Global ETD Search

1	Recognition and enforcement of foreign custody orders and the associated problem of international parental kidnapping : a model for South Africa Nicholson, Caroline Margaret Anne 07 1900 (has links) Within the context of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments the recognition and enforcement of foreign custody orders is unique. By reason of the fact that custody orders are always modifiable "in the best interests of the child" they cannot be regarded as final orders and are thus not capable of recognition and enforcement on the same basis as final orders. The failure of courts to afford foreign custody orders recognition and enforcement in the normal course has created the potential for a person deprived of the custody of a child to remove the child from the jurisdiction of a court rendering a custody order to another jurisdiction within which he or she may seek a new, more favourable order. This potential for behaviour in contempt of an existing order has been exploited by numerous parents who feel aggrieved by custody orders. The problem of parental child snatching has escalated to such a degree that the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction was drawn up to introduce uniform measures amongst member states to address this problem. Despite being a meaningful step in the fight against international child abduction the Hague Convention does not fully resolve the problem. For this reason other measures have been suggested to supplement the Convention. The different approaches taken in South Africa, the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States of America to recognition and enforcement of foreign custody orders and the measures to overcome the problem of international child abduction are examined and a comparative methodology applied to the design of a model approach for South Africa. The object of this model is to permit the South African courts to address the international child abduction problem without falling prey to any of the pitfalls experienced elsewhere in the legal systems examined. / Law / LL.D. Acquiescence Child abductiion Contempt Council of Europe Convention Criminal liability Enforcement Extradition Finality Foreign judgements Full faith and credit Grave risk Hague Convention Jurisdiction Kidnapping Merger Custody Delict Parental abduction Pre-emption Psychological harm Public policy Recognition Res judicata Retention Wrongful removal 346.17068 Parental kidnapping -- South Africa Conflict of laws -- Custody of children Children (International law)
2	Le principe de séparation des pouvoirs dans la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme / The principle of separation of powers in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights Tsampi, Aikaterini 03 July 2017 (has links) Quid d’un principe constitutionnel concernant l’organisation institutionnelle de l’État, tel que la séparation des pouvoirs, dans la jurisprudence d’une cour internationale des droits de l’homme, telle que la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme ? S’il serait audacieux de prouver que le juge de Strasbourg applique une certaine théorie de séparation des pouvoirs, il est pourtant pertinent de répondre à la question de savoir si les solutions adoptées par le juge européen des droits de l’homme dessinent une vision cohérente de ce que doivent, selon lui, être les relations entre les pouvoirs. En outre, il ne faut pas faire abstraction du fait que la théorie de la séparation des pouvoirs telle qu’elle est conçue dans l’État libéral contemporain n’implique la consécration que d’un socle minimal de solutions soit acquis. / What of the idea that a constitutional principle concerning the institutional organization of the State, such as the separation of powers, could be found in the jurisprudence of an international court of human rights, namely the European Court of Human Rights ? Even if it were to be audacious to prove that the judges of the Strasbourg Court apply a precise theory of separation of powers, it, nonetheless remains relevant to answer the question whether the solutions adopted by the aforementioned judges outline a coherent vision of what should be, in their view, the relations between the branches of government. Yet, one should always bear in mind that the theory of the separation of powers, as conceived in the contemporary liberal State, implies the consecration of only a minimum nucleus of solutions. Cour européenne des droits de l’homme Séparation des pouvoirs Droits de l’homme Droit constitutionnel Pouvoir judiciaire Pouvoir législatif Pouvoir exécutif Court of Human Rights Separation of powers Human rights Constitutional law Judicial branch Legislative branch Executive branch 340
3	Recognition and enforcement of foreign custody orders and the associated problem of international parental kidnapping : a model for South Africa Nicholson, Caroline Margaret Anne 07 1900 (has links) Within the context of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments the recognition and enforcement of foreign custody orders is unique. By reason of the fact that custody orders are always modifiable "in the best interests of the child" they cannot be regarded as final orders and are thus not capable of recognition and enforcement on the same basis as final orders. The failure of courts to afford foreign custody orders recognition and enforcement in the normal course has created the potential for a person deprived of the custody of a child to remove the child from the jurisdiction of a court rendering a custody order to another jurisdiction within which he or she may seek a new, more favourable order. This potential for behaviour in contempt of an existing order has been exploited by numerous parents who feel aggrieved by custody orders. The problem of parental child snatching has escalated to such a degree that the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction was drawn up to introduce uniform measures amongst member states to address this problem. Despite being a meaningful step in the fight against international child abduction the Hague Convention does not fully resolve the problem. For this reason other measures have been suggested to supplement the Convention. The different approaches taken in South Africa, the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States of America to recognition and enforcement of foreign custody orders and the measures to overcome the problem of international child abduction are examined and a comparative methodology applied to the design of a model approach for South Africa. The object of this model is to permit the South African courts to address the international child abduction problem without falling prey to any of the pitfalls experienced elsewhere in the legal systems examined. / Law / LL.D. Acquiescence Child abductiion Contempt Council of Europe Convention Criminal liability Enforcement Extradition Finality Foreign judgements Full faith and credit Grave risk Hague Convention Jurisdiction Kidnapping Merger Custody Delict Parental abduction Pre-emption Psychological harm Public policy Recognition Res judicata Retention Wrongful removal 346.17068 Parental kidnapping -- South Africa Conflict of laws -- Custody of children Children (International law)

1

Page generated in 1.0552 seconds