Workplace aggression incidents are increasing and, thus, becoming more difficult to address in the United States. Health care workers in particular are at an increased risk of burnout compared to individuals working in other occupations. The purpose of this quantitative correlational study was to investigate the propensity for workplace aggression among health care professionals and the association between job satisfaction and the propensity for workplace aggression. The conservation of resources theory was used to frame the study. The Work Environment Scale and the Conditional Reasoning Test of Aggression were used to collect data from 89 mental health clinicians, nurses, and technicians employed at 2 metro Atlanta hospitals. Findings indicated no correlation between workplace aggression and job satisfaction among mental health workers. Findings also indicated no higher propensity for workplace aggression among frontline workers (nurses and technicians) than among other mental health workers. However, findings revealed that employees with more years of service had a higher propensity for workplace aggression. Implications for social change include enhancing the capacity of mental health workers to handle the emotional and physical demands of the job.

Workplace bullying has detrimental effects on victims and organizations. Research from the bully's perspective is lacking resulting in unknown causes for the aggressive behavior. Research indicates some child bullies have histories of maltreatment and that bullying may persist throughout adulthood. The purpose of this non-experimental quantitative study was to examine associations between workplace bullying and childhood abuse/neglect, actual or perceived current victimization, attachment style, and the desire to gain social dominance. An examination of the possible influence of social dominance on the relationship between abuse and workplace bullying was also included. Social dominance theory and attachment theory provided the framework for the study. The sample consisted of 126 adult men and women. The survey instrument included the Bullying Behavior Scale, Social Dominance Q-Scale, Social Dominance Orientation Scale, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, Coercion and Conflict Scale, and Adult Attachment Scale. Data analysis included ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and linear regression. ANOVA results indicated significant associations between low- to mid-range incomes and certain industries and workplace bullying. There was a negative correlation between the relationship workplace bullying and childhood abuse/neglect. Results for domestic violence, social dominance need, and attachment style were not significant. There were no moderating effects of social dominance on the occurrence of workplace bullying and childhood abuse/neglect. Improvements to workplace environments and coping programs for bullies might result from this study's outcome.

No description available.

Workplace mistreatment, in the form of both incivility and aggression, can have a major impact on personal and organizational outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the mental judgments that individuals make before engaging in either uncivil or aggressive behavior. Data was analyzed in terms of both the potential costs and the potential benefits that an instigator could expect from engaging in such behavior, with specific emphasis on gender differences in cost/benefit expectations. There were no significant gender differences in either the perceived costs or the perceived benefits of engaging in incivility. The hypothesis that individuals with a low cost and/or high benefit pattern of responses of incivility were more likely to report instigating uncivil behaviors was also unsupported. The limitation of statistical analyses by a violation of the assumption of equal variances is discussed.

In this study the researcher set out to determine the levels and the causes of workplace stress, as well as the consequences of stress in terms of witnessed and experienced aggression in the workplace, anxiety, depression, and worry for a sample of 205 subjects. To achieve this, the following tests were used: 1) Experience of Work and Life Circumstances Questionnaire, 2) the Aggression in the Workplace Questionnaire, 3) the IPAT Anxiety Scale,4) the Beck Depression Inventory, and 5) the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. The subjects’ ability to cope withexperienced stressors in relation to social problem solving was examined with the Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised. The raw data were analysed by means of the usual descriptivestatistics. In addition, inferential statistics including z-tests, t-tests, analysis of variance and posthoc analyses (Scheffé) were conducted for the following groups: total group, gender, marital status, age, organizational type, qualification and position level. Results indicate that most of the subjects in the sample experienced normal levels of stress, indicating that the participants generally experienced their circumstances within or outside the workplace as satisfactory. Generally, the results also indicated that their expectations regarding their work situation were met. With reference to the consequences of stress, the total sample reported low levels of witnessing and experiencing workplace aggression, normal levels of anxiety, low levels of depression and worry. Good overall social problem solving suggests the ability to cope with demands and stressors within and outside the workplace. Generally, Pearson correlations indicated significant relationships between a) levels of stress as experienced by subjects and b) witnessed and experienced workplace aggression, c) anxiety, d) depression, e) worry and f) social problem solving. That most of the subjects in this sample were able to deal effectively with the demands and stressors placed on them, from within and outside the workplace suggests the ability to use effective problem-focused coping involving social problem solving which for most participants, was due to a positive problem orientation and effective rational problem solving skills. These findings may be useful as part of a stress management programme to help employees deal with stress proactively by becoming more effective problem-solvers. In terms of a salutogenic paradigm, and consistent with recent developments in positive psychology, the findings indicate that more attention should be paid to possible reasons why some employees appear to cope with stress more effectively than others. / Thesis (PhD (Psychology))--University of Pretoria, 2008. / Psychology / PhD / unrestricted

The purpose of this thesis was to examine the mediating effects of job-related negative emotions on the relationship between workplace aggression and outcomes. Additionally, the moderating effects of workplace social support and intensity of workplace aggression are considered. A total 321 of working individuals participated through an online survey. The results of this thesis suggest that job-related negative emotions are a mediator of the relationship between workplace aggression and outcomes, with full and partial mediation supported. Workplace social support was found to be a buffering variable in the relationship between workplace aggression and outcomes, regardless of the source of aggression (supervisor or co-worker) or the source of the social support. Finally, intensity of aggression was found to be a strong moderator of the relationship between workplace aggression and outcomes.

No description available.

Workplace bullying is a recently recognized problem within organizations. Two personalities may be theoretically related, and may be able to predict this aggressive behavior: right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. However, it is still unclear how to measure right-wing authoritarianism as a construct. Two surveys were distributed. The first was to assess the factor structure inconsistency among the literature. A three-factor operationalization was supported. Analysis of the second survey examined the relationship between the aggression dimension of right-wing authoritarianism, dangerous worldview and workplace bullying; as well as the relationship between social dominance orientation and competitive worldview on workplace bullying. No significant relationship was found between authoritarian aggression and workplace bullying, however, social dominance orientation fully mediated competitive worldview and workplace bullying. Theoretical implications, limitations, and practical applications are discussed.

Objectif. L’objectif est de comprendre comment les intervenants en relation d’aide et les agents des forces de l’ordre composent avec la violence au travail et le stress lié à l’imputabilité. Un cadre théorique basé sur l’identité professionnelle est proposé afin de comprendre la modulation de la santé psychologique au travail et testé via le Professional Quality of Life des intervenants en protection de la jeunesse. Les facteurs de prédiction de la banalisation de la violence au travail et des impacts psychologiques de cette banalisation sont également étudiés. Méthodologie. Un sondage mené auprès d’un échantillon représentatif constitué de 301 intervenants en protection de la jeunesse a permis d’examiner le Professional Quality of Life. Les effets de l’exposition à la violence en milieu de travail, à l’exposition au matériel traumatique et du stress lié à l’imputabilité sur la fatigue de compassion ont été analysés à l’aide d’équation structurelle. Les effets indirects attribuables au genre, au soutien organisationnel perçu, à l’adhésion à l’identité professionnelle, aux stratégies d’adaptation et à la confiance en ses moyens pour gérer un client agressif ont été mesurés. Pour l’examen des facteurs de prédiction de la banalisation de la violence au travail, les résultats d’un sondage mené auprès de 1141 intervenants en relation d’aide et des forces de l’ordre ont été analysés à l’aide de régression linéaire. L’analyse des réponses des 376 intervenants de cet échantillon ayant rapporté avoir été perturbé par un acte de violence au travail a permis de mesurer l’impact de la banalisation sur les conséquences psychologiques suite à une victimisation au travail. Les effets indirects attribuables à la banalisation de la violence ont été mesurés. Des analyses différenciées en fonction du sexe ont également été menées. Résultats. L’exposition à la violence, le sentiment d’imputabilité et l’évitement amplifiaient la fatigue de compassion chez les intervenants en protection de la jeunesse sondés. Les attitudes masculines, l’adhésion à l’identité professionnelle, la confiance en ses moyens pour gérer les clients agressifs l’atténuaient. Quant aux facteurs de prédiction de la banalisation de la violence au travail, les participants masculins étaient plus enclins que les femmes à la normaliser. Les agents des forces de l’ordre percevaient davantage la violence comme tabou que les intervenants en relation d’aide. Les facteurs organisationnels avaient tous un effet négatif sur le tabou entourant la violence au travail. Finalement, l’âge, les victimisations antérieures, les blessures graves et percevoir la violence au travail comme un tabou augmentaient le nombre de conséquences psychologiques suite à une victimisation. Les analyses différenciées en fonction du sexe ont identifié des facteurs de prédiction spécifiques aux hommes et aux femmes. Implications. Lors de déploiement de stratégies organisationnelles afin d’aider les employés à gérer avec les stress liés au travail, les organisations doivent considérer l’identité professionnelle de leur travailleur ainsi que des différences en fonction du sexe et du genre. / Objective. The goal of this thesis is to understand how caregivers and law enforcers cope with workplace aggression and accountability. Relying on identity theory, a theoretical framework is put forth to understand mental health at work and examined through an adapted version of the Professional Quality of Life for child protection workers. Individual and organizational predictors of trivialization of workplace aggression are also investigated. The impact of trivializing workplace aggression on psychological wellbeing is assessed. Method. To examine the Professional Quality of Life, a survey conducted among a representative sample of 301 Canadian child protection workers was utilized. The effects of exposure to workplace aggression, exposure to traumatic material and stress emanating from accountability on compassion satisfaction and fatigue were evaluated in a path analysis model. The indirect effects through gender roles, perceived organizational support, adherence to professional identity, coping ability and confidence in coping with patient aggression were also tested. To identify predictors of workplace aggression, responses to a survey research conducted among a convenience sample 1141 Canadian caregivers and law enforcers were computed in linear regression modeling. Using the same dataset but only selecting victims of workplace aggression resulting in a sub-sample of 376 Canadian caregivers and law enforcers, individual and organizational factors were used in path analysis modeling in order to predict psychological consequences. Normalizing and tabooing were introduced as intervening variables. For the objectives regarding trivialization of workplace aggression, between group differences analyses were also conducted for women and men. Findings. Exposure to workplace aggression, felt accountability and avoidant coping strategies increased compassion fatigue among child protection workers while masculine attitudes, adherence to professional identity and confidence in coping with client aggression decreased it. As for predictors of trivialization of workplace aggression, male respondents were more likely than women to think that workplace aggression was normal. Law enforcers were more likely than caregivers to taboo workplace aggression. Organizational factors were all significant negative predictors of tabooing violence. Finally, being older, prior direct victimization, injury requiring hospitalization and tabooing workplace aggression were positively associated with negative psychological consequences following workplace aggression victimization. Gender-based analyses revealed specific predictors for males (e.g. normalizing). Implications. When developing and disseminating policies to help workers to cope with specific work-related stress, organizations must consider the “professional identity” promoted by the job as well as the gender of the workers. Adapted to these identities, they should sensitize workers on the impact of aggression and accountability in order to break the taboo while fostering strategies that dampen the impact of these stressors.

This study explored the relationship between workplace discrimination climate on team effectiveness through three serial mediators: collective value congruence, team cohesion, and collective affective commitment. As more individuals of marginalized groups diversify the workforce and as more organizations move toward team-based work (Cannon-Bowers & Bowers, 2010), it is imperative to understand how employees perceive their organization’s discriminatory climate as well as its effect on teams. An archival dataset consisting of 6,824 respondents was used, resulting in 332 work teams with five or more members in each. The data were collected as part of an employee climate survey administered in 2011 throughout the United States’ Department of Defense. The results revealed that the indirect effect through M1 (collective value congruence) and M2 (team cohesion) best accounted for the relationship between workplace discrimination climate (X) and team effectiveness (Y). Meaning, on average, teams that reported a greater climate for workplace discrimination also reported less collective value congruence with their organization (a1 = -1.07, p < .001). With less shared perceptions of value congruence, there is less team cohesion (d21 = .45, p < .001), and with less team cohesion there is less team effectiveness (b2 = .57, p < .001). In addition, because of theoretical overlap, this study makes the case for studying workplace discrimination under the broader construct of workplace aggression within the I/O psychology literature. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis found that workplace discrimination based on five types of marginalized groups: race/ethnicity, gender, religion, age, and disability was best explained by a three-factor model, including: career obstruction based on age and disability bias (CO), verbal aggression based on multiple types of bias (VA), and differential treatment based on racial/ethnic bias (DT). There was initial support to claim that workplace discrimination items covary not only based on type, but also based on form (i.e., nonviolent aggressive behaviors). Therefore, the form of workplace discrimination is just as important as the type when studying climate perceptions and team-level effects. Theoretical and organizational implications are also discussed.