No description available.

Informe de Seminario para optar al grado de Licenciado en Filosofía

Informe de Seminario para optar al grado de Licenciado en Filosofía

Orientador: Celso Kraemer. / Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação, Centro de Ciências da Educação, Universidade Regional de Blumenau, Blumenau.

Tesis

Esta dissertação pretende inserir alguns pontos em um território que atravessa as áreas da Educação e da História: o ensino de História. O problema investigativo deste trabalho se volta para o professor de História na sala de aula e questiona: como ele se constitui como sujeito? Pesquisador ou mero reprodutor de discursos acadêmicos? De que forma a bagagem acumulada no estudo dos conhecimentos históricos em nível universitário afeta a sua prática professoral? Que lugar ocupam os saberes e os fazeres docentes no ensino da História? O referencial teórico principal é composto por escritos de Michel Foucault, buscando assinalar as críticas que o autor fez à escrita da História. Como ferramenta de análise, optou-se pela descrição de cenas de aulas de História, quando o pesquisador foucaultiano e o docente se encontram no palco do acontecimento: a sala de aula. As cenas narram as relações estabelecidas entre os corpos de professor e de alunos e que resultam em choques, confrontos e embates de verdades, posições e significações. Elas buscam inserir problematizações neste cenário, fazendo surgir as experiências intempestivas e as vivências infames. O professor de História, na perspectiva foucaultiana, anseia por buscar elementos que tornem o passado um objeto vivo. Assim como aquele que se denominou historiador do presente, o caminho investigativo desta pesquisa aspira pensar de que maneira pode-se contribuir para libertar os pensamentos e as narrativas das estruturas engessadas que persistem nos ditos e escritos históricos. / This dissertation intents to insert some points in a territory that crosses the Areas of the Education and History: History teaching. The investigative problem of this study turns to the History professor in the classroom and interrogates: how does he constitute himself as a subject? Is he a researcher or mere reproducer of academic discourses? How does the know-how of the historical knowledge accumulated during the study, in university level, affect his professorial practices? What places do the professor’s knowledge and doings occupy in the teaching of History? The main theoretical framework is constituted by Michel Foucault’s writings, aiming to analyze the critics made by the author about the writings of the History. The description of History classes’ scenes was used as tool of analysis, when Foucault’s researcher and the professor meet each other on the happening’s stage: the classroom. The scenes narrate the relations established between professor and students that result in shock, confrontation and true oppositions, positions and significations. They attempt to reveal the truth established around this scenery, promoting untimely and infamous experiences. The History professor, according to Foucault’s perspective, is eager to find elements that turn the past into live object. As that one who called himself as the historian of the present, the investigative path of this research aspires to think how it is possible to contribute to release the thoughts and narratives from the plastered structures that remain in the historical sayings and writings.

Através do estudo de trajetória do compositor Ernani Braga (Rio de Janeiro,1888 - São Paulo, 1948) busquei recriar o contexto de criação do álbum de canções Cancioneiro Gaúcho, uma obra musical encomendada para marcar a data de comemoração do Bicentenário da cidade de Porto Alegre, em 1940. De caráter regionalista, mas de cunho educacional nacionalista e em consonância com o projeto de canto orfeônico implementado por Villa-Lobos, a obra visava satisfazer, do ponto de vista institucional, as exigências de estratégia política da Era Vargas. Na realização da pesquisa cruzei fontes e materiais de arquivos com depoimentos orais objetivando reconstruir a teia de relações que trouxeram o compositor até Porto Alegre e o colocaram na incumbência de compor a obra, preparar e reger grupos corais estudantis durante os festejos oficiais. Através da reconstrução tripartite da memória das performances musicais dos eventos envolvendo o Cancioneiro Gaúcho (elaboração, transmissão e recepção), objetivei delinear a relação compositor-obra como nexo sócio-sônico na construção de representações identitárias em um determinado tempo-espaço. / Through a bio-study of Brazilian composer Ernani Braga (1888-1948) I sought to recreate the creational context of the song collection entitled Cancioneiro Gaúcho, a musical work commissioned to celebrate the Bicentennial of Porto Alegre, in 1940. Inspired by musico-poetic regional motives, but totally in tune with nationalist-educational policies as well as with the orpheonic singing project implemented by Villa-Lobos, the work was intended to meet the demands of the political strategy of the Vargas Era. In delineating the research process, I have crossed oral and archival documents aiming to reconstruct the web of relationships and circumstances that led the composer to Porto Alegre and placed him in charge of composing, preparing and conducting choral groups during the oficial festivities. Through a tripartite reconstruction of the memory around the musical performances of the Cancioneiro Gaúcho (preparation, transmission and reception) I aimed to analyze the composer-work relationship as a socio-sonic nexus in the construction of identity representations within that social context.

區凱琳. / "2009年7月". / "2009 nian 7 yue". / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2009. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 168-172). / Abstracts in Chinese and English. / Ou Kailin. / 引言 --- p.1 / Chapter 一 --- 導論 --- p.2 / Chapter 1.1 --- 傅柯的倫理學之預備¨®Ơ明 --- p.4 / Chapter 1.1.1 --- 傅柯學¨®Ơ的三條軸線 / Chapter 1.1.2 --- 傅柯對道德觀的三種區分 / Chapter 1.1.3 --- 傅柯研究的道德觀及其研究方法 ´ؤ´ؤ「實行手法之道德觀」與「道德過程之個性化條件」 / Chapter 1.1.4 --- 傅柯研究的道德觀之歷史 ´ؤ´ؤ「道德主體化的方式」及「自身實踐的方式」之歷史 / Chapter 1.1.5 --- 傅柯研究的道德觀及其研究方法之特殊意義 / Chapter 1.2 --- 傅柯的《主體解釋學》之預備¨®Ơ明 --- p.16 / Chapter 1.2.1 --- 傅柯對古代研究之態度 / Chapter 1.2.2 --- 傅柯對古代倫理之基本分析 / Chapter 1.2.3 --- 《主體解釋學》的工作及其目的 / Chapter 1.3 --- 本文的旨趣 --- p.22 / Chapter 二 --- 關懷自身原則中的主體與真理關係 --- p.24 / Chapter 2.1 --- 概¨®Ơ「關懷自身」與「認識你自己」 --- p.27 / Chapter 2.2 --- 「關懷自身」之理論化與邊緣化 --- p.32 / Chapter 2.3 --- 兩種哲學區分與主體與真理的弔詭關係 --- p.42 / Chapter 2.4 --- 修省之理由 --- p.48 / Chapter 三 --- 知識探索與自身轉化 --- p.53 / Chapter 3.1 --- 關懷自身之「自身的『自身目的化』」 --- p.57 / Chapter 3.2 --- 轉向自身´ؤ´ؤ知識與真理的基點 --- p.62 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- 目光之轉向 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- 實在的轉移及回歸自身 / Chapter 3.3 --- 知識之精神性模態化´إ´إ主體與世界關係之安頓 --- p.67 / Chapter 3.3.1 --- 德米特里厄斯的知識之關係性模式 ´ؤ´ؤ自身與世界連繫在一起的知識觀 / Chapter 3.3.2 --- 伊比鳩魯的自然研究 ´ؤ世界知識成為轉化自身之催化媒介 / Chapter 3.3.3 --- 塞內加的世界頂峰 ´ؤ´ؤ此岸世界之解放 / Chapter 3.3.4 --- 奧列里烏斯之無限小的剖析 ´ؤ魔力與誘惑之消解 / Chapter 3.4 --- 兩種知識之區分´ؤ´ؤ「精神性知識」與「智力知識的知識」 --- p.95 / Chapter 四 --- 修省與拯救 --- p.100 / Chapter 4.1 --- 概¨®Ơ修省 --- p.103 / Chapter 4.1.1 --- 哲學的修省與基督宗教的苦行 / Chapter 4.1.2 --- 修省與預備 / Chapter 4.1.3 --- 修省之兩層 / Chapter 4.2 --- 真言之主體化´ؤ´ؤ哲學之修習方式 --- p.108 / Chapter 4.2.1 --- 聆聽與沉默 / Chapter 4.2.2 --- ˇئø讀與書寫之關係 / Chapter 4.2.3 --- 言¨®Ơ與真理 / Chapter 4.3 --- 主體之修行´ؤ´ؤ知行一致的主體 --- p.118 / Chapter 4.3.1 --- 鍛鍊與考驗 / Chapter 4.3.1 a --- 節制之養生法 / Chapter 4.3.1 b --- 試煉之實踐 / Chapter 4.3.2 --- 主體的沉思 / Chapter 4.3.2 a --- 邪惡之預想 / Chapter 4.3.2 b --- 死亡之修鍊 / Chapter 4.3.2 c --- 良知的檢測 / Chapter 4.4 --- 拯救自身´ؤ´ؤ此生此世的拯救 --- p.134 / Chapter 4.4.1 --- 基督宗教的拯救概念 / Chapter 4.4.2 --- 「自身目的化」與拯救 / Chapter 4.4.3 --- 古代的拯救概念 / Chapter 五 --- 結論´ؤ´ؤ哲學與自我拯救 --- p.142 / Chapter 5.1 --- 回顧及小結 --- p.143 / Chapter 5.2 --- ´ؤ己與超越 --- p.147 / Chapter 5.3 --- 精神性及關懷自身的回歸 --- p.151 / Chapter 5.4 --- 總結 --- p.157 / Chapter 5.3.1 --- 保存個體存在風格的倫理觀 / Chapter 5.3.2 --- 哲學之用 / 後記 --- p.162 / 附錄一 縮寫 --- p.163 / 附錄二 詞彙表 --- p.164 / 附錄三參考書目 --- p.168 / 回顧 --- p.173

Analiza la conexión entre saber y poder en la sociedad del capitalismo postdisciplinario. La primera parte de la tesis se aboca a explicar la relación entre saber y poder y porque para Foucault se trata de prácticas estrechamente ligadas. En la segunda parte se analiza la constitución del conocimiento científico y su relación con los dispositivos de poder del capitalismo disciplinario. En la tercera parte se propone un estudio sobre cuáles serían las relaciones entre las formas de poder y conocimiento en la sociedad contemporánea. / Tesis

Many of the writings of Leo Strauss were dedicated to combating the "crisis of modernity". This crisis was for him the advent and acceptance of nihilism--a state of being wherein any principle one dare dream is allowed and judgment must be withheld. He claimed that the promotion of nihilism at the hands of modern social scientists would lead to the downfall of civilization. Yet, this work seeks to show that all of these claims are made by Strauss in an attempt to hide the "truth" of nihilism from the masses and that Strauss, in fact, is a nihilist thinker. The introductory chapter of this work introduces the problem of nihilism as outlined by Strauss. It also briefly explains the positions of two other nihilist thinkers, Friedrich Nietzsche and Michel Foucault, in order to establish the thought which Strauss seems to be arguing against in his works. It then explains the writing style of Strauss as being esoteric. The following chapter will deal with the Strauss' argument for the causes of nihilism. Chapter three will be dedicated to the two solutions that Strauss presents for combating nihilism. The exoteric solution calls for a return to the teachings of the classics, specifically the three types of teaching that he recognizes--Socratic-Platonic, Aristotelian, and Thomistic. The esoteric solution, however, is to use the Platonic conception of the "noble lie" in order to hide the "truth" of nihilism. Chapters four and five will compare Strauss' nihilism to that of Nietzsche and Foucault, respectively. Each chapter will expand on the discussion already presented in the first chapter to further elucidate each thinker's version of nihilism. Finally, I will outline the conception of these three thinkers as a continuum for nihilist thought. I will also discuss how the only definitive difference between the three thinkers is their outlook on the human condition. For example, Strauss and his hidden nihilism is a direct result of his pessimistic view of the masses; whereas Nietzsche's Übermensch nihilism is brought about by his outlook on the prospect for development beyond humanity and Foucault's pure nihilism is drawn out from his notion of power/knowledge. In this way, this work will not only show Strauss as a closet nihilist but also show his integral role in understanding the full range of nihilist thought.