Each of the fifty U.S. state constitutions establishes a fundamental framework for governmental operations within the state. Described by previous scholarship as the state's political technology, state constitutions delineate formal gubernatorial and legislative authority. Extant literature has focused on gubernatorial and legislative relations from the standpoint of the contemporary contextual political factors associated with individuals serving in the respective offices. Although useful, this focus limits a deeper understanding about how state constitutions, as a point of departure, might affect the way in which governors and legislators interact in the policy process. Specifically examined by this research is how variation in design might impact the ability of governors and state legislatures to achieve preferred policy alternatives. This is addressed through the divergence between the governor's proposed budget and the state legislature's enacted budget. To analyze potential influences of this divergence, state budgets from 27 U.S. states over a recent period of eleven years were collected and coded according to policy areas. Data were used to test hypothesized effects of state constitutional design of formal authority. Based on Tobit model estimation and predicted values of divergence derived from alternative constitutional design scenarios, some state constitutional factors affect the ability of governors and state legislatures to achieve preferred policy alternatives. Salient constitutional variables include gubernatorial and legislative budget authority, institutional control, and duration in service factors. The empirical focus of this research contributes to a more enriched understanding of state constitutions as political technologies. In essence, the design of state constitutional authority has the potential to affect how governors and state legislatures interact in the policy process. In addition to contributing to state constitutional theory, these findings enrich the understanding of the design of authority by reformers and citizens. / Ph. D.

Comparatively few studies have explored how variations in state governing institutions influence voting behavior. Utilizing lower chamber state legislative election returns from the years 2000 through 2010, and the 2002 through 2010 GSS data series, this dissertation focuses on how US state legislatures influence voting behavior and political attitudes of the American electorate. Specifically, this research takes on a comparative approach and illustrates how institutional differences in the size, capacity, and composition of the US state legislatures affect the electorates’ propensity to vote and how politically efficacious people feel.

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / O presente trabalho examina as razões dos procedimentos de urgência nos projetos do Executivo junto à Assembléia Legislativa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul entre 1999-2006. Para tal, o texto discute os fundamentos e algumas implicações de teorias sobre a organização legislativa, especialmente as vertentes partidária e informacional, situando, primeiramente, o debate sobre a política regional gaúcha e as relações Executivo-Legislativo no âmbito subnacional brasileiro. O objetivo do estudo é analisar a rationale dos procedimentos de urgência utilizados pelo Governador, unilateralmente, e pelo próprio Legislativo, através de seu Colégio de Líderes, para acelerar a tramitação dos projetos do Executivo, retirando a matéria das Comissões permanentes antes da aprovação de parecer. Empiricamente, a pesquisa investiga se a presença de cartéis legislativos e a distância das preferências do Governo em relação às do mediano do Plenário da Assembléia têm efeitos sobre as chances de utilização de tais procedimentos. Assim, avalia a possibilidade de conjugação da teoria partidária com problemas informacionais para a análise do processo decisório legislativo no âmbito subnacional. O exame conclui que tanto a urgência governamental quanto o acordo de lideranças possuem padrões distintos apresentando resultados diversos que dependem do tamanho das forças políticas e da distribuição de preferências, figurando as instituições como fatores intervenientes, de modo que tais procedimentos obedecem a uma lógica partidária, mas colocada diante de problemas informacionais / This paper examines the reasons of the urgency procedures in the Executive bills at the state legislature of Rio Grande do Sul from 1999-2006. To this end, the text discusses the fundamentals and some implications of theories on legislative organization, especially partisan and informational aspects, placing first the debate on regional politics and Executive- Legislative relationship at subnational scope. The goal is to analyze the rationale of the urgency procedures used by the Governor unilaterally and by the Legislature, through partisan leaders, to accelerate the conduct of executive bills, removing them from committees before approving reports. Empirically, the research investigates whether the presence of legislative cartels and Government distance of preferences in relation to the median of the floor Assembly have effects on the odds of using such procedures. Thus, it evaluates the possibility of combining partisan theory with informational problems for the analysis of legislative decision-making at subnational levels. It concludes that both the gubernatorial urgency procedure and the leaderss agreement have distinct patterns showing different results depending on the size of political forces and the distribution of preferences, with the institutions figuring as intervenient factors, so that such procedures follow a partisan logic, but placed in front of informational problems

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / O presente trabalho examina as razões dos procedimentos de urgência nos projetos do Executivo junto à Assembléia Legislativa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul entre 1999-2006. Para tal, o texto discute os fundamentos e algumas implicações de teorias sobre a organização legislativa, especialmente as vertentes partidária e informacional, situando, primeiramente, o debate sobre a política regional gaúcha e as relações Executivo-Legislativo no âmbito subnacional brasileiro. O objetivo do estudo é analisar a rationale dos procedimentos de urgência utilizados pelo Governador, unilateralmente, e pelo próprio Legislativo, através de seu Colégio de Líderes, para acelerar a tramitação dos projetos do Executivo, retirando a matéria das Comissões permanentes antes da aprovação de parecer. Empiricamente, a pesquisa investiga se a presença de cartéis legislativos e a distância das preferências do Governo em relação às do mediano do Plenário da Assembléia têm efeitos sobre as chances de utilização de tais procedimentos. Assim, avalia a possibilidade de conjugação da teoria partidária com problemas informacionais para a análise do processo decisório legislativo no âmbito subnacional. O exame conclui que tanto a urgência governamental quanto o acordo de lideranças possuem padrões distintos apresentando resultados diversos que dependem do tamanho das forças políticas e da distribuição de preferências, figurando as instituições como fatores intervenientes, de modo que tais procedimentos obedecem a uma lógica partidária, mas colocada diante de problemas informacionais / This paper examines the reasons of the urgency procedures in the Executive bills at the state legislature of Rio Grande do Sul from 1999-2006. To this end, the text discusses the fundamentals and some implications of theories on legislative organization, especially partisan and informational aspects, placing first the debate on regional politics and Executive- Legislative relationship at subnational scope. The goal is to analyze the rationale of the urgency procedures used by the Governor unilaterally and by the Legislature, through partisan leaders, to accelerate the conduct of executive bills, removing them from committees before approving reports. Empirically, the research investigates whether the presence of legislative cartels and Government distance of preferences in relation to the median of the floor Assembly have effects on the odds of using such procedures. Thus, it evaluates the possibility of combining partisan theory with informational problems for the analysis of legislative decision-making at subnational levels. It concludes that both the gubernatorial urgency procedure and the leaderss agreement have distinct patterns showing different results depending on the size of political forces and the distribution of preferences, with the institutions figuring as intervenient factors, so that such procedures follow a partisan logic, but placed in front of informational problems

In this dissertation I systematically examine African-American and Latino legislator behavior in a legislative setting. The project specifically examines whether and how minority legislators represent and influence African American and Latino policy interests during the legislative process. I perform an analysis of minority legislator participation rates on bills and develop an original measure of substantive representation using patterns in legislative speech of state representatives’ language during committee hearings. I build on existing theory in the representation literature and offer new hypotheses for expanding the scope of how substantive representation is defined and investigated, namely through an empirical investigation of the link between deliberation and descriptive representation. Second, I collect an original data set and develop an original measure of substantive representation to test these hypotheses with participation rates and a linguistic frame based content analysis approach of minority and non-minority representatives’ language on bills for racial perspectives during state legislative committee hearings on several policy issue areas including, but not limited to education, healthcare, and immigration. Third, I offer a critical test of hypotheses to test whether African American and Latino representatives’ (1) participate more when the legislation is deemed minority interest in comparison to their non-minority counterparts? (2) their behavior (or deliberation style) is different from non-minority legislators? (3) impact the deliberation style of non-minority legislators? The analysis draws on original data collected through committee hearing tapes and online video archives of Texas committee hearings in multiple policy areas, and the findings indicate that minority legislators do indeed provide a voice for minority constituents, providing more minority interest language on minority interest bills in comparison to their non-minority colleagues, especially when the legislation is threatening to minority populations. These results support the argument that minority legislators do indeed substantively represent minority constituents at levels greater than non-minority representatives during the legislative process.

In this dissertation I systematically examine African-American and Latino legislator behavior in a legislative setting. The project specifically examines whether and how minority legislators represent and influence African American and Latino policy interests during the legislative process. I perform an analysis of minority legislator participation rates on bills and develop an original measure of substantive representation using patterns in legislative speech of state representatives’ language during committee hearings. I build on existing theory in the representation literature and offer new hypotheses for expanding the scope of how substantive representation is defined and investigated, namely through an empirical investigation of the link between deliberation and descriptive representation. Second, I collect an original data set and develop an original measure of substantive representation to test these hypotheses with participation rates and a linguistic frame based content analysis approach of minority and non-minority representatives’ language on bills for racial perspectives during state legislative committee hearings on several policy issue areas including, but not limited to education, healthcare, and immigration. Third, I offer a critical test of hypotheses to test whether African American and Latino representatives’ (1) participate more when the legislation is deemed minority interest in comparison to their non-minority counterparts? (2) their behavior (or deliberation style) is different from non-minority legislators? (3) impact the deliberation style of non-minority legislators? The analysis draws on original data collected through committee hearing tapes and online video archives of Texas committee hearings in multiple policy areas, and the findings indicate that minority legislators do indeed provide a voice for minority constituents, providing more minority interest language on minority interest bills in comparison to their non-minority colleagues, especially when the legislation is threatening to minority populations. These results support the argument that minority legislators do indeed substantively represent minority constituents at levels greater than non-minority representatives during the legislative process.

Made available in DSpace on 2010-04-20T20:49:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 3 61770.pdf.jpg: 10662 bytes, checksum: 5d51af05b4de1da9a6071f2deac97110 (MD5) 61770.pdf: 1756077 bytes, checksum: 3def4ef9ba4ec0574d2884b60b37258f (MD5) 61770.pdf.txt: 589936 bytes, checksum: 6b29df295a97461f10ca89d588bf63df (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-10-09T00:00:00Z / This dissertation aims to assess the effect of institutional variations in Executive-Legislative relations over policies in Brazilian states. It analyses Legislative institutions, governor’s agenda and leadership, and government coalitions. The first part of the text is based on scholarship on American state legislatures and the Brazilian Congress, to estimate the best approaches to assess the institutional diversity on the ability to legislate and to oversight the Executive on Brazilian state legislatures. Subsequently, it is performed case studies concerning the state legislatures from Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul and São Paulo and their participation on State reform policies, the main issue on gubernatorial agenda for the studied interval. Finally, it concludes that, institutions, although important, are incomplete to explain how the political process for policy-making occur in Brazilian states. / Este trabalho tem como objetivo estudar os impactos das variações institucionais nas relações Executivo-Legislativo nos estados sobre as políticas públicas neles implementadas. Para isso, analisa as instituições, com foco no Poder Legislativo, a agenda do governador, sua liderança política e as coalizões de apoio. Inicialmente é feita uma discussão sobre os instrumentos analíticos disponíveis para os estudos legislativos e sua utilização para a compreensão de processos políticos no contexto brasileiro. Em seguida, com base em estudos sobre a Câmara dos Deputados brasileira e sobre os legislativos estaduais norte-americanos, são selecionados os recortes mais aplicáveis para se captar a diversidade institucional nos estados brasileiros, especialmente no que se refere à sua capacidade legislativa e fiscalizadora. Posteriormente, são elaborados estudos de caso com os estados de Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul e São Paulo na implantação de programas de Reforma do Estado, o principal item da agenda no período estudado. Conclui-se que as instituições, embora importantes, são insuficientes para explicar como se dão os processos políticos para a implementação de políticas públicas nos estados brasileiros.

Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) / Prior studies on state legislative elections have found gubernatorial coattails playing a key role; however, they fail to examine the temporal and state-based trends of this phenomena. Using precinct level data from nine states (Alabama, Arkansas, California, Minnesota, New York, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, and Wyoming), over two election cycles (2002 and 2006), I measure the importance a state’s ideological makeup, and a governor’s institutional powers has on gubernatorial coattails. Findings reaffirm the importance of coattails, and previously researched variables; however, the addition of the above measures greatly affects coattail strength, dependent on host of controlling factors.