Orientador: Luci Regina Muzzeti / Banca: Sueli Aparecida Itman Monteiro / Banca: José Luís Vieira de Almeida / Banca: Mara Regina Martins Jacomeli / Banca: Celso João Ferretti / Resumo: Em um contexto marcado pela reestruturação produtiva do modo de produção capitalista, a escola aparece como uma instância fundamental para a formação do trabalhador com um novo perfil para atender às exigências do capital. Dessa forma, alguns autores e os sistemas educacionais procuram por meio de reformas adequarem a escola a esses novos tempos. Por isso tornou-se comum a fala de que a escola está em crise e é através das mudanças curriculares que esta crise será resolvida, segundo seus proponentes. A reforma não tira a escola da crise, pois tanto o capitalismo quanto o seu modelo de indivíduo e de escola são irreformáveis. Analisando as interpretações que alguns teóricos têm sobre a crise da escola verificou-se que os mesmos apontam como saída a adaptação da escola ao modelo de capitalismo através da participação e da cidadania. A perspectiva desse estudo, ao contrário daqueles autores, situa a crise da escola como decorrência da crise da concepção burguesa de indivíduo. Para comprovar essa hipótese, analisou-se a concepção liberal de indivíduo através dos conceitos de autonomia e liberdade em dois autores clássicos, Thomas Hobbes e John Locke e identificou-se que a crise da concepção burguesa de indivíduo repercute na escola, que também é burguesa. Demonstrou-se também que a crise da concepção burguesa de indivíduo decorre da divisão do trabalho que separou o fazer do pensar e, portanto, o trabalhador de seu produto. Ao finalizar as investigações teóricas conclui-se, que a crise da escola não existe. O que existe é a crise da concepção burguesa de indivíduo e esta, repercute na escola. Esta repercussão decorre das mudanças no modelo de organização do trabalho criando um descompasso entre o que é ensinado e as novas exigências do mercado de trabalho. Ela passa por reformas desde sua organização... (Resumo completo, clicar caesso eletrônico abaixo) / Abstract: In a context marked by productive restructuration of the capitalist way of production, the school appears as a fundamental instance for the worker formation with a new profile to attend the capital exigencies. This way, some authors and the educational systems search by means of reform to adequate the school to the new times. Consequently what became common was the idea that the school is in crisis and it is through curricular changes that this crisis will be solved, according to their proponents. Reform does not take the school off the crisis because as capitalism such as its standard of individual and school are unreformable. Analyzing the interpretations that some theoreticians have about the crisis of the school it was verified that they point as an answer to the school adaptation to the capitalism layout through participation and citizenship. The study perspective, instead of those authors, situates the crisis of the school as an occurrence of the crisis of the bourgeois conception of the individual. To prove this hypothesis, the liberal conception of the individual was analyzed by the concepts of autonomy and freedom in two classic authors, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, and it was identified that the crisis of the bourgeois conception of the individual reverberates at school that it is also bourgeois. It also demonstrated that the crisis of the bourgeois conception of the individual occurs by the share of work that separated the make of the think and, therefore, the worker of its product. Finalizing the theoretical investigation it concludes that the crisis of the school does not exist. It is a false question. What exists is the crisis of the bourgeois conception of the individual and this reverberates at school. This reverberation occurs by the changes in the work's organization layout. It passes through reforms since its organization and until the moment it continues being pointed... Complete abstract click electronic access below) / Doutor

This thesis deals with the nationalistic imaginary in the novels of Sven Lidman, published 1910–1913. The novels hold forth a conservative point-of-view that embraces the bourgeois ideal of masculinity and the idea of the healthy, Swedish rural way of life as opposed to the destructive metropolis. This dualism is part of a dichotomy that structures the novels. It also entails continuity/fragmentation, the Swedish/the foreign, men/women, activity/ passivity as well as masculinity/femininity and unmanliness. In the Silfverstååhl-cycle the protagonists are young men of a noble, Swedish family. They progress from lost and introspective youths to grown men who are deeply concerned with and engaged in society. They are different representatives of the Swedish man – the farmer, the business man, the explorer and the clergy man. What unites them is how their “coming of age” develops, how through trial and struggle they become stronger and prove worthy of the manly role they finally take on. This is a major principle of the bourgeois masculinity that is also closely connected to the national identity of the men. There is also an ambiguity concerning modernity. Throughout the novels a critique of modern society is formulated, that acknowledges the modern age but simultaneously takes on a prudent attitude towards modern society. There is no going back for the Swedish nation; the modern times have to be confronted. The present is very important since it is the time for scrutiny. The handling of the modern era takes place in the developing processes of the young men, who have to be careful not to get trapped in the modern whirlpool that threatens to shatter the human being. The past, the familiar and the rural anchorage that the family relation entitles, is a defense against the destructive forces of modernity. But the past is not completely beneficial. Even though the past is of major importance to the national identity of the protagonists, they have to be very careful not to delve too much into the past because of the risk of paralysis and effeminization. In the nationalistic narrative the present encapsulates the past and the future. The Swedish man has to navigate in the borderland of modernity. / De svenska författarna och kriget

Cette thèse de doctorat étudie les liens entretenus entre les sociétés politiques de Dijon et de Lille et le pouvoir princier sous les deux derniers ducs de Bourgogne (1419-1477), en interrogeant la manière dont les bourgeois l’ont apprécié en termes d’opportunité, se sont associés au fonctionnement de l’État princier et investis au service du prince. Toutes deux capitales d’un ensemble multipolaire de principautés dont elles sont deux des principales villes francophones, Dijon et Lille appartiennent à deux espaces géopolitiques diversement intégrés (le premier, marginal ; l’autre, central) et rarement observés ensemble. L’analyse, portée à partir des milieux dirigeants, souligne l’originalité avec laquelle ces liens s’établissent. Les dijonnais sont étroitement associés à l’exercice du pouvoir princier, là où les Lillois séparent strictement implication municipale et service du prince, mais sont étroitement liés à l’entourage ducal. La sociologie du pouvoir municipal comme des éléments de contexte régional expliquent les différences remarquées. Au-delà de ces différences, l’investissement bourgeois, qui s’articule à un ensemble d’activités parmi lesquelles l’exercice du pouvoir municipal reste toujours décisif, participe à l’évolution des sociétés urbaines, et, amorçant leur intégration à une société politique d’ordre territorial, et induit une adaptation pragmatique des pratiques politiques des Villes. La disparition de Charles le Téméraire confirme cette capacité d’adaptation des sociétés bourgeoises, qui réorientent à leur profit vers de nouveaux pouvoirs les liens élaborés auprès des ducs de Bourgogne. / This PhD thesis is about the relationship between political societies of Dijon and Lille and princely power under the last two dukes of Burgundy (1419-1477) studying the manner the citizens felt it in terms of appropriateness and how they associated to the princely state and got involved in serving it. Both capitals of a multipolar body of principalities of which they are two of the main French-speaking towns, Dijon and Lille belong to two geopolitical, diversely integrated areas (the former marginal, the latter central) and seldom observed together. The analysis seen from the ruling circles emphasizes the originality with which their links work out. The inhabitants of Dijon are closely associated with the prince’s exercising of power whereas the inhabitants of Lille strictly separate town implication from prince service though both closely related to the ducal entourage. The municipal power sociology together with regional context elements can explain those observed differences. Beyond them, the citizens investment, which is articulated to a set of activities among which the town exercise of power always remains decisive, takes part in urban societies development and initiating their integration in a political territorial society, induces a pragmatic adaptation of town practical politics. The death of Charles the Bold confirms this ability of bourgeois societies to adapt themselves and redirect the ties built with the dukes of Burgundy towards new powers for their benefit.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:31:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2011-04-27Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T20:22:19Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 pereira_v_dr_arafcl.pdf: 384719 bytes, checksum: 371281d8994213da9df64910f597357b (MD5) / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / Em um contexto marcado pela reestruturação produtiva do modo de produção capitalista, a escola aparece como uma instância fundamental para a formação do trabalhador com um novo perfil para atender às exigências do capital. Dessa forma, alguns autores e os sistemas educacionais procuram por meio de reformas adequarem a escola a esses novos tempos. Por isso tornou-se comum a fala de que a escola está em crise e é através das mudanças curriculares que esta crise será resolvida, segundo seus proponentes. A reforma não tira a escola da crise, pois tanto o capitalismo quanto o seu modelo de indivíduo e de escola são irreformáveis. Analisando as interpretações que alguns teóricos têm sobre a crise da escola verificou-se que os mesmos apontam como saída a adaptação da escola ao modelo de capitalismo através da participação e da cidadania. A perspectiva desse estudo, ao contrário daqueles autores, situa a crise da escola como decorrência da crise da concepção burguesa de indivíduo. Para comprovar essa hipótese, analisou-se a concepção liberal de indivíduo através dos conceitos de autonomia e liberdade em dois autores clássicos, Thomas Hobbes e John Locke e identificou-se que a crise da concepção burguesa de indivíduo repercute na escola, que também é burguesa. Demonstrou-se também que a crise da concepção burguesa de indivíduo decorre da divisão do trabalho que separou o fazer do pensar e, portanto, o trabalhador de seu produto. Ao finalizar as investigações teóricas conclui-se, que a crise da escola não existe. O que existe é a crise da concepção burguesa de indivíduo e esta, repercute na escola. Esta repercussão decorre das mudanças no modelo de organização do trabalho criando um descompasso entre o que é ensinado e as novas exigências do mercado de trabalho. Ela passa por reformas desde sua organização... / In a context marked by productive restructuration of the capitalist way of production, the school appears as a fundamental instance for the worker formation with a new profile to attend the capital exigencies. This way, some authors and the educational systems search by means of reform to adequate the school to the new times. Consequently what became common was the idea that the school is in crisis and it is through curricular changes that this crisis will be solved, according to their proponents. Reform does not take the school off the crisis because as capitalism such as its standard of individual and school are unreformable. Analyzing the interpretations that some theoreticians have about the crisis of the school it was verified that they point as an answer to the school adaptation to the capitalism layout through participation and citizenship. The study perspective, instead of those authors, situates the crisis of the school as an occurrence of the crisis of the bourgeois conception of the individual. To prove this hypothesis, the liberal conception of the individual was analyzed by the concepts of autonomy and freedom in two classic authors, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, and it was identified that the crisis of the bourgeois conception of the individual reverberates at school that it is also bourgeois. It also demonstrated that the crisis of the bourgeois conception of the individual occurs by the share of work that separated the make of the think and, therefore, the worker of its product. Finalizing the theoretical investigation it concludes that the crisis of the school does not exist. It is a false question. What exists is the crisis of the bourgeois conception of the individual and this reverberates at school. This reverberation occurs by the changes in the work‘s organization layout. It passes through reforms since its organization and until the moment it continues being pointed... Complete abstract click electronic access below)

This thesis is about the new Swedish political party, Borgerlig Framtid (Bourgeois Future) in comparison with the other bourgeois parties in Swedish politics. It uses the (theoretical aspect), organization theoretical perspective on why new political parties is being formed. This perspective means that new political parties emerged when the existing once fail to align themselves with voters preferences. Two questions is being answered “What similarities and differences exist between the Bourgeois Future and the four bourgeois parliamentary parties?” and “Are there based on the organization theoretical perspective space for Bourgeois Future in Swedish politics?” The answers to these questions are that between Bourgeois Future and (some of) the other bourgeois parties there are many similarities but also some big differences and that there might be room for Bourgeois Future in Swedish politics but that depends on whether if the differences that exist appear as important or not to the voters.

This thesis discusses the intersections of exposure therapy and art therapy in the works and careers of Deborah Orloff, Tracey Emin, and Louise Bourgeois, as well as in my own work. Artists use their practice as a form of mental healing, subconsciously utilizing essential theories of exposure and art therapies.

<p>This doctoral thesis examines how modernisation affects and is affected by existing local culture and identity. It is about the relation between the social and mental barriers experienced, expressed and manifested in the social culture of local community, and modernisation’s dynamic powers over time. The thesis deals with different time periods from the 1800’s until today with regard to expressions and consequences of modernity. People during the societal transformation of Sweden in the 19th and 20th centuries are culturally depicted from a micro-perspective.</p><p>An overall perspective for the analysis of modernity uses the concepts of basal and variable modernity, borrowed from the historian of ideas Sven-Eric Liedman. The perspective makes possible the separation between on the one hand the structural modernisation within the fields of economy, technology and natural sciences, and on the other hand the cultural modernity manifested in conceptions of the world, politics, existential viewpoints, aesthetic expressions and social culture. Within the first-mentioned fields, where basal modernity dominates, a uniform and cumulative developmental pattern emerges as well as an almost self-propelled continuity toward the next innovation or stage of development. Within the latter fields, however, a non-uniform pattern emerges, where modernisation is constantly the object of alternative interpretations and attitudes. This variable modernity is characterised by a cultural struggle between conflicting ideologies and strategies in relation to ongoing modernisation. Different individuals and groups position themselves between acceptance and resistance, progressiveness and the critique of civilisation, the preservation of traditions and the will to change. In this course of events new affinities and identifications, but also new dissociations and antagonisms are created in local social contexts. Modernity leads both to the obliteration of boundaries and to the emergence of new social and mental boundaries. This process can also lead to existing geographical borders being charged with a new ideological content so their importance is revitalised.</p>

This study presents an attempt to understand the political and aesthetic relationship between two of Modernism’s most enigmatic authors, Wyndham Lewis and Ford Madox Ford by examining their novelistic practice in light of their writings on politics and social criticism. A close look at the use of ironic distance, a hallmark feature in our understanding of modernist fiction, in Tarr (1918) and The Good Soldier (1915) reveals both authors conscious effort to distance themselves from their novel’s subjects, Fredric Tarr and John Dowell respectively. In light of both novels’ satirical element, a scathing attack on bourgeois narcissism caused by the wealthier class’ persistent attempts to identify with hollow and self serving social roles through the sham-aristocratic prestige created by England’s pre-war commodity culture, and the fact that both Fredric Tarr and John Dowell are artist figures that somehow resemble their creators, this project reinterprets Ford and Lewis’ ironic distance as an instance of self-distanciation. From this we can infer that both Ford and Lewis were invested in the modernist idea of impersonality, not just as a artistic or literary technique, but as the artist’s only means of escaping the narcissistic and slothful trap of modern subjectivity, and that, along with the production of modernist art, they saw a continual self-effacement as the price of authenticity, therefore inspiring in them the conviction to live as “uncelebrated stylists.”

This thesis points to the existence of a bourgeois revolution in the history of the Ottoman Empire. Against all approaches of the historiography on the subject which employ outmoded criteria and point to a duality between the moments in 1908 and 1923 / it employs contemporary arguments on bourgeois revolutions and argues that the Ottoman Empire witnessed a single revolutionary sequence which occurred between July 1908 and November 1922. The thesis also suggests the idea that this single revolutionary sequence of the Ottoman Empire was a bourgeois revolution.

This study presents an attempt to understand the political and aesthetic relationship between two of Modernism’s most enigmatic authors, Wyndham Lewis and Ford Madox Ford by examining their novelistic practice in light of their writings on politics and social criticism. A close look at the use of ironic distance, a hallmark feature in our understanding of modernist fiction, in Tarr (1918) and The Good Soldier (1915) reveals both authors conscious effort to distance themselves from their novel’s subjects, Fredric Tarr and John Dowell respectively. In light of both novels’ satirical element, a scathing attack on bourgeois narcissism caused by the wealthier class’ persistent attempts to identify with hollow and self serving social roles through the sham-aristocratic prestige created by England’s pre-war commodity culture, and the fact that both Fredric Tarr and John Dowell are artist figures that somehow resemble their creators, this project reinterprets Ford and Lewis’ ironic distance as an instance of self-distanciation. From this we can infer that both Ford and Lewis were invested in the modernist idea of impersonality, not just as a artistic or literary technique, but as the artist’s only means of escaping the narcissistic and slothful trap of modern subjectivity, and that, along with the production of modernist art, they saw a continual self-effacement as the price of authenticity, therefore inspiring in them the conviction to live as “uncelebrated stylists.”