Diss.--Stuttgart, 2003. / Bibliogr. p. 293-328.

Texte remanié de: Diss.--Fakultät für Sozial- und Verhaltenswissenschaften--Heidelberg--Ruprecht-Karls-Universität, 1996. Titre de soutenance : Zur Pädagogik Jonas Cohns : ihre Form, Gestalt und systematische Voraussetzung. / Bibliogr. p. 261-280. Index.

An investigation into memory of heightened moments through visual phenomena.

No description available.

No description available.

Adam Michnik, Bernard Kouchner et Daniel Cohn-Bendit, anciens héros des révoltes de 68 en Pologne et en France, bien qu'évoluant dans des contextes politique et social différents et n'agissant pas sur les mêmes terrains, ont des parcours qui, à bien des égards, présentent des similitudes. Sont-ils, oui ou non, représentatifs de la génération 68 ? Leur engagement dans les évènements de 68 relève-t-il des mêmes motivations ? 68 constitue-t-il pour eux un évènement « dateur » auquel ils ne cesseront de se référer tout au long de leurs vies. Si oui, quel fut son impact sur les actions qu'ils ont menées ultérieurement ? Après 68, successivement acteurs politiques et « spectateurs engagés », ils n'ont cessé d'influer sur la vie publique. Adam Michnik, dissident et leader de l'opposition au régime communiste en Pologne, devient un des « pères » des transformations démocratiques. Après la chute du régime 1989, tout en soutenant le pouvoir élu démocratiquement ainsi que les réformes qu'il a entreprises, il sort, pour un temps, de son rôle de dissident. Cependant, selon ce qu'il affirmait lui-même, il « s'est converti » rapidement et a regagné ses positions de dissident. Qu'en était-il de Bernard Kouchner et de Daniel Cohn-Bendit ? Ont-ils été, sont-ils toujours, des acteurs politiques à part entière ou, plutôt, des outsiders de la politique ? Michnik, Kouchner et Cohn-Bendit, que sont-ils aujourd'hui ? Des « traîtres » qui se sont détournés de leurs idéaux et passions de jeunesse ? Des visionnaires qui, souvent peu compris et controversés, dévancent, de loin, leur époque et leurs comptemporains ? Qu'est-ce qui motive leurs choix politiques et engagements ? C'est autour de ces interrogations et d'autres problématiques auxquelles renvoyent les trois protagonistes cités ci-dessus que nous souhaiterions construire notre analyse. / "Adam Michnik, Bernard Kouchner and Daniel Cohn-Bendit - "converted dissidents" : Comparative analysis.

A Reforma Sanitária Brasileira (RSB) tem sido bastante estudada pelo campo científico da Saúde Coletiva. Recentemente, novos estudos retomam sua trajetória e, assim, têm estimulado discussões sobre seu futuro. Este trabalho buscou valorizar este tema e o pensamento de uma de suas pesquisadoras e personagens, a socióloga Amélia Cohn. Devido à relevância de suas contribuições teóricas e a inexistência de trabalhos sobre esta autora, o objetivo desta dissertação foi compreender o pensamento de Amélia Cohn sobre a Reforma Sanitária Brasileira, a partir de um conjunto de seus textos, publicados ao longo de 24 anos. Para tanto, elaboraram-se as seguintes temáticas para análise dos quatro textos principais: a \"definição\" construída por Amélia Cohn sobre a RSB, o protagonismo político no interior do movimento da RSB, as características das estratégias políticas do movimento da RSB, os objetivos da RSB e o alcance de suas propostas, a produção de conhecimentos do campo da RSB, e a questão democrática para o campo da RSB. Concluiu-se que a autora buscou analisar esse tema de modo amplo, avaliando diferentes aspectos e priorizando em sua avaliação sobre os rumos da RSB a relação concomitante entre a produção de conhecimentos do campo e suas propostas e ações políticas. Além disso, ela considerou a RSB das décadas de 1960, 1970 e 1980, como a experiência de referência para suas reflexões. Dessa forma, elaborou em 1992 sua tese principal sobre o esgotamento da reforma sanitária e, em 2013, a tese sobre a renúncia do campo a um projeto de saúde para o país. Portanto, entende-se que Amélia Cohn buscou identificar pluralidade teórico-política no movimento e no pensamento da RSB, incluindo-se o campo da Saúde Coletiva, e propôs a autoconfrontação dos projetos do campo em suas análises. / The Brazilian Sanitary Reform (BSR) is a common object of research within the Public Health scientific field. Long-lasting questions about its path have been discussed in recent studies, opening doors to think about its future. This study highlights this theme by reflecting on the sociologist Amélia Cohn\'s theoretical contributions upon the BSR. Due to the relevance of her theoretical contributions and the absence of studies about her scholarly works, this dissertation seeks to understand Amélia Cohn\'s thought about the BSR through published works over a 24-year-period. In order to do so, the following themes guide through the analysis of four main readings: Amelia Cohn\'s \'definition\' of the BSR, the political role within the BSR, the characteristics of the political strategies of the RSB movement, the goals of the BSR and the extent of its propositions, the production of knowledge from the BSR field, and the understanding of the democratic question to the BSR field. The author sought to analyze the BSF in a broad spectrum by evaluating its diverse aspects and prioritizing the concomitant relationship between the production of knowledge of the field and its proposals and political actions in order to evaluate the BSR\'s paths. Furthermore, she considered the 60\'s, 70\'s and 80\'s as time reference for her reflections on the development of the BSR. Accordingly, in 1992 she developed her main thesis on the collapse of sanitary reform, and, in 2013, theorized about the resignation of the BSR to a health project for the country. Therefore, Amélia Cohn sought to identify theoretical and political plurality in the movement and thought of the BSR, which includes the field of Public Health. The author has clearly proposed the confrontation between the projects carried out by the field in her analytical frameworks.

We present new results on absolute stability for BDF-ADI (Backward differentiation formula Alternating Direction Implicit) methods applied to a linear advection and diffusion equations. Unconditional absolute stability of the BDF2-ADI method is proven for advection and diffusion separately, as well as to the BDF3-ADI method for the purely-diffusive case. Conditional absolute stability of the BDF4-ADI is also proven for the purely-diffusive case, and stability regions for BDF3-ADI and BDF4- ADI are given in terms of the PDE coefficients and numerical parameters. Lastly, numerical experiments are presented to support the theoretical results and conjectures. These experiments also suggest future work.

No description available.

Volume One, the adult literary novel, Dissection, is a portrayal of the inner world of Anna McBride, a female GP who has been sued for medical negligence. The novel spans the three-month period prior to Anna's mediation meeting with a young male patient, now the plaintiff, and his mother. Central to the writing of Dissection is the rendering of the consciousness of a woman who, in the wake of what she perceives to be a grave error of judgement, unflinchingly questions her worth and her relationships with others. Volume Two, the exegesis, examines various literary techniques (autonomous monologue, narrated monologue and communal narration) used in the representation of the consciousness of female characters in Marie Darrieussecq's 'A brief stay with the living' and Jacinta Halloran's 'Dissection'. With reference to the work of narratologists, Susan Lanser and Dorrit Cohn, these literary techniques are analysed in the context of two contemporary novels that seek to represent women's inner lives.