21 |
Cross-cultural adoption in constitutional perspectiveChurch, Jacqueline 11 1900 (has links)
Although a child's right to parental care and family life is constitutionally entrenched,
many South African children are deprived of this right. Transcultural adoption could
serve their need but historically this has been prohibited or discouraged by racist
policies. Whether this is in keeping with the now non-racial South African society is
questionable. In adoption the best interests of the child is paramount and in
determining this, courts should balance children's constitutional rights to their culture
of origin against their constitutional rights to non-discrimination.
After considering arguments for and against transcultural adoption and the position in
the United States and the United Kingdom, the writer suggests that further
interdisciplinary research into the question is necessary in South Africa; inter-country
adoption should be considered and law reform and governmental policy should facilitate these. / Private Law / LL. M. (Law)
|
22 |
The implementation of affirmative action policy within the Pretoria District of the South African Police ServiceHlongwane, Paulus 13 June 2013 (has links)
The primary aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of the affirmative action
policy within the Pretoria district of the South African Police Service. There is a need to
examine and understand how the SAPS remove unfair discrimination in recruitment and
selection processes in the implementation of affirmative action measures. Prior to 1994 the
South African Police Force was male dominated and racism was fully institutionalised. Black
people (Africans, Indians and coloureds), women and disabled people were marginalised and
denied appropriate employment and advancement opportunities. The focus of the study was
to identify challenges or problems encountered by the SAPS during the implementation of
affirmative action policy; propose the strategies through which the SAPS can address
discrimination in personnel staffing processes; and to assess and describe the criteria utilised
by the SAPS in identifying the beneficiaries of affirmative action. The study includes the
survey of international and national literature on the implementation of affirmative action.
The study was conducted at 35 police stations within the district of Pretoria. The survey
questionnaires were distributed to the respondents whereby three hundred and seventy (370)
returned completed questionnaires, meeting the required sample figures. The respondents
were selected by using a quota sampling. Qualitative research methodology was utilised in
the interpretation and analysis of data. In addition, data was also collected through the
documentary study.
The major findings of this study illustrated that job requirements and responsibilities are
seldom adjusted to accommodate disabled people. The communication of affirmative action
policy is seen by respondents as being problematic. Respondents believe that affirmative
action discriminates against certain groups within the disadvantaged groups. The research has
divulged that the usage of interviews and involvement of supervisors in interview panels
would minimise unfair discrimination in the allocation of promotional positions. Diversity
management is not fully implemented to support affirmative action. People of all races are
not employed to positions on the basis of their qualifications, experience and competencies as
they deserve. The SAPS does not consider academic qualifications as criterion in the
allocation of promotions. / Public Administration & Management / M. Admin. (Public Administration)
|
23 |
Access to justice for non-citizens : a constitutional analysisMatshakaile, Thabani Nkosiyapha 04 1900 (has links)
Thesis (LLM)--Stellenbosch University, 2014. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The rights entrenched in the Bill of Rights in South Africa’s final Constitution are, with a few
exceptions, guaranteed to citizens and non-citizens alike. South Africa has seen an influx of
migrants, asylum seekers and refugees since 1994, and this migratory movement has posed
significant challenges to the post-apartheid legal order. This thesis is concerned with the
State’s implementation of its constitutional obligations to protect and guarantee the
constitutional rights of everyone within the borders of South Africa.
It is important that these constitutional obligations do not remain mere aspirations but should
translate into reality. Most non-citizens living in South Africa face numerous barriers to
accessing justice and the processes that could enable them to realise their rights. The thesis
examines the concept of “access to justice” and investigates a number of obstacles
encountered by different categories of non-citizens – such as refugees, asylum seekers and
documented and undocumented migrants – in trying to access justice and to realise their
rights.
Against this background, arrest, detention and deportation under the Immigration Act and
Refugees Act are examined because these processes have often been abused by State officials
to prevent non-citizens from accessing the rights and protections guaranteed in these Acts and
the Constitution, and to frustrate the implementation of court orders vindicating the rights of
non-citizens. The application of the Immigration and Refugees Acts is discussed through the
lens of sections 12(1), 33, 34 and 35(2) of the Constitution which ensure that arrest, detention
and deportation are done in a lawful and procedurally fair manner, as opposed to the
arbitrariness that most non-citizens experience on a daily basis. Secondly, the thesis also examines access to justice for non-citizens in the context of
xenophobia and bias based crimes. The State has in the past failed to respond in a coordinated
and timely fashion in the face of violent manifestations of xenophobia. Against this
background, the State’s obligation to protect non-citizens from violence from either public or
private sources in terms of section 12(1)(c) of the Constitution is discussed and analysed. The
role, accessibility and effectiveness of Equality Courts are also examined in light of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act and the cases that were
brought before them emanating from xenophobic incidents.
The thesis concludes with proposals on areas which require better implementation of existing
laws; and areas in which legislative reform is needed. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die regte wat in die Handves van Regte in Suid-Afrika se finale Grondwet veranker is, word
op enkele uitsonderings na vir burgers en nie-burgers gewaarborg. Sedert 1994 het Suid-
Afrika instroming van migrante, asielsoekers en vlugtelinge beleef, en hierdie verskuiwing
het wesenlike uitdagings aan die post-apartheid regsorde gestel. Hierdie tesis is gemoeid met
die Staat se implementering van sy grondwetlike verpligting om die grondwetlike regte van
almal wat hul binne Suid-Afrika se landsgrense bevind, te beskerm en te waarborg.
Dit is belangrik dat hierdie grondwetlike verpligtinge nie blote aspirasies bly nie, maar ’n
werklikheid word. Die meeste nie-burgers wat in Suid-Afrika woon staar talle hindernisse in
die gesig wat dit vir hulle moeilik maak om toegang tot geregtigheid te verkry en om hul
regte te verwesenlik. Die tesis ondersoek die begrip “toegang tot geregtigheid” en bekyk
aantal struikelblokke in die weg van verskillende kategorieë nie-burgers – soos vlugtelinge,
asielsoekers en gedokumenteerde en nie-gedokumenteerde migrante – wat toegang tot
geregtigheid probeer verkry en hul regte probeer verwesenlik.
Teen hierdie agtergrond word arrestasie, aanhouding en deportering ingevolge die Wet op
Immigrasie en die Wet op Vlugtelinge ondersoek, aangesien hierdie prosesse dikwels deur
staatsamptenare misbruik word om nie-burgers te verhinder om toegang te verkry tot die
regte en beskermings wat in hierdie wetgewing en in die Grondwet gewaarborg word, en om
geregtelike bevele wat die regte van nie-burgers afdwing, te verydel. Die toepassing van die
Wet op Immigrasie en die Wet op Vlugtelinge word deur die lens van artikels 12(1), 33, 34
en 35(2) van die Grondwet bespreek, wat probeer verseker dat arrestasie, aanhouding en
deportering op regmatige en prosedureel billike manier geskied, in teenstelling met die
willekeur wat nie-burgers op daaglikse basis ervaar. Tweedens ondersoek die tesis toegang tot geregtigheid vir nie-burgers in die konteks van
vreemdelingehaat en misdade wat op vooroordeel gebaseer is. Die Staat het in die verlede in
gebreke gebly om in die aangesig van gewelddadige manifesterings van vreemdelingehaat op
gekoördineerde en tydige manier te reageer. Die Staat se verpligting om ingevolge artikel
12(1)(c) van die Grondwet nie-burgers teen geweld van hetsy openbare hetsy private
oorsprong te beskerm, word bespreek en ontleed. Die rol, toeganklikheid en doeltreffendheid
van gelykheidshowe word ook bespreek in die lig van die Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act en die sake wat deur hierdie howe beslis is wat uit
xenofobiese voorvalle voortspruit.
Die tesis sluit af met voorstelle oor terreine waar beter implementering van bestaande
wetgewing benodig word, asook terreine waar wetgewende hervorming verlang word.
|
24 |
The implementation of affirmative action policy within the Pretoria District of the South African Police ServiceHlongwane, Paulus 13 June 2013 (has links)
The primary aim of this study was to investigate the implementation of the affirmative action
policy within the Pretoria district of the South African Police Service. There is a need to
examine and understand how the SAPS remove unfair discrimination in recruitment and
selection processes in the implementation of affirmative action measures. Prior to 1994 the
South African Police Force was male dominated and racism was fully institutionalised. Black
people (Africans, Indians and coloureds), women and disabled people were marginalised and
denied appropriate employment and advancement opportunities. The focus of the study was
to identify challenges or problems encountered by the SAPS during the implementation of
affirmative action policy; propose the strategies through which the SAPS can address
discrimination in personnel staffing processes; and to assess and describe the criteria utilised
by the SAPS in identifying the beneficiaries of affirmative action. The study includes the
survey of international and national literature on the implementation of affirmative action.
The study was conducted at 35 police stations within the district of Pretoria. The survey
questionnaires were distributed to the respondents whereby three hundred and seventy (370)
returned completed questionnaires, meeting the required sample figures. The respondents
were selected by using a quota sampling. Qualitative research methodology was utilised in
the interpretation and analysis of data. In addition, data was also collected through the
documentary study.
The major findings of this study illustrated that job requirements and responsibilities are
seldom adjusted to accommodate disabled people. The communication of affirmative action
policy is seen by respondents as being problematic. Respondents believe that affirmative
action discriminates against certain groups within the disadvantaged groups. The research has
divulged that the usage of interviews and involvement of supervisors in interview panels
would minimise unfair discrimination in the allocation of promotional positions. Diversity
management is not fully implemented to support affirmative action. People of all races are
not employed to positions on the basis of their qualifications, experience and competencies as
they deserve. The SAPS does not consider academic qualifications as criterion in the
allocation of promotions. / Public Administration and Management / M. Admin. (Public Administration)
|
25 |
Discrimination on the ground of citizenship under the constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996Skosana, Jacob 06 1900 (has links)
Prior to 1994, citizenship was one of the pillars upon which the erstwhile government's
policy of separate development rested. The concepts of citizenship and nationality were
manipulated by the apartheid government to justify the denationalisation of black people and
the creation of different classes of citizenship. Race, colour and language were the
distinguishing features used to classify people into the different classes of citizenship.
With the advent of the new constitutional order in 1994, common citizenship and the
rights associated with it were restored to all South Africans. This discussion shows how in
the post-1994 constitutional order citizenship has become an element of nation-building,
while on the other hand it continues to perpetuate discrimination against non-citizens. The
study aims to further the debate regarding the ill treatment of non-citizens with a view of
influencing legislative and policy reform to replace the existing laws which are biased
against no-citizens. / Law / LL.M.
|
26 |
Cross-cultural adoption in constitutional perspectiveChurch, Jacqueline 11 1900 (has links)
Although a child's right to parental care and family life is constitutionally entrenched,
many South African children are deprived of this right. Transcultural adoption could
serve their need but historically this has been prohibited or discouraged by racist
policies. Whether this is in keeping with the now non-racial South African society is
questionable. In adoption the best interests of the child is paramount and in
determining this, courts should balance children's constitutional rights to their culture
of origin against their constitutional rights to non-discrimination.
After considering arguments for and against transcultural adoption and the position in
the United States and the United Kingdom, the writer suggests that further
interdisciplinary research into the question is necessary in South Africa; inter-country
adoption should be considered and law reform and governmental policy should facilitate these. / Private Law / LL. M. (Law)
|
27 |
The constitutional rebuilding of the South African private law : a choice between judicial and legislative law-makingDafel, Michael January 2018 (has links)
A tension arises whenever the South African private law fails to meet constitutional right norms. To remedy a deficiency, two law-making options are available. The first is for the judiciary to develop or change private law principles and rules in order to provide protection for the implicated constitutional norm. The second is for the judiciary to enforce an obligation upon Parliament to enact legislation to amend or replace existing private law rights and obligations so as to safeguard the norm against interference from a private individual or entity. The former is the more conventional option, but, in recent years, the law reports record an increasing reliance on the legislative duty to protect constitutional right norms in private legal relationships. The thesis investigates the extent to which the latter phenomenon - which will be described as a 'pivot towards legislative remedies' - exists, and the circumstances in which the courts pivot towards legislative remedies rather than developing private law of their own accord. The thesis finds that legislative schemes that give effect to constitutional rights are likely to contain an array of benefits that are absent from or reduced in the judicial law-making process. The judicial pivot towards legislative remedies is thus a strategy to enhance the process through which conflicting rights are resolved, as it allows for the constitutional rebuilding of private law in a way that the judiciary is unable to do on its own. Importantly, however, theories of judicial deference do not explain the pivot. On the contrary, the courts have exercised a strict level of control over the legislative law-making pathway. Through either statutory interpretation or the review of legislation, the courts require legislation to contain the essentials of the judicial law-making framework. From this perspective, the judicial law-making process produces the floor of the rebuilding project and the legislative law-making process enhances that framework.
|
28 |
Affirmative action: a comparative studyDeane, Tameshnie 30 November 2005 (has links)
Racial and gender inequality, as well as other forms of discrimination has been a part of the South African, American and Indian histories for a very long time. Even today racial disparity is still very evident in the South African and American societies whilst discrimination based on caste is still prevalent in the Indian society. This is illustrated by continued racial discrimination and the remaining signs of societal segregation. Due to continuing disparities amongst the people, it became necessary to implement affirmative action programmes. Focusing in particular on education and jobs, affirmative action policies require active measures to be taken to ensure that blacks and other minorities enjoy the same opportunities for career advancement and school admissions that had been the nearly exclusive province of whites in SA and the USA, or for the forward castes in India. Affirmative action has been both praised and denounced, as an answer to racial inequality. One of the key issues that arise when affirmative action is discussed is whether or not affirmative action in fact promotes equality and atones for past prejudices. Another concern is whether the current affirmative action policy is the right policy to use. The issues surrounding affirmative action seems to be universal as are the circumstances. Perhaps the most widespread similarity among the programmes in these very different countries has been that group preferences and quotas are almost always discussed. The debate on affirmative action exists because it is a very divisive issue and it affects different groups of people in different ways, and some groups or persons seemingly benefit more from affirmative action than other persons or groups. In addition, it causes people to be classified into groups, and at the same time, strives to break down group barriers. It is an issue that is difficult to resolve because people have varied ideas about how the problems of racial inequality and historical discrimination should be addressed / Jurisprudence / LLD
|
29 |
Affirmative action: a comparative studyDeane, Tameshnie 30 November 2005 (has links)
Racial and gender inequality, as well as other forms of discrimination has been a part of the South African, American and Indian histories for a very long time. Even today racial disparity is still very evident in the South African and American societies whilst discrimination based on caste is still prevalent in the Indian society. This is illustrated by continued racial discrimination and the remaining signs of societal segregation. Due to continuing disparities amongst the people, it became necessary to implement affirmative action programmes. Focusing in particular on education and jobs, affirmative action policies require active measures to be taken to ensure that blacks and other minorities enjoy the same opportunities for career advancement and school admissions that had been the nearly exclusive province of whites in SA and the USA, or for the forward castes in India. Affirmative action has been both praised and denounced, as an answer to racial inequality. One of the key issues that arise when affirmative action is discussed is whether or not affirmative action in fact promotes equality and atones for past prejudices. Another concern is whether the current affirmative action policy is the right policy to use. The issues surrounding affirmative action seems to be universal as are the circumstances. Perhaps the most widespread similarity among the programmes in these very different countries has been that group preferences and quotas are almost always discussed. The debate on affirmative action exists because it is a very divisive issue and it affects different groups of people in different ways, and some groups or persons seemingly benefit more from affirmative action than other persons or groups. In addition, it causes people to be classified into groups, and at the same time, strives to break down group barriers. It is an issue that is difficult to resolve because people have varied ideas about how the problems of racial inequality and historical discrimination should be addressed / Jurisprudence / LLD
|
Page generated in 0.1376 seconds