Background:  A growing momentum around the potential of impact investing to contribute to development in both environmental and social sustainability has challenged the way business is operating, offering solutions for both the people and planet. Previous studies have claimed that trade-offs between purpose and profit are inevitable in order to successfully achieve sustainability goals, which requires practitioners in the financial discipline to invent new investment approaches to manage dual outcomes. Here, it becomes evident to move beyond trade-offs to avoid that one goal outperforms the other, considered as a vital question to address towards a new investment paradigm.  Purpose:  This study aims to explore the nexus between social impact and financial return, and thus understand the different factors that enable managers in the impact investing industry to successfully manage the trade-offs between pursuing dual values.     Method:  An interpretivist approach is followed throughout the study with an exploratory nature that is used to analyze two company cases. In total, two participants were interviewed through qualitative and semi-structured questions; two managers in the impact investing field.   Conclusion:  The findings reveal the interconnection of impact measurement, values and impact management. The authors have derived a model that graphically represents the Impact-Return Nexus Model (IRNM) which enhances the impact awareness and long-term value creation. The result of this study shows how the synergy between social impact and financial return will improve the performance on both sides. Accordingly, the cases present that a nuanced impact-approach tends to scale both impact and profits.

This thesis investigates how ESG ratings for Nordic companies vary between two ESG providers, and how the risk and expected return differs between two highly rated ESG portfolios according to the two providers. In doing so, we aim to contribute to research on the topic of ESG divergence as it is of great importance for investors that this subject is studied further. To achieve the purpose of this thesis, secondary data was gathered in terms of ESG ratings from two chosen providers, S&P Global and Refinitiv. Based on the collected data, a Spearman correlation analysis was performed as well as statistical investigations in Excel in order to examine the rating divergence between the two providers. Additionally, efficient frontier values of the two provider dependent portfolios were calculated using R Studio. The results found suggests that there is an evident ESG rating divergence amongst all companies examined, regardless of origin and industry. Furthermore, it was concluded that Refinitiv consistently rated companies higher than S&P Global. The comparison between the two provider dependent portfolios illustrates that relying on ESG ratings from different providers will result in different portfolio composition. In turn, this has an impact on investors seeking to implement ESG as a part of their investment strategy. The results indicate that the composition differences affects portfolio performance. This led to the conclusion that it is of great importance for investors to be aware of the existing divergence in order to make accurate investment decisions.

I takt med att klimatrelaterade problem blivit allt mer påtagliga har ett flertal internationella samarbeten och handlingsplaner presenterats, däribland Parisavtalet och EU kommissionens handlingsplan för finansiering av hållbar tillväxt. Studier i ämnet har visat att finans- och fastighetsmarknaden utgör en betydande roll i att uppnå den hållbara omställning som eftersträvas i dessa initiativ. För att möjliggöra detta anses gröna obligationer vara ett centralt verktyg i vägen framåt, men produkten bedöms bristfällig och kräver förändringar för att uppnå dess fulla potential.  Gröna obligationer introducerades 2008 och med grund i produktens jämförelsevis korta existens, föreligger en viss oro kring marknadens transparens och legitimitet. Genom att analysera perspektivet hos dagens investerare och undersöka effekten av externa granskningar, syftar denna studie till att identifiera otillräckliga marknadssegment där vidare utveckling kan bidra till att attrahera fler investerare. Denna studie har genomförts med en kvalitativ metod bestående av såväl litteraturstudier som semistrukturerade intervjuer med svenska bolag som investerar i gröna obligationer. Resultaten visade att investerare inte skiljer på avkastningskraven för gröna och konventionella obligationer. Majoriteten av respondenterna ansåg också att marknaden har stor utvecklingspotential där ökad transparens och tydligare definitioner urskilde sig. Genom att studera effekten av externa granskningar har denna studie även identifierat intressekonflikter hos tredjepartsverifierare. Med hjälp av striktare regleringar kan externa verifieringar bidra till ökad legitimitet och således attrahera ett större antal investerare, vilket i förlängningen kan bli avgörande för att uppnå Parisavtalets klimatmål. / As the number of problems regarding climate change has surged, many initiatives have taken place on international level. The Paris Agreement and the European Commission action plan for financing sustainable growth comprise the key endeavors in achieving international climate objectives. Studies have shown that financial and real estate markets will play a significant role in transitioning the world economy towards a sustainable future. In order to do so, green bonds have been identified as a key mechanism, but the product requires substantial development to unlock its full potential. Green bonds are defined, similarly to conventional bonds, as a interest bearing debt instrument, but with the requirement that the use of proceeds contribute to a climate positive project. Because of its recent introduction in 2008, some investors are concerned whether the market is legitimate or not. By analyzing the current investor perspective and examining the effect of external verifications, this study aims to identify insufficient market elements which can be improved and thereby attract more investors. This study has been carried out using a qualitative method consisting of literature studies as well as semi structured interviews with Swedish corporations which invest in the green bond market. The results showed that investors do not differentiate green and conventional bonds regarding yield requirements. The majority also expressed that green bonds have great potential for improvement where increased transparency and distinct definitions stood out. Furthermore, by studying external verifications, this study has identified issues of interest conflict in Third Party Verifiers which improvement is concluded to be pivotal in boosting investor reliance and accessing further investments.

Sustainability has become a pressing global issue due to environmental and social challenges caused by human activity which has led to a rise in sustainable investing, including ESG investing. Research on financial performance and sustainable investing have not only showed mixed results, but they are also generally conducted in greater markets such as the US, Europe, and Asia-pacific markets. Currently, there is a lack of research on performance of sustainable investment strategies in the Nordic Region. The purpose of this paper is to examine the performance of portfolios constructed with an ESG investment strategy, which involves creating two portfolios consisting of top and bottom ESG scored companies. The portfolios are measured against each other and a market index benchmark, in the context of various theories, including the efficient market hypothesis, adaptive market hypothesis, shareholder theory, and stakeholder theory. The theoretical framework includes asset-pricing models and portfolio theory. A quantitative study with a deductive approach is utilized to construct the portfolios, focusing on mid-cap companies in the Nordics with data collected from Refinitiv Eikon’s database. The portfolio construction process yields financial metrics such as returns, volatility, and risk-adjusted returns. To test for outperformance in returns, the unpaired t-test is utilized. The Carhart four-factor model is also used to explain variations in returns related to risk factors and investigate the presence of positive and significant abnormal returns. The results demonstrate that the bottom ESG portfolio exhibits superior portfolio characteristics compared to the top ESG portfolio and the index benchmark, including annual returns and risk-adjusted returns. Furthermore, this study identifies significant positive abnormal returns when using the Carhart four-factor model, and evidence of outperformance in mean cumulative returns for the bottom ESG portfolio relative to the top ESG portfolio and index benchmark. On the other hand, the performance of the top ESG portfolio and index benchmark is inconclusive, with mixed results across different performance metrics and years. Although the top ESG portfolio outperforms in two out of three years in terms of annual returns, volatility, and risk-adjusted returns, no evidence of positive abnormal returns is found. Meanwhile, the index benchmark demonstrates evidence of outperformance in terms of cumulative returns. Overall, the findings suggest that the bottom ESG investment strategy is more effective in generating superior performance, while the mixed results of the top ESG portfolio make it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about its performance characteristics.

The ocean is increasingly seen as a new economic frontier. While investments are rapidly growing, these are mainly directed to unsustainable practices and a huge funding gap remains to ensure that ocean industries are in line with the aspirations of a truly “blue” economy. Acknowledging the role of financial actors as both gatekeepers and enablers of a sustainable ocean economy, this thesis explores the financial landscape of the 100 largest ocean companies – the ‘Ocean 100’ – which collectively account for 60% of total ocean economy revenues. The study uses a mixed-methods approach, combining network analyses, descriptive statistics, and more qualitative examples, to identify financiers of the Ocean 100 and discuss their potential for incentivizing ocean stewardship. It explores two potential leverage points: the use of sustainable loans and bonds and the influence of shareholders. New sustainable debt instruments that link interest rate to sustainability targets are increasingly used by the Ocean 100 and have potential in becoming a new norm, however, the connection to the ocean remains weak. There is a need for transparency and regulation in the sustainable finance market to ensure quality and to scale up sustainable finance instruments. The results also highlight the financial impact of large passive asset managers whose influence span over several ocean industries, some of which are characterized by high market concentration. As interest in the ocean economy is growing, regulations and public pressure to change investment norms represent a much needed incremental, if not radical, change towards improved sustainability.

The purpose of this master’s thesis is to investigate to what extent ESG assets and traditional benchmarks affect one another. Since sustainable investment is a growing segment of the financial market, investors need to be informed about how it may affect their portfolios, and by extension if it can be used for portfolio diversification. By using an AR(1)-GARCH(p,q) model and a Diebold-Yilmaz spillover approach, we can measure the spillover effects between ESG indices and other benchmark indices for both return and volatility. We find that country-level ESG indices are more integrated with other country-level ESG indices than other assets, and that country-level ESG indices transmit more to the MSCI world ESG index, MSCI world equity index, Crude oil, Gold, and our currency index EUR/USD. These findings hold true for both return and volatility spillover. Thus, our policy implications are that including country-level ESG assets in the portfolio can decrease portfolio risk and help minimize the contagious effects of shocks on the portfolio.

With the stakeholder model, the responsibility that companies have in society extends beyond yielding profit to their shareholders. They are also responsible for the environmental and social impact their operations may have, requiring a new type of financing with this kind of commitment in mind. Green bonds are already used extensively in Sweden, especially within the real estate sector regarding green investing and has been well researched. Social investments and social bonds on the other hand, even though there is a growing interest, are not widely applied in the Swedish real estate market. At the same time, the subject remains uncharted by researchers. With a deductive approach using semi-structured interviews with real estate professionals, debt investors, and researchers, this thesis aims to answer why Swedish real estate companies are not using social bonds and what can be done to facilitate its use. The main findings are that social investments and bonds are competing with green bonds, preventing their application. Another hindrance is finding relevant and easily measurable KPIs for social bonds. / Med lanseringen av stakeholdermodellen har synen på företagens roll i samhället förändrats. Modellen menar att företag har ett ansvar för den miljömässiga samt sociala påverkan deras verksamhet har. Med ett sådant ansvar, behövs en ny typ av finansieringsmetod. Gröna obligationer används idag flitigt när det kommer till att göra gröna investeringar i Sverige, framför allt inom fastighetssektorn. Trots ett ökat intresse för sociala investeringar och sociala obligationer bland svenska fastighetsbolag används inte finansieringsformen alls i samma utsträckning som ute i Europa. Även forskningen på området är begränsad. Genom ett deduktivt tillvägagångssätt, med semi-strukturerade intervjuer med verksamma personer inom fastighetsbranschen, skuldinvesterare samt forskare är syftet med uppsatsen att ge svar på vad som begränsar svenska fastighetsbolag från att använda sociala obligationer, samt vad som krävs för att underlätta nyttjandet av finansieringsmodellen i framtiden. De huvudsakliga slutsatserna som dras i rapporten är att det som främst begränsar fastighetsbolagen från att emittera sociala obligationer är konkurrensen från gröna obligationer. Vidare framgår att ett sätt att underlätta användningen av sociala obligationer är att hitta relevanta och mätbara KPIer.

The EU Taxonomy Regulation[1] (“EU Taxonomy”) is a relatively new classification system for determining what economic activities are considered sustainable. By creating a common language between investors, issuers, and policymakers, the regulation aims to increase transparency and help investors assess whether investments meet robust environmental standards. This thesis aims to investigate how the EU Taxonomy, as a legal instrument, aims to serve its legislative objective and secondly identify potential challenges of the regulation.  Findings indicate that the regulation can create an adequate commonly held classification system as long as the technical criteria for each sector keep up with new scientific discoveries and technological advancements. A regulation to develop uniform understanding across the EU and delegated acts to amend the legislation seems like the most appropriate legal instrument. Areas for improvement concern revising the scope of whom it applies, and this process has begun with the proposal of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Other areas for improvement concerns the political nature of what sectors should be included in the taxonomy, for instance, whether nuclear energy and gas should be deemed sustainable or not. The taxonomy may strive to be a neutral classification system; however, member states’ economic incentives affect what is included.  Finally, this thesis concludes that it is too early to predict the taxonomy’s breakthrough. In theory, it is a significant idea. Still, we can only know with time whether we have reached a more common understanding, transparency and eventually have facilitated a transition through this regulation.  [1] Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment and amending regulation (EU) 2019/288.

Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) integration in financial activities is a crucial topic that is gaining importance in financial markets. During the years, many studies have been conducted about Initial Public Offering (IPO) and underpricing since they are fundamental aspects of firms’ lifecycle. Nevertheless, none of these studies have appropriately related firms’ ESG characteristics to IPO underpricing. In order to fill this knowledge gap, this thesis’s purpose is to investigate whether the ESG factors of a firm have effects on its IPO underpricing in the U.S stock market. The U.S has been chosen as it is the biggest stock market in the world and because of the quality and reliability of the data available for this country.  A quantitative study is applied to investigate the relationship between ESG characteristics of the firms and the level of underpricing. First, to obtain the measurement of the ESG level of the pre-IPO firms, we have conducted two textual analysis of IPO prospectus, namely, term frequency and sentiment analysis. These indicators aim to show the disclosure level of ESG factors and whenever ESG is perceived negatively or positively by the market. Successively, the multiple regression is performed for each ESG indicator to find which measures have the analytical abilities to explain IPO underpricing. Based on the multiple regression results, we can conclude that the frequency of environmental & governance terms occurred in IPO prospectus, the negative tone, and the overall sentiment of the environmental context are significantly explaining IPO underpricing. These results have given meaningful answers for our research. The market does not perceive the social factors of a firm in the IPO context. On the other hand, environmental and governance aspects still attract the market’s attention in different ways. The market is concerned about the disclosure level of the governance activities and whether these activities are sufficiently mentioned in the prospectus. Meanwhile, the market takes into serious consideration the environmental activities of a firm by assessing the qualities of these activities. Moreover, the market is more sensitive to the negative information about environmental content than positive information in the IPO context. The textual analysis methods applied in this thesis have some limitations. However, this study has the reliability to confirm that some companies’ ESG factors affect IPO underpricing. As a consequence, it is possible to state that the market cares about  ESG issues.

This study explores the increasingly popular government practice of issuing green bonds. By interviewing individuals involved in the development of the Swedish green government bond issued in 2020, and examining key documents, it provides an in-depth understanding of the motivations driving a government to issue a green bond. The empirical analysis shows that the Swedish government did not issue the green bond to finance green investments, but to promote the green bond market, communicate what it was already doing in terms of environmental investments, help investors attain more sustainable portfolios and strengthen the Swedish government as a bond issuer. While the political driving force behind the green government bond was the Green Party, it was strongly supported by segments of the financial sector. The main criticism came from authorities within the government itself. Even though the proponents of the green government bond shared a concern about the environment, it was not clear how this policy would ultimately contribute to the green transition. This analysis suggest that it is more appropriate to consider it as a form of industrial policy for supporting the sustainable finance industry. This is the first in-depth case study conducted on a green government bond and thus contributes to a new research topic. It also contributes to the literature on Sustainable Finance and Investment and green bonds more generally. Furthermore, it contributes to research on government debt policy and the political economy of the green transition.