This article analyzes how Environmental Law can take intoconsideration some of fundamental rights study categories, by a constitutional point of view, particularly the right to a balanced and appropriate environment recognized in article 2, paragraph 22 of the 1993 Peruvian Constitution in order to develop policies oriented to implementation of constitutional legal status for environment rights and property. / El presente trabajo analiza la manera en que el derecho ambiental puede tomar en consideración categorías propias del estudio de los derechos fundamentales desde una perspectiva constitucional, en particular del derecho al medio ambiente equilibrado y adecuado reconocido en el artículo 2, inciso 22, de la Constitución de 1993, con miras al desarrollo de las políticas orientadas a la concretización de los derechos y bienes jurídico constitucionales relacionados con el medio ambiente.

Thesis Purposeful Categorization of Land as an Interference with the Right to Property presents an analysis of the institute of purposeful categorization of land and its specifics on a background of a theoretical thought about the right to property, the right to favorable environment and the collision of two constitutionally guaranteed rights. The purpose of this thesis is to assess current legislation of purposeful categorization of land, including the instruments that are used in relation to it, and to, based on the assessment, identify problematic issues of the legislation and asses the limitation of right to property that the individual instruments related to the institute create. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

L’objet de cette étude porte exclusivement sur le droit à un environnement sain en droit européen tel qu’il est décliné par les deux grands ordres juridiques européens, constitutifs de ce droit, à savoir celui du Conseil de l’Europe et celui de l’Union européenne. Il apparait fondamental de comprendre comment ces deux ordres juridiques à la fois complémentaires mais aussi concurrents peuvent se saisir de manière similaire ou au contraire sensiblement différente du grand enjeu que constitue le droit à un environnement sain. Le choix d’étudier le droit à un environnement dans un contexte européen est justifié par l’approche inédite offerte par le droit européen en tant que champ d’analyse. En effet, les deux organisations et leurs ordres juridiques respectifs, l’Union européenne et le Conseil de l’Europe, sont deux systèmes qui œuvrent différemment, qui sont animées par des objectifs singuliers mais qui n’excluent pas pour autant certains rapprochements. Ainsi le droit à un environnement sain en Europe est le plus souvent appréhendé sous deux angles distincts. D’un côté, l’angle « droit de l’hommiste » très privilégié par le Conseil de l’Europe qui revendique son rôle de pionnier dans la protection des droits de l’homme, de la démocratie et de l’État de droit. D’un autre côté, l’Union européenne, conçue d’abord comme une Union économique et qui est une organisation qui reste fondamentalement animée par des objectifs économiques. Certes, l’UE défend et protège aussi les droits de l’homme. Mais l’environnement sain ou le niveau de protection élevé de l’environnement qui constitue son corolaire est plus fréquemment confronté aux libertés fondamentales garanties par l’UE, en particulier la libre circulation dans le cadre du marché intérieur. Cette balance entre approche droit de l’homme et approche marché intérieur est très spécifique au droit de l’Union. Le droit européen sera étudié dans une approche systémique, c’est-à-dire en tant que processus de production des normes. Cette singularité du droit européen à l’environnement sain et sa dynamique méritent d’être appréhendées tant du point de vue de la reconnaissance de droit que de sa mise en œuvre, dont on verra qu’elle est animée par des ressorts propres à chacune des grandes organisations, mais qui ne sont pas forcément exclusifs les uns des autres. / The subject of this study focuses exclusively on the right to a healthy environment in European law as it is defined by the two major European legal systems which constitute this right: Council of Europe and European Union. It seems fundamental to understand how these two complementary but also competing legal orders can be seized in a similar way or, on the contrary, significantly different from the great challenge of the right to a healthy environment. The choice to study the right to an environment in a European context is justified by the special approach offered by European law as a field of analysis. Indeed, the two organizations and their respective legal orders, the European Union and the Council of Europe, are two systems that work differently, which are driven by singular objectives but which do not exclude certain reconciliations. Thus the right to a healthy environment in Europe is most often apprehended from two different approaches. On the one hand, the "droit de l’hommiste" angle, very much favored by the Council of Europe, which claims its pioneering role in the protection of human rights, democracy and the rule of law . On the other hand, the European Union, first conceived as an Economic Union and an organization that remains fundamentally driven by economic objectives. Of course, the EU also defends and protects human rights. But the healthy environment or the high level of environmental protection that is its corollary is more frequently confronted with fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the EU, in particular freedom of movement within the framework of the internal market. This balance between the human right approach and the internal market approach is very specific to EU law. European law will be studied in a systemic approach: process of norm production. This specificity of European law to the healthy environment and its dynamics deserve to be apprehended both from the point of view of the recognition of right and its implementation, which we will see that it is animated by springs specific to each of organizations, but which are not necessarily exclusive of each other.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:27:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 IvanaldoSSJ.pdf: 1689543 bytes, checksum: f639e03fbb6c1d5cf779099616f0de68 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-02-16 / The Article 225 of Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil in its main body, stipulates that everyone is entitled to ecologically balanced environment and the use of common people and essential to the healthy quality of life, should be imposed on public authorities and the community the duty to defend it and preserve it for present and future generations. Following a universal trend, the letter raised the Brazilian environment the category of one of those values ideals of social order, dedicating it, along with a constitution of rules sparse, a chapter, itself, which definitely, institutionalized the right to healthy environment as a fundamental right of the individual. The national public policies and state should be in line with modern theories of Sustainable Development, outlined within the international society, and certainly instruments that should be made effective through the mobilization of civil society as a whole. The implementation of Human Rights, in fact, depends on a strong political action and not just a legal problem. Thus, this work of theoretical-descriptive nature we will address various dimensions of sustainable development, such as environmental education, water, sanitation, health and sustainable development plans, evaluating its current stage in our state / O art. 225 da Constitui??o da Rep?blica Federativa do Brasil de 1988, em seu caput, prev? que todos t?m direito ao meio ambiente ecologicamente equilibrado, bem de uso comum do povo e essencial ? sadia qualidade de vida, devendo ser imposto ao poder p?blico e ? coletividade o dever de defend?-lo e preserv?-lo para as presentes e futuras gera??es. Seguindo uma tend?ncia universal, a Carta brasileira erigiu o meio ambiente ? categoria de um daqueles valores ideais da ordem social, dedicando-lhe, a par de uma Constitui??o de regras esparsas, um cap?tulo, pr?prio, que definitivamente, institucionalizou o direito ao ambiente sadio como um direito fundamental do indiv?duo. As pol?ticas p?blicas nacionais e estaduais devem ficar em conson?ncia com as modernas teorias acerca do Desenvolvimento Sustent?vel, delineadas no seio da sociedade internacional, sendo indubitavelmente instrumentos que dever?o ser tornados eficazes mediante a mobiliza??o da sociedade civil como um todo. A concretiza??o dos Direitos Humanos, de fato, depende de uma forte atua??o pol?tica, n?o sendo apenas um problema jur?dico. Desta forma, nesta disserta??o de natureza te?rica-descritiva iremos abordar diversas dimens?es do Desenvolvimento Sustent?vel, como Educa??o Ambiental, recursos h?dricos, saneamento b?sico, sa?de e planos de desenvolvimentos sustent?veis, avaliando o seu atual est?gio no nosso estado

Although these days, we can perceive the right for environmental information as something automated and quite natural in a democratic society, we must realize that it was far from it in the past. Hand in hand with the principle of secretiveness of state administration, the public had virtually no possibility to obtain information concerning not only the state of the environment but also general information concerning almost anything. It is not surprising after all because before 1989, neither the general right for information nor the right for environmental information were protected by law, less alone by the constitution. Nevertheless, the democratic changes which took place after the Velvet Revolution produced changes also in the field of the right for information and this right was, both generally - as a right for information, and specifically - as a right for environmental information, included in the legal regulation of the greatest legal force, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms, which became a part of the constitutional order of the Czech Republic on the basis of the resolution of the Czech National Council presidium No. 2/1993 Coll. On the basis of its constitutional protection, the right for environmental information was provided for also by law (Act No. 123/1998 Coll.) and...

[pt] O presente trabalho visa compreender a tensão existente entre o direito fundamental à moradia e o direito fundamental ao meio ambiente a partir do fenômeno das ocupações em áreas de preservação permanente. O estudo parte da análise das questões urbanas envolvidas, sobretudo os processo de urbanização brasileiro e a tutela da moradia e do ambiente no ordenamento jurídico como direitos fundamentais na Constituição de 1988. Adota a abordagem interdisciplinar para a análise de casos de referência e analisa de decisões judiciais pertinentes. Tem como pressuposto as relações de vulnerabilidade presente nos conflitos entre estes direitos, para os quais apresenta como a diretriz de harmonização para o seu equacionamento a justiça socioambiental. / [en] The present dissertation aimed to understand the tension between the fundamental right to housing and the fundamental right to the environment from the phenomenon of occupations in areas of permanent preservation. At the outset, to understand the phenomenon, was considered the essential aspects of the urban question that involves urban growth without planning, reproduction of the labor force in the capitalist market, access to urban land and private property, housing deficit, unequal allocation of public equipment and services in urban space. The urban question that arises in the context of the construction of an urban space of an essentially social character needs to be understood from the point of view of social dynamics. That is, understanding the participation, responsibilities and the way of acting of each urban actor is paramount for facing the urban question. In addition, in order to understand the tensions between urban actors and institutions, the right to the city is an effective way of harmonizing and overcoming obstacles in the dialogue between fundamental rights housing and the environment. It is still to be considered in the attempt to harmonize them, the environment has now assumed the biocentric vision, in which the protection of all forms of life prevails and not only of human life. For the purposes of equalizing the tension between rights, the environment will have its relative value recognizing and assuming the environmental damages already produced as a way to also meet the most basic human needs related to the right to housing.