Inaug. Diss.--Philosphische Promotions-Kommission--Frankfurt am Main, 1972. / Résumé p. 405-415. Bibliogr. p. 417-431. Index.

Konstanz, Univ., Diplomarb., 2007.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität zu München, 1983. / Cover title: Die Buchmesse in Frankfurt am Main vor 1560. Includes bibliographical references (p. 189-203).

Thesis (doctoral) - Universität, Zürich, 2006. / Includes bibliographical references and indexes.

Frankfurt (Main), Univ., Diss. S. Maftei-Kick, T. Kick, 2000.

Universiẗat, Diss., 2003--Kassel. / Lizenzpflichtig.

Univ., Diss., 2006--Marburg

Zugl.: Gießen, Univ., Diss., 1988 u.d.T.: Brake, Ludwig: Die Anfänge des Eisenbahnbaus in Frankfurt, Hessen-Darmstadt, Kurhessen und Nassau 1830- 1866.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-11-10T11:09:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2013-03-22Bitstream added on 2014-11-10T11:58:27Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000793378_20160322.pdf: 582433 bytes, checksum: 8dea949607989e1bedd3182b0eb49658 (MD5) Bitstreams deleted on 2016-03-28T13:37:46Z: 000793378_20160322.pdf,. Added 1 bitstream(s) on 2016-03-28T13:38:49Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 000793378.pdf: 878499 bytes, checksum: d15fd855ac36398d95b67083f4ab4333 (MD5) / O presente trabalho tem por objeto o estudo da bioética como fenômeno da modernidade, a partir de um olhar filosófico que diagnostica os problemas bioéticos como excrescências de uma racionalidade específica, que tem sua égide no início dos tempos modernos, com o método cartesiano, seu apogeu no iluminismo (ou esclarecimento), e se desenvolve enquanto cientificismo positivista e tecnologia até ao presente. As problemáticas decorrentes do avanço da biotecnologia, da poluição ambiental e da escassez de tratamentos médicos para populações pouco favorecidas estão identificadas como resultados necessários de uma razão mitificada, totalitária, perversa e autopoiética, serviçal do sistema econômico capitalista. Para a elaboração dessas afirmações, o trabalho parte do materialismo histórico dialético enquanto epistemologia fundamental e terá, na primeira geração da Escola de Frankfurt, seu principal referencial teórico. Este será cotejado com o pensamento de outros autores de maneira coerente, sem o desvio do eixo epistêmico fundamental. Para isso, em todo o percurso, não se perdeu de vista que razão e capitalismo estão necessariamente imbricados enquanto grandes alicerces da modernidade, e que toda critica à ciência moderna não pode desconsiderar que ela é mais um processo de produção do capital. Além da correlação entre problemas bioéticos e razão esclarecida, o trabalho percorre a relação entre razão e medicina, bem como entre razão e direito, ambos tecnicizados pelo positivismo a serviço do capital. Devassando algumas estruturas da medicina, busca-se evidenciar a dificuldade pratica de edificação de uma bioética. Ao lançar seu olhar sobre o direito moderno, o trabalho denota que o biodireito é o pior caminho de desdobramento para a bioética. Por fim, na esperança de uma proposta bioética possível, o trabalho realiza uma ponte entre esta e os direitos... / Bioethics is object of this study as a contemporary phenomenon, from a philosophical look that diagnoses the bioethical problems as outgrowths of a specific rationality, which has its aegis in early modern times, with the Cartesian method, its peak the Enlightenment and develops as positivistic scientism and technology until current days. The issues arising from advances in biotechnology, environmental pollution and the scarcity of medical treatments for disadvantaged populations is identified as a necessary result of a mythologized reason, totalitarian, perverted and autopoietic, servant of the capitalist economic system. For the preparation of these statements this study comes from historical materialism dialectical epistemology as fundamental, and it has, in the first generation of the Frankfurt School, its main theoretical framework. This will be collated with the thought of other authors consistently, without the fundamental epistemic axis deviation. For this, all the way, not lost sight of why capitalism is necessarily intertwined as major foundations of modernity, and that any criticism of modern science can not ignore that it is one more process of capital production. Besides the correlation between bioethical problems and enlightened reason, this work covers the relationship between reason and medicine, as well as between reason and law, both tecnicized by positivism in service of capital. Looking some structures of medicine, the study seeks to highlight the difficulty of building a practical bioethics. In launching his gaze on modern law, the work shows that the biolaw is the worst way to split bioethics. Finally, in the hope of a possible proposal bioethics, the work makes a bridge between this and human rights, through the redemption of a dialectical reason, reflective and emancipatory, and multiculturalism

L’objectif de ce travail est d’étudier parallèlement les critiques de la modernité développées à partir de deux positionnements philosophiques en grande partie antithétiques représentées ici par leurs figures de proue : Leo Strauss et Theodor Adorno. Nés et décédés presque aux mêmes moments sans s’être connus, ils seront interrogés ici, en particulier, à partir de leurs manières respectives de faire face aux multiples défis lancés en 1945 à la réflexion philosophique. La première section de cette étude examine leurs philosophies comme celles de penseurs se représentant eux-mêmes à travers leurs réactions différentes à l’antisémitisme. La deuxième section analyse leurs relations critiques, de teneurs fortement distinctives, à la pensée de Heidegger, vis-à-vis de laquelle chacun élabore à sa manière une démarche de rupture. La troisième section aborde, comme constituant des points de croisement entre Strauss et Adorno, deux discussions jouant un rôle-clé dans leurs pensées : d’une part avec le positivisme des sciences sociales ; d’autre part, avec la modernité, identifiée comme affrontant une crise consubstantielle à ses options spécifiques. Ces deux discussions font apparaître paradoxalement plusieurs points de convergence entre des démarches si opposées. La dernière section examine les deux solutions à l’égard du problème de la modernité, l’une macrologique s’appuyant sur les sources médiévales, l’autre micrologique demeurant dans le sillage de l’Aufklärung. Une discussion s’amorce dans la conclusion quant à ce qu’il peut en être désormais de la postérité conceptuelle de ces deux pensées dans le nouveau contexte qui est aujourd’hui celui de la philosophie politique. / The aim of this study is to examine the critiques of modernity developed in parallel from two philosophical positions largely antithetical that are represented here by two main figures: Leo Strauss and Theodor Adorno. Born and died almost at the same time, these two thinkers are analyzed here from their way of facing different challenges imposed to the philosophical thinking in 1945. The first section examines their different reactions to the anti-Semitism. The second one analyzes their critical relations to Heidegger with whom each of them achieves a separation. The third section studies some junctions between them with two discussions: on the one hand, the discussion about the positivism in social sciences; on the other hand, the discussion about modernity considered as affronting a consubstantial crisis with their own options. These discussions make appear paradoxically several converging points between two opposing philosophical positions. The last section examines two solutions with regard to modernity: one, based on the medieval sources, is macrological, while the other, firmly devoted to the heritage of Aufklärung, is micrological. In the conclusion, this study will discuss the conceptual relevance of the posterity of these two thoughts in light of the actual context of the political philosophy.