. Alternative moment frame connections incorporating the use of LYP steel plates are also investigated. The hybrid BRBF approach was evaluated on seventeen regular (standard) frames with different story heights, seismic design categories and building plans. By varying the steel areas and materials in the BRB cores, three hybrid BRBFs were developed for each regular (standard) frame and their behavior was compared against each other through pushover and incremental dynamic analyses. The benefits of the hybridity were presented using different damage measures such as story accelerations, interstory drifts, and residual displacements. Collapse performance evaluation was also provided. The performance of hybrid moment frames was investigated on a design space including forty-two moment frame archetypes. Two different hybrid combinations were implemented in the designs with different column sections and different strong column-weak beam (SC/WB) ratios. The efficiency of the hybrid moment frame in which only the girder sizes were changed to control the plastification was compared with regular moment frame designs with higher SC/WB ratios. As side studies, the effect of shallow and deep column sections and SC/WB ratios on the moment frame behavior were also investigated.   In order to provide adequate ductility in the reduced capacity bays with special detailing, alternative hybrid moment frame connections adapting the use of low strength steel were also studied. / PhD

N/A

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Controlled Rocking Steel Braced Frames (CRSBFs) have been developed as a high-performance structural solution to resist seismic forces, due to their ability to minimize structural damage and self-centre the structure back to its original position after an earthquake. A CRSBF is intentionally allowed to uplift and rock on its foundation, which acts as the nonlinear mechanism for the system rather than member yielding and buckling. While the CRSBF is in the rocking phase, the response of the system is controlled by prestressing which anchors the frame to the foundation and energy dissipation devices which are engaged by uplift. Although CRSBFs have shown promising structural performance, an assessment of the overall effectiveness of this system must also consider the performance of nonstructural components which have a significant impact on the safety and economic performance of the system. The purpose of this thesis is to compare the performance of nonstructural components in buildings with CRSBFs to their performance in a conventional codified system such as a buckling restrained braced frame (BRBF), while also investigating which design parameters influence nonstructural component demands in CRSBFs. The responses of various types of nonstructural components, including anchored components, stocky unanchored components that slide, and slender unanchored components that rock, are determined using a cascading analysis approach where absolute floor accelerations generated from nonlinear time-history analyses of each structural system are used as input for computing the responses of nonstructural components. The results show that the trade-off of maintaining elastic behaviour of the CRSBF members is, in general, larger demands on nonstructural components compared to the BRBF system. The results also show that the stiffness of the frame and vibration of the frame in its elastic higher modes are the main influencers for nonstructural component demands in buildings with CRSBFs, while energy dissipation has a minimal impact. / Thesis / Master of Applied Science (MASc) / Controlled Rocking Steel Braced Frames (CRSBFs) have been proposed as a high-performance structural system that resists earthquake forces on buildings. This system has the ability to minimize damage to structural members and self-centre the building back to its original position after an earthquake, two characteristics that are typically not achieved by current conventional systems. However, an assessment of the CRSBF’s overall effectiveness cannot be limited to the consideration of only the structural skeleton, as the performance of nonstructural components (e.g. architectural elements, mechanical and electrical equipment, furnishings, and building contents) that are not part of the structural skeleton can have a significant impact on the safety and economic performance of earthquake resisting systems. This thesis compares the demands on nonstructural components in buildings with CRSBFs to their demands in a more conventional system during earthquake motions. The results show that the trade-off for avoiding damage to structural members in the CRSBFs is often higher demands on the nonstructural components.

No / This paper presents the results of a simulation study of 10 fire tests on restrained steel beam–column assemblies using five different types of joints: fin plate, flexible endplate, flush endplate, web cleat and extended endplate. This paper will provide details of the simulation methodology for achieving numerical stability and faithful representation of detailed structural behaviour, and compare the simulation and experimental results, including joint failure modes, measured beam axial forces and beam mid-span deflections. Good agreement between ABAQUS simulations and experimental observations confirms that the finite element models developed through the ABAQUS/Standard solver are suitable for predicting the structural fire behaviour of restrained structural assemblies with realistic steel joints undergoing different phases of behaviour in fire, including restrained thermal expansion and catenary action in the beams. The validated model may be used to conduct numerical parametric studies to generate theoretical data to help develop detailed understanding of steel joint behaviour and their effects on robustness of steel framed structures in fire.