With the highly development of Internet, it¡¦s much easier than ever for student to commit plagiarism. However, there¡¦s still no related research regarding Internet plagiarism in Taiwan. Therefore, this study will be focused on student¡¦s Internet plagiarizing behaviors, which are committed by college students, and trying to understand the relationship among students¡¦ personality traits, learning styles, demographic characteristics, and their Internet plagiarizing behaviors. In this study, Internet plagiarism is given a definition by three different types: (1) after reading the contents of Internet materials, students paraphrase and put them in the papers without citation. (2) Students copy texts or data directly from the Internet materials then paste them in the papers without paraphrase and citation. (3)Students not only paraphrase some materials from Internet, but also copy and paste texts and data in the papers directly. 433 questionnaires were distributed in seven universities/colleges in Taiwan and completed by undergraduate and graduate students. The major findings after statistic analyses are as follow: (1)For the last experience of writing papers, the rate of Internet plagiarism committed by college students is up to 86.85%. (2)Students¡¦ Internet plagiarism behaviors have significant differences in gender, age, year level of graduate school, college or graduate school, and discipline, but no significant differences in personality trait, learning style, and year level of college. (3)Students who commit Internet plagiarism, deliberately or not, have significant differences in personality trait and college or graduate school, but no significant differences in learning style, gender, age, year level of college, year level of graduate school, and discipline. (4) Types of student plagiarism have significant differences in gender, age, college or graduate school, discipline, and reasons of plagiarism, but no significant differences in personality trait and learning style. (5)Students¡¦ square root plagiarizing levels have significant differences in personality trait, discipline, and reasons of plagiarism, but no significant differences in learning style, gender, year level of college, year level of graduate school, and college or graduate school. (6)Reasons of student plagiarism have significant differences in age and college or graduate school, but no significant differences in personality trait, learning style, age, year level of college, year level of graduate school, and discipline.

abstract: Academic deviance is a potentially detrimental behavior for students and universities alike in that it causes credit to be given to individuals where it is not due. Furthermore, it is a common occurrence, with around half of college students admitting to engaging in this behavior at least once. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between perfectionism, strain, and academic deviance. In doing this, this study uses data from a primary data collection effort in Arizona State University, with a final sample of 696 students, to answer three research questions: Are there differences in the likelihood of engaging in academic deviance by maladaptive perfectionists, adaptive perfectionists, and non-perfectionists? Are there differences in the perceptions of the wrongness of academic deviance between maladaptive perfectionists, adaptive perfectionists, and non-perfectionists? Are there differences in how context dependent maladaptive perfectionists, adaptive perfectionists, and non-perfectionists view academic deviance the wrongness of academic deviance? Ordered logistic regression are used to access these research questions. Results suggest that neither perfectionism nor strain were a significant factor in determining the likelihood that a participant would engage in an academically deviant behavior, or how wrong they believed that behavior to be. However, perfectionism did seem to have a mild impact on how context dependent individuals felt the wrongness of their behaviors, meaning that if the cause of the strain was due to the professor’s actions, students viewed academic deviance as less wrong, and self-control explained at least part of this effect. Strain, on the other hand, did not have a significant effect. Overall, the results suggest some legitimacy to the use of general strain theory to explain the potential relationships, given the relationship between perfectionism and context dependency. Additionally, the results support policy implications designed to reduce maladaptive thoughts and subsequently academic deviance, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Future research should examine the link between perfectionism and other types of academic strain. / Dissertation/Thesis / Masters Thesis Criminology and Criminal Justice 2020

Academic dishonesty and cheating abound in universities across the globe, with increased instances of academic dishonesty in many disciplines including medical professional education programs that have high expectations for integrity and ethical conduct. The purpose of this study was to determine how faculty in physician assistant (PA) programs described their experiences, specifically their roles and responsibilities, in addressing incidents of academic dishonesty. The conceptual framework by Nitsch and colleagues, which focused on faculty failure to report conduct violations in dishonesty cases, informed interviews with 10 PA faculty members concerning the role of faculty members in academic dishonesty violations. Interview transcripts were analyzed to identify common themes through a manual coding process. Interviews were followed by a modified Delphi process with 5 of the participants to confirm consensus of the responses obtained in the interviews. Themes from the findings focused on faculty members' high expectations of academic honesty from students in PA programs, the role of university involvement in reporting and managing cases of academic dishonesty, including deterrents to faculty reporting, and program strategies to deter academic dishonesty. Based on findings, a PA faculty development workshop was developed for creating cultures of academic integrity in PA programs and program campuses. Positive social change may result through better management of cases of academic dishonesty in PA programs and on campus, as well as the use of faculty as change agents in promoting a culture of campus integrity.

This study was designed to examine: (1) the extent to which cheating occurs in fundamentalist Christian colleges; (2) the attitudes of fundamentalist Christian college students toward cheating; (3) attitudes of fundamentalist Christian college students toward cheating among their peers; (4) the kinds of cheating practices of fundamentalist Christian college students; (5) the degree to which students engage in neutralizing behavior to justify cheating; (6) differences in cheating behaviors according to gender; (7) differences in cheating behaviors according to ethnicity; and (8) differences in cheating behaviors according to the length of duration of Christian commitment. Based upon the responses of 337 students attending 3 different Christian colleges, it was concluded that: (1) most Christian fundamentalist students do not engage in cheating; (2) respondents believe that each of 17 self-reported cheating behaviors are serious forms of cheating; (3) respondents are unlikely to report cheating among peers; (4) plagiarism is the most common cheating behavior; (5) most respondents justify cheating on the basis of the workload at school and the pressure to obtain good grades; (6) there are no differences in cheating behavior according to gender; (7) there are differences in cheating behavior according to groups; and (8) most respondents do not cheat regardless of the self-reported duration of Christian commitment.

Academic dishonesty has been widely reported to be a prevalent occurrence among university students and yet little research has been done to explore, in depth, the meanings the phenomenon holds for students. In response to this gap in research, the purpose of this study was to discover senior Education students understandings of academic honesty and dishonesty. A naturalistic research design was employed and the data were the verbatim discussions of five groups of senior Education degree program students from two western Canadian universities.<p> Findings were focused on the substantive, structural, and future applicability in students understandings. Essential elements of academic dishonesty appearing in students understandings were existence of rules, intent to break those rules, and resulting unearned grade advantages. These elements were extrapolated to serve as a baseline definition of academic dishonesty and as principles of culpability. Numerous situational considerations were volunteered by students that described enticements, deterrents, and beliefs about likelihoods associated with academic honesty and dishonesty. These considerations served as structures for the contemplation of risk that appeared prevalent in students understandings. Future applicability in students understandings was centred on expectations for teaching and professionalism. As teachers, students expected to need to respond to and prevent academic dishonesty. When working in a professional environment, they expected little need to acknowledge sources and a more collaborative climate overall that, for them, meant concerns for academic dishonesty had less relevance. Students expectations suggested rules for teaching and they contrasted the environments experienced as students with those anticipated as teachers.<p> The findings of this study were integrated to suggest students vision of a system for academic honesty that bears some similarity to a moral system. Also extrapolated were four metaphors for the roles of students in the university related to concerns for academic dishonesty: student as subject, student as moral agent, student as trainee, and student as competitor. Implications for higher education policy development and communication were based on students focus on grades and students sense of subculture for academic honesty and dishonesty. Students deference to the authority of the professor suggested implications for instructional practice. A lack of monitoring of students and professors behaviours related to academic honesty and dishonesty had implications for administrative practice in terms of fostering norms for academic integrity. A model for discernment of the student voice is proposed for student concerns appearing to be most freely and richly explored in a discussion among students. Recommendations for approaches to future research of this nature and for research questions and student populations bring the dissertation to a close.

Academic dishonesty has been widely reported to be a prevalent occurrence among university students and yet little research has been done to explore, in depth, the meanings the phenomenon holds for students. In response to this gap in research, the purpose of this study was to discover senior Education students understandings of academic honesty and dishonesty. A naturalistic research design was employed and the data were the verbatim discussions of five groups of senior Education degree program students from two western Canadian universities.<p> Findings were focused on the substantive, structural, and future applicability in students understandings. Essential elements of academic dishonesty appearing in students understandings were existence of rules, intent to break those rules, and resulting unearned grade advantages. These elements were extrapolated to serve as a baseline definition of academic dishonesty and as principles of culpability. Numerous situational considerations were volunteered by students that described enticements, deterrents, and beliefs about likelihoods associated with academic honesty and dishonesty. These considerations served as structures for the contemplation of risk that appeared prevalent in students understandings. Future applicability in students understandings was centred on expectations for teaching and professionalism. As teachers, students expected to need to respond to and prevent academic dishonesty. When working in a professional environment, they expected little need to acknowledge sources and a more collaborative climate overall that, for them, meant concerns for academic dishonesty had less relevance. Students expectations suggested rules for teaching and they contrasted the environments experienced as students with those anticipated as teachers.<p> The findings of this study were integrated to suggest students vision of a system for academic honesty that bears some similarity to a moral system. Also extrapolated were four metaphors for the roles of students in the university related to concerns for academic dishonesty: student as subject, student as moral agent, student as trainee, and student as competitor. Implications for higher education policy development and communication were based on students focus on grades and students sense of subculture for academic honesty and dishonesty. Students deference to the authority of the professor suggested implications for instructional practice. A lack of monitoring of students and professors behaviours related to academic honesty and dishonesty had implications for administrative practice in terms of fostering norms for academic integrity. A model for discernment of the student voice is proposed for student concerns appearing to be most freely and richly explored in a discussion among students. Recommendations for approaches to future research of this nature and for research questions and student populations bring the dissertation to a close.

The present study aimed to integrate situational and dispositional perspectives on the investigation of unethical and dishonest behavior through an experimental and a correlational study. More explicitly, the current study explored the effects of state self-control and social influence on cheating, and investigated the trait self control and conformity as predictors of academic dishonesty. Two preliminary studies were conducted. First, a pilot study with 230 undergraduate students was conducted to assess the reliability of the Turkish versions of the four scales intended to measure the constructs of interest. All four scales were found to have sufficient reliabilities. A second preliminary study was conducted to observe and to ameliorate the effects of two manipulations constructed for the main study, namely the rewriting task (depletory versus neutral) and the norm induction (deciding to cheat, not to cheat or to meet with a friend after the study). The main study was conducted with 87 undergraduate students. Correlational results underlined the importance of low self-control and high susceptibility to social influence as predictors of past behavior of academic dishonesty. Experimental results revealed that first, groups

Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-02T21:42:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Silvia Palmieri2.pdf: 781946 bytes, checksum: 04d34f504c722e96a227f1ea390ebf9c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-07-27 / O número de Instituições de ensino e alunos têm aumentado e a efetividade na gestão acadêmica torna-se assunto relevante. Simultaneamente ao aumento de estudantes, a tecnologia da informação tem evoluído rapidamente, o que tem propiciado novas oportunidades de ensino e profusão de informações. Infelizmente, no sentido oposto ao da qualidade de ensino, esse cenário tem propiciado o surgimento e crescimento de uma variedade de situações e oportunidades para que o comportamento academicamente desonesto se desenvolva. Uma possível associação entre desonestidade acadêmica e o comportamento antiético no ambiente de trabalho é defendida por vários autores, alertando que comportamentos éticos dos estudantes podem gerar melhores líderes de organizações no futuro e aconselhando que se estabeleçam universidades provedoras de princípios morais e íntegros. O objetivo deste trabalho é contribuir para o entendimento dos fatores antecedentes da atitude dos alunos em relação à desonestidade acadêmica, por meio da identificação das associações que possam existir entre aspectos individuais e de grupo. Fundamentado inicialmente na Theory of Planned Behavior TPB (Teoria do Comportamento Planejado) de AJZEN (1991), e com base em extensa revisão de literatura, criou-se um modelo de pesquisa instrumentalizado como um pré-teste a estudantes de uma IES particular como forma de operacionalizar os construtos, obtendo-se 116 respostas válidas. Os dados foram obtidos a partir de uma survey eletrônica e analisados por Modelagem com Equações Estruturais, em particular com base no algoritmo Partial Least Squares PLS. As estimativas de coeficientes foram feitas pela técnica Bootstrap, com 1000 reamostragens, com reposição. Com base no pré-teste os resultados indicaram que a percepção das práticas do grupo é especialmente influente no comportamento acadêmico desonesto do indivíduo (Beta = 0,39; p< 0,00), mas também que a idade do aluno é inversamente proporcional à intensidade com que essa desonestidade se manifesta (Beta = -0,24; p<0,00). Adicionalmente, a característica pessoal de idealismo mostrou ser provável um fator de contenção da atitude favorável à desonestidade (Beta =-0,25; p<0,05), mas mecanismos como o desengajamento moral indicam sua provável presença identificada (Beta = 0,25; p<0,05), desfavorecendo o processo de autorregulação do aluno, o que amplia a atitude de desonestidade acadêmica. Optou-se pela técnica de análise multivariada com Modelagem de Equações Estruturais, considerada adequada para análise simultânea de relações entre construtos, e considerada uma técnica de caráter confirmatório, utilizada para determinar a validade do modelo teórico diante dos dados observados. Com algumas reformulações no instrumento, foi aplicada uma nova survey, quanto à coleta de dados foi aplicado um questionário eletrônico operado na plataforma Surveymonkey. O link do questionário foi enviado á uma população de 2000 alunos obtendo como retorno 146 respostas válidas. Nos resultados apresentados na pesquisa final destacam-se a influência da Percepção Social no comportamento da desonestidade acadêmica com coeficiente altamente significante (0,446***), também o desengajamento Moral frente à atitude e a Intenção/Comportamento com resultados expressivos quanto a influência do fator idade, apresentando o coeficiente (-0,156***). O estudo indica a possível existência de várias implicações para o gestor e para a comunidade acadêmica, permitindo desdobramentos em pesquisas futuras

As university faculty are often required to police academic misconduct among students, their attitudes and beliefs toward misconduct warrant investigation, particularly as the failure to act may exacerbate the incidence of students’ unethical behaviors. Therefore, this descriptive study examined faculty perceptions of academic dishonesty among students, institutional support, and self-plagiarism using an electronic-mail questionnaire (N = 201) and assessed the academic environment, frequency of student misconduct, and severity of those behaviors. Female faculty were more likely than male faculty to perceive high levels of cheating on exams (pppppppppp Additionally, online faculty were more likely than campus-based faculty to perceive higher levels of plagiarism among graduate students (p p Multi-way frequency analyses revealed significant interactions between the perceptions concerning academic integrity policies, institutional support, and understanding of self-plagiarism, thereby, resulting in the rejection of the three null hypotheses of no association. Overall, faculty remain troubled by self-plagiarism; their perceptions are mediated by gender and academic rank. Consequently, additional efforts should be made to educate instructional staff about the various forms of academic dishonesty including, but not limited to, self-plagiarism, double-dipping, and recycling; increase faculty understanding and awareness of misconduct; and encourage compliance with said policies.

Historically, cheating in universities has been limited to smuggling notes into exams, unauthorized cooperation, plagiarism and using ghost writers. New improvements in natural language processing now allow students to easily generate text, that is both unique and, in many ways, indistinguishable from what a human would create. These texts can then be submitted with little to no risk of getting caught by anti-cheating software. There are currently a multitude of such text generators online, which vary in ease of use, cost and capabilities. They are capable enough to generate unique text which will evade plagiarism-tools employed by universities. If you combine relatively cheap pricing, ease of use, pressure to perform well in school and low risk of detection. It is not too difficult to imagine that students will use tools like these to cheat. This thesis mainly focuses on whether humans can differentiate AI-generated essays from human written ones and what countermeasures can be used to hinder its use. By giving teachers at Halmstad University human and AI-generated text; then asking them to guess the source of text presented. The experiment concluded that teachers' ability to differentiate AI-generated text from human written text could not be proven.  This thesis also surveys the currently available detection methods for AI-generated text and determines that they are not sufficient in their current form. Lastly, this thesis showcases alternative examination methods that could be used instead of essay-style examinations.