No início da década de 1880, a peça teatral A Caipirinha foi encenada no interior paulista, contando a história de uma jovem moça caipira forçada a ir para a cidade. Escrita pelo político Cesário Motta Junior (1847-1897), o texto dramático valoriza o caipira ao apresentar seu modo de vida em uma sociedade marcada por transformações. A peça foi levada ao palco diversas vezes entre os anos de 1917 e 1928, na capital paulista, e vertida ao cinema em 1919, mesmo período em que ocorrem importantes discussões sobre o caipira. O estudo desta peça, nesses diferentes momentos históricos, permite uma compreensão dessas representações do caipira e suas relações no processo de construção da identidade paulista. / At the beginning of the 1880s, the play A Caipirinha was performed in inland towns in the state of São Paulo. The play told the story of a young country girl who was made to move into a large city. This dramatic text, written by a politician called Cesário Junior (1847-1897), highlights the countryside people by showing their life style in a society which was going through lots of changes. Between 1917 and 1928 the play was taken to the stages of São Paulo a number of times, and it was made into a movie in 1919, time during which important studies were being carried out about the countryside people. The study of this play through different historic moments allows one to understand these representations as well as their relationship with the identity formation process of São Paulo.

No início da década de 1880, a peça teatral A Caipirinha foi encenada no interior paulista, contando a história de uma jovem moça caipira forçada a ir para a cidade. Escrita pelo político Cesário Motta Junior (1847-1897), o texto dramático valoriza o caipira ao apresentar seu modo de vida em uma sociedade marcada por transformações. A peça foi levada ao palco diversas vezes entre os anos de 1917 e 1928, na capital paulista, e vertida ao cinema em 1919, mesmo período em que ocorrem importantes discussões sobre o caipira. O estudo desta peça, nesses diferentes momentos históricos, permite uma compreensão dessas representações do caipira e suas relações no processo de construção da identidade paulista. / At the beginning of the 1880s, the play A Caipirinha was performed in inland towns in the state of São Paulo. The play told the story of a young country girl who was made to move into a large city. This dramatic text, written by a politician called Cesário Junior (1847-1897), highlights the countryside people by showing their life style in a society which was going through lots of changes. Between 1917 and 1928 the play was taken to the stages of São Paulo a number of times, and it was made into a movie in 1919, time during which important studies were being carried out about the countryside people. The study of this play through different historic moments allows one to understand these representations as well as their relationship with the identity formation process of São Paulo.

Submitted by Fabiano Vassallo (fabianovassallo2127@gmail.com) on 2017-12-01T14:22:26Z No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Dissertação.pdf: 479433 bytes, checksum: 16567ad3cff9d13aa371575b19716053 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Jussara Moore (jussaramoore@id.uff.br) on 2018-01-15T14:35:31Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Dissertação.pdf: 479433 bytes, checksum: 16567ad3cff9d13aa371575b19716053 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-15T14:35:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Dissertação.pdf: 479433 bytes, checksum: 16567ad3cff9d13aa371575b19716053 (MD5) / O presente trabalho tem como aporte teórico a Análise do Discurso de fundação francesa e como objeto de pesquisa o discurso sobre os “sujeitos do campo” - os quais, são definidos segundo Caldart (2002) como indivíduos que vivem e trabalham no campo como pequenos agricultores, quilombolas, povos indígenas, pescadores, camponeses, assentados, reassentados, ribeirinhos, povos da floresta, caipiras, lavradores, roceiros, sem-terra, agregados, caboclos, meeiros, boias-frias, entre outros. Esses sujeitos vivem e produzem cultura a partir das relações sociais estabelecidas no campo, as quais são mediadas pelo trabalho na terra. A pesquisa objetiva analisar os efeitos de sentidos que se constituem para os "sujeitos do campo" em documentos do Instituto Federal do Pará-Campus Rural de Marabá e busca, na identificação das designações atribuídas a eles, refletir sobre os dizeres que circulam nos documentos. O corpusem análise é constituído por recortes discursivos extraídos do Projeto Político Pedagógico do campus, o qual está localizado a 25 km da sede do município de Marabá, na PA–150, sentido Eldorado dos Carajás, em uma área de 354 ha e que foi estrategicamente implantado para ter uma forte integração com um Projeto de Assentamento (PA 26 de Março), além debuscar fortalecer a permanência dos educandos no contexto social, econômico, cultural e ambiental do qual fazem parte. Esse campus foi pensado num contexto de mobilização e organização da luta camponesa por reforma agrária e pela constituição de condições favoráveis ao desenvolvimento e à sustentabilidade da produção familiar no sul e sudeste paraense. São analisadas nesta pesquisa as expressões linguísticas que designam os “sujeitos do campo”, bem como os dizeres que constituem efeitos de sentidos para esses sujeitos.Em nossos gestos de análise observamos que o documento não apresenta uma definição sobre esses sujeitos porque eles são designados de muitas formas e o discurso do Campus Rural de Marabá funciona na produção de dizeres que se constituem por não ditos, contradições e apagamentos que apontam nos dizeres, apenas uma enumeração instável de grupos que representam esses sujeitos, os quais são vistos como inferiores em relação ao sujeitos que não são do campo / This work has as theoretical support the analysis of the French foundation speech and as a research object the speech from the "countryside people" - which are defined according Caldart (2002) as individuals who live and work in the countryside as small farmers, Quilombolas, indigenous peoples, fishermen, peasants, settlers, resettled, riverside, forest peoples, farmers, partners, landless, aggregates, caboclos, servants, cold stores, among others. These individuals have their own cultural identity, which has roots in their way of living and working, finally, a "culture that is produced through social relations mediated by work on the land" (FERNANDES, CERIOLI, CALDART, 1998). The research aims to analyze the effects of senses that are constituted for the "countryside people" in documents of the Federal Institute of Pará - Marabá Countryside Campus and search, in the identification of the designations assigned to them, to reflect on the sayings that circulate in the documents. The corpus under examination consists of extracted discursives the Pedagogical Political Project of the campus, which is located 25 km from the headquarters of the city of Maraba, the PA- 150 toward Eldorado dos Carajás, in an area of 354 ha and which was strategically deployed to have a strong integration with a Settlement Project (PA March 26), and seek to strengthen the permanence of the students in social, economic, cultural and environmental to which they belong. This campus has been designed in the context of mobilization and organization of the peasant struggle for land reform and the creation of favorable conditions for the development and sustainability of family farms in the south and southeast of Pará. In this research the linguistic expressions that designate the "countryside people" are analyzed, as well as the sayings that constitute sense effects for these people. In our gestures of analysis we observe that the document does not present a definition about these people because they are designated in many ways and the speech from the Rural Campus of Marabá works in the production of sayings that are constituted by not said, contradictions and deletions that point in the sayings, only an unstable enumeration of groups representing these people, which are seen as inferior to people who are not from the countryside

Perceptions and attitudes can have a major impact on the motivations for countryside people to visit city destinations as tourists. The findings from this study present the two major motivations; extraordinary experiences and travelling for specific events, along with several further aspects, which motivate people in the countryside to visit cities. However, the motivations can change over time and are not necessarily the same for each visit, thus, the motivations are essential for the decision-making process, travel intentions, as well as meeting the personal wants and needs when travelling. But still, to research the motivations for countryside people to visit city destinations as tourists, it is important to learn their travel behaviour and understand their perceptions and attitudes toward cities, as these aspects have a major impact on the decision-making process, frequency of travel, and choice of destinations. Although, other perspectives impact the decision-making process as well, such as destination image, travel distance, transport, accessibility, economy, and time availability. This indicates that people who live in the countryside tend to travel to cities only for a shorter amount of time, such as weekends or long-weekends, to experience something they cannot in their everyday life, which in turn can feel luxurious. Therefore, the majority of the countryside people associate cities with positive experiences, but the general associations with cities are negative, due to the fact that they would not choose to stay here for longer than their travel intentions.    The purpose of this research is to investigate the motivations of people who live in the countryside to visit city destinations as tourists, study their perceptions and attitudes toward cities and how this impacts their decision-making process and general perspectives of cities. Interviews with 30 people who currently live in the countryside will support the research and answer the research questions, to provide results and connect this back to previous research, which have helped to support the results of this study as well. Suggestions are made for further research on this topic or similar aspects, which can help to improve the understanding of the countryside people’s travel behaviour. As a major theme in the tourism industry is to learn and understand the tourist and the travel behaviours, it is important to do so from all aspects, which could benefit both the traveller, suppliers and further research. The perspectives that have been investigated in this study, have not been researched before, and therefore, it may provide for new opportunities and knowledge about the topic that could benefit future research. Furthermore, future research can help to support the results and knowledge contribution from this research, providing similar results, and improve knowledge about city tourism in the future.