Tidigare forskning visar att personer med intellektuella funktionsnedsättningar tillviss grad är begränsade i deras sätt att uttrycka en sexuell identitet, på grund avbegränsade nätverk. Det har också visats att personer med intellektuellafunktionsnedsättningar som identifierar sig med en hbtq-läggning är mer utsatta förnegativa fördomar och begränsande möjligheter. Syftet med denna studie är att setill hur personal och anhörigas egna sexuella normer påverkar personer medintellektuella funktionsnedsättningar och deras möjlighet att uttrycka en sexuellidentitet. Empirin består av två fokusgrupper med personal som arbetar inom LSSverksamhetensamt en fokusgrupp med chefer inom samma verksamhet. Treindividuella, semistrukturerade intervjuer har också genomförts med anhöriga tillpersoner med intellektuella funktionsnedsättningar. Analys har gjorts utifrånCripteorin (McRuer) och Den sexuella värdehierarkin (Rubin). Resultatet pekar påatt omgivningen tror att personer med intellektuella funktionsnedsättningaromfattas av färre eller inga sexuella normer. Samtidigt menar de att de somidentifierar sig med en hbtq-läggning riskerar att utsättas för ökad utsatthet, samtatt det finns bristande kunskap och för få arbetsmetoder ute i verksamheterna. / Recent science shows that people with intellectual disability to some extent islimited in their possibilities to express their sexual identity. They seem to liverelatively protected in a social network that often consists only by personnel andrelatives, which in turn influences the sexual norms they live by. It has also beenshown that people with intellectual disabilities who identifies with a LGBTsexualityis particular exposed by negative biases and limited possibilities. The aimwith this study is to see how personnel and relatives own sexual norms influencesthe possibilities people with intellectual disabilities have to express a sexualidentity. In this study I have interviewed two focus groups of personnel and onefocus group of chiefs working in a so called LSS-occupation. Three individual, semistructured interviews have also been made with relatives to people with intellectualdisabilities. To put a theoretical perspective on my work I have used the Crip theory(McRuer), the charmed circle (Rubin). The result shows that the interviewedpersonnel and relatives to people with intellectual disabilities think that they don’tare included in the same or less sexual norms. At the same time they also expectedto be more exposed to negative biases if they also identified as LGBT. Also thereis a lack of knowledge and few working methods for personnel’s and chief’s to beworking with these questions.

The purpose of this study is to investigate how the argumentation for the freedom of speech versus the right to safety was presented when these rights came in conflict with each other when a neo-Nazi organization was allowed to co-arrange Almedalen 2017. The material consists of press statements, debate articles and news articles where the arguments of four key agents connected to Almedalsveckan 2017 were collected. In order to fulfill the purpose of the study, the argumentation is analyzed by answering three research questions: How did each agent present their argument? How did the argumentation rely on current law? How did the agents rely on the others’ rights claim? The argumentation is analyzed qualitatively through a normative theory in order to investigate how the claims were made for each right. The agents that claim freedom of speech are Region Gotland and the police. The agents that claim the right to safety are RFSL and Funktionsrätt Sverige together with the JAG Association. The argumentation is categorized thematically for each agent and every category is analyzed separately. The results show that both sides used emotionally charged arguments or affective language and both sides may be considered as lacking in concretization regarding the meaning of their main arguments. Both sides clearly relied on current law by either mentioning laws explicitly or implicitly. All of the agents made some statement about the other key agent’s position or responsibility. Both sides can be considered as having valid right claims by referring to intrinsic values and current law. In the end, Region Gotland and the police have the right to determine who is allowed to co-arrange Almedalen and can therefor decide which claimed rights that is prioritized in the value hierarchy. Furthermore, the study shows that each conflict of rights needs to be valued individually as the circumstances, consequences and claims are crucial for the determination of the hierarchy. For future research, I recommend investigating how the public opinion considers allowing or limiting neo-Nazi’s freedom of opinions, as well as investigating how the Swedish praxis regarding the application and restriction of freedom of opinions for neo-Nazi organizations and parties is carried.