Spelling suggestions: "subject:"defense (criminal procedure)"" "subject:"efense (criminal procedure)""
31 |
Nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid as verweer in die Suid-Afrikaanse strafregVan der Merwe, Frederik Wilhelm 06 1900 (has links)
Text in Afrikaans / Die verweer van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid in die Suid-Afrikaanse strafreg word
bespreek. Hierdie verweer is van onlangse oorsprong en verskil van die verwere van
ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid as gevolg van jeugdigheid en geestesongesteldheid soos in artikel 78(1)
van die Strafproseswet 51 van 1977 uiteengesit word.
Die verweer van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid dek gevalle waar dit deur faktore soos
emosionele spanning veroorsaak is. Hierdie verweer staan ook as die algemene ontoerekeningsvatbaarheidsverweer
bekend.
In 'n aantal beslissings, soos onder andere, S v Arnold 1985 (3) SA 256 (C); S v Campher 1987 (1)
SA 940 (A) en S v Chretien 1981 (1) SA 1097 (A), word die gevolgtrekking gemaak dat die verweer
van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid wei in die Suid-Afrikaanse strafreg bestaansreg het.
Ten einde met 'n verweer van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid te slaag, is die blote ipse
dixit van die beskuldigde onvoldoende. 'n Behoorlike grondslag vir die verweer moet gele word. Die
bewyslas in die geval van 'n verweer van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid word bespreek. / The defence of non-pathological criminal incapacity in the South African criminal law is discussed.
It is a relatively new defence and should be distinguished from the defences such as youth and mental
illness set out in section 78(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977.
This defence covers cases in which criminal capacity is excluded by factors such as intoxication and
emotional stress. It is also known as a general defence of criminal incapacity.
In a number of cases, inter alia in S v Arnold 1985(3) SA 256 (C); S v Campher 1987 (1) SA 940 (A)
and S v Chretien 1981 (1) SA 1 097 (A) the conclusion is reached that the defence, non-pathological
criminal incapacity, does have a right of existence in the South African criminal law.
In order to successfully raise the defence on non-pathological criminal incapacity, the mere ipse dixit
of the accused is insufficient. A proper foundation for the defence must be laid. The onus of proof
is discussed. / Criminal & Procedural Law / LL. M.
|
32 |
Reg op regsverteenwoordiging met spesifieke verwysing na 'n handves van menseregteBarwise, Maria Elizabeth Danetta 11 1900 (has links)
Text in Afrikaans / The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 200 of 1993 that took effect
from 27 April 1994, gave an accused a constitutional right to legal
representation.
Although the right of an accused to be legally represented formed an integral part
of the South African Law, the Constitution gave him the further right ofbeing
provided with legal representation at the cost of the State .
For the practical implementation ofthe Constitution extensive changes to the
current Legal Aid Scheme are essential .
This work is an investigation of the justification of an accused's right to legal
representation and the right to be provided with legal representation at the
expense of the State . The practical implementation of the Constitution is
discussed and suggestions are made that might be a solution to the current
problem of the provision of legal aid at the State's expense. / Die Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika 200 van 1993 wat op 27 April
1994 in werking getree het, het konstitusionele erkenning verleen aan 'n
beskuldigde se reg op regsverteenwoordiging .
Alhoewel die reg van 'n beskuldigde tot regsverteenwoordiging inherent deel van
die Suid-Afrikaanse reg was het die Grondwet verder gegaan en 'n beskuldigde
die reg gegee om op staatskoste van regsverteenwoordiging voorsien te word .
Om die Grondwet prakties uitvoerbaar te maak sal ingrypende veranderings aan
die huidige Regshulpskema noodsaaklik wees .
Hierdie werk behels 'n regshistoriese - en regsvergelykende studie van die reg van
'n beskuldigde tot regsverteenwoordiging en die reg om op staatskoste van
regshulp voorsien te word . Die praktiese uitvoerbaarheid van die Grondwet word
bespreek en voorstelle word aan die hand gedoen om die huidige situasie, wat
betref die verskaffing van regshulp op staatskoste, te verbeter . / Criminal & Procedural Law / LL. M.
|
33 |
Nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid as verweer in die Suid-Afrikaanse strafregVan der Merwe, Frederik Wilhelm 06 1900 (has links)
Text in Afrikaans / Die verweer van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid in die Suid-Afrikaanse strafreg word
bespreek. Hierdie verweer is van onlangse oorsprong en verskil van die verwere van
ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid as gevolg van jeugdigheid en geestesongesteldheid soos in artikel 78(1)
van die Strafproseswet 51 van 1977 uiteengesit word.
Die verweer van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid dek gevalle waar dit deur faktore soos
emosionele spanning veroorsaak is. Hierdie verweer staan ook as die algemene ontoerekeningsvatbaarheidsverweer
bekend.
In 'n aantal beslissings, soos onder andere, S v Arnold 1985 (3) SA 256 (C); S v Campher 1987 (1)
SA 940 (A) en S v Chretien 1981 (1) SA 1097 (A), word die gevolgtrekking gemaak dat die verweer
van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid wei in die Suid-Afrikaanse strafreg bestaansreg het.
Ten einde met 'n verweer van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid te slaag, is die blote ipse
dixit van die beskuldigde onvoldoende. 'n Behoorlike grondslag vir die verweer moet gele word. Die
bewyslas in die geval van 'n verweer van nie-patologiese ontoerekeningsvatbaarheid word bespreek. / The defence of non-pathological criminal incapacity in the South African criminal law is discussed.
It is a relatively new defence and should be distinguished from the defences such as youth and mental
illness set out in section 78(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977.
This defence covers cases in which criminal capacity is excluded by factors such as intoxication and
emotional stress. It is also known as a general defence of criminal incapacity.
In a number of cases, inter alia in S v Arnold 1985(3) SA 256 (C); S v Campher 1987 (1) SA 940 (A)
and S v Chretien 1981 (1) SA 1 097 (A) the conclusion is reached that the defence, non-pathological
criminal incapacity, does have a right of existence in the South African criminal law.
In order to successfully raise the defence on non-pathological criminal incapacity, the mere ipse dixit
of the accused is insufficient. A proper foundation for the defence must be laid. The onus of proof
is discussed. / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL. M.
|
34 |
Reg op regsverteenwoordiging met spesifieke verwysing na 'n handves van menseregteBarwise, Maria Elizabeth Danetta 11 1900 (has links)
Text in Afrikaans / The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 200 of 1993 that took effect
from 27 April 1994, gave an accused a constitutional right to legal
representation.
Although the right of an accused to be legally represented formed an integral part
of the South African Law, the Constitution gave him the further right ofbeing
provided with legal representation at the cost of the State .
For the practical implementation ofthe Constitution extensive changes to the
current Legal Aid Scheme are essential .
This work is an investigation of the justification of an accused's right to legal
representation and the right to be provided with legal representation at the
expense of the State . The practical implementation of the Constitution is
discussed and suggestions are made that might be a solution to the current
problem of the provision of legal aid at the State's expense. / Die Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika 200 van 1993 wat op 27 April
1994 in werking getree het, het konstitusionele erkenning verleen aan 'n
beskuldigde se reg op regsverteenwoordiging .
Alhoewel die reg van 'n beskuldigde tot regsverteenwoordiging inherent deel van
die Suid-Afrikaanse reg was het die Grondwet verder gegaan en 'n beskuldigde
die reg gegee om op staatskoste van regsverteenwoordiging voorsien te word .
Om die Grondwet prakties uitvoerbaar te maak sal ingrypende veranderings aan
die huidige Regshulpskema noodsaaklik wees .
Hierdie werk behels 'n regshistoriese - en regsvergelykende studie van die reg van
'n beskuldigde tot regsverteenwoordiging en die reg om op staatskoste van
regshulp voorsien te word . Die praktiese uitvoerbaarheid van die Grondwet word
bespreek en voorstelle word aan die hand gedoen om die huidige situasie, wat
betref die verskaffing van regshulp op staatskoste, te verbeter . / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL. M.
|
35 |
A Critical discussion of Section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1 of 1988De Chermont, Charles Roblou Louis 11 1900 (has links)
A brief analysis of South African Law relating to intoxication as a defence prior to
1988 is given. This is followed by an in-depth discussion and evaluation of the
statutory crime created by section 1 (1) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1 of
1988. Various points of criticism against the wording of section 1 (1) as well as the
problems with regard to its application in practice are set out. In conclusion a draft
for a new, more effective wording for section 1 (1) is given / Criminal & Procedural Law / LL.M. (Criminal & Procedural Law)
|
36 |
Die omvang van die reg op regsverteenwoordiging in 'n demokratiese Suid-Afrika, met spesifieke verwysing na die posisie in die Verenigde State van AmerikaBLackburn, Hester Francina. 05 1900 (has links)
Text in Afrikaans / Alhoewel die Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika die bestaande reg op
regsverteenwoordiging uitgebrei het tot sy logiese eindpunt, is daar geen vaste inhoud
aan hierdie reg gegee nie en sal die howe die omvang daarvan moet ontwikkel.
Hierdie reg kan weens die heersende sosiale en ekonomiese omstandighede nie 'n
absolute reg wees nie. Indien 'n beskuldigde nie 'n regsverteenwoordiger kan bekostig
nie, sal een op staatsonkoste aan horn verskaf word, maar slegs indien <lit andersins tot
wesentlike onreg sal lei. In so 'n geval het die beskuldigde nie die reg op 'n
regsverteenwoordiger van sy keuse nie. Effektiewe regsverteenwoordiging word ook
nie gewaarborg nie. Daar word derhalwe steeds nie aan die sine qua non van 'n
volledige strafregplegingstelsel soos <lit oor tyd in die Verenigde State van Amerika
ontwikkel het, <lit is die verskaffing van kostelose regsverteenwoordiging aan elke
behoeftige persoon beskuldig van 'n emstige misdaad, voldoen nie / Although the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa has extended the existing
right to legal representation to its logical conclusion, no definitive substance has been
given to this right and the courts will have to develop the purview thereof. This right
cannot be an absolute right because of ruling social and economic circumstances.
Should an accused not be able to afford a legal representative, one will be supplied to
him at state expense, but only if substantial injustice would otherwise result. In such
an event the accused is not entitled to a legal representative of his choice. Effective
legal representation is also not guaranteed. There is therefore still not compliance
with the sine qua non of a comprehensive criminal justice system as has developed
over time in the United States of America, that is the provision of free legal
representation to every indigent person accused of a serious crime / Criminal & Procedural Law / LL.M. (Straf en Prosesreg)
|
37 |
A Critical discussion of Section 1(1) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1 of 1988De Chermont, Charles Roblou Louis 11 1900 (has links)
A brief analysis of South African Law relating to intoxication as a defence prior to
1988 is given. This is followed by an in-depth discussion and evaluation of the
statutory crime created by section 1 (1) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1 of
1988. Various points of criticism against the wording of section 1 (1) as well as the
problems with regard to its application in practice are set out. In conclusion a draft
for a new, more effective wording for section 1 (1) is given / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL.M. (Criminal & Procedural Law)
|
38 |
Die omvang van die reg op regsverteenwoordiging in 'n demokratiese Suid-Afrika, met spesifieke verwysing na die posisie in die Verenigde State van AmerikaBlackburn, Hester Francina. 05 1900 (has links)
Text in Afrikaans / Alhoewel die Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika die bestaande reg op
regsverteenwoordiging uitgebrei het tot sy logiese eindpunt, is daar geen vaste inhoud
aan hierdie reg gegee nie en sal die howe die omvang daarvan moet ontwikkel.
Hierdie reg kan weens die heersende sosiale en ekonomiese omstandighede nie 'n
absolute reg wees nie. Indien 'n beskuldigde nie 'n regsverteenwoordiger kan bekostig
nie, sal een op staatsonkoste aan horn verskaf word, maar slegs indien <lit andersins tot
wesentlike onreg sal lei. In so 'n geval het die beskuldigde nie die reg op 'n
regsverteenwoordiger van sy keuse nie. Effektiewe regsverteenwoordiging word ook
nie gewaarborg nie. Daar word derhalwe steeds nie aan die sine qua non van 'n
volledige strafregplegingstelsel soos <lit oor tyd in die Verenigde State van Amerika
ontwikkel het, <lit is die verskaffing van kostelose regsverteenwoordiging aan elke
behoeftige persoon beskuldig van 'n emstige misdaad, voldoen nie / Although the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa has extended the existing
right to legal representation to its logical conclusion, no definitive substance has been
given to this right and the courts will have to develop the purview thereof. This right
cannot be an absolute right because of ruling social and economic circumstances.
Should an accused not be able to afford a legal representative, one will be supplied to
him at state expense, but only if substantial injustice would otherwise result. In such
an event the accused is not entitled to a legal representative of his choice. Effective
legal representation is also not guaranteed. There is therefore still not compliance
with the sine qua non of a comprehensive criminal justice system as has developed
over time in the United States of America, that is the provision of free legal
representation to every indigent person accused of a serious crime / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL.M. (Straf en Prosesreg)
|
39 |
Le juge des libertés et de la détention / The judge for freedom and detentionLe Monnier de Gouville, Pauline 23 June 2011 (has links)
« Le juge des libertés et de la détention ». A l’oxymore de son appellation répond l’ambivalence de l’institution dans le procès pénal. Créé par la loi du 15 juin 2000 renforçant la protection de la présomption d’innocence et les droits des victimes, le magistrat s’impose, à l’origine, comme le compromis attendu entre la nécessité d’un nouveau contrôle de la détention provisoire et l’attachement français à l’institution du juge d’instruction. Investi d’un rôle central en la matière, le juge judiciaire a également vocation à intervenir dans le cadre de mesures diverses, que son contrôle irrigue les enquêtes pénales ou qu’il s’étende à d’autres contentieux, comme en matière de privation de liberté des étrangers, de visites et saisies administratives ou encore de l’hospitalisation sans consentement. La succession de modifications sporadiques de ses pouvoirs confirme sa fonction malléable, au service d’une quête pérenne : la protection des libertés, l’équilibre de l’avant-procès. Au rythme des louvoiements du législateur, le magistrat peine, pourtant, à s’identifier dans le processus pénal : hier au service des libertés, aujourd’hui de la coercition. Alors que l’institution semble poser les sédiments d’une nouvelle perception de la phase préparatoire du procès, l’évolution de son rôle préfigure d’autres mutations : de la justice pénale, des acteurs judiciaires, l’esquisse, enfin, d’une équation processuelle singulière. La présente recherche propose ainsi de situer ce magistrat au coeur de ces évolutions, comme la trame embryonnaire d'un "renouveau" de la phase préparatoire du procès. / « The Judge for freedom and detention » [Le juge des libertés et de la détention]. The oxymoron of its name reflects the ambivalence of this institution in criminal matters. Founded by the June 15, 2000 statute which reinforces the protection of presumption of innocence as well as the victims’ rights, this magistrate originally imposed itself as the expected compromise between the necessity of a new control over custody and ties of the French to the institution of the investigating judge [juge d‟instruction]. Empowered with a central role in this matter, the judiciary judge must also intervene when various measures are considered, both during criminal investigations and other types of litigations, such as those depriving foreigners of their freedom, administrative search and seizures or hospitalization without consent. The succession of the sporadic modifications of its powers only confirms the flexible nature of its function to serve a never ending quest: the protection of civil liberties and the balance of the pre-trial. As the legislator hedges, the institution struggles to find its place within the criminal process. Yesterday dedicated to civil liberties, today to coercion. Whilst the institution seems to set the basis for a new perception of the pre-trial phase, the evolution of its role announces further transformations: to criminal justice, to the judiciary actors and finally, the preparation of a singular equation in the litigation process. The present paper offers to locate this magistrate within these evolutions as the embryonic plot of a “new era” in the pre-trial phase.
|
Page generated in 0.0985 seconds