Yes / Purpose: Although start-ups have gained increasing scholarly attention, we lack sufficient understanding of their entrepreneurial strategic posture (ESP) in emerging economies. The purpose of this study is to examine the processes of ESP of new technology venture start-ups (NTVs) in an emerging market context. Design/methodology/approach: In line with grounded theory guidelines and the inductive research traditions, the authors adopted a qualitative approach involving 42 in-depth semi-structured interviews with Ghanaian NTV entrepreneurs to gain a comprehensive analysis at the micro-level on the entrepreneurs' strategic posturing. A systematic procedure for data analysis was adopted. Findings: From the authors' analysis of Ghanaian NTVs, the authors derived a three-stage model to elucidate the nature and process of ESP Phase 1 spotting and exploiting market opportunities, Phase II identifying initial advantages and Phase III ascertaining and responding to change. Originality/value: The study contributes to advancing research on ESP by explicating the process through which informal ties and networks are utilised by NTVs and NTVs' founders to overcome extreme resource constraints and information vacuums in contexts of institutional voids. The authors depart from past studies in demonstrating how such ties can be harnessed in spotting and exploiting market opportunities by NTVs. On this basis, the paper makes original contributions to ESP theory and practice.

O presente estudo foi realizado com o objetivo compreender os fatores críticos inerentes ao sucesso de organizações detentoras de portfólios com baixa agregação de valor ou diferenciação perante a concorrência, na implementação de posicionamentos competitivos distintos daqueles trabalhados pela administração estratégica para empresas de produtos \"commoditizados\", como liderança em custo, por exemplo. Para isso, desenvolveu-se uma revisão da literatura a respeito de administração estratégica, marketing estratégico, gestão em redes de relacionamento e posicionamento competitivo. Mais especificamente focou-se no Modelo Delta, como parâmetros conceituais de verificação dos possíveis fatores que levam as empresas com baixa diferenciação intrínseca de seus produtos a buscarem diferenciação perante a concorrência por meio de serviços, relacionamento/intimidade ou parcerias na rede de relacionamento, adquirindo, com isso, ganhos acima da média. Propõe-se um esquema analítico baseado nos princípios de posicionamento competitivo sugeridos pelo Modelo Delta, como ferramental de análise. O estudo é ainda complementado por uma verificação empírica por meio de um estudo de caso de uma organização química focada no mercado de baixa diferenciação de produtos. Ao final, pretende-se contribuir com o conhecimento e a atuação das organizações, no que tange ao Posicionamento Competitivo e à gestão de redes, propondo uma análise diferenciada de estratégias possíveis em mercados \"commoditizados\". / The present study was aimed to understand the critical factors inherent to the success of organizations with low added value portfolios or differentiation from the competitors, on the implementation of competitive positioning, distinct than those worked by strategic management for \"commoditized\" product companies, as cost leadership, for instance. For this purpose, a review of the literature was developed on the following subjects: strategic management, strategic marketing, relationship management and competitive positioning. More specifically focused on the Delta Model parameters such as conceptual verification of the possible factors that lead companies with low intrinsic differentiation of their products to seek differentiation from the competition through services, relationship or partnerships, acquiring thereby gains above average. It proposes an analytical framework based on the principles suggested by the competitive positioning of Delta Model, as an analysis tool. The study is complemented by an empirical verification through a case of a chemical organization focused on low differentiation market. At the end, the intention is to contribute to the knowledge and performance of organizations, in regard to competitive positioning and management of networks, offering a differentiated analysis of possible strategies in \"commoditized\" markets.

Com base em estudos teóricos e ilustrado com análises que representam a prática, este trabalho visa a contribuir para a discussão a respeito da importância da estratégia para o desenvolvimento das empresas, em especial as de médio porte. Apontando as diferenças e aplicações das várias correntes existentes sobre o assunto, busca identificar as dificuldades enfrentadas pelas empresas na sua implementação. Este tema vem sendo abordado com base, principalmente, em duas correntes. A primeira, baseada na noção de equilíbrio de mercado, onde se destacam a Teoria de Posicionamento Estratégico e a Teoria Baseada nos Recursos. A segunda corrente é associada a uma visão dinâmica de mercado, onde se destacam a Teoria de Processos de Mercado e a Teoria das Capacidades Dinâmicas, na qual inclui-se a Teoria da Competição Baseada em Competência (RUAS; ANTONELLO; BOFF, 2005). A Teoria de Posicionamento Estratégico ganhou força na década de 70, com o trabalho de Porter, e coloca as decisões estratégicas de forma dependente de fatores exógenos, onde os diferenciais competitivos das empresas estão vinculados à sua capacidade de adaptação aos setores onde estão inseridas. A Teoria Baseada em Recursos nasceu a partir das ideias de Penrose (1959) e foi desenvolvida por Barney e Hesterly (1991) e atribuía as vantagens competitivas das empresas aos seus recursos e sua capacidade de utilizá-los de forma ótima. A Teoria da Competição Baseada em Competência aborda as capacidades das organizações para sustentar alocações coordenadas de recursos a fim de atingir os seus objetivos. Esta Teoria nasceu a partir do trabalho de Prahalad e Hamel (1995), que criaram o conceito de Core Competence. Tomando como base teórica a Teoria de Posicionamento Estratégico e a Teoria Baseada em Recursos, restringindo a análise sobre competências à premissa de que a capacidade de utilização ótima de recursos pode ser identificada como tal, foi possível, a partir da análise dos relatos resultantes das reuniões com gestores de 4 empresas de médio porte com atuação em segmentos diferentes, concluir que, apesar das diferenças conceituais, não há evidências de que alguma das abordagens seja totalmente inválida ou negada pelas demais. Suas influências nas estratégias corporativas são de ordens distintas e o grande desafio de obter resultados superiores demanda profundo conhecimento e, principalmente, análise de como a empresa está trabalhando cada uma das dimensões apresentadas. / Based on theoretical studies and illustrated with case studies, this study aims at contributing to the discussion about the importance of the strategy for companies' development, especially medium-sized companies. Pointing out the differences and applications of various existing tendencies on the subject, and the difficulties faced by companies in their implementation. This theme has been approached mainly on the basis of two tendencies. The first, based on the notion of market equilibrium, where we highlight the Strategic Positioning Theory and the Resource-Based Theory. The second tendency is associated with a dynamic view of the market, where we highlight the Market Process Theory and the Dynamic Capabilities Theory, which includes the Theory of Competence-Based Competition (RUAS; ANTONELLO; BOFF, 2005). The Strategic Positioning Theory gained momentum in the 70s, with the works of Porter, and puts the strategic decisions dependent on exogenous factors, where the competitive advantages of companies are linked to its ability to adapt to the sectors where they are inserted. The Resource-Based Theory sprang from the ideas of Penrose (1959) and was developed by Barney and Hesterly (1991) and attributed the competitive advantages of companies to their resources and their ability to use them optimally. The Theory of Competence-Based Competition addresses the capacity of organizations to support coordinated allocation of resources to achieve their goals. This theory rose from the works of Prahalad and Hamel (1995), who created the concept of Core Competence. Taking into account the Strategic Positioning Theory and the Resource-Based Theory as the theoretical basis, restricting the analysis on competences to the premise that the ability to optimal use of resources can be identified as such, it was possible, from the analysis of reports arising from meetings with managers from 3 midsize companies with operations in different segments, it was concluded that, despite the conceptual differences, there is no evidence that any of the approaches is totally invalid or denied by other. Their influence on corporate strategies are of different orders and the great challenge of obtaining superior results demand a deep understanding and, especially, an analysis of how the company is working each of the shown dimensions.

Com base em estudos teóricos e ilustrado com análises que representam a prática, este trabalho visa a contribuir para a discussão a respeito da importância da estratégia para o desenvolvimento das empresas, em especial as de médio porte. Apontando as diferenças e aplicações das várias correntes existentes sobre o assunto, busca identificar as dificuldades enfrentadas pelas empresas na sua implementação. Este tema vem sendo abordado com base, principalmente, em duas correntes. A primeira, baseada na noção de equilíbrio de mercado, onde se destacam a Teoria de Posicionamento Estratégico e a Teoria Baseada nos Recursos. A segunda corrente é associada a uma visão dinâmica de mercado, onde se destacam a Teoria de Processos de Mercado e a Teoria das Capacidades Dinâmicas, na qual inclui-se a Teoria da Competição Baseada em Competência (RUAS; ANTONELLO; BOFF, 2005). A Teoria de Posicionamento Estratégico ganhou força na década de 70, com o trabalho de Porter, e coloca as decisões estratégicas de forma dependente de fatores exógenos, onde os diferenciais competitivos das empresas estão vinculados à sua capacidade de adaptação aos setores onde estão inseridas. A Teoria Baseada em Recursos nasceu a partir das ideias de Penrose (1959) e foi desenvolvida por Barney e Hesterly (1991) e atribuía as vantagens competitivas das empresas aos seus recursos e sua capacidade de utilizá-los de forma ótima. A Teoria da Competição Baseada em Competência aborda as capacidades das organizações para sustentar alocações coordenadas de recursos a fim de atingir os seus objetivos. Esta Teoria nasceu a partir do trabalho de Prahalad e Hamel (1995), que criaram o conceito de Core Competence. Tomando como base teórica a Teoria de Posicionamento Estratégico e a Teoria Baseada em Recursos, restringindo a análise sobre competências à premissa de que a capacidade de utilização ótima de recursos pode ser identificada como tal, foi possível, a partir da análise dos relatos resultantes das reuniões com gestores de 4 empresas de médio porte com atuação em segmentos diferentes, concluir que, apesar das diferenças conceituais, não há evidências de que alguma das abordagens seja totalmente inválida ou negada pelas demais. Suas influências nas estratégias corporativas são de ordens distintas e o grande desafio de obter resultados superiores demanda profundo conhecimento e, principalmente, análise de como a empresa está trabalhando cada uma das dimensões apresentadas. / Based on theoretical studies and illustrated with case studies, this study aims at contributing to the discussion about the importance of the strategy for companies' development, especially medium-sized companies. Pointing out the differences and applications of various existing tendencies on the subject, and the difficulties faced by companies in their implementation. This theme has been approached mainly on the basis of two tendencies. The first, based on the notion of market equilibrium, where we highlight the Strategic Positioning Theory and the Resource-Based Theory. The second tendency is associated with a dynamic view of the market, where we highlight the Market Process Theory and the Dynamic Capabilities Theory, which includes the Theory of Competence-Based Competition (RUAS; ANTONELLO; BOFF, 2005). The Strategic Positioning Theory gained momentum in the 70s, with the works of Porter, and puts the strategic decisions dependent on exogenous factors, where the competitive advantages of companies are linked to its ability to adapt to the sectors where they are inserted. The Resource-Based Theory sprang from the ideas of Penrose (1959) and was developed by Barney and Hesterly (1991) and attributed the competitive advantages of companies to their resources and their ability to use them optimally. The Theory of Competence-Based Competition addresses the capacity of organizations to support coordinated allocation of resources to achieve their goals. This theory rose from the works of Prahalad and Hamel (1995), who created the concept of Core Competence. Taking into account the Strategic Positioning Theory and the Resource-Based Theory as the theoretical basis, restricting the analysis on competences to the premise that the ability to optimal use of resources can be identified as such, it was possible, from the analysis of reports arising from meetings with managers from 3 midsize companies with operations in different segments, it was concluded that, despite the conceptual differences, there is no evidence that any of the approaches is totally invalid or denied by other. Their influence on corporate strategies are of different orders and the great challenge of obtaining superior results demand a deep understanding and, especially, an analysis of how the company is working each of the shown dimensions.

Com base em estudos teóricos e ilustrado com análises que representam a prática, este trabalho visa a contribuir para a discussão a respeito da importância da estratégia para o desenvolvimento das empresas, em especial as de médio porte. Apontando as diferenças e aplicações das várias correntes existentes sobre o assunto, busca identificar as dificuldades enfrentadas pelas empresas na sua implementação. Este tema vem sendo abordado com base, principalmente, em duas correntes. A primeira, baseada na noção de equilíbrio de mercado, onde se destacam a Teoria de Posicionamento Estratégico e a Teoria Baseada nos Recursos. A segunda corrente é associada a uma visão dinâmica de mercado, onde se destacam a Teoria de Processos de Mercado e a Teoria das Capacidades Dinâmicas, na qual inclui-se a Teoria da Competição Baseada em Competência (RUAS; ANTONELLO; BOFF, 2005). A Teoria de Posicionamento Estratégico ganhou força na década de 70, com o trabalho de Porter, e coloca as decisões estratégicas de forma dependente de fatores exógenos, onde os diferenciais competitivos das empresas estão vinculados à sua capacidade de adaptação aos setores onde estão inseridas. A Teoria Baseada em Recursos nasceu a partir das ideias de Penrose (1959) e foi desenvolvida por Barney e Hesterly (1991) e atribuía as vantagens competitivas das empresas aos seus recursos e sua capacidade de utilizá-los de forma ótima. A Teoria da Competição Baseada em Competência aborda as capacidades das organizações para sustentar alocações coordenadas de recursos a fim de atingir os seus objetivos. Esta Teoria nasceu a partir do trabalho de Prahalad e Hamel (1995), que criaram o conceito de Core Competence. Tomando como base teórica a Teoria de Posicionamento Estratégico e a Teoria Baseada em Recursos, restringindo a análise sobre competências à premissa de que a capacidade de utilização ótima de recursos pode ser identificada como tal, foi possível, a partir da análise dos relatos resultantes das reuniões com gestores de 4 empresas de médio porte com atuação em segmentos diferentes, concluir que, apesar das diferenças conceituais, não há evidências de que alguma das abordagens seja totalmente inválida ou negada pelas demais. Suas influências nas estratégias corporativas são de ordens distintas e o grande desafio de obter resultados superiores demanda profundo conhecimento e, principalmente, análise de como a empresa está trabalhando cada uma das dimensões apresentadas. / Based on theoretical studies and illustrated with case studies, this study aims at contributing to the discussion about the importance of the strategy for companies' development, especially medium-sized companies. Pointing out the differences and applications of various existing tendencies on the subject, and the difficulties faced by companies in their implementation. This theme has been approached mainly on the basis of two tendencies. The first, based on the notion of market equilibrium, where we highlight the Strategic Positioning Theory and the Resource-Based Theory. The second tendency is associated with a dynamic view of the market, where we highlight the Market Process Theory and the Dynamic Capabilities Theory, which includes the Theory of Competence-Based Competition (RUAS; ANTONELLO; BOFF, 2005). The Strategic Positioning Theory gained momentum in the 70s, with the works of Porter, and puts the strategic decisions dependent on exogenous factors, where the competitive advantages of companies are linked to its ability to adapt to the sectors where they are inserted. The Resource-Based Theory sprang from the ideas of Penrose (1959) and was developed by Barney and Hesterly (1991) and attributed the competitive advantages of companies to their resources and their ability to use them optimally. The Theory of Competence-Based Competition addresses the capacity of organizations to support coordinated allocation of resources to achieve their goals. This theory rose from the works of Prahalad and Hamel (1995), who created the concept of Core Competence. Taking into account the Strategic Positioning Theory and the Resource-Based Theory as the theoretical basis, restricting the analysis on competences to the premise that the ability to optimal use of resources can be identified as such, it was possible, from the analysis of reports arising from meetings with managers from 3 midsize companies with operations in different segments, it was concluded that, despite the conceptual differences, there is no evidence that any of the approaches is totally invalid or denied by other. Their influence on corporate strategies are of different orders and the great challenge of obtaining superior results demand a deep understanding and, especially, an analysis of how the company is working each of the shown dimensions.

O presente estudo foi realizado com o objetivo compreender os fatores críticos inerentes ao sucesso de organizações detentoras de portfólios com baixa agregação de valor ou diferenciação perante a concorrência, na implementação de posicionamentos competitivos distintos daqueles trabalhados pela administração estratégica para empresas de produtos \"commoditizados\", como liderança em custo, por exemplo. Para isso, desenvolveu-se uma revisão da literatura a respeito de administração estratégica, marketing estratégico, gestão em redes de relacionamento e posicionamento competitivo. Mais especificamente focou-se no Modelo Delta, como parâmetros conceituais de verificação dos possíveis fatores que levam as empresas com baixa diferenciação intrínseca de seus produtos a buscarem diferenciação perante a concorrência por meio de serviços, relacionamento/intimidade ou parcerias na rede de relacionamento, adquirindo, com isso, ganhos acima da média. Propõe-se um esquema analítico baseado nos princípios de posicionamento competitivo sugeridos pelo Modelo Delta, como ferramental de análise. O estudo é ainda complementado por uma verificação empírica por meio de um estudo de caso de uma organização química focada no mercado de baixa diferenciação de produtos. Ao final, pretende-se contribuir com o conhecimento e a atuação das organizações, no que tange ao Posicionamento Competitivo e à gestão de redes, propondo uma análise diferenciada de estratégias possíveis em mercados \"commoditizados\". / The present study was aimed to understand the critical factors inherent to the success of organizations with low added value portfolios or differentiation from the competitors, on the implementation of competitive positioning, distinct than those worked by strategic management for \"commoditized\" product companies, as cost leadership, for instance. For this purpose, a review of the literature was developed on the following subjects: strategic management, strategic marketing, relationship management and competitive positioning. More specifically focused on the Delta Model parameters such as conceptual verification of the possible factors that lead companies with low intrinsic differentiation of their products to seek differentiation from the competition through services, relationship or partnerships, acquiring thereby gains above average. It proposes an analytical framework based on the principles suggested by the competitive positioning of Delta Model, as an analysis tool. The study is complemented by an empirical verification through a case of a chemical organization focused on low differentiation market. At the end, the intention is to contribute to the knowledge and performance of organizations, in regard to competitive positioning and management of networks, offering a differentiated analysis of possible strategies in \"commoditized\" markets.

In recent years, negativity has become a dominant theme in the political campaign. However, there are no comprehensive studies to measure the amount of negativity and to examine how parties and candidates adopt these negative strategies, particularly in the Canadian context. Although some studies have focused on a particular aspect of negative campaigning in a Canadian election, the question remains of how and to what extent parties adopt negative strategies in an election. In this thesis, I have collected and analyzed parties’ press releases in the 2015 federal election to examine and explain negativity in parties’ political campaigns. I have tested my results according to five primary theories of negative campaigning, including competitive positioning, ideological proximity, party organization, coalition or minority effect, and negative personalization, to see if these theories apply in the Canadian context. My results indicate that the 2015 federal campaign was a highly negative one, and most of the negative attacks have been directed towards the leader of the Conservative Party, Stephen Harper, while the Conservative Party published the least amount of negative attacks during the campaign. I also found that the Liberal Party has published the most negative statements during the campaign. My results also show that one of the influential factors in shaping parties’ negative campaign strategies is the other parties’ status in public opinion polls, particularly the federal voting intention factor. Although the results show that most of the attacks in the 2015 campaign targeted leaders of parties, I did not find enough support in my models to verify the negative personalization theory. The overall findings of this thesis show that Canadian elections are moving toward a presidential-style campaign, similar to the United States, by becoming more negative and more personalized, which can have significant implications for Canadian democracy.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-10T10:50:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DANIEL MORAIS VIEIRA.pdf: 1498350 bytes, checksum: 805cc9066d58a64a9c86745105eb978e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-08-11 / Prostitution has existed since the dawn of humanity. Over time, the camouflaged sex lust is nowadays the corporate model. Several companies have developed their entertainment-based businesses. For this, they use strategies to increase marketing and market segmentation, an increase higher than that of traditional companies. Even cities such as Las Vegas and Dubai realized the great economic potential that is in operation in this segment and organized its structures to become real cities in the entertainment. In Goiânia there are some companies who have developed their entertainment-oriented business to add strategic value, attract customers and make use of their services a memorable experience. The research of this field of study is a show house in Goiania, offering adult entertainment to a public looking for exclusivity and discretion. The aim is to investigate whether there is a relationship between the strategies of the business world and the exploitation of prostitution as luxury business. It is assumed that there is targeting the luxury sex and market competitive positioning against the competition as long as grounded in the entertainment economies but also the experience, making the practice of prostitution as a luxury product, to assume a character more acceptable among society. / A prostituição existe desde os primórdios da humanidade. No decorrer do tempo, o sexo camuflado pela luxúria encontra nos dias atuais o modelo corporativo. Várias empresas têm desenvolvido seus negócios baseados no entretenimento. Para isso, elas utilizam de estratégias para o incremento mercadológico e segmentação de mercado, apresentando crescimento superior ao de empresas tradicionais. Até mesmo cidades, como Las Vegas e Dubai perceberam o grande potencial econômico que há na exploração desse segmento e organizaram suas estruturas para se tornarem em verdadeiras cidades do entretenimento. Em Goiânia existem algumas empresas que desenvolveram seus negócios orientados ao entretenimento para agregar valor estratégico, atrair clientes e tornar o consumo de seus serviços uma experiência memorável. O campo de estudo dessa pesquisa é uma casa de espetáculo em Goiânia, que oferece entretenimento adulto a um público que procura exclusividade e discrição. Busca-se investigar se existe relação entre as estratégias do mundo empresarial e a exploração da prostituição como negócio de luxo. Supõese que exista segmentação do sexo de luxo e o posicionamento competitivo de mercado diante da concorrência, desde que fundamentada nas economias do entretenimento, mas também na experiência, fazendo com que a prática da prostituição, como produto de luxo, assuma um caráter mais aceitável entre a sociedade.

[pt] Diferentemente de várias pesquisas que estudam as diferenças de desempenho somente entre grupos estratégicos para verificar as implicações nos resultados das empresas devido ao posicionamento estratégico adotado, este estudo tem por objetivo examinar tais diferenças não só entre, mas também dentro dos grupos estratégicos para responder à esta mesma questão. Utilizando um banco de dados com informações da indústria farmacêutica brasileira no período de 1999 a 2002, esta pesquisa toma por base o estudo de Miller e Dess sobre tipologias para identificar os grupamentos existentes e as estratégias relevantes neste segmento industrial, buscando relacionar o posicionamento competitivo utilizado pelas empresas ao desempenho observado. Os resultados obtidos sugerem que os melhores desempenhos pertencem aos grandes laboratórios estrangeiros que fabricam medicamentos de marca e que utilizam estratégias simultâneas de baixo custo e diferenciação em um escopo amplo de atuação de mercado. Estes resultados mostram ainda indícios de que a tipologia de Miller e Dess descreve o posicionamento estratégico das empresas dentro da indústria farmacêutica brasileira melhor do que a tipologia de Porter. Por fim, o estudo sugere que nenhuma empresa possui vantagem competitiva pelo fato de estar posicionada como principal, secundária ou solitária dentro dos grupos estratégicos desta indústria. / [en] Unlike many researches that study performance differences only among strategic groups to verify the implications on firms results due to their strategic positioning, this study aims to examine such differences not only among, but also within strategic groups in order to answer the same question. Using a database that contains information about the Brazilian pharmaceutical industry from 1999 to 2002, this research employs Miller and Dess study about typologies as a base to identify existing groups and their relevant strategies in this industrial sector, and to relate the competitive positioning of firms to their achieved performance. Obtained results suggest that the best performances belong to foreign giant laboratories that produce branded drugs and that simultaneously utilize low cost and differentiation strategies with a broad market orientation. Furthermore, the aforementioned attained results show strong indicia that Miller and Dess typology describes strategic positioning of firms within the Brazilian pharmaceutical industry better than Porter s typology does. Finally, this study suggests that no company has competitive advantage because of its positioning as a core, secondary or solitary firm within the strategic groups of this industry.

It has been widely accepted that the banking industry is highly dependent on information technology (IT). Due to its pervasiveness and intertwining nature in most aspects of banking business, IT has also significantly become one of the critical components that facilitate the ability of banking institutions to meet regulatory requirements in an efficient and a cost-effective way. For instance, in the effort to mitigate the activities of money laundering and terrorism financing (ML/TF), various information on banking customers are timely and accurately gathered and analysed through automation. Furthermore, in many instances, IT systems exclusively built to achieve a similar objective are frequently established, and comparable to most IT implementations in the banking institutions, they are often can be equally regarded as a significant investment as well. Viewed from the longstanding debate on the value of IT investments to organisations, empirical research within the IS domain seemed to have placed less emphasis on the possible contribution of regulatory IT implementations. While it is easy to conceive that these IT deployments were never intended to directly benefit banking business from the outset, a study from this perspective should not be disregarded, but instead, warrant to be equally explored. The rationale for this statement can be attributed to the aforementioned assertion regarding the potentially substantial monetary investments required. In addition to this, it may also be due to the high tendency of stringent regulations being enforced in the future, and hence, could inevitably place a significant demand on organisational resources, and further influence their associated opportunity costs. For that reason, this study has attempted to fill the identified research gaps by conducting an investigation from the standpoint of a topical issue regarding anti-money laundering and counter terrorism financing (AML/CFT) implementation efforts within banking institutions. Utilising a conceptual framework that leverages the resource-based view (RBV) to structurally analyse a list of research objectives, empirical evidence of business benefits and the associated capabilities through organisational AML/CFT efforts have indeed been discovered. The benefits are particularly in the form of having the opportunity to leverage various information and infrastructure that were established for regulatory purposes. Further evidence has also suggested that selected AML/CFT alerts have the potential of providing unique opportunity for the organisation to trigger time-critical event-based marketing activities, resulting in a possible improved competitive positioning (ICP). Importantly, by appreciating the insights obtained through the research, a conceptual framework is proposed, which may aid to structurally assess the possible benefits of any organisational regulatory IT implementations.