No description available.

No description available.

Legislative committee meetings are an integral part of the lawmaking process for local and state bills. The testimony presented during these meetings is a large factor in the outcome of the proposed bill. This research uses Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning techniques to analyze testimonies from California Legislative committee meetings from 2015-2016 in order to identify what aspects of a testimony makes it successful. A testimony is considered successful if the alignment of the testimony matches the bill outcome (alignment is "For" and the bill passes or alignment is "Against" and the bill fails). The process of finding what makes a testimony successful was accomplished through data filtration, feature extraction, implementation of classification models, and feature analysis. Several features were extracted and tested to find those that had the greatest impact on the bill outcome. The features chosen provided information on the sentence complexity and type of words used (adjective, verb, nouns) for each testimony. Additionally all the testimonies were analyzed to find common phrases used within successful testimonies. Two types of classification models were implemented: ones that used the manually extracted feature as input and ones that used their own feature extraction process. The results from the classification models and feature analysis show that certain aspects within a testimony such as sentence complexity and using specific phrases significantly impact the bill outcome. The most successful models, Support Vector Machine and Multinomial Naive Bayes, achieved an accuracy of 91.79\% and 91.22\% respectively

Une maladie est considérée comme étant rare si elle touche moins d’une personne sur 2000. Étant donné les connaissances limitées sur ces conditions médicales, les adultes atteints de maladies rares peinent à être diagnostiqués rapidement et à obtenir des traitements appropriés. Ces soins inadéquats leur occasionnent des difficultés importantes dans le milieu de la santé, leurs vies quotidiennes, leurs relations interpersonnelles ainsi que leurs carrières et leurs études. Plusieurs de ces difficultés peuvent être qualifiées de situations moralement problématiques selon l’éthique pragmatiste. L’éthique pragmatiste est une théorie en éthique qui reconnaît la place centrale de la moralité dans la vie humaine. Elle souligne l’importance existentielle de ces situations pour les personnes qui les vivent. Elle apprécie leur agentivité. Elle leur offre des outils pour mieux comprendre ces situations et les résoudre. Malgré la signification qu’ont ces situations pour les personnes qui les vivent, elles n’ont pas été étudiées précédemment. En parallèle, le concept de situation moralement problématique a seulement été décrit superficiellement dans la littérature. Pour répondre à ces lacunes dans la littérature, le projet de recherche décrit dans cette thèse avait quatre objectifs : (1) identifier des situations moralement problématiques vécues par les adultes atteints de maladies rares; (2) approfondir les situations moralement problématiques les plus significatives vécues par les adultes québécois atteints de maladies rares; (3) proposer un plan d’action de nature éthique qui soutient la résolution des trois situations moralement problématiques les plus significatives vécues par les adultes atteints de maladies rares; et (4) enrichir le concept de situation moralement problématique en précisant ses composantes. Pour répondre à ces objectifs, nous avons entrepris un projet de recherche-action participative compris d’étapes de recherche qualitatives. Nous avons formé le Groupe de travail sur l’éthique et les maladies rares pour nous appuyer dans la mise en œuvre du projet. Le groupe de travail était constitué de trois personnes atteintes de maladies rares, deux cliniciens-chercheurs, une représentante d’une association de patients, une assistante de recherche et un éthicien. Les étapes de recherche du projet étaient une revue de littérature, une collecte de témoignages sous la forme d’un sondage en ligne et le développement d’un plan d’action de nature éthique. Les membres du groupe de travail ont contribué au développement de ces étapes, à l’interprétation des résultats et à la rédaction des chapitres de résultats qui en découlent. Ces étapes de recherche révèlent que les adultes atteints de maladies rares vivent des situations moralement problématiques dans le milieu de la santé, la vie quotidienne, la carrière et les études ainsi que dans les interactions sociales et les relations interpersonnelles. Ces situations sont moralement problématiques parce qu’elles engendrent des tensions internes chez les personnes qui les vivent, contraignent leur agentivité et à l’occasion, les incitent à mobiliser des stratégies d’autonomisation pour les surmonter. Ces situations ont des causes et des répercussions affectives, elles évoluent et elles ont des impacts négatifs et positifs. Dans notre plan d’action de nature éthique, nous présentons des interventions prometteuses qui pourraient limiter l’émergence de ces situations dans le milieu de la santé. / A disease is considered rare if its prevalence is less than 1 in 2,000 people. Given the limited knowledge about these medical conditions, adults living with rare diseases struggle to be promptly diagnosed and receive appropriate treatment. This inadequacy in care causes them significant difficulties in the healthcare environment, their daily lives, their interpersonal relationships, and their careers and studies. Many of these difficulties can be qualified as morally problematic situations according to pragmatist ethics. Pragmatist ethics is a theory in ethics that recognizes the centrality of morality in human life. This theory underlines the existential importance of these situations for the people who experience them. It also appreciates their agency. Thus, it provides them with tools to better understand these situations and resolve them. Despite the significance that these situations have for those who experience them, they have not been studied previously. Moreover, the concept of the morally problematic situation has only been superficially described in the literature. To address these gaps in the literature, the research project described in this dissertation had four objectives: (1) to identify morally problematic situations experienced by adults living with rare diseases; (2) to understand in greater depth the most significant morally problematic situations experienced by adults living with rare diseases in the province of Québec; (3) to propose an ethics action plan that supports the resolution of the three most significant morally problematic situations experienced by adults living with rare diseases; and (4) to enrich the concept of the morally problematic situation by specifying its components. To meet these objectives, we undertook a participatory action research project that included qualitative research steps. We created the Ethics and Rare Diseases Working Group to support us in carrying out the project. The working group was made up of three individuals living with rare diseases, two clinician researchers, a representative of a patient association, a research assistant and an ethicist. The research stages of the project were a literature review, collecting testimonies through an online survey and the development of an ethics action plan. The members of the working group notably contributed to the development of these stages, the interpretation of the results, and the drafting of the chapters reporting these results. Our research reveals that adults with rare diseases experience morally problematic situations in the health environment, daily life, career and studies, and in social interactions and interpersonal relationships. These situations are morally problematic because they elicit internal tensions within the people who experience them, constrain their agency and, on occasion, prompt them to mobilize empowerment strategies to overcome them. These situations have causes and emotional repercussions, they evolve, and they have negative and positive impacts. In our ethical action plan, we present promising interventions that could limit the emergence of these situations in the health sector.

This dissertation produces the first attempt to bring the work of sociologist Pierre Bourdieu and the political theory literature on citizenship into dialogue with the scholarship on American empire in the field of International Relations (IR). It explores how the United States’ quest for global pre-eminence, mirrored by the war in Iraq, reveals and exacerbates the social wounds at the seams of American society. To do this, it introduces three new concepts to the field of International Relations. It builds on historian Christophe Charle’s sociological framework of “imperial society” and “national habitus” (2001, 2004 and 2005) and introduces an original concept, the field of citizenship, to examine social conflict over the distribution of military sacrifice amongst citizens in the United States. Finally, it explores these tensions by looking at multiple documentary sources, including over 200 newspaper articles, 60 testimonies about the war from soldiers and their relatives, congressional documents, and military manpower policies.

This dissertation produces the first attempt to bring the work of sociologist Pierre Bourdieu and the political theory literature on citizenship into dialogue with the scholarship on American empire in the field of International Relations (IR). It explores how the United States’ quest for global pre-eminence, mirrored by the war in Iraq, reveals and exacerbates the social wounds at the seams of American society. To do this, it introduces three new concepts to the field of International Relations. It builds on historian Christophe Charle’s sociological framework of “imperial society” and “national habitus” (2001, 2004 and 2005) and introduces an original concept, the field of citizenship, to examine social conflict over the distribution of military sacrifice amongst citizens in the United States. Finally, it explores these tensions by looking at multiple documentary sources, including over 200 newspaper articles, 60 testimonies about the war from soldiers and their relatives, congressional documents, and military manpower policies.

This thesis is the first in depth study that has been undertaken concerning Edinburgh and Glasgow’s identities and rivalry. It is not an economic or a social study driven solely by theory. Essentially, this is a cultural and political examination of Edinburgh and Glasgow’s identities and rivalry based on empirical evidence. It engages with theory where appropriate. Although 1752 – 1842 is the main framework for the period there are other considerations included before this period and after this timeframe. This study provides the reader with a better understanding of the ideas highlighted in the introduction and it also indicates the degrees of changes as well as continuity within the two cities. Therefore, this thesis is not a strict comparison of the two cities and neither does it provide for a complete contextual breakdown of every historical event over the course of every year. The primary focus is kept on an array of primary written sources about the two cities over the course of the period, with only brief reflections about other places, where it is deemed appropriate. The thesis is driven by the evidence it has uncovered in relation to identity and rivalry, and the study uses particular events and their impact on the two cities within a particular historical narrative. As it is a preliminary report of its kind, there are, of course, many gaps which are opportunities for further research. This is something that the conclusion of this thesis returns to. Identity and rivalry are words not attached to any particular corpus of research material but rather are buried in an array of primary sources that are wide-ranging and all encompassing. Most have been uncovered in individual collections and in the literature of the time, including newspapers, guidebooks, travellers’ accounts, civic histories, speeches, letters, and in entries for the Encyclopaedia Britannica and also the Old and New Statistical Accounts. Although historians may have examined some of this material it has not necessarily been employed by them to investigate how the cities’ identities and rivalry evolved. The period was influenced by the ideas birthed from the Enlightenment and Romanticism, by the impact of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars and by the intense processes harboured by urbanisation, industrialisation and by political and social change as the Georgian city became a Victorian one, so consideration of these important aspects must be afforded, as well as the particular historians’ ideas about them and how they affected cities like Edinburgh and Glasgow within a Scottish and a British context.

This dissertation produces the first attempt to bring the work of sociologist Pierre Bourdieu and the political theory literature on citizenship into dialogue with the scholarship on American empire in the field of International Relations (IR). It explores how the United States’ quest for global pre-eminence, mirrored by the war in Iraq, reveals and exacerbates the social wounds at the seams of American society. To do this, it introduces three new concepts to the field of International Relations. It builds on historian Christophe Charle’s sociological framework of “imperial society” and “national habitus” (2001, 2004 and 2005) and introduces an original concept, the field of citizenship, to examine social conflict over the distribution of military sacrifice amongst citizens in the United States. Finally, it explores these tensions by looking at multiple documentary sources, including over 200 newspaper articles, 60 testimonies about the war from soldiers and their relatives, congressional documents, and military manpower policies.

secret emigration in 1940' and reasons that later let to the mass emigration in The fifth chapter describes the emigrant's situation before they left la Gomera d emigrant's life in Venezuela. It's devided into particular sub

This dissertation produces the first attempt to bring the work of sociologist Pierre Bourdieu and the political theory literature on citizenship into dialogue with the scholarship on American empire in the field of International Relations (IR). It explores how the United States’ quest for global pre-eminence, mirrored by the war in Iraq, reveals and exacerbates the social wounds at the seams of American society. To do this, it introduces three new concepts to the field of International Relations. It builds on historian Christophe Charle’s sociological framework of “imperial society” and “national habitus” (2001, 2004 and 2005) and introduces an original concept, the field of citizenship, to examine social conflict over the distribution of military sacrifice amongst citizens in the United States. Finally, it explores these tensions by looking at multiple documentary sources, including over 200 newspaper articles, 60 testimonies about the war from soldiers and their relatives, congressional documents, and military manpower policies.